‘I bought 6 homes in Italy for $1 each'
A US woman has revealed how she snapped up six properties in Italy for the bargain price of $1.06 ($AU1.65) each and transformed them into dream homes.
Rubia Daniels, who is originally from Brazil but lives in San Francisco, purchased six crumbling houses in 2019 in Mussomeli, a centuries-old hill town in Sicily, through a local initiative that aims to breathe new life into abandoned real estate, according to SWNS.
The houses came with a catch: they were in various states of ruin, with some missing roofs and lacking basic infrastructure.
'I packed six suitcases of all my tools and a generator,' Ms Daniels recalled to the outlet.
The 51-year-old planning consultant flew out with her husband and brother-in-law to collect the deeds, having spent a total of about $US25,440 ($A39,600) after administrative fees and agency costs, the New York Post reports.
MORE: I bought my 'dream' home, it was a DISASTER
Huge twist: Woman pays $1 in wild home sale
'I save $3k a month living in a bin'
Rubia Daniels bought six abandoned homes in Italy for just $1.06 each. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
The homes are located in Mussomeli — a hilltop town in Sicily. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
The properties were in disrepair — some with collapsed roofs and lacking basic utilities. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
Despite the dilapidated conditions, the mum-of-three felt at ease with the undertaking.
'I'm comfortable with the idea of transforming things and breaking walls,' she said.
'For example, my husband panics when he sees me eyeing up projects like this, but for me it's just a combination of excitement and joy.'
The first property, which was completely collapsed, is now fully renovated.
It 'has a beautiful marble bedroom,' she said.
The restoration cost her approximately $US63,600 ($A98,850) and she hopes it will require no further work 'for 50 years'.
Her vision extends beyond family homes.
One of the six properties is earmarked as a future wellness retreat offering yoga and meditation classes.
'It would be nice to give back to the community this way,' she said.
A kitchen. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
A bedroom. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
A bathroom. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
One of six homes. Picture: rubia.daniels/Instagram
Ms Daniels also furnished the properties using local vendors — installing everything from sinks to flooring sourced nearby.
'We wanted to do it with the community in mind,' she explained. 'We love it here — it's much nicer than California.'
What drew her to Mussomeli wasn't just the bargain prices, but the way of life.
'Nobody is rushing around, everything is affordable,' she said. 'A coffee and a croissant costs €1.50. In California, it's a very stressful environment and everything is so superficial.'
Now, her two aunts, aged 70 and 82, plan to retire in the hilltop town permanently.
And while her project initially raised eyebrows back home, the once-overlooked Sicilian village has gained international attention.
At least 30 people are looking at one home now, she said, explaining how the influx initiative has grown in popularity.
For Ms Daniels, the appeal was clear from the start: 'You're getting the house basically for free and you can turn that into whatever you desire'.
Parts of this story first appeared in the New York Post and was republished with permission.
Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox.
MORE: Iconic Carlton restaurant up for grabs
Elite school buys Aus jail for $2.6m
$250k man cave: Inside Aus' ultimate tradie dream home
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Coles, Woolworths 'falling into line' with new-age tech at the expense of their workers as stories of layoffs due to AI continue to stack up
The future of human replacement, for artificial intelligence is here. No longer the scenario of 10 years down the track, it has begun to chip away across almost all sectors. While a shift towards salient new technologies is inevitable, questions need to be answered on the viability of cutting jobs and whether industries should be allowed to use AI as an excuse to stop employing people, or terminate employment en masse to replace them with AI. Stories of layoffs due to AI are adding up, and while national and multinational corporations, who make billions in profits, look for ways to cut costs, the costs of replacing human labour for software packages may be the worst road to take. There is some inevitability that downsizing will take place as departments run more efficiently, with new powerful AI tools. However, there are many sectors and corporations within those sectors who can support workers and remain competitive without massive job cuts. With new occupations emerging due to AI, companies have an obligation to provide long-term investment in human jobs instead of taking the easy way out. Meta, the brainchild of Mark Zuckerberg, with platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger and a plethora of software and app developments, could be replacing 90 per cent of the staff who perform their privacy and integrity reviews. Microsoft, who produce a swath of video game content and run platforms such as LinkedIn, Skype, and Mojang just to name a few, recently announced it will be slashing up to 9,000 jobs to invest more heavily into AI. Other corporations who are following suit include Intuit, Duolingo, UPS, Cisco, and IBM who are replacing staff to incorporate AI or are using their savings to invest in it. Other companies closer to home who are racing towards technological optimisation for its customers are Coles and Woolworths. The massive supermarket giants have recently announced trials of their 'digital revolution' in the form of the Coles Smart Trolley and Woolworths Scan&Go Trolley, allowing customers to use a small tablet to scan and bag items as they go, display in-store specials and 'product aisle locations'. This allows customers to track their spending as they shop, 'pack as you go', and simply pay the sum total at a self-serve checkout, rather than offloading at a serviced checkout. A Coles spokesman said Smart Trolley showcases Coles' commitment to delivering value and convenience to customers through innovative digital solutions. It says on the Woolworths Group webpage there will be no change to existing methods of transaction, 'including the option to be served by a team member at an assisted checkout, using the self-service check out, pick up via 'direct to boot', or online delivery'. Woolworths insists the rollout of their smart trolleys is limited, with only about 35 stores so far involved in the process, and that the grocery giant has no plans to make any changes to its staffing levels. However, the trend towards cutting back on staff at the coalface of customer service at Coles and Woolworths is obvious. There are great services Woolworths and other grocery stores provide, which support employment, with click and collect and direct to-the-boot initiatives, employing people to perform these services and Woolworths are adamant their human workforce will not be impacted by the new smart-tech trolleys. However, as these AI-powered trolleys become the status quo, the days of half a dozen or so employees "ringing up" groceries and packing them is over. New AI technologies that are developing right now can perform so many of the tasks that human labour delivers – but without the need for an hourly payrate, superannuation contributions, accumulated holiday and sick days, no maternity leave and no dispute resolution. What do all the aforementioned companies have in common, apart from technical prowess and market domination? They are all hugely profitable. Meta's estimated worth alone is $3 trillion. Microsoft $6 trillion. IBM $363.2 billion. Duolingo $24.7 billion and Woolworths is estimated at over $38 billion. One of the labour markets hit hardest by AI is entry-level occupations, usually filled with young graduates, with youth unemployment expected to trend upward drastically by 2030. This leads one to ask whether AI is really replacing humans because it is a natural progression or because companies and corporations simply choose an easy way out at the detriment of society. Where does this all leave humanity? What will happen when occupations that people have studied for, worked for, no longer cater for human labour? What is going to happen to school leavers when trying to enter the labour market but cannot, with so many entry-level jobs being replaced with AI software. Furthermore, if less hours, universal wages, and greater freedoms to pursue creative and personal goals are a part of the answer, will the millionaires and the top one per cent be allowed to remain the aristocracy? Will they be the last of their kind who can attain such wealth? The economic purists will begin deriding the assertions here that companies have always needed to adapt, develop, and invest in the ever-changing competitive market, and that AI is merely a continuance of the industrial revolution. There is room for AI to improve businesses, to run the most complex math equations and find answers in minutes rather than years, and to steer us towards finding cures for diseases. However, governments need to ensure that we are not replaced, and although work will evolve and move into areas most of us can barely imagine, the transitions need to be nuanced and positive for society, with opportunities for generations to partake in meaningful careers and undertakings. As companies begin to replace staff with AI under the guise of restructuring, there needs to be an intervention now, between government and industry, to produce guidelines to stabilise the labour force and provide initiatives for the next generation to move through school and tertiary education, in the knowledge that the world is still their oyster. Robert Weir is a freelance journalist whose work has also been published in The Spectator Australia. He enjoys writing political, lifestyle, and environmental stories as well as film reviews
Sky News AU
21 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Son of Virginia bowling billionaire cheats on wife with their four kids' former nanny, asks for divorce on Christmas Day: court papers
They're headed for a 50/50 split. The married son of a powerful Virginia bowling billionaire had a steamy affair with his kids' ex-nanny — and callously informed his wife he wanted a divorce as she held their baby on Christmas Day, bombshell court papers claim. The sordid marital strife rocking one of the Old Dominion State's most prominent families pits Rolex- and race car-loving scion Peter Goodwin, 40, against wife Cara Goodwin, a 40-year-old popular clinical psychologist. Peter — whose uber-successful dad, William Goodwin, is a former co-owner of the AMF Bowling chain, among a slew of other business mega-ventures — kicked off the pair's divorce battle when he delivered his big reveal to Cara over the 2023 holiday at their Virginia estate, according to documents obtained by The Post. Cara 'sat in front of him holding their 4-month-old daughter' as he told her they were through and fled, screaming obscenities, while the couple's other three kids watched, read the court papers filed by Cara in Albemarle County Circuit Court. Within six days of leaving his wife, the dad of four and his blond younger honey, former family nanny Annette Lombard, were romping together at the posh Four Seasons Hotel at the Surf Club in Surfside, Fla., the documents allege. Over the next few months, the illicit pair 'engaged in adulterous acts'' everywhere from Jackson Hole, Wyo., to the former couple's Palm Beach, Fla., pad, the papers say. Lombard, now 27, began working for the couple around age 21, starting in 2019 while she was an undergrad at the University of Virginia, court papers say. Beginning in the spring of 2020, Lombard lived with Peter and Cara and the kids for about a year as she cared for the children during the pandemic, according to the documents. She became so close to the kids that they referred to her as their sister, the filing says. That same year, Peter hired Lombard to also work for him at his office — and eventually promoted her to a vice president of his company. But by the end of the year, Cara told her husband of her 'growing discomfort regarding the nature of his interactions with'' Lombard, which he 'dismissed,'' the documents say. Less than two years later, in August 2023, Cara had the couple's fourth child. The next month, Peter 'began expressing strong desire for more independence and time away from his family to focus on his own self-care,'' the divorce papers say. Peter's Instagram page, under the username 'timetodrive5,' features the tagline 'just trying to keep the revs high.' It has dozens of posts of sports cars, race cars and luxury watches, and he has nearly 17,000 followers. Cara's Instagram page, meanwhile, has the username 'parentingtranslator' and says she has a PhD in child psychology. The page, which has 135,000 followers, features parenting advice, memes and research. Peter's dad, William, retired as the head of investment entities CCA Industries and the Riverstone Group, which has interests in everything from the Kiawah Island Golf Resort in South Carolina to the posh Jefferson Hotel in Richmond, Va. He has been featured in the press through the years for his philanthropic work, donating tens of millions of dollars to cancer research and to education. William was also appointed to the UVA board by former Virginia Gov. George Allen and again by ex-Gov. Bob McDonnell. His son filed for divorce from Cara in January 2025, court records show. Peter admitted to the affair in his response to Cara's allegations in her own documents. The estranged couple was hitched in 2014 and have two daughters, ages 2 and 9, and two sons, ages 5 and 7, court papers show. They have a prenup agreement. Cara is seeking half of their marital assets — including from their companies — child support and $500,000 to pay lawyers and experts as she fights the divorce case, the filings show. They currently share custody of their children after working out an agreement on that front on Feb. 27, 2024, the filing says. A rep for Cara and one for Peter separately declined to comment. Lombard did not return Post requests for comment. Peter filed a motion last month to seal the divorce case, which Cara's side is opposing. Originally published as Son of Virginia bowling billionaire cheats on wife with their four kids' former nanny, asks for divorce on Christmas Day: court papers
West Australian
2 days ago
- West Australian
THE ECONOMIST: How Artificial Intelligence could create first solo unicorn as it rewrites the startup playbook
Sarah Gwilliam is neither a software engineer nor, she confesses, does she 'speak AI'. But after her father died recently she got the spark of an idea for creating a generative artificial-intelligence startup that would help others like her handle their grief and sort out their late loved ones' affairs. Call it wedding planning for funerals. Her firm, Solace, is still more of an early-stage startup than an established business. But besides herself, almost no human being is helping her build it. She has joined an AI-powered incubator, Audos, which decided her idea was promising. Its bots helped to set her up online and on Instagram. If her idea works out, the incubator will not only provide capital; its AI agents will support Ms Gwilliam with product development, sales, marketing and back-office work, all in exchange for a royalty. She does not need staff. In effect, AI helped her co-found the company. 'I can't tell you how empowering it was,' she says. As is its custom, Silicon Valley has already adopted a neologism that describes one-person founders like Ms Gwilliam: they are 'solopreneurs'. In tech circles, there are bets on which of them is likely to create the first single-person unicorn — an unlisted firm worth more than $US1 billion. Some hope that generative AI will make starting a business so cheap and hassle-free that anyone will be able to become an entrepreneur much as anyone can become a YouTuber — a breath of fresh air in America's concentrated business landscape. Whether people like Ms Gwilliam will be able to escape the suffocating grip of the tech giants, however, is another matter. Technological revolutions have a habit of shaking up the way firms do business. The increased importance of machinery combined with the expansion of transport networks in the late 19th century led to the rise of giant corporations. Ronald Coase, a British economist, argued in his 1937 paper The Nature of the Firm that their existence was a testament to the efficiency of consolidating and managing work within the confines of a business, rather than outsourcing activities to the market. That, however, began to change with the rise of digital communications. Not only could companies more easily outsource manufacturing and back-office jobs to low-cost countries. They could also rely on internet platforms like Google for marketing and Amazon Web Services for computing. The rise of AI could well accelerate the trend, as semi-autonomous agents provided by Silicon Valley enable firms to perform the same amount of work with fewer employees. Henrik Werdelin, who co-founded Audos, says that the rise of cloud computing helped him start several new businesses over the past 20 years or so with little more than the swipe of a credit card to get going. He describes AI as the next wave in that 'democratisation'. 'You don't need to code, you don't need to be able to use Photoshop, because you can get AI to help with that.' This, he hopes, will give rise to a flood of startups built by people like Ms Gwilliam with no background in technology but who have identified real problems to solve. Another evangelist is Karim Lakhani of Harvard Business School. It now offers a leadership course for executives in which they use generative AI to build a snack-food company in 90 minutes, using the technology to perform customer research, generate recipes, find suppliers and design packaging. In a recent paper, Mr Lakhani and his co-authors presented a field trial in which 776 professionals at Procter & Gamble, a consumer-goods company, were asked to address a real business need either individually or in two-person teams, with and without using generative-AI tools. It found that AI significantly boosted performance, helping individuals with AI match the performance of teams without it. AI proved to be more of a 'teammate' than a tool. With the era of free money over, founders are eager to find ways to keep costs down. Peter Walker of Carta, which helps startups manage equity ownership, says that founders used to boast about how many employees they had. 'Now it's a badge of honour to say, 'look how few people work for me'.' According to Carta's data, the median period it takes founders to hire their first employee after their startup incorporates has risen from less than six months in 2022 to more than nine months in 2024. Base44, an AI-native coding startup, made headlines recently when it was sold to Wix, a web-development platform, for $US80 million. It had just eight employees. It is early days, of course. For one thing, AI agents are far from foolproof. In June Anthropic, an AI lab, revealed the results of an experiment in which its Claude Sonnet model operated a vending machine at the company's headquarters. The bot's goal was to avoid bankruptcy. It was good at identifying suppliers and adapting to user requests (including hunting for a tungsten cube mischievously requested by one employee). But it ignored lucrative opportunities, hallucinated, offered too many discounts and ultimately failed to make money. Other forces may also get in the way of an AI-infused surge in entrepreneurship. Despite the growth of the internet, social media, software-as-a-service and cloud computing over the past three decades, business formation in America was anaemic until the pandemic — the result in part of an ageing population. That demographic pressure will only intensify. For all the promise of generative AI, it poses problems for entrepreneurs, too. Annabelle Gawer of the University of Surrey notes that although the technology lowers barriers to entry for new businesses, it also makes it easier to quickly copy ideas. Unless a founder has unique expertise in their domain, that may make it harder to sustain a competitive advantage. Moreover, the provision of AI tools is dominated by tech giants and the labs they invest in, such as OpenAI, backed by Microsoft, and Anthropic, backed by Amazon and Google. Ms Gawer draws an analogy with the rise of cloud computing in the 2010s, which those three tech giants dominate. Although that infrastructure has made life easier for startups, it has also left them dependent on the cloud triumvirate, which has been able to capture a good share of the value these firms have generated. Last year the trio's net profits were equivalent to 7 per cent of America's total, up from 2 per cent a decade before. Another galling possibility is that the tech giants could pinch smaller companies' best ideas. For now, Ms Gwilliam of Solace is sanguine. What she calls 'first-mover disadvantage' could be 'a bummer', but it could also validate her idea. 'Maybe they'll come to me and say, 'We want Solace.' And then I'll be, like, 'Great, sold!'' Just like a typical entrepreneur, then.
