logo
Charity ‘feared funding cut' over links with gender-critical academic

Charity ‘feared funding cut' over links with gender-critical academic

Times7 hours ago
​A Scottish academic has claimed she was compelled to step down from a charity over fears that Scottish government funding would be cut due to its association with her.
Professor Sarah Pedersen​, dean of the graduate school at Robert Gordon University​, said the charity's Edinburgh head office ​told her it was ​a​nxious that funding would be pulled because of her gender-critical views. She declined to identify the charity.
​A​fter ​a​ppearing at​ an Edinburgh University​ event on trans rights, Pedersen said she endured non-platforming and aggression from students who allegedly compiled a 'dossier' of 'evil things' she was alleged to have done, including retweeting a social media post from Johann Lamont, the gender-critical former Scottish Labour leader.
The ​l​ecturer has now called for John Swinney, the first minister, to show immediate leadership on the issue of sex and gender in Scotland.
• Times view: Kirk fiasco shows SNP must stop dragging its feet on single-sex spaces
Pedersen is one of a handful of UK academics who put their name to a UK government-commissioned report by Professor Alice Sullivan, a companion piece of research to a report earlier this year that found health boards, rape crisis services and police in Scotland had failed to record accurate data on sex and gender.
They gave evidence that those who have challenged the theory that sex is always less important than gender identity have been bullied, harassed and blocked from career progression.
The report, 'Barriers to research on sex and gender', features personal accounts from UK academics, including those from the University of Edinburgh and Robert Gordon University.
In what is described as the most extensive research of its kind conducted in the UK, Sullivan has collected and analysed evidence on the impact of a 'hostile culture' that has developed in university campuses over the past decade.
Pedersen said she was taken aback by the number of research participants who wished to remain anonymous, demonstrating the 'chilling effect' of discrimination against gender critical academics.
Pedersen thought 'long and hard' about whether or not to go on the record​ but said she was supported by Robert Gordon University, which had encouraged 'academic freedom throughout'.
The report contains other accounts of the personal and professional impact of universities tolerating and encouraging the behaviour of a small minority of staff.
Campaigns were often co-ordinated through LGBT+ networks, which were embedded in management EDI (equality, diversity and inclusion) structures, it found.
One of the most difficult experiences involved Pedersen being invited to step down from the charity she chaired.
The organisation's umbrella body in Edinburgh said that Scottish government funding might be pulled due to the charity's association with her.
'I'm not sure how credible a concern that was in reality but I think the fact that it was the head office in Edinburgh that told our committee this made it credible,' she said.
• Keir Starmer says trans ruling must be enacted 'as soon as possible'
'It certainly made me feel that I could not continue in my role, because if we didn't get funding, and if the charity had to close or reduce its services, then I would feel tremendously guilty.'
Sullivan has made 20 recommendations to the government and academic institutions to defend high-quality research and protect individual academics from professional and personal attack.
One of the routes to improvement, Pedersen believes, would be a sense of leadership on the issue from the Scottish government. 'Keir Starmer came out firmly with a position a couple of days ago, but we've not had that lead from John Swinney,' she said.
'And I think that until that happens, things will continue to stall.'
The Scottish government has been contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glastonbury chanters or the Southport hate-tweeter – throw the book at one, you must throw it at them all
Glastonbury chanters or the Southport hate-tweeter – throw the book at one, you must throw it at them all

The Guardian

time40 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Glastonbury chanters or the Southport hate-tweeter – throw the book at one, you must throw it at them all

News that Avon and Somerset police have launched criminal investigations into the bands Bob Vylan and Kneecap for their Glastonbury sets reminds me that we have a severe prisons crisis in the UK, and that we need to build more of them. Perhaps we should build a special one for all the people we keep criminally investigating for saying, rather than doing, bad things. I'm pretty sure they have a few of those types of prisons in other countries. Although, it must be said that those are normally countries run by people we consider bad. Confusing! But look, maybe we're becoming the sort of country where we imprison lots of people for saying awful things. I don't … love this look for us, I have to say. But no doubt someone has thought it all through very, very carefully. If so, they could put the two nasty idiots from Bob Vylan in it. Obviously all of Kneecap, too. Maybe those guys would have their cell on the same landing as Lucy Connolly, the woman who was imprisoned for two years and seven months for a repulsive tweet in the wake of the Southport child killings. They could be joined by whoever at the BBC didn't pull the Glastonbury live stream on Saturday after Bob Vylan started their repulsive chants, given that Conservative frontbencher Chris Philp is now officially calling for the corporation to be 'urgently' investigated. I see Chris is also calling for the BBC to be prosecuted – so I guess he's already done the police investigation for them, and all at the same time as absolutely aceing his brief as shadow home secretary for where-are-they-now political outfit the Conservative party. In terms of Spewing Hate Into The Nation's Living RoomsTM, it must be said that the footage of Bob Vylan's offending set is still embedded into multiple stories on the MailOnline website, all containing an exhortation to 'watch the full video'. Should whoever is leaving the videos up on MailOnline also be investigated and prosecuted? Perhaps Chris Philp could adjudicate. Either way, let's keep a cell or five for them in the special new prison. After all, why on earth shouldn't we imprison a few journalists, too? In for a penny, and so on. Needless to say, embattled prime minister Keir Starmer has made time to have plenty of official views not just on the behaviour of the two bands, but on any future decisions to book them. If all you have is a hammer, everything is a nail – and if your big job before politics was being director of public prosecutions, then I'm sure everything looks like a prosecutable offence. It certainly did to the prime minister after last summer's riots in the wake of the Southport murders, when Starmer seemed to relish the response happening the best way he knew how: by rushing it through the courts. Connolly was one of those prosecuted, in her case for a manifestly revolting and racist but also clearly tossed-off post responding to a false rumour the killer was an asylum seeker, saying people could set fire to asylum hotels 'for all I care'. She admitted inciting racial hatred in court, but has since become something of a cause celebre for the fact that she is a mother with an otherwise clean record (and one who had lost a young child herself), and that she has got a harsher sentence for this tweet that she later deleted than some convicted rapists. I wrote in the immediate wake of the riots that it was clear that something big had happened in the UK – though it wasn't yet precisely clear what. Unfortunately, the prime minister seemed to think it was fairly simple. 'Let me also say to large social media companies and those who run them,' he said, albeit to some reporters instead, 'violent disorder clearly whipped up online: that is also a crime. It's happening on your premises, and the law must be upheld everywhere.' Sadiq Khan seemed to think it was something to do with the Online Safety Act not being 'fit for purpose'. In more successful hot takes, it was also the moment that Elon Musk test-drove his epithet 'two-tier Keir'. That one has stuck, and it will stick even harder if, for example, sublebrity band Bob Vylan don't get the book thrown at them in the same way that no-mark Lucy Connolly did. To be clear, I don't think any of the aforementioned lot ought to be in prison, however vile and unacceptable their behaviour was. But if you don't deal with them in pretty much the same way, then people are going to be talking far more loudly about two-tier justice again. This type of talk has already reached all the way into the Oval Office where, in February, vice-president JD Vance suggested to Starmer that the UK had a free speech problem. You might have seen that Bob Vylan have just promptly had their US visas revoked for what the deputy secretary of state called 'their hateful tirade'. But we can't expect consistency from the Trump administration. What we expect of our own country is infinitely more important. I used to think masses of legislation around what horrible things people could or couldn't say was a niche-application civilisational advance, but I have changed my view, and now fear we are sleepwalking towards a society where half the people will think certain incarcerated miscreants are political prisoners, and the other half will think a different bunch of incarcerated miscreants are political prisoners. I am very much for living in a country where we don't think we have political prisoners at all. Getting there isn't simple – but stopping travelling in the wrong direction would be a good start. Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here. This article's URL was amended shortly after publication to remove draft text that was included in error.

'Smell detectors' could be used to catch drug abuse - both inside and outside of prison
'Smell detectors' could be used to catch drug abuse - both inside and outside of prison

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

'Smell detectors' could be used to catch drug abuse - both inside and outside of prison

"Smell detectors" and AI cameras could be used to catch drug use inside and outside of prison. Tech companies have pitched the devices to prisons and probation minister James Timpson as a method to monitor criminals and prevent reoffending. A smell detector which uses synthetic brain cells and artificial intelligence to detect drugs such as spice or fentanyl was among the proposals. It could improve staff safety in prisons, and help detect if an offender in the community has breached their licence conditions. AI cameras could also be set up in offenders' homes in the community to check their behaviour while on licence. It comes as justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said emerging technology has the potential to "impose a digital prison outside a prison". Lord Timpson said: "We inherited a justice system in crisis and in need of reform. Prisons and probation are working in analogue while tech drives forward a new digital age. "That's why we have invited companies to present bold new ideas to help us deliver tough punishment and enhanced surveillance. "Embracing new technologies will help us to protect victims, reduce reoffending and cut crime as part of our plan for change." Other ideas that were pitched included software to help staff consistently input information on offenders and transcription tools to cut administrative tasks. Decisions on the plans are expected over the coming months, with successful proposals to be considered for rollout under pilot schemes.

Wimbledon umpire takes action after player complains of ‘dangerous' spectator
Wimbledon umpire takes action after player complains of ‘dangerous' spectator

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Wimbledon umpire takes action after player complains of ‘dangerous' spectator

Security at Wimbledon is 'absolutely critical', the tournament's operations director has said, after a player raised concerns about a spectator during the championship's first day. During her match on Monday, the world No 33, Yulia Putintseva, raised security concerns to the umpire about a spectator whom she described as 'crazy' and 'dangerous' and asked for them to be ejected. 'Take him out, because maybe he has a knife and he will attack after, I don't know,' Putintseva said to the umpire during her match against Amanda Anisimova. Wimbledon's operations director, Michelle Dite, said on Tuesday that if players had any concerns, they 'absolutely' should be brought to light. 'We would rather know about these things, and that is what happened yesterday, and the chair umpire then had some really good communication as planned,' said Dite, adding that it was not a stalking incident. A person present at the match told the Athletic that the spectator at issue had been speaking in Russian about the war in Ukraine. Putintseva, who was born in Russia, changed to represent Kazakhstan in 2012. A Wimbledon spokesperson declined to say if the spectator was ejected. 'Security was in the area. The issue was dealt with,' he said. The incident is the latest surrounding security measures after a man who was given a restraining order in Dubai in February for stalking Emma Raducanu was blocked from buying tickets for the championships this month in the public ballot. Dite said: 'Protocols were followed. The matter was dealt with.' On Tuesday morning, more than 10,000 spectators queued outside the grounds with fans and umbrellas to watch British players including Jack Draper, a top contender for the men's singles championship. On Monday, more than 13,000 people entered the grounds after queueing in the heat, some overnight, as opening-day attendance jumped to 42,756 from 40,514 last year. Protesters on the ground's outskirts called for a boycott of Wimbledon's banking partner, Barclays, over ties to Israel's war on Gaza. Temperatures on Tuesday reached 34.2C (93.6F) by early afternoon, as spectators frequently sought shade and were encouraged to hydrate after a woman collapsed while watching a match on Monday. Dite, discussing the incident on Monday during which Carlos Alcaraz interrupted play to hand a struggling spectator a bottle of water, thanked the returning Wimbledon champion for his support and acknowledged there had been a delay in the medical response. 'Yes, it did take a while, but this lady had fainted, so it needed to be managed very carefully. I know there was a bit of delay but we all work very hard,' said Dite. 'It takes a while sometimes to just assess the situation,' she added. 'And thanks to Carlos for his support for going to get some water.' Daniel Evans was the first British player to go through to the second round of Wimbledon on Tuesday after defeating Jay Clarke in an all-British clash. Draper eased into the second round after his opponent Sebastian Baez retired injured, while wildcard Jack Pinnington Jones completed a straight-sets victory over Tomás Etcheverry. Six Britons – Clarke, Heather Watson, Johannus Monday, Jodie Burrage, George Loffhagen and Francesca Jones – suffered first-round exits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store