In Washington and across the country, lawmakers express safety fears: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.
In today's edition, we explore the security concerns elected officials are harboring in the wake of the Minnesota shootings. Plus, Steve Kornacki explains why New York City's Democratic mayoral primary may not be the end of the Andrew Cuomo-Zohran Mamdani battle.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Adam Wollner
After the targeted shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers, elected officials serving in Capitol buildings in Washington and around the country are growing increasingly worried about the level of protection they receive.
In Congress: Law enforcement officials have been holding security briefings with members of Congress over the past several days, Scott Wong, Julie Tsirkin and Melanie Zanona report. Federal lawmakers have been told that they can spend money from their office budgets on home security systems and campaign cash on private security. Only a handful of congressional leaders get 24-hour protection from Capitol Police security details. Members can request extra protection, which is assigned based on whether Capitol Police determine there is an active threat.
But so far, those assurances have done little to calm nervous lawmakers, who have been harboring such concerns amid a string of violent attacks on American politicians over the past 15 years — a period that has included assassination attempts on a presidential candidate and members of Congress and a riot at the U.S. Capitol.
House Democratic leaders have asked Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to boost members' official budgets 'to support additional safety and security measures in every single office.' And over the weekend, House Republicans held a tense call that featured rank-and-file members' expressing concerns about their safety when they are in their districts.
'It's scary as sh--,' a senior House lawmaker said, describing how members of Congress feel after the Minnesota shootings.
In the states: Even the limited protection available to the average member of Congress goes far beyond what is available to most state lawmakers, Adam Edelman reports.
Outside of their state capital complexes, state legislators have little to no security protection. No state offers proactive security to members of its legislature, though law enforcement will typically step in if there are credible threats.
And despite the renewed attention to the issue, lawmakers fear little will ultimately be done that can make a meaningful difference, given that in many states, such positions are effectively part-time jobs with small budgets.
'We are constantly out there, vulnerable. Whether I'm volunteering somewhere, knocking doors for someone, starting to run my own campaign, I'm out there, vulnerable,' said Arizona state Rep. Stephanie Simacek, a Democrat.
Read more on the fallout from the Minnesota shootings:
Trump says he won't call Gov. Tim Walz after Minnesota shootings, by Megan Lebowitz and Kelly O'Donnell
GOP Sen. Mike Lee deletes social media posts about the Minnesota shooting after facing criticism, by Dareh Gregorian
How Minnesota shooting conspiracy theories took over social media feeds, by David Ingram, Bruna Horvath and Adam Edelman
Political violence thrusts 2028 candidates onto the national stage, by Natasha Korecki and Jonathan Allen
New York City is overwhelmingly Democratic, so it seems logical that the winner of the party's mayoral primary next week will be a shoo-in for November. But it may not be that simple, as a confluence of factors could give rise to an unpredictable, multicandidate general election campaign.
Start with the two leaders in the Democratic race, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. Each carries significant political baggage.
Cuomo, of course, resigned as governor in a sexual harassment scandal in 2021 and has faced sustained criticism of his Covid pandemic policies, especially relating to nursing homes. Even within his own party, Cuomo is a lightning rod, with a recent poll finding that over 40% of Democrats have unfavorable views of him. And Mamdani is a democratic socialist with a history of far-left pronouncements that are now being featured in attack ads from the Cuomo side.
If either wins the Democratic primary, there figure to be plenty of unhappy customers within the party and — potentially — among general election voters who would be open to an alternative. And if one falls just short in the primary, either Cuomo and Mamdani could decide to turn around and take another shot in the general election. Each already has a ready-made vehicle to do so.
Cuomo has created his own third party, which he is calling the Fight and Deliver Party. Officially, he did that to give himself a second spot on the November ballot if he is the Democratic nominee. Under New York's peculiar election laws, third parties can run major-party nominees as their own candidates. Cuomo's position is that he plans to be both the Democratic nominee and the Fight and Deliver nominee.
But if Cuomo were to lose to Mamdani in the primary, there'd be nothing to stop him from simply running as the Fight and Deliver candidate. In fact, his father, Mario, made that very move back in 1977, when he lost the Democratic mayoral primary to Ed Koch but then ran as the Liberal Party candidate in the fall.
Meanwhile, the Working Families Party, which is closely aligned with progressive Democrats, has already indicated that it won't back Cuomo even if he is the Democratic nominee. The WFP has also encouraged its backers to make Mamdani their top choice in the Democratic primary. That raises the possibility that Mamdani could run as the WFP's general election nominee even if he loses to Cuomo next week. For that matter, given its antipathy to Cuomo, the WFP might also seek out another high-profile candidate if Mamdani isn't interested.
If Cuomo or Mamdani do opt to mount third-party bids in the fall, it could open the door to chaos, since other candidates already loom.
The current mayor, Eric Adams, is bypassing the Democratic primary and already has created two vehicles for the general election, the 'EndAntiSemitism' and 'Safe&Affordable' parties. Adams, who faced federal corruption charges before President Donald Trump pardoned him, has his own political baggage but still retains some support, particularly from Black voters. That base, along with his incumbency, would make him a factor in a multicandidate general election.
Republicans also have their own ballot line and are set to nominate Curtis Sliwa, who was their nominee against Adams in 2021. And a former federal prosecutor, Jim Walden, is running his own independent bid. He is positioning himself as a centrist and says he was motivated to run after Adams was indicted last year.
Of course, it's possible that the Democratic primary result will be decisive enough that the loser stands down for the general election. That would all but ensure the winner a glide path to Gracie Mansion. It's also theoretically possible that another candidate besides Cuomo or Mamdani catches fire in the final week, claims the nomination and unites the party.
Read more:
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander arrested at an immigration court, by Ben Kamisar
Bernie Sanders backs progressive Zohran Mamdani in NYC mayoral race, by Ben Kamisar
➡️ Israel-Iran latest: Trump is considering a range of options when it comes to Iran, including a possible U.S. strike on the country, multiple current and former administration officials said after he met with his national security team in the White House Situation Room. Follow live updates →
🤝 Strange bedfellows: A group of lawmakers spanning a broad ideological spectrum have signed on to a resolution seeking to limit Trump's power to get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict. Read more →
⬅️ Immigration backtrack: The Trump administration has reopened arrests of immigrant workers at hotels, restaurants and agricultural businesses. It's a reversal after Trump said last week they were necessary workers whose jobs were almost 'impossible' to replace. Read more →
🗣️ Going there: Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., called Trump a 'tyrant' in a Senate floor speech in which he recounted his forcible removal from a DHS news conference. Read more →
🪙 GENIUS Act: The Senate passed a landmark cryptocurrency regulation bill on a bipartisan vote of 68-30, sending it to the House. Read more →
⚖️ SCOTUS watch: Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson revealed she made more than $2 million from the publisher of her bestselling memoir as part of her financial disclosure report for 2024. Read more →
⚖️ SCOTUS watch, cont'd: Two educational toy companies today asked the Supreme Court to quickly hear their challenges to Trump's tariffs. Read more →
📦 Tariff update: Trump signed an agreement that formally lowered some tariffs on imports from the United Kingdom as the countries continue to work toward a formal trade deal. Read more →
⚫ Reporting to prison: Former Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., turned himself in at a federal prison in Pennsylvania to begin serving an 11-year sentence on bribery charges. Read more →
🗳️ If it's Tuesday: It's primary day in Virginia, but the general election matchup for the commonwealth's highest-profile race is already set. Read more →
That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.com
And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Christiane Amanpour Now Treats Travel To U.S. 'As If I Was Going To North Korea'
British journalist Christiane Amanpour said she treats travel to the U.S. under President Donald Trump 'as if I was going to North Korea.' The longtime CNN correspondent talked about her experience flying to the U.S. on her podcast, 'The Ex Files.' 'I must say I was afraid,' Amanpour told her co-host and ex-husband, Jamie Rubin, on Wednesday's episode. Amanpour was traveling to the U.S. last week to give a speech at Harvard University, which has come under increased attacks by Trump, including revoking the university's ability to enroll international students. Trump has also ramped up his attacks on immigrants, using agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to snatch people off the streets and imprison them without due process. And on Thursday, Trump announced that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the U.S. and seven others that would face restrictions. 'I'm a foreigner,' Amanpour said. 'I don't have a green card. I'm not an American citizen. I'm fairly prominent, and I literally prepared to go to America as if I was going to North Korea. I took a burner phone, Jamie. Imagine that. I didn't take a single … not my mobile phone, not my iPad, nothing, and I had nothing on the burner phone except a few numbers.' Amanpour said she also spoke to CNN security about what precautions to take. 'I've heard that many, including British citizens, have been stopped at the border and been questioned for hours and hours and hours,' she said. Thankfully, Amanpour said she went through airport security without any issues. 'I was welcomed,' she said. 'The immigration officer at Boston, where I came in, could not have been nicer. Huge sigh of relief I breathed.'


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Iran supreme leader responds to Trump: ‘We will never surrender'
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei early Wednesday declared his nation 'will never surrender' to threats from Israel's allies, including President Trump, amid the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. 'It isn't wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender,' Khamenei said in a post on social platform X. 'What should the Iranian nation surrender to? We will never surrender in response to the attacks of anyone.' 'This is the logic of the Iranian nation. This is the spirit of the Iranian nation,' he added. The response comes a day after Trump called on Iran to agree to an 'unconditional surrender,' signaling earlier this week that merely a ceasefire agreement wasn't enough. The president has also doubled down on his request for a deal with Tehran to dismantle its nuclear program. While Trump has left open the possibility of U.S. troops getting involved in the conflict, he has not, thus far, supported plans to target Khamenei. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there,' Trump wrote Tuesday. 'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' 'But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers,' he added, alluding to Iran's suggestion that it could target U.S. bases should the Trump administration choose to step in. 'Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Iran has rejected calls to surrender, after launching a counterattack following Israel's initial strike, and mounted plans to continue the development of nuclear weapons while warning against U.S. interference. 'The US entering in this matter [war] is 100% to its own detriment,' Khamenei added Wednesday in a separate X post. 'The damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.' 'The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him,' he added in another post. 'They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened. The Iranian nation isn't frightened by such threats.' The Iranian death toll is above 500 and injuries have soared in the thousands according to the Washington based group Human Rights Activist. Trump and Israeli forces have encouraged all who are able to evacuate the Iranian capital of Tehran, predicting additional air raids and a high increase in casualties. 'Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life,' Trump wrote earlier this week on Truth Social. 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.' The president added, 'I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michigan Senator dings House GOP for skipping off to Washington to meet with Trump administration
Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, and Sens. Darrin Camilleri (D-Trenton) and Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak) on the Senate floor on Jan. 8, 2025, the Senate's first day of session for the year. | Kyle Davidson Several Republican members of the Michigan House of Representatives were in Washington, D.C. this week to meet with members of the Trump administration, which has one state Democratic senator questioning their priorities as the budget deadline looms. Speaking to reporters following the Senate session on Tuesday, state Sen. Darrin Camilleri said he was disappointed that his colleagues in the House were gone while Senate Democrats were still working. He also laid blame for the slow pace of the budget process at the feet of Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township). 'We're here on the floor working hard, not only still figuring out budget priorities and discussions, but we've been working on legislation while House Republicans are in D.C. kissing the ring of the president,' said Sen. Darrin Camilleri (D-Brownstown) in a scrum with reporters following Tuesday's Senate session. 'We have very different priorities, and that's very clear from the contrast this week.' Camilleri said the goal was to have the two chambers' budgets ready to go by July 1, and the state Senate rose to the occasion by passing its entire budget – including spending plans for schools and higher education – months ago. Meanwhile, the House has only pushed through its education budget. That's left their colleagues in the Senate unaware of their other budget priorities, stymying the negotiation process. 'The span between their budget proposal and ours is about as big as the [Mackinac Bridge],' he said. 'For us to see where they put their priorities, it's only been about increasing costs. They increased costs for retirement. They've increased costs for school operations … [and] university operations.' Camilleri added that proposed GOP cuts to universal free school meals and preschool will raise costs on families. The senator said it was troublesome that several members of the House Republican Caucus were in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday to meet with President Donald Trump's administration to talk about the congressional budget bill – and not hashing out their own budget at home. 'The thing I don't understand is what they're hoping to learn out of D.C.,' Camilleri said. 'The budget bill that they passed out of D.C. only makes our jobs harder. It cuts funding to critical services like Medicaid. It puts on the chopping block additional funds that we would rely on to figure out our state budget. I don't know what they're going to get out of that trip, but they are wasting an entire week doing so.' That said, Camilleri, chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on PreK-12, has met with his counterpart in state Rep. Tim Kelly (R-Saginaw Township), chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on School Aid and Department of Education. It was an informal breakfast that served as a means to get to know each other better, but Camilleri said if the public school budget negotiations were up to him and Kelly, they could likely have a deal done before July 1. Camilleri then said that bolstered his belief that Hall was the problem in the process. 'If he were to let [House Appropriations Committee Chair Rep. Ann Bollin] or Tim Kelly do their jobs, I think we could actually get to a deal,' he said. 'I know that [Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Sen. Sarah Anthony] and Chair Bollin have developed a really good relationship the last couple months. Chair Kelly and myself had a great first meeting. I think that there could be some progress here, but because [Hall] has been micromanaging this process from day one, I don't know how we can get a deal if he's not letting his members do their jobs.' It's not all doom and gloom, though. Camilleri said there were areas of common ground between the two chambers. He said Hall wants more money funding schools, which the Senate agrees with. The devil is in the details in how that's done. House Republicans passed a public schools budget with many of its past categorical spending on programs like school meals placed into per-pupil funding. Camilleri said the Senate wasn't opposed to wrapping some of those programs up, it was simply a matter of doing that the right way. Many of the programs that were rolled up into the foundation allowance are things Democrats in the House and Senate care deeply about, Camilleri said, and they fought hard in past budgets when they held all stations of state government to make sure they were funded appropriately. 'Their proposal guts most of them,' he said. 'Are there some things I think we could find ways to just put into a per-pupil allotment? Perhaps. … But gutting the programs like at-risk [student] funding or free school meals, that's just not somewhere where we're going to go.' Camilleri said it wasn't out of the question for the two chambers to start negotiating by July 1, but he wasn't sure how the entire budget process could be completed by then. It also wasn't out of the question for the Senate to work through the summer on the budget with their House counterparts, but Camilleri said that if the parties can't get something tangible done by July, he wasn't sure how productive it would be to slog away in August. 'We can come back in September and try again in the fall,' he said. 'But my hope is that if they can get to a target [of] negotiation by July 1, maybe that's the first step of this process. … I'm being optimistic.' Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) confirmed with reporters after Tuesday's Senate session that she and Hall were meeting on Wednesday to start discussing budget plans. 'I certainly hope that's the main topic,' Brinks said. 'It's June 17. They have still not passed [a full] budget, so I am very eager to make progress there. It's high time that we have those conversations. I am very pleased that he has finally accepted the opportunity to meet and I'm very hopeful that these will be productive conversations.'