logo
How to win Trump over

How to win Trump over

Express Tribune2 days ago
Apple chief Tim Cook went straight to the point: "It's 24-karat gold... I'll take the liberty of setting it up."
"Wow," said a clearly enthralled Donald Trump, as Cook assembled a unique gift for the US president — a custom-engraved glass piece made by iPhone glassmaker Corning, set in a gold base.
The scene — which unfolded Wednesday in the Oval Office — is just one of many over-the-top efforts made by world leaders and industry titans to get in Trump's good graces.
The Republican billionaire president is known for loving all that glitters — as evidenced by the gilded revamp of his office — and also loves seeing his name in bold font.
Both of those things did not escape Cook, who is mindful of remaining friendly with a head of state known for condemning Apple for not making its iconic iPhones in the United States -- and occasionally threatening to punish the company.
Beyond promising an additional $100 billion investment in the United States, Cook also offered Trump a gleaming gift made in the USA — a glass disk produced in Kentucky and designed by a former Marine Corps corporal now working at Apple.
On a more solemn note, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet just nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize — an honor that the real estate mogul-reality television star-president believes he deserves for meditating various conflicts.
Hun Manet's letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee praised Trump's "visionary and innovative diplomacy" as well as his "historic contributions in advancing world peace."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, keen to maintain Washington's support for his government during the Gaza war, also nominated Trump, as did Pakistan. A Nobel announcement is expected in October.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Advantage China, Pakistan
Advantage China, Pakistan

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Advantage China, Pakistan

Listen to article "Virtually alone in the world, Pakistan seems to have played its cards right with President Donald Trump," says Bloomberg. The same day The New York Times published an article to explain how Indian relationship took an ugly turn with the US, under Trump. The NYT headline sums up the situation like this: "India's Modi left soul-searching after failed courtships of Xi and Trump." This was quite spectacular given India became the darling of the US in recent years as successive administrations in Washington saw New Delhi as central to its strategy to contain China. But developments of the past few months have threatened to unravel the years of investment in the relationship. Trump is unpredictable as we all know, yet few would have imagined he would publicly ridicule his "best friend" Modi. What went wrong with them? There were different explanations. But the seeds of discord were sown in September last year when Prime Minister Modi was on a visit to the US. Biden was still at the helm as lame duck President and elections were only a few months away. Trump then announced that his "great friend" Modi would join him at a public rally. But Modi never turned up. It was reported that Modi was planning to meet both Presidential candidates. However, his meeting with Kamala Harris, the Democrat candidate, was cancelled at the last minute. Modi's aide advised him not to meet Trump as this would send a wrong signal. Also, Indians thought Trump might not have great chances to make it to the White House. So, Modi played safe and bet on Kamala, who has Indian heritage. But election results proved otherwise. Trump returned to the White House with a thumping majority, sweeping swing states. Modi already knew that he rebuffed Trump's invitation. Therefore, in order to control damage, he rushed to the White House and was among the first few leaders who had a meeting with Trump. On the face of it, everything seemed fine. But discussions behind the scenes were not pleasant. According to media reports quoting Indian officials, Trump treated Modi with disdain. He pressured him to buy US weapons and oil. Modi came to the White House in order to mend ties with Trump and request him to exempt India from trade tariffs and other restrictions. But Trump in a joint press conference later dismissed those demands, termed India as the biggest exploiter in trade with the US. That was the first indication that the Howdy-Modi era was over. Back home, critics started questioning Modi's ill-timed visit to the White House. As Trump was preparing to upend the eight decades' old global trade order, another military standoff in South Asia was brewing after the April 22 Pahalgam attack. Initially, the US showed little interest, saying it was a matter between the two neighbours. When India launched missile strikes deep inside Pakistani mainland, Pakistan responded befittingly. In a matter of few minutes, Pakistan shot down 6 Indian fighter jets including the French-made Rafale. That shook the world as to how Pakistan with a weak economy and many vulnerabilities took on the bigger neighbour. The Trump administration soon began to realise that the situation was heading towards an all-out war. Then the US got directly involved and eventually brokered a ceasefire. Pakistan publicly acknowledged Trump's role while India was adamant the truce happened as a result of bilateral efforts. Pakistan's befitting response raised its profile in Washington and other western capitals. Trump, who brands himself as peacemaker, wanted to take the credit. In an unprecedented move, he invited Pakistan's Army Chief to the White House for luncheon meeting. If reports are to be believed he wanted to invite Modi too probably to arrange a meeting with General Asim Munir. Modi refused, dealing a fatal blow to their much-touted friendship. India is now scrambling to safeguard its interests. India has reached out to China for this purpose. Meanwhile, the fast changing geostrategic situation has handed great advantage to both China and Pakistan.

Trump says to move homeless people ‘far' from Washington
Trump says to move homeless people ‘far' from Washington

Business Recorder

time5 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Trump says to move homeless people ‘far' from Washington

President Donald Trump said Sunday that homeless people must be moved 'far' from Washington, after days of musing about taking federal control of the US capital where he has falsely suggested crime is rising. The Republican billionaire has announced a press conference for Monday in which he is expected to reveal his plans for Washington – which is run by the locally elected government of the District of Columbia under congressional oversight. It is an arrangement Trump has long publicly chafed at. He has threatened to federalize the city and give the White House the final say in how it is run. Trump demands new US census excluding undocumented immigrants 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' the president posted on his Truth Social platform Sunday. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital,' he continued, adding that criminals in the city would be swiftly imprisoned. 'It's all going to happen very fast,' he said. Washington is ranked 15th on a list of major US cities by homeless population, according to government statistics from last year. While thousands of people spend each night in shelters or on the streets, the figure are down from pre-pandemic levels. Earlier this week Trump also threatened to deploy the National Guard as part of a crackdown on what he falsely says is rising crime in Washington. Violent crime in the capital fell in the first half of 2025 by 26 percent compared with a year earlier, police statistics show. The city's crime rates in 2024 were already their lowest in three decades, according to figures produced by the Justice Department before Trump took office. 'We are not experiencing a crime spike,' Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said Sunday on MSNBC. While the mayor, a Democrat, was not critical of Trump in her remarks, she said 'any comparison to a war torn country is hyperbolic and false.' Trump's threat to send in the National Guard comes weeks after he deployed California's military reserve force into Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration raids, despite objections from local leaders and law enforcement. The president has frequently mused about using the military to control America's cities, many of which are under Democratic control and hostile to his nationalist impulses.

Europe pushes for Ukraine role in Trump-Putin talks
Europe pushes for Ukraine role in Trump-Putin talks

Business Recorder

time6 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Europe pushes for Ukraine role in Trump-Putin talks

BRUSSELS: European leaders pushed on Sunday for Ukraine to be a part of the negotiations between the United States and Russia, ahead of talks between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The two leaders will meet in the US state of Alaska on Friday to try to resolve the three-year war, but Europe has insisted that Kyiv and European powers should be part of any deal to end the conflict. EU foreign ministers will discuss the next steps before the talks in a meeting by video link on Monday, joined by their Ukrainian counterpart. The idea of a US-Russia meeting without Zelenskyy has raised concerns that a deal would require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory, which the EU has rejected. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain and Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a joint statement, urging Trump to put more pressure on Russia. In a flurry of diplomacy, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy held calls with 13 counterparts over three days including Kyiv's main backers Germany, Britain and France. Trump and Putin to meet to discuss Ukraine peace deal in Alaska German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Sunday said he hoped and assumed Zelenskyy will attend the leaders' summit. Top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas said any deal between the United States and Russia to end the war in Ukraine must include Kyiv and the bloc. 'President Trump is right that Russia has to end its war against Ukraine. The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously. Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security,' Kallas said. 'I will convene an extraordinary meeting of the EU foreign ministers on Monday to discuss our next steps,' she said in a statement Sunday. Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga will also take part in the meeting on Monday afternoon, the ministry said. Territory sticking point NATO head Mark Rutte told ABC's This Week broadcast on Sunday that Trump was 'putting pressure on Putin', adding: 'Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end.' Ukraine's military said on Sunday it had taken back a village in the Sumy region from the Russian army which has made significant recent gains. Kallas says any deal between US, Russia must include Ukraine and EU The village is on the frontline in the north of the country and about 20 kilometres (13 miles) west of the main fighting between the two armies in the northern region. As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. The EU's Kallas backed Kyiv's position on Sunday. 'As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: All temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine,' the EU foreign policy chief said. NATO's Rutte said it was a reality that 'Russia is controlling some of Ukrainian territory' and suggested a future deal could acknowledge this. 'When it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal, that Russia is controlling, de facto, factually, some of the territory of Ukraine. It has to be effectual recognition and not a political de jure recognition,' Rutte told ABC's This Week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store