Korea's market cap tops W3,000tr for 1st time amid Kospi rally
Fueled by a rally in the benchmark Kospi, South Korea's combined stock market capitalization sharply increased, surpassing the 3,000 trillion won ($2.18 trillion) threshold for the first time Thursday.
According to data provided by the bourse operator Korea Exchange, the total market capitalization of stocks listed on the local bourse reached 3,020.8 trillion won as of Thursday's closing.
By market, the benchmark Kospi accounted for 2,603.7 trillion won, while the secondary bourse Kosdaq and Konex, known as a stepping stone market, stood at 413.9 trillion won and 3.2 trillion won, respectively.
In recent months, the Kospi has experienced a sharp rally, with its market valuation rising by over 600 trillion won from around 1,963 trillion at the end of 2024.
The bullish Kospi closed trading at 3,183.23, up 49.49 points or 1.58 percent from the previous trading day. It surpassed the previous year-high set at 3,133.74 in just a day. It was the first time the Kospi had closed above 3,180 since September 2021.
Foreign investors and institutional investors each net bought shares worth 445.8 billion won and 41.6 billion won on the Kospi, while retail investors dumped 560 billion won.
"While US President Donald Trump continues to exert pressure through tariffs, the market placed more weight on the possibility of a trade deal," analyst Kim Ji-won at KB Securities said.
'The Korean government's policy momentum continues. Expectations for a boost in undervalued stocks have been steadily growing, as measures such as mandatory treasury share cancellations and separate taxation on dividend income are being pushed forward faster than anticipated, aimed at enhancing shareholder value."
The expectation for eased monetary policy also fueled the stock market. Though the Bank of Korea held its base rate steady at 2.5 percent Thursday, the market viewed the central bank remains on track for a rate cut.
'The rate freeze is necessary to temper excessive expectations for a rate cut,' BOK Gov. Rhee Chang-yong said at a press conference held shortly after the rate-setting meeting.
The rate freeze was executed to rein in mounting household debt amid a resurgent property market.
"Housing prices, especially in the Seoul metropolitan area, are rising faster than they did in August last year," Rhee said.
'The policy priority lies in stabilizing market expectations and managing household loans to prevent a rise in housing prices."
Rhee further explained that four out of six members of the Monetary Policy Board, excluding himself, left the door open for a possible rate cut within the next three months, while the other two took a more cautious stance. Rhee's own suggestion was not disclosed.
Since October, the bank has been alternating between rate cuts and holds, bringing down the policy rate by a cumulative 1 percentage point to support the sluggish economy.
"Rhee explained that while financial stability must be prioritized, at the same time, stimulus policies remain necessary due to the low-growth environment," Ahn Ye-ha, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said.
'While the rate cut could be delayed until October as the BOK assesses the impact of the real estate policies, the possibility of a rate cut in August remains high, provided the low-growth trend does not change significantly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Barry Eichengreen] Trump in the Falklands](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F13%2Fnews-p.v1.20250813.a3871433fb2942c597c102c3ec8f87d9_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Barry Eichengreen] Trump in the Falklands](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
[Barry Eichengreen] Trump in the Falklands
US President Donald Trump's trade war resembles nothing so much as UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's Falklands War in 1982: One side deploys massive force, and the other withdraws with its tail between its legs. Of 57 countries and territories included in Trump's 'Liberation Day' list of targets for 'reciprocal' tariffs, just three — Brazil, Canada and China — are credibly threatening retaliation against the United States. The Heard and McDonald Islands, populated only by penguins, were understandably supine. But it is more than a little surprising that so many others have taken US aggression lying down, given expectations of tit-for-tat retaliation. The European Commission's agreement with the US is especially stunning in this respect. The Commission has accepted Trump's 15 percent baseline tariff, with exemptions only for aircraft parts, critical minerals and a couple of other items. US duties on steel, copper and aluminum remain at 50 percent. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has pledged that Europe will buy additional US energy and invest $600 billion in the US, although it is questionable whether such commitments are in fact within the Commission's remit. The Trump administration claims further that Europe will import more agricultural goods and loosen its restrictions on digital trade. In return, the EU receives basically nothing, only a US promise not to impose still higher tariffs, at least for now. Moreover, the deal enhances US exporters' access to European markets, while Europe's exporters face additional barriers in the US. Von der Leyen hails this agreement as putting an end to an extended period of tariff uncertainty, although for how long greater certainty lasts remains, well, uncertain. The outcome is widely seen as a sign of the EU's weakness, and there is more than a little merit to this view. The Commission had to negotiate an agreement on behalf of 27 countries with different positions on how aggressively Europe should respond. In France, there was considerable support for the idea that it was important to face down a bully. In Germany, by contrast, policy was shaped by automotive and machinery industries desperate to retain access to the US market on terms at least not grossly inferior to those obtained by Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom. These differences left the Commission with little wiggle room. Then there is the fact that the EU continues to rely on the US for weaponry, and that it needs America's help in supporting Ukraine. Europe recognizes this vulnerability and is seeking to build up its defense and geopolitical capacities independent of the US. But substantial progress in this direction will take years. Europe likewise lacks a pressure point analogous to China's control of rare earth refining, which allows the Chinese government to threaten targeted retaliation by cutting off an essential input required by US high-tech industries and by the country's defense complex. Finally, like other economies contemplating how to respond, Europe faces a 'madman' problem. Normally, the strongest argument for retaliating is to deter further aggression. A rational leader will understand that launching a trade war, much like launching a conventional war, will provoke a counterattack in which his country suffers as much as his opponent's. But this strategy works only when leaders are rational. Trump's trade-policy decisions are clearly guided by an irrational belief in tariffs — 'the most beautiful word in the dictionary,' as he puts it — and by the perverse satisfaction he derives from punishing opponents and even allies, regardless of the costs to the US itself. Negotiators, not only in Europe, had good reason to fear that Trump would meet retaliation with retaliation, resulting in escalation and further damage. There is, however, a contrary view that Europe has shown strength, not weakness, in its response to Trump's trade war. Meeting tariffs with tariffs, especially when these have no deterrent effect, is simply a way of shooting oneself in the economic foot. Higher import prices fuel inflation and hurt consumers, and taxing imported inputs, as the US is doing, makes domestic production more costly and less efficient. At the same time, less import competition encourages rent seeking: Domestic producers will lobby for tariff concessions and make campaign contributions to obtain them. Thus, Europe has shown its wisdom in shunning self-destructive measures. It now needs to follow up by ratifying its free trade agreement with Latin America's Mercosur bloc, solidifying its trade relations with China, and recommitting to the multilateral trading system, whether the US participates in it or not. Something else that Trump's trade war and Thatcher's Falklands War have in common is their utility in distracting attention from their instigators' domestic problems — in Thatcher's case an unemployment crisis, and in Trump's the questions about the extent of his ties to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who hanged himself while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Helped by her victory in the South Atlantic, Thatcher would reign for eight more years. The US constitution prevents Trump from serving as president until 2033. Or so we are led to believe. Barry Eichengreen Barry Eichengreen, a professor of economics and political science at the University of California, Berkeley, is the author, most recently, of 'In Defense of Public Debt' (Oxford University Press, 2021). The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Outgoing Indian envoy, Herald CEO discuss India-Korea ties
Outgoing Indian Ambassador to Korea Amit Kumar and Herald Media Group CEO Choi Jin-young underscored deepening India-Korea ties in a courtesy meeting on Wednesday. They discussed bilateral dimensions and mutual perceptions amid global economic uncertainties, with Kumar praising the Herald Media Group's commercial forums and events for connecting Korean and Indian businesses. 'I'll leave a note for my successor,' Kumar said, referring to Herald Media Group events and content such as the Hello India series, which helped bridge the information gap between Korea, India and the wider world. He cited HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering's memorandum of understanding with India's largest state-owned shipbuilder, Cochin Shipyard Limited, for long-term cooperation in the shipbuilding value chain. "In green hydrogen, we have known four companies, four Indian companies, which are accredited by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy," Kumar added. Choi urged deeper strategic cooperation and stronger economic diplomacy between India and Korea to ensure future economic security, while thanking Kumar for his efforts in boosting ties and hosting the India-Korea Business Partnership Forum in November 2024. 'India and Korea together can respond to global challenges more effectively,' said Choi, suggesting ways to 'strengthen networks' for strategic goals through stronger economic diplomacy. Kumar will return to the Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi after completing his tenure in South Korea this month. sanjaykumar@
Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
New chiefs named for antitrust, financial oversight
President Lee Jae Myung unveiled a sweeping reshuffle of top economic and regulatory posts, nominating a mix of veteran policymakers and academics to lead agencies that set the country's market and financial agenda. Ju Biung-ghi, an economics professor at Seoul National University, was tapped to head the Fair Trade Commission, the country's antitrust watchdog. A University of Rochester-trained economist, Ju has advised the presidential National Economic Advisory Council and led the Korean Association of Applied Economics. Presidential Chief of Staff Kang Hoon-sik said the nominee is expected to 'meticulously implement the administration's economic philosophy of eradicating chronic unfair practices, such as subcontracting abuses, collusion and insider transactions, and establishing a fair market order' as the new chief of the nation's 'economic prosecutor.' Lee Eog-weon, a former first vice finance minister and macroeconomic strategist, was nominated to chair the Financial Services Commission, the country's top financial regulator. Known for guiding the economy through the pandemic and advancing innovation-led growth, Lee also served as the first Korean chair of a WTO domestic regulation working group. His policy track record spans international finance, market regulation and structural economic reform, giving him rare crossover expertise in both fiscal management and capital market oversight. The government said he will be tasked with balancing market stability with reform while expanding consumer protections. After nominating a new Financial Services Commission chair, the agency held an emergency meeting Wednesday to recommend attorney Lee Chan-jin as governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, a post that would make him the administration's first chief of the watchdog once confirmed. A classmate of President Lee Jae Myung at the Judicial Research and Training Institute, he built his career as a labor rights advocate, serving in leadership roles at Lawyers for a Democratic Society and People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. He also represented the president in a high-profile case involving alleged illicit payments to North Korea. Separately, the government promoted internal candidates to lead two other agencies: Baek Seung-bo as commissioner of the Public Procurement Service and Ahn Hyung-jun as commissioner of Statistics Korea.
