24k SUV lands but there's a catch
It's a zippy, family-friendly SUV that's hard to ignore.
But while it may look like the ultimate bargain, it comes with a catch.
Mahindra isn't submitting it for ANCAP testing, as it's not mandatory in Australia.
Instead, the automaker is working on tuning the vehicle to meet Australia's upcoming 2026 ANCAP protocols which include new benchmarks for post-crash safety, driver monitoring and advanced autonomous braking.
That doesn't mean the car won't be tested at all.
It's likely ANCAP will independently test the vehicle.
A social media clip recently revealed ANCAP conducted a test on this model; however, its rating has not yet been released.
ANCAP CEO Carla Hoorweg said consumers shouldn't overlook the importance of a verified rating.
'It is positive to hear Mahindra are working to bring safety improvements to their future model line-up, but consumers should be aware that – until independent safety testing is undertaken – the safety performance of any new model arriving in our market is unknown,' she said.
Hoorweg emphasised that safety is critical in the compact SUV category.
'The Mahindra 3XO is entering a very competitive segment with a competitive price-tag, and while some may suggest safety isn't important for the smaller end of the market, in fact the opposite is true,' she said.
'Smaller vehicles, by physical size, are at a disadvantage out on the road. We all drive within a mixed fleet of larger cars, utes, vans, and trucks, so having a high level of structural safety, on-board safety features, and best ability to avoid a crash is critical for those looking to purchase a smaller vehicle.'
Budget-friendly cars like the XUV-3XO often appeal to younger, more inexperienced drivers or older Australians, who may be more vulnerable in crashes, Hoorweg said.
'We also need to think about the consumer cohorts that are likely to buy these vehicles. They're generally some of the most at-risk – younger, more inexperienced drivers and older drivers who are physically more vulnerable.'
Despite the lack of ANCAP testing, Mahindra insists the car is built to high safety standard and has been tested in India.
According to the brand, the XUV 3XO features 55 safety features, including six airbags, level 2 ADAS, Bosch electronic stability program and 360 degree camera system.
The 3XO on sale today is based on the heavily modified platform originally used by SsangYong's Tivoli, first released here in 2018.
Mahindra says it has made major structural improvements but admits the car isn't currently tuned to meet ANCAP's stricter rules coming in 2026.
A revised model will be submitted for future testing which could result in a higher price.
With a current entry price below many hatchbacks and a lengthy 7-year warranty, the XUV 3XO offers strong bang for buck.
The base model AX5L offers a sunroof, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a 6 speaker system for $23,490 drive away (July-August introductory offer).
The top spec AX7L adds a panoramic sunroof, leatherette interior and cabin, and a 360-degree camera for $26,490 drive away (July-August introductory offer).
But with the current model not built to ANCAP's future crash standards, and a revised version already in the pipeline, buyers need to weigh up whether to buy now or wait.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
42 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Real reason for car giant's ‘woke' nightmare
If you've looked at any Jaguar headlines right now, they would all tell you the same thing: 'Catastrophic sales result following the brand's 'botched', woke' rebrand.' However, these obnoxious headlines overlook a vital aspect of the situation. Jaguar intentionally halted production at the end of 2024, a move that extended into early 2025 in some European regions, as part of a planned transition to become an EV-only brand. It is true that Jaguar sales in Europe plunged 97.5 per cent according to the latest sales data by the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. The British luxury carmaker registered just 49 vehicles in Europe in April, compared with 1,961 cars in the same month last year. Sales between January and April plummeted 75.1 per cent, with just 2,665 cars sold across the European continent. May wasn't much better, showing a 93.6 per cent drop. Overall, sales have declined 77.8 per cent year to date compared to 2024. These numbers aren't faltering in the slightest, and frankly, Jaguar would likely prefer to be further along in its EV transition process. However, key details surrounding the brand's strategy to move all of its inventory to EVs are the missing puzzle pieces to many of these very misleading stories. The company has delayed the release of its flagship model, a four-door GT. The EV, expected to cost around $US200,000, won't be available until late 2025, according to The New York Post. And stopping the production of the entire petrol and diesel Jaguar line-up while the company rebranded and developed its future EV flagship was all along the plan. Was it the best plan? Probably not, but at least it's not as if this sales drop occurred while Jaguar continued to produce cars. All of this is simply to say, don't read too much into low sales figures for Jaguar just yet. Currently, the brand's strategy appears to be a deliberate pause for a reset, rather than an indication of failure. The real test will come when Jaguar re-enters the market with a higher price point and a fully electric line-up. If it can win buyers over, it could mark a remarkable return for one of the industry's most iconic names.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Qantas gives update on mass cyber incident
Qantas revealed it has not been contacted by anyone claiming to have customers' personal information after the airline was impacted by a mass cyber attack. The national carrier said on Friday it is still working on its investigations into the incident where some six million Aussies' have been potentially impacted. It is understood a cyber criminal targeted a call centre, based in Manila in the Philippines, and gained access to a third party customer servicing platform used by Qantas. Data breach includes some customers' names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers. The system has since been 'contained' and the national carrier said there has been no further threat activity in the system, nor has it been contacted by anyone claiming to have the data. 'We know that data breaches can feel deeply personal and understand the genuine concern this creates for our customers. Right now we're focused on providing the answers and transparency they deserve,' Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. 'Our investigation is progressing well with our cybersecurity teams working alongside leading external specialists to determine what information has been accessed.' The national carrier is working with specialist cyber security experts, including to forensically analyse the impacted system. 'We're finalising a process that will enable us to provide affected customers with more information about their personal information that was potentially compromised.' The airline confirmed the system remains secure and no credit card details, personal financial information or passport details were stored on the compromised system. It also added there is no impact to Qantas Frequent Flyer accounts. 'We are treating this incredibly seriously and have implemented additional security measures to further strengthen our systems,' Ms Hudson said. 'Our customers can be assured that we have the right expertise and resources dedicated to resolving this matter thoroughly and effectively. 'I want to apologise again for the uncertainty this has caused. We're committed to keeping our affected customers informed with regular updates as our investigation progresses.' Qantas to contact affected customers next week The airline said it will be in a position to provide an update to affected customers next week on the types of their personal data that was contained in the system. 'This will confirm specific data fields for each individual which will vary from customer to customer,' the airline said in a statement. Since Wednesday morning, the airline said it has communicated directly with its frequent flyers to notify them of the incident and to apologise that this has occurred. It added that Frequent flyer passwords, PIN numbers and log in details were not accessed or compromised, but customers can update these details at any time. Qantas advises customers remain alert for unusual communications claiming to be from the airline or requesting personal information or passwords. Customers can contact our dedicated support line on 1800 971 541 or +61 2 8028 0534, including access to specialist identity protection advice and resources. 'Frustrating' and 'concerning' Despite, credit card details, personal financial information and passport details not being impacted, an expert said the information that was exposed is actually far more 'frustrating' and 'concerning' to have in the hands of hackers. 'When a data breach like this occurs, it's very frustrating for everyone involved,' said Dr Hammond Pearce from UNSW Sydney's School of Computer Science and Engineering. He told the 'date-of-birth' being leaked was of greatest concern. 'The kind of information that has been stolen, you use it everywhere … they define you. I can change my credit card number, it's annoying and it's a hassle, but I can ring up my bank and it's done. 'But my name and my date of birth, these are things that are a little bit more permanent and in many ways these are just as frustrating to have leaked because those are things you actually can't change. I can't change my name very easily and I certainly can't change my date of birth.' 'Worried about is impersonation' Dr Pearce said that a hacker obtaining your full name, date-of-birth, email or phone number are three pieces of personal data that may pave the way for a future 'downstream attack', and that as a cybersecurity expert, his biggest fear for impacted customers is impersonation. 'The biggest thing that we're worried about is impersonation … where they [hackers] can pretend to be you with other businesses that you might be registered with.' Qantas is another victim in a long line of Australian companies, including Optus and Medibank, to have had a breach like this. Dr Pearce added it's getting 'quite frustrating' that these big companies are 'not responsibly looking after our data.' Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the incident had created 'ongoing risks for consumers' and warned that the government expected companies not to be reliant on third-party protection for their systems. 'Because emails and phone numbers have been compromised, if anyone gets a cold call from Qantas, hang up,' said Mr Burke, adding that he had spoken to acting Qantas chief executive Steph Tully twice during the day. 'If you're going to talk to Qantas on the phone, use the published number and you make the call,' he advised, as per the Financial Review.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Bupa customers voice frustrations over denied health insurance claims
Health insurer Bupa has been accused of ongoing unscrupulous behaviour towards its customers amid legal action by the competition watchdog. ABC News has been contacted by patients and medical practices from around the country concerned legitimate claims were denied. Concerns were also raised about poor communication with patients, problematic billing practices, and lack of education among Bupa staff. Earlier this week, the health insurer was fined $35 million by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission for unlawfully rejecting thousands of claims between May 2018 and August 2023. Bupa rejected claims in full when only part of a procedure was not covered. The insurer admitted to engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. But Brisbane woman Tara Manning says she believes poor conduct has not stopped after she experienced difficulty with a claim in April 2025 — about 18 months after the period dealt with by the ACCC. She said Bupa tried to reject a claim for laparoscopic surgery to investigate possible ovarian cancer when she went through the pre-surgery eligibility check. The mother-of-two had bronze-level cover that included cover for gynaecological surgery. But because one part of the procedure was deemed "digestive" by the insurer and the government, the claim was initially rejected in full. Facing a $14,000 bill, Ms Manning spent weeks calling and messaging BUPA ahead of her surgery and only had her claim approved hours after she submitted a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman. "It was an incredibly stressful time trying to get a hold of Bupa with wait times on the phone over an hour," she said. "I was told very mixed opinions throughout the whole process. Bupa said it could not comment on individual cases. It said the ACCC case related to errors that occurred because of inaccurate or unclear instructions, training or guidance which meant Bupa did not always make correct assessments of these claims and eligibility checks or act quickly enough to fix these issues. "We are deeply sorry for our failure to get this right in these instances. We know this isn't good enough and we're committed to doing better." Plastic surgery clinics also said their bronze cover patients were repeatedly having problems with Bupa when it came to skin cancer removals. When patients needed a cancer surgically removed, they sometimes required a small skin graft or flap to cover the wound which Bupa deemed to be plastic surgery. Plastic surgery was only covered under silver policies, leaving patients with out-of-pocket expenses of up to $4,500. Jane Griffiths, chief executive officer of peak group Day Hospitals Australia, said private health legislation stated that plastic surgery related to skin surgery was, in fact, covered at bronze level. She said their members regularly experienced this from Bupa. "You can't leave a patient without a closed skin lesion," she said. Do you have a story to share? Email Bupa said this was an industry-wide problem to do with automated billing and patients needed manual overrides. It was raised with the federal government in 2021 but recommendations for reform were yet to be implemented. In response, medical practices told ABC News other insurers had better processes to override the problem, whereas poorly trained Bupa staff would meet requests for overrides with "a blanket no" and the inability to escalate the issue. Many patients were also unaware of the issue and simply paid the gap, the medical practices said. "We are working with hospitals and medical practices to make this process smoother," a Bupa spokesperson said. Bupa also refused to cover more than one surgical billing item a day, while other insurers would cover two or three, Ms Griffiths said. This could be a problem for several types of procedures, including ophthalmology and chemotherapy which involved more than one element, and especially for skin cancers. "If the patient needs to be covered for [multiple cancers], you would have to keep bringing the patient in multiple times which of course is not desirable for the patient or for the surgeon," Ms Griffiths said. Bupa said different health insurers took different approaches to funding same-day procedures. Bupa is Australia's second largest private health insurer. Figures from the Commonwealth Ombudsman show 2024 complaint numbers were largely in proportion to its market share. Queensland man David Anderson said he was left with a $48,000 bill for triple bypass heart surgery in 2022 after Bupa denied his claim. He said the insurer delved into his medical records and discovered what it deemed a "sign" of heart disease and claimed it was a pre-existing condition. That was despite three of his treating doctors signing statutory declarations that he was symptom-free prior to taking out the policy. "I had climbed a mountain in Canada two months prior to diagnosis," he said. Bupa declined to comment on individual cases but said under law those with pre-existing conditions were not covered even if it was discovered after a policy was taken out and the patient was symptom-free. "What private health insurers can cover is limited by private health insurance legislation." Bupa's market power makes it hard for small operators Ms Griffiths said day hospital operators had a lot of difficulties with Bupa compared to other insurers and "to some extent" they were abusing their market power. She said Bupa was difficult to deal with in negotiations for their contracts with private hospitals. "From the feedback I've had from members, a lot of them have difficulty — particularly very small, specialised units," she said. "They have difficulty negotiating a reasonable indexation at the end of each contract." Bupa said its main aim was a sustainable network across Australia. "Bupa has an extensive private hospital network, and our relationships and commercial arrangements with hospital operators are both fair and equitable. "Bupa is working closely with our hospital provider partners reach agreements that balance the needs of hospitals, while keeping health insurance affordable for our customers." The company said it processed about six million hospital and medical claims each year and the overwhelming majority are assessed and paid without issue.
