&w=3840&q=100)
China-Pak ties not 'directed at any third party': Beijing on Ishaq Dar-Wang Yi meeting
China's statement is seen as part of its broader diplomatic balancing act. Although a close ally of Pakistan and a major investor in the CPEC, Beijing is trying to rebuild substantial trade and diplomatic ties with India read more
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Pakistan Mohammad Ishaq Dar had recently remarked that his nation Pakistan has agreed to deepen trade and investment with China.
Media reports then suggested that China and Pakistan discussed security cooperation in the context of the recent India-Pakistan tensions.
However, now, China seems to be distancing itself from such assertions. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said regarding a media query about the meeting, 'China has released information on the meeting. You may refer to that. I don't have more specific information to offer, but what I can tell you is that China and Pakistan are traditionally friendly neighbours, and bilateral cooperation across various fields is very close. As for the current situation you're concerned about, I can assure you that China-Pakistan cooperation is not directed at any third party."
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China takes middle ground
China on Tuesday (May 20) had said it supports efforts by India and Pakistan to resolve their differences through dialogue and welcomed the ceasefire agreement reached earlier this month following the worst fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours in over two decades decades.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi made the remarks during a meeting with Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar in Beijing, according to a statement from China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Wang said China supports both countries in pursuing 'a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire' and urged continued communication to maintain regional stability.
The statement comes after India and Pakistan agreed to halt hostilities on May 10, following an escalation triggered by a deadly terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir region and retaliatory strikes by the Indian Army under Operation Sindoor.
China's balancing act
China's statement is seen as part of its broader diplomatic balancing act. Although a close ally of Pakistan and a major investor in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Beijing is trying to rebuild substantial trade and diplomatic ties with India.
That effort comes amid turbulent ties it has with US, especially since the new Trump administration imposed heavy tariffs on imports from China.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
India is world's bright spot, set to overtake Japan: WEF chief Borge Brende
Even as trade tensions escalate, global growth slows, and geopolitical risks mount, the President and CEO of the World Economic Forum, Brge Brende, says India is emerging as the world's most resilient major to Business Today's Siddharth Zarabi and India Today Consulting Editor Rajdeep Sardesai, Brende said that among all large economies, India is currently outperforming expectations and may soon leapfrog Japan to become the world's fourth-largest the largest economies of the world, India is the bright spot. It is really doing well. In the last quarter, it even did better than expected—7.5% growth,' Brende said. 'If it continues like this, India will be the fourth-largest economy in the world—$5 trillion—maybe already this year, and take over the fourth place from Japan.' His comments come as the WEF's 2025 global outlook warns of serious headwinds, including rising trade barriers, record-high debt levels, and a fragmented geopolitical order. Brende noted that global growth is now 'far below trend,' with trade slowing to levels not seen in decades. But India, he said, has managed to buck the also praised India's positioning in a rapidly changing global trade order.'There is a change in trade that is more structural. Trade in services and digital trade are growing three times faster than trade in manufacturing,' he said. 'I think this is one of the reasons why India is doing relatively well—because India is very strong on services and digital trade.'advertisementIndia's rising influence isn't just economic—it is becoming more strategic, Brende noted, especially as companies and countries reconfigure supply chains after the pandemic and amid ongoing US-China tensions.'Just in time is not good enough anymore. You have to have just in case,' he said. 'We are seeing friend-shoring, home-shoring, and near-shoring. That complicates things, but India is well-positioned to benefit.'He pointed to the rapid rise of India's manufacturing ecosystem as a case in point.'A few years ago, there were no iPhones produced in India. Now, 25% of the production comes from India,' he said. 'And the US administration is already saying iPhones should be produced in the US. So there are first questions there. But India has a huge opportunity.'He also highlighted India's demographic advantage and its role in the digital economy.'The median age in India is 28 years. The workforce is growing every year, and there is a lot of tech-savvy talent. That helps when it comes to the digital revolution,' Brende he cautioned that sustaining high growth will require India to keep pushing reforms.'If India is going to keep the growth, there has to be deregulation, less red tape, better infrastructure, and coordination between states. If that happens, India will geopolitically and geo-economically play a significant role in the coming decades.'
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Tariffs, wars, AI: WEF chief breaks down what's next for global economy
Even as the global economy proves more resilient than expected, deep structural risks and profound technological shifts are reshaping the world order—from the threat of new wars and rising debt to AI-driven transformations and a trade system in flux, warns Borge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic to India Today's Rajdeep Sardesai and Business Today's Siddharth Zarabi, Brende flagged four major forces driving global uncertainty and opportunity: geopolitical conflicts, trade fragmentation, historic levels of sovereign debt, and the rise of artificial GROWTH RESILIENT DESPITE CHALLENGES'The global growth is more sluggish than it was in the last decades, but with the geopolitical backdrop we are faced with—the most complicated one maybe since the Second World War—the global economy is more resilient than I expected,' Brende said. He spoke about the risk of another major war, potentially involving Iran or another Asian flashpoint, and warned that trade wars are already denting global output. 'We are far below trend growth,' he noted. 'We had trend growth the last decades close to 4%. Now, the global trend growth is maybe even less than 3%... and trade is now growing slower than global growth.'The WEF's latest global outlook highlights another red flag: global debt levels haven't been this high since World War II. 'Many countries are struggling with this,' Brende pointed to a structural shift in the nature of global trade, away from manufacturing and toward services and digital flows. 'Trade in services and digital trade are growing three times faster than trade in manufacturing,' he said, adding that this change is partly why India is performing well amid global TARIFF UNCERTAINTYBut policy unpredictability, especially from the United States, is compounding volatility. With the Trump administration threatening up to 50% steel tariffs on key trade partners by July, Brende said 'it is a full-time job to follow' the evolving stance. 'There's a lot to unpack it's not only about tariffs. The Chinese are not exporting rare earths like before, the Americans are restricting exports of aircraft engines. We're seeing tit-for-tat policies.'The globalisation model of the last four decades is breaking down. In its place, Brende sees the rise of 'friend-shoring,' 'home-shoring,' and 'just-in-case' production, as countries rewire supply chains for security rather than efficiency.'Just in time is not good enough anymore. You also have to have just in case,' Brende said. 'You want to have production in your country and not necessarily import. That can lead to higher prices, and inflation is also a problem.'He added that the current US tariff regime, which uses executive provisions to bypass Congress, may soon face legal challenges, potentially up to the Supreme Court. 'There are many unknowns still,' he said. 'The summer will show us more.'IN THE ERA OF AIadvertisementTurning to the pressing question of jobs and growth in the AI era, Brende acknowledged the global challenge of meeting employment demands, especially for countries like India with a large and growing workforce.'It is, but it's also a great opportunity,' he said. 'With every paradigm shift in technology, it can reduce or kill some jobs, but it can also create new, higher-value jobs. Artificial intelligence is a huge impact factor on productivity. Our economists estimate that proactive AI adoption could boost productivity by 10% — a gain we haven't seen for decades. And productivity means prosperity.'Brende believes India is uniquely positioned to benefit thanks to its young, tech-savvy population, strong services sector, and digital infrastructure like digital IDs. 'Of course, it's hard to know exactly where future jobs will come from. Look at Switzerland: 100 years ago, 95% of their population worked in agriculture. Now, it's just 2%, yet they produce more food and have some of the highest incomes in the world because they embraced change and innovation.'advertisementBrende said the jury is still out on AI's potential impact on inequality. 'The platform economy showed a 'winner takes all' trend with big tech dominating. AI hardware requires massive investment, but as software applications proliferate, there are opportunities for smaller players. We saw a Chinese company launch a language model at a fraction of the cost of the big ones, showing disruption can come from unexpected places.'He added, 'Some of the world's most valuable companies didn't even exist 30 years ago. The next global giants could be emerging today in Bangalore or other innovation hubs. Whether AI leads to concentration or broader opportunity is uncertain — it's a key challenge of our time.''AVOID WARS'Asked about his biggest worry and greatest hope for the global economy beyond 2025, Brende said, 'I'm concerned about future wars. If we see new wars, that will kill growth.'Yet, he remains optimistic: 'The world economy has been so resilient. Trade was the driver of growth for decades. Maybe new technologies like AI are already driving growth, increasing productivity, and leading to investment. I don't think we will see a repeat of the sluggish 1970s.' advertisement
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
He does this to his dad, Shashi Tharoor quips after son's curveball on Op Sindoor
In a rare and heartwarming moment during India's diplomatic outreach in Washington DC following the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor found himself fielding a question from his son, Ishaan senior Tharoor, who is part of an all-party delegation visiting key global capitals to highlight the Pahalgam carnage and India's response to it, was pleasantly surprised when Ishaan - introducing himself jokingly as asking "in a personal capacity and mostly to say hi before you go off for your next engagement" - posed a pointed query about terrorism advertisementAs Ishaan took the mic, Shashi Tharoor smiled and gestured for him to raise it properly before he responded. The question, both timely and probing, was whether any country had asked the Indian delegation for evidence of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack, given Pakistan's repeated denials. "I'm very glad you raised this. I didn't plant it, I promise you. This guy does this to his dad," Tharoor said candidly. He stated that "no one had any doubt," and that the delegation was not asked for evidence by any foreign government. However, he acknowledged that the media in "two or three places" did raise the question."Let me say very clearly that India would not have done this without convincing evidence," he said. Citing three reasons for international understanding, Tharoor highlighted the 37-year pattern of terror attacks originating from Pakistan, each followed by habitual reminded the audience of Pakistan's disavowal of knowledge of Osama bin Laden's whereabouts, even when he was eventually found in a compound adjacent to an army camp in Abbottabad. He also mentioned Pakistan's denial of involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks."So we know what Pakistan's all about. They will dispatch terrorists, they will deny they did so until they're actually caught with red hands," he also dismissed the idea of American mediation between India and Pakistan. The US has, on several occasions, taken credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, with President Donald Trump claiming that he strongarmed the two nuclear nations with the threat of trade and tariffs. India, however, has denied the claim on several occasions. "Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. You're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," he said. He added, "There is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. There is no equivalence between a country that provides a safe haven to terrorism and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business."Addressing US diplomatic engagement following the attacks, Tharoor said the PM Modi-led government had received calls at high levels from the US, and that India appreciated the concern and interest. However, he said, "They must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side. Because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process... But that's guesswork on my part."advertisementReiterating the nature of India's actions in Operation Sindoor, Tharoor drew a sharp contrast between the two nations' conduct. "India hit terror bases in Pakistan, while Pakistan hit civilians in retaliation, since there are no terror bases in India," he asserted. "There are no terrorist organisations in India listed in the UN or the State Department anywhere else. So, what do you hit? You hit civilians, innocent people. That is the asymmetry of this particular conflict."Tharoor said India's response was "precise and calibrated", and stressed that India has "systematically signalled" it is not interested in war with Pakistan. "We're not interested in attacking Pakistani civilians, ordinary people. This is about India versus terrorism," he the question of Chinese military technology and Pakistan's alleged use of it, Tharoor said India responded innovatively and effectively during the conflict. The Thiruvananthapuram MP spoke about China's interest in Pakistan, but added that despite Islamabad's use of Beijing's technology, India was able to manoeuvre its military plans to give a befitting reply to supposed to be something called a kill chain that the Chinese specialise in. We simply did things in a different way. Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to hit 11 airfields," he explained. He acknowledged the depth of China's investment in Pakistan through the Belt and Road Initiative, particularly the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, and said India had "no illusions" about China's strategic stake in on the broader context, Tharoor described the war as "a distraction" for India, but "fundamental" to the Pakistani military's sense of self-importance."There was a lot of chuckling in Delhi," Tharoor remarked wryly, "when the failed general became a field marshal by promoting himself, as you said, with an extra star".Tune InTrending Reel
