How the Aquatic Healing Therapy Janzu Taught Me the Art of Surrender
It's only minutes into the ceremony, and I feel completely safe with him, as he always knows when to bring me back to air at the perfect moment. Though I'm aware of reality and in my body (and completely sober, may I add), what unfolds truly feels like a psychedelic journey: light fractals of the blazing sun dance above my eyelids, tension melts from my limbs, and my body feels limitless. It's a practice of complete and total surrender and one that sends ripples of pleasure and bliss and euphoria through my body. Though many describe Janzu as a rebirth experience, for me it feels like a step beyond that—a return to my truest form, an aquatic liberation dance into the innate essence of who I am.
I'm fortunate to be guided by Acatl, one of the leading practitioners in southern Mexico who specializes in Janzu ceremonies. The water-based practice is native to the region and was first developed in the 1990s by Mexican healer Juan Villatoro. As a participant in my friend Amalia Moscoso's inner child transformation retreat at Kokoro Mio, a boutique hotel tucked into the jungle just outside Xul-Ha, the southernmost point of the lagoon, I was privy to a session with Acatl as part of the programming. (He leads the hotel's wellness offerings, guiding guests not only through Janzu, but also temezcal sweat lodge ceremonies and fire circle rituals.) Given Janzu's profound effect on me, I delved deeper into the therapeutic form with Acatl to understand why exactly it's so powerful.
'Water therapy has the power to restructure cellular memory through constant friction and ion exchange, providing improved blood flow and deep lymphatic drainage,' says Acatl. 'It helps reduce inflammation in the body and muscles and relieves pain. But what makes Janzu a particularly powerful form of water therapy is its profound emotional and subconscious release of trauma and fear, and why it's considered a rebirth therapy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
8 hours ago
- Medscape
48-Year-Old's Wrist Pain Reveals Bone Necrosis
A 48-year-old man presented with a 2-year history of oedema and pain in his right hand. Initially diagnosed with tendonitis, he underwent physical therapy which provided limited relief. MRI demonstrated avascular necrosis of the lunate. The patient underwent surgery and follow-up treatment with home exercises and a structured physiotherapy program; he regained minimal wrist flexion restriction and normal grip strength. The Patient and His History In 2018, the patient had a vertebral fracture that resolved without complications. He received physical therapy and anaesthetic injections which provided limited relief. Due to the persistent symptoms, further evaluation was conducted. Findings and Diagnosis Physical examination revealed palm ecchymosis, reduced range of motion in both flexion and extension of the right wrist, and diminished grip strength. Imaging studies, including X-rays and MRI, indicated osteosynthesis of the carpal bones and fractures of the scaphoid and lunate bones. Coronal MRI showed diffuse hypointensity and collapse of the lunate. The patient was diagnosed with avascular necrosis of the semilunar bone of the carpus, Kienböck disease stage IV (according to the Lichtman classification), and carpal arthrofibrosis. The patient underwent surgical intervention, including scaphoid-lunate fusion with bone grafting, semilunar tendon arthroplasty, and radiocarpal capsulectomy. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant improvement, although the chronic pain initially persisted. He underwent a 12-session physical therapy program. No medications for pain were prescribed. After 1-year of home exercises, he achieved almost full range of motion, with minimal wrist flexion restriction and normal grip strength. Discussion Kienböck disease, or lunate osteonecrosis, is a debilitating condition that primarily affects the lunate bone in the wrist. It is characterised by avascular necrosis due to an interrupted blood supply, leading to bone death. This rare condition affects approximately 0.0066% of the population, predominantly men aged 20-40 years. The aetiology of Kienböck disease is largely unknown; however, several contributing factors have been identified. These include repetitive microtrauma, acute wrist injuries, and anatomical variations in the lunate blood supply, which are limited to a few vessels, making it susceptible to ischaemic damage. Systemic conditions, such as lupus or sickle cell disease, that impair blood flow may also play a role. The pathophysiology begins with an ischaemic event leading to lunate necrosis, followed by changes such as bone fragmentation, collapse, and carpal instability. Management varies by stage, focusing on pain relief, preservation of wrist function, and prevention of disease progression. Early stages may respond to conservative treatments such as immobilisation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy, but these are often ineffective in advanced stages. Management requires a tailored approach based on disease stage and individual factors. Early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment to preserve wrist function and slow disease progression. The authors noted that continued research and advances in imaging are expected to improve both the understanding and management of this condition.
Medscape
9 hours ago
- Medscape
Biologic Dose Adjustments May Benefit Patients With IBD
TOPLINE: The dose escalation of biologic therapy was effective in achieving remission in up to approximately half of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with a probability of sustaining the escalated dose ranging from 71% to 88% at 24 months across different biologics. Dose de-escalation was proved to be feasible in selected patients, with 89%-100% maintaining clinical remission at 12 months. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study, researchers analysed patients with IBD enrolled in a Spanish registry (January 2012 to December 2022) from 72 Spanish centres to assess the frequency, persistence, and effectiveness of the dose escalation of biologics or their discontinuation. Adult patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received standard maintenance doses of infliximab (5 mg/kg every 8 weeks), adalimumab (40 mg every other week), golimumab (50 and 100 mg monthly for those with weight ≤ 80 kg and > 80 kg, respectively), vedolizumab (300 mg every 8 weeks), or ustekinumab (90 mg every 8 or 12 weeks) were identified. Overall, 5096 patients underwent dose escalation, defined as any increase in the dose and/or shortening of the dosing interval from the standard schedule's doses. Conversely, dose de-escalation was defined as the reduction in the dose and/or lengthening of the dosing interval following an escalation regimen, occurring in 669 patients. The effectiveness of dose escalation or de-escalation was assessed on the basis of clinical remission with or without corticosteroids, response, and non-response. Factors associated with drug discontinuation after dose escalation were also assessed, with a median follow-up duration ranging from 9 to 24 months across different biologics. TAKEAWAY: Among patients on various biologics, the incidence rate of dose escalation per patient-year of follow-up was 5% for those on infliximab, 7% for those on adalimumab, 7% for those on golimumab, 10% for those on vedolizumab, and 12% for those on ustekinumab. Remission was achieved in 32%-49% of patients after dose escalation, with a probability of maintaining the escalated dose ranging from 71% to 88% at 24 months across different biologics. Incidence rates of dose de-escalation per patient-year of follow-up ranged from 3% to 9% across various biologics. Factors associated with drug discontinuation after dose escalation were previous biologic exposure and the duration of IBD (for infliximab), monotherapy (for adalimumab), and the presence of UC (for ustekinumab). Clinical remission was observed in 89%-100% of patients who underwent dose de-escalation, with a probability of maintaining the de-escalated dose ranging from 82% to 90% at 12 months across different biologics. Factors linked to relapses after dose de-escalation were previous biologic exposure (for infliximab) and age at dose de-escalation (for adalimumab). IN PRACTICE: "While dose escalation offers a clear benefit in cases of LOR [loss of response], with a high proportion of patients achieving response (and remission) over time, dose de-escalation seems feasible for long-term management in selected patients, although it must be approached with caution," the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Cristina Rubín de Célix, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. It was published online on August 08, 2025, in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. LIMITATIONS: Drug trough levels and antidrug antibodies were not routinely measured prior to dose escalation and de-escalation. The small number of patients undergoing vedolizumab or ustekinumab dose de-escalation precluded definitive conclusions about these regimens. Response after dose escalation and outcomes following dose de-escalation were determined solely by clinician judgement as endoscopic confirmation was unavailable. DISCLOSURES: This study received support from Eli Lilly and Company for the statistical analysis, medical writing, and publication fees alone. Several authors reported receiving education funding, support for congress and conference attendance or travelling, speaker fees, research support, and consulting fees and serving as speakers, consultants, and advisory members for various pharmaceutical companies. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Advice From Economics Might Be The Answer To Your Parenting Burnout. Here's Why.
When my wife and I brought our first child home from the hospital, we planned on diligently following all of the expert recommendations regarding his care: He would breastfeed exclusively and sleep in a bassinet beside our bed, on his back, in a properly ventilated room. We had read about SIDS and would take every possible precaution. What could be more important that preventing harm from coming to our child? Almost immediately, however, we ran into trouble. Our baby stopped peeing. He was dehydrated and hungry, somehow, although he spent pretty much all day at my breast. So we feed him some infant formula using a medicine dropper, which he lapped up hungrily, sending me into a shame spiral that took months of therapy to crawl out of. But at least with the supplementary formula we were able to keep him happily fed. Related: The second problem sent us into a territory that was even more mortifying. In spite of the fact that my breasts were only partially functional, the baby was extremely attached to them. As in, he would only sleep if they were right there, right beside him, skin to skin with his tiny cheek. Every time he feel asleep while nursing and unlatched his little rosebud lips, I moved as stealthily as possible to try to get him into the bassinet. But more often than not, he woke and started crying. And even if I could get him to lie in the bassinet, it often didn't last long. The end result was that I spent a lot of time nursing him in the chair, and, in my desperation and exhaustion, I often fell asleep. My wife could tell, just by looking at us, that this was not a safe situation. Since it wasn't possible to get him into the bassinet, we just cleared our bed of blankets and pillows and let him sleep where he wanted to, right next to my body. We didn't tell anyone. We had been taught that bed-sharing with a baby was deadly, so we certainly weren't going to admit to doing it. This was all back in 2009, before economist Emily Oster began publishing her bestselling books, in which she brings a unique, data-driven perspective to the art of parenting. In her second book, 'Cribsheet,' she explains how holding up the ideal infant sleeping arrangement as the only permissible option can actually lead parents to put their babies in more danger. Because although it is safest to have baby sleep on a separate surface, it is much more dangerous to sleep with a baby on a sofa or armchair. Sixty-seven times more dangerous. Though it wasn't a best-case scenario that the baby wasn't in the bassinet, he was a lot safer sleeping next to me on the mattress instead of in the recliner. Infant sleep, Oster writes, is one example of a scenario in which we might benefit from considering what she calls 'second best' parenting. It is a term she borrows from economics. 'When we are giving advice in parenting, we tend to be absolutist: There is the best option and then everything else,' Oster told HuffPost, She has used the term 'outer darkness' to refer to everything else — as in, if it's not the best option, it's all equally bad and scary. But this all-or-nothing approach doesn't apply well to infant sleep, where we clearly have a first best option (bassinet/crib in same room as parent) followed by a second best option (on a clear, flat sleeping surface next to the nursing parent) and then, way, way down, the 67th best option of a desperate mother accidentally falling asleep in an armchair while holding the baby because she has been told that under no circumstances should she consider bringing the baby into her bed. 'The idea of 'second best' is to recognize that within the category of 'other options,' some are better than others. The second best is the best option that we can achieve,' Oster said. She thinks that this can be a useful framework for other parenting choices, too, such as what to feed our children. 'We're told the best snack for our kids is, say, a whole apple and a glass of water. But what if your kid doesn't eat that? We don't help people pick well among the options their child will eat. You'd be forgiven for thinking that once you're going to applesauce, you might as well give a pile of cookies. But actually those aren't the same.' Believing that there is only one right way and the rest are wrong sets us up to see only black and white when actually there are so many shades of gray. 'When we tell people that it's the 'best or the rest,' we do not allow for them to choose smartly among the rest,' Oster said. In addition to not choosing well, this thinking makes people feel badly about how they're parenting. 'When we tell people they aren't doing their best, that disempowers them. And no one parents well from a place of shame,' Oster added. Finding Other Good Options Beyond Perfect The advantage of referring to 'second best' is that, with the word 'best,' parents are left with space to take pride in their parenting. A silver or bronze medal is still a win, after all. The argument that Oster is making is similar to that of 'good enough parenting,' an idea popularized in the 1950s by Donald Winnicott. Parenting coach Kristene Geering told HuffPost that this is the framework she uses with parents. 'It's based on the notion that there is no such thing as perfect,' Geering explained. 'Part of being human is that there are challenges, there are times when there's no clear or easy path (which is also how we learn). There is no 'best.' You take what information you have, make a decision based on that and then you learn as you go along.' Geering thinks this dovetails nicely with Carol Dweck's 'growth mindset,' in which as we learn more, we do better. Geering said she often tells families that 'we're all doing the best we can with what we have' and advises, 'Learn from your mistakes, repair as you go, and show your children how to hold compassion for yourself and those around you.' She likes the 'good enough' phrasing because it makes room for the idea that there are many different options that might be 'bests' for different families dealing with different circumstances. Geering agrees with Oster that it's important to move parents out the space of 'all is lost,' where they may get trapped in their shame. She said that where she works in Silicon Valley, 'I see a lot of parents fall into this trap of trying to be 'perfect' ... and then researching themselves into a state where they're almost frozen with indecision.' With an endless amount of information readily available, this isn't an uncommon place for parents to land. 'I've fallen into this trap as well,' Geering admitted. 'Things like which school to attend, which activity to sign up for... it's really overwhelming.' Make Peace With Your 'Good Enough' Using a 'second best' or 'good enough' mindset doesn't come naturally to people raised in a culture of competition. But sooner or later, all parents are faced with a scenario that challenges expectations of perfection. For Geering, a clear example of this in her own family was pandemic schooling. 'I watched my own kids struggle on 'Zoom school,' to the point where it was clear this would never work for them. So I pulled them, and we did homeschool for a year... while my husband and I both worked full time. Was it perfect? Nope. Was it 'second best'? I have no idea.' Her kids are 'still catching up on math,' she said, although they also 'gained a lot of skills in independence.' 'Instead of beating myself up on all the math they missed out on, I looked at it from the point of view that I was doing the best I could in really awful circumstances. And I looked at all the moms in my friend groups and the parents I was working with, and I saw everyone making different decisions, based on their specific circumstances. Absolutely no one did the 'best' thing... because there was no 'best' thing.' Whether you think of it as 'second best' or 'good enough,' parenting within this framework, as opposed to one in which there is only one right option for all families, makes room for you to give yourself some grace. An added benefit of letting go of a perfection-or-nothing mindset is the weight that this takes off of our kids. If we 'show them how to repair the relationship when we mess up and share our learning process with them,' Geering said, 'it lets them be compassionate with themselves, learn from their mistakes, create authentic and meaningful relationships with others, and have a growth mindset as their default throughout life. That's pretty powerful stuff.' Related... Parents Are Lying About Where Their Babies Sleep At Night. Here's Why That's A Problem. What Second-Time Parents Wish They Didn't Stress About The First Time Around This 1 Thing May Be Wearing Parents Out Everywhere
