logo
Harassing reporters should not be normal

Harassing reporters should not be normal

Opinion
The Globe and Mail's Carrie Tait has been doing exemplary work reporting on Alberta Health Services (AHS) and the way Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's government has treated serious allegations of political interference in that province's health system.
Her reporting has included breaking stories on a senior health executive, Athana Mentzelopoulos, who was fired as chief executive of Alberta Health Services. Mentzelopoulos says in a lawsuit against the province that she was fired after investigating questionable contracts by AHS — the Smith government maintains Mentzelopoulos was fired for incompetence.
Tait also reported on the firing of the AHS board by the Alberta government on the day the board was to review a report by investigators about improper activity involving AHS. That, and other reporting, has certainly made Tait unpopular with Smith, the Alberta government, and with the governing United Conservative Party.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith
But now, Tait is herself news.
How?
Because of a phantom Twitter/X account — now suspended — that posted a series of clandestinely obtained photographs of Tait, sometimes with other people she was meeting with, and announced that it would 'start exposing Carrie Tait's sources in the continuing health care saga. You are not going to want to miss this!'
If you think that sounds like an attempt to derail a media investigation into questionable government conduct, you'd be exactly right. It's also clearly harassment, and it really makes you stop and wonder who exactly would benefit from trying to derail the Globe and Mail's coverage.
The move is certainly getting broad condemnation, including from the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ).
'These kinds of intimidation tactics have no place in a democratic society,' said CAJ president Brent Jolly in a written statement. 'They are assaults on the very foundations of press freedom that are enshrined in Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms … Targeting a journalist for simply doing their job is a cowardly act that endangers not only the reporter, but also the vital public interest work that journalism represents. Carrie Tait should be saluted for her work — not spoofed or surveilled.'
And that's why we're writing about the work being done by a competitor of ours — and work being done in a province other than our own as well.
Because the issue is one that strikes at the heart of what we do — providing objective journalism and commentary that, almost necessarily, occasionally displeases governments. That work should be done without the fear of threats and attacks — and an attack on Tait, if allowed to stand as normal practice, is an attack on all journalists.
That leaves the question of who's doing the attack.
Wednesdays
What's next in arts, life and pop culture.
Once again — who would benefit from derailing Tait's work?
The Alberta government insists they're not involved — but at the same time, at first blush, that province's premier seemed to feel the issue was less than serious.
Asked about the surveillance by a Globe and Mail reporter at a meeting of Canada's premiers in Huntsville last week, Smith said 'I'm not talking about that' — and laughed as she walked away.
Later, she appeared to take the issue more seriously, telling CTV News that, 'No one should be harassing anybody, and I don't comment on sock puppet accounts … I have no idea who's behind it, and so if there's criminal harassment, I hope that the RCMP finds them, punishes them to the full extent of the law.'
It's hard not to agree with Smith, at least on that last point. There are clearly things going on in Alberta provincial politics that are deeply wrong, and anyone involved in this personal attack should certainly face consequences.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I remember Alia Hogben
I remember Alia Hogben

Globe and Mail

timea day ago

  • Globe and Mail

I remember Alia Hogben

I had the good fortune to encounter Alia Hogben when I was a public servant in the old multiculturalism program of the Department of Canadian Heritage, following up on a small grant to assist her with her manuscript on the history of Muslim women in Canada. We ended with a good 45-minute conversation on the post-Gulf War and post-9/11 challenges facing young Muslim women, which I had observed while performing other duties for my department. I was especially impressed by her fervour for Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and how it was a guidepost for women of all communities and origins, but much more so for Muslim women, who had to deal with family pressures and those of a wider society still uncertain about how they should respond. She was practical and direct on this issue when I twice saw her speak frankly to Muslim audiences. She believed strongly that one could best be a good Muslim by being a good Canadian. My colleagues and I were pleased as punch when she was named to the Order of Canada; its motto, 'desiderantes meliorem patriam,' translates as 'they desire a better country,' and this truly applied to Alia. Austin Cooke, Ottawa Sheema Khan's beautiful obituary of Alia Hogben mentioned all of the big and important events in Ms. Hogben's life. I remember her for a small one. Our church sponsored a family of refugees from Afghanistan. They arrived and settled down in Kingston, but we soon found that they had brought some family feuds with them. In particular, the conflict between some wanting to maintain all the old way of life, and others wanting to become true new Canadians. I needed a neutral counsellor and remembered the many wonderful columns Alia had written for the Kingston Whig-Standard, offering sage counsel. I contacted her and explained the problem. Within days she arrived, listened to us in detail, and suggested how to approach the family. It worked, and we saw a feuding family settle happily – now some 20 years ago – into Canadian life. Thanks, Alia. Peter Gower, Kingston To submit a memory about someone we have recently profiled on the Obituaries page, e-mail us at obit@

LILLEY: Activist judge says bike lanes are a Charter right
LILLEY: Activist judge says bike lanes are a Charter right

Toronto Sun

time2 days ago

  • Toronto Sun

LILLEY: Activist judge says bike lanes are a Charter right

Justice Paul Schabas claims there is a Charter right to bike lanes based entirely off his own political view. Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox A bike lane looking northbound on University Ave. to Queen's Park in Toronto on Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2022. Photo by Ernest Doroszuk / Toronto Sun When Pierre Trudeau was sitting down with the premiers to draft the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, they weren't talking about the Charter right to bike lanes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account But that didn't stop activist lawyer turned activist judge Paul Schabas from deciding that there is a Charter right to bike lanes. 'Justice' Paul Schabas of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said that the Ford government, which passed legislation to remove certain bike lanes and which won an election on this issue, cannot move forward. Let's just fold tents and let people like 'Justice' Schabas run our lives and give up on elections – it seems to be what he wants. In his decision, Justice Schabas relies heavily on the idea of positive rights, which is the idea that the government must take action to provide you with certain rights. This isn't part of the longstanding Canadian tradition that takes a negative rights view, which means that the government cannot take steps against you such as restricting your freedom of expression, your freedom or religion or assembly and so on. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The idea of positive rights, that the government must take actions on your behalf, is a relatively new idea by comparison and one upheld by the far-left activists that Justice Schabas has long been associated with. He cites myriad of cases, some of which he would disagree with if taken to their logical conclusion, like Chaoulli, but uses them to push his point. He even cites American case law to try and make his ridiculous claim there is a 'positive right' that obliges the government to provide bike lanes. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Ford government's move to pull bike lanes from certain roads was not a blanket ban on bike lanes. In fact, Ford said that he would prefer bike lanes be put on secondary roads. 'Believe it or not, my brother Rob actually put more bike lanes in than David Miller, but he didn't do it down the middle of University or Bloor or any of those streets,' Ford said about his late brother mayor Rob Ford when announcing his bike lane changes last fall. None of this matters to activist Paul Schabas, a man who should never have been appointed to the bench. Schabas acknowledged that those arguing against the bike lane removal never even raised the constitutional elements, but he made a decision on that front anyway. 'The constitutionality of the current provision was not, technically, challenged in this application, as it was enacted after the case was argued. However, the findings in these Reasons have application to the continuing controversy between the parties and the government's proposed action,' Schabas said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Here again is a judge deciding an issue, a case before them, that doesn't actually deal with the case that is in front of the judge. Justice Schabas is the epitome of judge made law. It should be noted that Justice Schabas was the activist judge who couldn't find the Charter right to freedom of expression when he was ruling in the case of Jordan Peterson. Peterson had challenged the idea that the College of Psychologists of Ontario should be able to discipline him based off of his social media statements. Schabas took a totally hands-off approach to freedom of expression simply because he disagreed with Peterson politically. Now, he takes a hands-on and positive rights view for bike lanes because he politically opposes Doug Ford and supports the idea of bike lanes. Justice Paul Schabas, an activist lawyer appointed to the bench by former justice minister David Lametti under the Justin Trudeau government, is the worst example of judicial activism. We deserve better in Canada. If we don't get better, then expect Conservatives to be as egregious in appointing activist judges as Liberals have been in appointing people like Paul Schabas to the bench. blilley@ MLB Celebrity Wrestling Canada Toronto & GTA

Drimonis: Hypocrisy takes the stage in Feucht affair
Drimonis: Hypocrisy takes the stage in Feucht affair

Montreal Gazette

time2 days ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Drimonis: Hypocrisy takes the stage in Feucht affair

As I watched the debate unfold around Christian singer/MAGA influencer Sean Feucht, whose Canadian tour included last week's stop in Montreal, I found myself growing increasingly tired of the hypocrisy it triggered. On all sides. I don't support Feucht's anti-abortion, anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ2+ beliefs. His Christian nationalism is fundamentally far-right politics wrapped up in religion. Feucht is also a hypocrite. You can't support Trump's inhumane policies when it comes to immigration, say, and be a genuine Christian. The two are incompatible. Feucht's views on abortion and gender identity may be reprehensible to me, but he's allowed to have them. While Canada has laws against hate speech and incitement to violence, freedom of expression is enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, even if such rights are not absolute. Many folks ascribe to similar beliefs here at home, and last I checked, they're not being silenced. I also saw no reason for the Plante administration to refuse him a permit because Feucht's 'show runs counter to the values of inclusion, solidarity and respect that are championed in Montreal.' A lot of things do, including Quebec legislation like Bills 21 and 84. More hypocrisy: people who advocated for the removal of pro-Palestinian protesters or the shutting down of campus protests now feigning selective outrage over some two-bit MAGA preacher not given a permit. Either you defend freedom of expression, or you don't. Conservatives who now claim Christianity is 'under attack' in Canada should also take a seat. No one's persecuting Christians here. It's laughable to even make such a claim. It's not because Feucht is Christian that he's unwelcome by many; it's because of his hateful rhetoric and reported ties to far-right extremist groups like the Proud Boys. Years ago, I argued in favour of allowing Julien Blanc, a misogynist who gave seminars on how to seduce women, into Canada. Many urged the government to ban him. There was nothing I supported about his message. 'Except, I wrote, 'his right to share it.' I bet most of you have never heard of Blanc, just like you had not heard of Feucht and his questionable hairstyle until now. Which brings me to: These people are grifters. They rely on your outrage. They want to play victim, be cancelled, told they can't perform, just so they can con those who hate 'woke' culture into parting with their money. Feucht's fundraiser is already up and running. I recognize we must be careful about what we choose to tolerate in the name of free speech. Hence the paradox of tolerance: If a society tolerates those who are intolerant, it risks enabling and normalizing intolerance. I understand people's visceral reaction to Feucht and their desire to keep him out of Canada. In the context of a predatory Trump administration, why roll out the carpet for a MAGA devotee and Christian supremacist? But those who rejoice when Feucht is denied a permit should also question the unintended consequences of allowing governments to decide what you should think and be exposed to. The free publicity we gave this mediocre performer, singing generic worship lyrics for profit, is maddening. There's a lot of money to be made in evangelical ministries and the merch that comes with it. God's love may be free, but Feucht's limited edition trucker hats sell for a whopping $42 U.S. His performance in a Montreal church had an audience of a few dozen. Remove the far-right Rebel News hacks covering the event and you could have fit everyone comfortably in my one-bedroom condo. But outrage gave him notoriety. And amplified his voice. When governments temporarily shut down superspreader faith-based gatherings during COVID, Feucht feigned religious persecution. As a result, his ministries' revenue jumped from a reported $283,526 to $5.3 million between 2019 and 2020. Playing the victim is lucrative. Don't allow your outrage to be used against you. There are better ways to fight back against hate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store