Keeping up with UP: It is time we celebrate Indian languages day, not just Hindi Diwas
While the southern states have relentlessly fought against the imposition of Hindi since independence, in Maharashtra, Shiv Sainiks are compelling Hindi-speaking migrants to speak Marathi. In Bengaluru too, outsiders have been critcised for not speaking in Kannada.
In this backdrop, Varanasi-based Socialist leader and author Shatrudh Prakash has made three suggestions to resolve the contentious issue. First, the use of information technology to defuse the ongoing conflict over language.
Second, as the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution recognises 22 official languages, the country should celebrate Indian Languages Day, and not Hindi Diwas, on September 14. Hindi was never the special status of a national language though used widely. Also, many of the 22 official languages have a history of thousands of years with Tamil being among the oldest.
Prakash argued that there was no justification for celebrating Hindi Diwas. Instead, the entire country should decide a date to unitedly celebrate Indian Languages Day.
There aren't many takers amongst Hindi lovers, who connect Hindi with the country's pride but Prakash has quoted famous Hindi poet and author Kedar Nath Singh's book in which he has raised questions on celebrating Hindi Diwas to endorse his view. Singh, a recipient of Jnanpith Award in 2013, had suggested review of all programmes for the promotion of Hindi.
Third, English has now become a language of the villages too, where people take pride in learning the language. Besides, even the governments encourage the use of English by naming their welfare schemes in English like the Smart City Mission and phrases like trillion-dollar economy double-engine government. The fact is words travel from one place to another and are used in the local dialect.
Prakash did his LLB from the Banaras Hindu University (BHU) after completing his graduation in Science. Interestingly he himself had entered public life in 1968, joining the 'English Hatao Movement' but has now given up his anti-English mindset.
He has traced the journey of languages from the pre-Independent era till today, extensively quoting the meetings of the Constituent Assembly, the deliberations and the subsequent constitutional provisions, the anti-Hindi protests in the South and the anti-English agitation in the northern belt in his comprehensive book titled Rashtriya Bhashon Ki Vyatha Katha' (Sad Tale of Indian Languages).
His argument is: 'Now, the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be changed as the Indian Parliament has limited powers to amend the Constitution under Article 368. Only amendments can be done without touching the basic structure of the Constitution.'
Referring to the strong reaction of southern leaders to Union home minister Amit Shah's recent statement on the Hindi language, in which they said the 'imposition of Hindi was beyond their intolerance', he said this only reflects the growing bitterness between the south and north.
'Thus, without making it an emotional or a prestige issue, one should look forward to finding an acceptable and feasible alternative in this era of modern technology,' he said.
Prakash suggested the scientists and experts use information technology to resolve the increasing conflict over languages. In the era of technology, there should be no competition or conflict between Indian languages.
Quoting Netflix, Prime Video and Jio websites, with provisions for audio and subtitles in any and every language of the world, he suggests the development of a similar software to provide translation in any Indian language and its script.
Aren't lakhs of people watching videos in the language of their choice, then why can't there be a software to end this row forever? The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha have audio provisions in several languages. So, why can' the Indian
Union make a similar provision. Vineet Kansal, director of the Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET) says, 'Realtime softwares are being used in defence. Many tools and applications are available while work is on in labs to develop more.'
Of the 22 official languages, Sanskrit is not an official language of any state. However, the central government spent ₹2532.59 crore on the promotion of Sanskrit between 2014-15 and 2024-25, 17 times the combined expenditure of ₹147.56 crore on five other classical Indian languages –– Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and Odia, according to data obtained by Hindustan Times through an RTI application and from public records. Some experts are of the view that the government should make appropriate use of funds though RSS is promoting the Sanskrit language.
The book, while reproducing the Constituent Assembly discussions, notes, 'During debate in the Constituent Assembly over the country's capital, a member from the South had said, 'when we travel from South to Delhi, we feel we are strangers.' The author raises a question here: 'Should we allow this feeling to fester?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
India Issues Stern Reply To Trumps Tariff Hike Threat, Says Targeted By US
New Delhi: The Indian government has issued a strongly worded response following US President Donald Trump's recent threat to impose additional tariffs on Indian goods. The statement, released on Monday by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), asserts that India is being unfairly singled out by both the United States and the European Union for its continued imports of Russian oil. In the official statement, the MEA said, "India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability." India emphasized that its energy imports are essential to ensuring domestic affordability and energy security amid global market disruptions. "India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." Statement by Official Spokesperson — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) August 4, 2025 Backing its claims with data, the MEA pointed out the scale of ongoing EU-Russia and US-Russia trade, calling the criticism of India "unjustified." "The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5mn tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21mn tonnes in 2022." "Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social, sharply criticizing India's trade with Russia amid the ongoing Ukraine war. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," Trump wrote. Trump announced the imposition of a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, 2025, citing India's trade policies and its alignment with the BRICS bloc. According to Trump, India's tariffs on US products are among 'the highest in the world.' He labeled India's actions as part of a broader anti-American agenda.
New Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Unjustified and unreasonable': India slams double standards after Trump threat on Russia oil imports
NEW DELHI: In a blistering rebuttal to renewed US criticism, India on Monday accused Washington and its allies of 'unjustified and unreasonable' targeting over Russian oil imports, reminding them that it was the United States itself that once encouraged those very purchases to stabilise global markets. The sharp response follows remarks from President Donald Trump, who has been talking about sanctioning India for its continued energy trade with Russia. India made it clear that such rhetoric smacks of geopolitical hypocrisy. "India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict," said External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal. 'But in fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India to strengthen global energy market stability.' The message was unmistakable that India will not be lectured, especially by countries that themselves continue trading with Russia while casting stones at others. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market realities," Jaiswal said. "However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'EU, US import Russian goods but target us': India defends oil purchase
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Monday issued a sharp rebuttal to US President Donald Trump's threat of imposing higher tariffs on Indian goods, calling the criticism over Russian oil imports 'unjustified and unreasonable.' The ministry stressed that India's energy ties with Russia are driven by national "necessity" and are far smaller in scale compared to trade between Russia and the West. 'India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict,' the MEA said in a statement on Monday. The ministry also recalled that, at the time, Washington had actually welcomed India's move to purchase Russian oil. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy market stability,' it noted. 'Energy imports vital for Indian consumers' India currently imports nearly a third of its crude oil from Russia and is the second-largest buyer of Russian crude after China. In its statement, the MEA defended these purchases, citing affordability and energy security for its population. However, the ministry also pointed out what it termed a glaring double standard: 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' West-Russia trade far exceeds India's Data cited by the MEA further underlined the imbalance in criticism. The European Union recorded €67.5 billion in goods trade with Russia in 2024, and an additional €17.2 billion in services trade in 2023 -- far higher than India's total trade with Moscow. 'European imports of LNG in 2024 reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the previous high of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022,' the ministry added. Trade between Europe and Russia spans sectors like fertilisers, chemicals, iron and steel, machinery, and transport equipment — going well beyond energy. Meanwhile, the United States also continues to do business with Russia. 'The US continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals,' the MEA said. India asserts its sovereign right India's response came after Trump took to his social media platform Truth Social, threatening to 'substantially' raise tariffs on Indian goods, accusing the country of profiting from the resale of Russian oil and ignoring the human toll in Ukraine. Trump wrote, 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' India, however, dismissed the accusations and reiterated that its decisions are guided by national interests. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' the MEA concluded. 'Long-term contracts cannot be abandoned overnight' Last week too, the government indicated there would be no sudden changes to oil imports from Russia. 'These are long-term oil contracts. It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight,' a senior official said. India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil between January and June this year, a slight increase from the previous year, according to Reuters. As global geopolitical tensions escalate, India appears firm in maintaining its strategic autonomy -- balancing energy needs with global diplomacy, while pushing back firmly against what it sees as selective outrage.
