
Brazil's Lula announces $5.5 billion in credits for exporters hit by US tariffs
The Brazilian government on Wednesday unveiled a plan to support local companies affected by a 50% tariff imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on several of the country's exports.
Dubbed "Sovereign Brazil," the plan provides for a credit lifeline of 30 billion reais ($5.5 billion), among other measures.
Hours later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced new sanctions against at least two Brazilian officials, in a move the South American nation's health minister rebuked.
Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva described the plan, which includes a bill to be sent to Congress, as a first step to help local exporters. The leftist leader, whose poll numbers have gone up since the tariffs against his country were announced, once again said he and Trump have never spoken, and claimed the American president does not want to negotiate.
Top congressional leaders attended Wednesday's ceremony at the presidential palace in Brasilia, a first in months, in a sign of growing political support for Lula in response to Trump.
Brazil's plan
Brazil's measures include postponing tax charges for companies affected by U.S. tariffs, providing 5 billion reais ($930,000) in tax credits to small- and medium-sized companies until the end of 2026, and expanding access to insurance against cancelled orders.
The plan also incentivizes public purchases of items that could not be exported to the U.S.
Brazil's government is also granting a one-year extension of tax credits for companies that import items so they can produce goods for exportation. That mechanism is called "drawback."
"We cannot be scared, nervous and anxious when there is a crisis. A crisis is for us to create new things," Lula said. "In this case, what is unpleasant is that the reasons given to impose sanctions against Brazil do not exist."
Trump has tied the 50% tariff on many imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest.
Brazil's president added that "for now" he will not use the country's reciprocity law to impose higher tariffs on American imports coming to Brazil.
Ricardo Alban, the chairman of the Brazilian industry confederation, said he hopes "this plan is behind us as quickly as possible." He described it as "palliative, but necessary."
"Nothing justifies us being on the lowest of tariffs to going to the highest of tariffs," Alban said.
Economy or politics?
Trump has repeated a narrative pushed by Bolsonaro's allies, which claims the former Brazilian president's prosecution for attempting to overturn his 2022 election loss is part of a "deliberate breakdown in the rule of law," with the government engaging in "politically motivated intimidation" and committing "human rights abuses."
"Our American friends, every time they decide to fight with someone, they try to create an image of a devil against the people they want to fight with," added Lula, who pledged to find markets to buy Brazilian goods that will not go to the U.S.
Lula repeated on Wednesday that Brazil's judiciary is independent. The executive branch, which manages foreign relations, has no control over Supreme Court justices, who in turn have stated they won't yield to political pressure. Bolsonaro's trial is expected to come to the sentencing phase sometime between September and October.
"If what happened at the Capitol (the U.S. riots on Jan. 6, 2021) had happened in Brazil, he (Trump) would be on trial here too," Lula said.
Earlier in August, Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro, was sanctioned under the U.S. Magnitsky Act, which is supposed to target serious human rights offenders. De Moraes has argued that defendants were granted full due process.
Rubio's response
Only hours after Lula's plan was announced, Rubio said the U.S. would "restrict visa issuance to Cuban and complicit third-country government officials and individuals responsible for Cuba's exploitative labor export program."
Rubio said on X that the Brazilian government program "More Doctors," which was started in 2013 with thousands of Cuban doctors spreading nationwide, was "an unconscionable diplomatic scam of foreign 'medical missions.'"
Brazil's Health Minister Alexandre Padilha, who was in the same job when the program was founded, later said the initiative "will survive to unjustifiable attacks from no matter who."
"This program saves lives and it is approved by those who matter most: the Brazilian people," Padilha said. "We will not bow to those who are against vaccines, against research, against science and now against two key people in my first tenure as health minister, Mozart Sales and Alberto Kleiman (who had their U.S. visas revoked)."
Brazil's government says the initiative currently has almost 25,000 medical professionals operating, but did not provide figures on how many of those are Cuban.
Lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who is seeking amnesty for his father and others implicated in the alleged coup plot, praised the U.S government.
"This measure is a clear message: neither ministers, nor lower-tier bureaucrats nor their family members are immune. Sooner or later, everyone who contributed to support those (autocratic) regimes will answer for what they did — and there will be no place to hide," he said.
Earlier, Brazil's Finance Minister Fernando Haddad said that his country "is being sanctioned for being more democratic than its aggressor."
"We will face, as we have, many difficult situations and we shall overcome," Haddad said. "This one comes from the outside, but unfortunately it has the support of radicalized sections of Brazil's society."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
What we know after the Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine
'Peace agreement' rather than a cease-fire in Ukraine, sanctions against Moscow kept quiet: the main outcomes of the Anchorage summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin became clearer on Saturday, through official statements. No cease-fire Ukraine and European leaders had hoped to convince Donald Trump on Wednesday to obtain a cease-fire from Vladimir Putin, more than three and a half years after the Russian army invaded Ukraine. That did not happen. 'It was judged by everyone that the best way to end the war […] is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not just a simple cease-fire agreement, which often does not hold,' Mr. Trump said on his Truth Social network once back in Washington. It is a victory for Vladimir Putin, whose troops have made recent advances in eastern Ukraine. From the start, the Russian president has demanded a broader 'peace agreement,' focused, in his view, on the 'root causes' of the war, beginning with Ukraine's desire to join NATO. Moscow considers this military alliance an existential threat that extends to its borders. According to Kyiv, the Russian army launched 85 drones and one missile on Ukraine during the night from Friday to Saturday, at the time of the summit. On Saturday, the Russian army claimed the capture of two localities in eastern Ukraine. US sanctions on hold Friday marked the expiration of a U.S. ultimatum to Russia to end the war in Ukraine, under threat of so-called 'secondary' sanctions — targeting countries that buy from Russia, particularly oil and weapons. 'Given how things went today, I don't think I need to think about that right now,' U.S. President Donald Trump ultimately said in response to a Fox News question at the end of the summit. Trump has at his disposal a legislative framework giving him 'the ability to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia and supports Putin's war machine,' according to one of the co-sponsors of this proposal, influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. Trump had said he would 'look very closely' at the proposal. European leaders, on the other hand, said Saturday that they 'will continue to strengthen sanctions and targeted economic measures to weigh on Russia's war economy, until a just and lasting peace is established.' Territorial issues unresolved Ukraine's biggest fear was a deal in Anchorage pushing it to cede, de jure or de facto, part of its territory. Beyond Crimea, annexed by Russia in 2014, the Russian army occupies about 20% of Ukrainian territory in four regions in the south and east (Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia). Neither Putin nor Trump directly addressed this burning issue during their press statements. Did the U.S. president make an implicit reference when he said in his final statement that 'very few' points remained to be settled, and that 'one of them is probably the most important'? Security guarantees Ukraine, supported by European leaders, demands such guarantees in the event of a halt to hostilities to prevent any renewed Russian invasion, which Moscow categorically refuses. This topic was not directly discussed by Trump and Putin in their final statement. However, in his post-summit briefing to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders, Trump mentioned a security guarantee for Kyiv similar to NATO's Article 5, though outside the framework of the Atlantic Alliance, according to two Ukrainian sources familiar with the matter. Several European countries, including France and the United Kingdom, indicated they are ready to contribute to a 'reassurance' force stationed in Ukraine, but not on the front line. Tripartite meeting on the horizon? Trump confirmed he would receive Zelensky at the White House on Monday. 'If all goes well, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin,' he added. He had previously said that an agreement to end the war 'really depends on the Ukrainian president.'


L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
New wave of condemnations after Qassem's speech
Reactions condemning the speech of the Hezbollah leader, who on Friday threatened confrontation if disarmament were imposed on his group, continued for the second consecutive day. These remarks were, however, supported by Iran's ambassador to Beirut, Mojtaba Amani, who said, 'American pressure will not break Lebanon.' The leader of the Lebanese Forces (LF), Samir Geagea, on Saturday called the statements of Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem 'unacceptable.' Kassem had declared on Friday that his organization was ready for confrontation, especially after the government tasked the Lebanese Army with drafting a plan to disarm it. 'The speech delivered yesterday by Sheikh Naim Kassem is unacceptable in every respect, as it constitutes a direct threat, first and foremost, to the Lebanese government, then to the parliamentary majority that has placed its trust in this government, and finally to all of Lebanon's constitutional institutions, including the presidency of the Republic and the presidency of the Council of Ministers,' Geagea said in a statement. 'It is also a direct threat to all free Lebanese,' he added. 'Supporting constitutional institutions' 'If Sheikh Naïm assumes that there are no longer any free Lebanese in Lebanon, he is gravely mistaken. If he assumes that he can thereby impose his authority, which does not exist, on these free Lebanese, he is also gravely mistaken,' added the LF leader, of the Christian sovereignist party opposed to Hezbollah's arsenal. In a barely veiled threat directed at Hezbollah's secretary-general, Geagea also promised to 'redouble efforts to support constitutional institutions' and to do everything possible 'to prevent anyone from undermining support for constitutional institutions again,' considering that the current phase is 'foundational' for Lebanon. 'These institutions, represented by the heads of state and government, are striving, with all their patriotism, energy, and strength, to restore Lebanon to itself, to reestablish order in the state, to bring Lebanon's friends back to its side, and also to bring the international community back with it,' he concluded. After more than a year of war between Israel and Hezbollah, the party, which has lost much of its leadership—including its chief Hassan Nasrallah, eliminated by the Israeli army on Sep. 27, 2024— continues to refuse to hand over its arsenal to the Lebanese Army, despite pressure from authorities and the international community. Beirut MP Ibrahim Mneimneh (opposition) said that Hezbollah 'should clearly declare that it is handing over its weapons and limit discussion on this matter to the Council of Ministers.' 'But Hezbollah continues to break its promises and move in a vicious circle,' he added in a radio interview. He also noted: 'The main problem still lies in the lack of trust in a state that is trying to recover. Therefore, Hezbollah should no longer make all Lebanese bear the burden of its crisis.' 'Threatening official authorities' Metn MP Elias Hankache, a member of the parliamentary group of the Kataeb Party, said, 'We cannot let pass an opportunity to build a country worthy of our ambitions in the face of a regional Iranian agenda.' In an interview with the Lebanese channel al-Jadeed, he accused Naim Qassem of 'threatening official authorities in Lebanon, the entire country, and all Lebanese,' noting that this escalation coincided with the visit of Iranian official Ali Larijani to Beirut. Meanwhile, MP Hadi Abou el-Hosn of the Democratic Gathering bloc (aligned with Jumblatt) said Qassem's speech is 'condemnable and unacceptable,' questioning why he used language from a bygone era, referring to the civil war invoked by the Hezbollah chief. 'This escalatory speech, which traps us in the Israeli game, is in total contradiction with Hezbollah's participation in the government, in which we are all integrated and whose ministerial declaration we have all approved,' he said in a statement. 'American pressure will not break Lebanon' Iran's ambassador to Beirut, Mojtaba Amani, stated that 'American pressure will not break Lebanon and its resistance.' In an interview with Al-Alam, reported by various Lebanese media, the diplomat said that his 'country resists pressures, government and people united, and wishes the same for Lebanon.' 'Iran supports Lebanon and its people without distinction between different communities, and its support for Lebanon is not a slogan but a concrete reality,' he added. Amani also said, 'If houses belonging to Christians, Druze, or other communities are destroyed, Iran is ready to help them, as it does for the oppressed people of Gaza.' Meanwhile, Hezbollah's deputy head of the political council, Mahmoud Comati, said on Saturday that Hezbollah is not 'in an internal Lebanese confrontation.' Naïm Kassem 'did not threaten, but said that we are ready, if cornered, to wage a Battle of Karbala,' referring to the battle in which Imam Hussein and his men were killed in 680 AD.


L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
‘It will do some good': In Moscow, Russians are positive after the Trump-Putin meeting
The summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska concluded on Friday without the announcement of a peace plan for Ukraine. However, in Moscow, it generated some satisfaction and hope, according to Russians interviewed by AFP on Saturday. For Vitali Romanov, 46, the meeting sparked 'hope that things will get better — for Russia, for the people, and for those fighting' on the front. Met just steps from the Kremlin, this employee of the Moscow Historical Museum said he wishes everything would stop 'now' in Ukraine, where very bloody fighting has continued since the start of Russia's large-scale offensive in February 2022. In a similar vein, Irina, a 55-year-old nurse, believes that the Trump-Putin meeting will 'do good' for Russia. Trump, who had threatened Russia with 'very serious consequences' if it did not agree to end the war, said he no longer plans any immediate measures following his meeting with Mr. Putin, while Moscow has already been under heavy Western sanctions since 2022. The Russian president's visit to the United States has already been perceived as a diplomatic victory for the Kremlin chief, who had been isolated from the Western world since the attack on Ukraine in 2022. Ukraine and European nations fear that the summit may have allowed Vladimir Putin to influence his American counterpart, who had previously mentioned the possibility of territorial concessions. Our 'greatness' Lyudmila, a 73-year-old retired woman from Moscow, is 'absolutely convinced' that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump 'will be able to reach an agreement, because Trump is not an idiot and understands that our country has greatness, status, and many good people.' She says she 'hopes a lot' for a possible visit to Moscow by the American president, who was invited the day before by his Russian counterpart. A sign of strong Russian interest in the Alaska meeting, Vadim, a 35-year-old agricultural specialist, said he watched the news on the summit — held late at night in Moscow — 'before going to bed and just after waking up.' He adds that he 'so wants to believe' that relations between Moscow and Washington will improve and that the conflict in Ukraine will end. The confrontation 'costs too much' 'I don't think relations will improve enough for us to become allies,' tempers Elena, a 36-year-old accountant, while walking with her daughter on Nikolskaia Street, near the Kremlin. 'But in any case, a confrontation costs the superpowers too much for it to continue forever,' she emphasizes. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin parted ways on Friday in Alaska without revealing any possible peace plan for Ukraine, while exchanging multiple engaging statements and friendly gestures. The American president described the meeting as 'very productive,' Putin called it a 'constructive' discussion, but in reality, nothing immediately emerged from their three hours of talks at a military base in Alaska. For analyst Tatiana Stanovaya, 'this meeting was neither a failure nor a success.' However, according to her, the summit reinforced 'Trump's conviction that Russia cannot be defeated.' And 'his main strategic conclusion is that he will never support Ukraine as fully as Europe does, because he does not believe Ukraine can win a war against a nuclear power,' she wrote on Telegram.