Political Tensions Escalate As Suvendu Adhikari's Convoy Faces Attack In West Bengal's Coochbehar
The attack occurred while Adhikari was traveling to the Coochbehar Superintendent of Police's office to submit a formal deputation regarding alleged harassment of BJP workers in the district. This visit was part of his ongoing efforts to address what his party claims are systematic attacks on their supporters and local leaders in the region.
Video footage from the scene revealed Adhikari's convoy attempting to navigate through a massive Trinamool Congress protest, where party workers were prominently displaying black flags and chanting aggressive slogans. The confrontation resulted in visible damage to at least two vehicles in the convoy, including a police vehicle and the pilot car, both of which suffered shattered windshields during the altercation.
According to BJP leaders present at the scene, a large mob carrying Trinamool party flags and black flags assembled at Khagrabari crossing around 12:35 PM, strategically positioning themselves as Adhikari's convoy approached the area. The protesters reportedly engaged in hostile behavior, shouting "go back Suvendu" slogans and even resorting to throwing shoes at the BJP leader's vehicle, escalating the confrontation beyond mere verbal protests.
The BJP has directly linked this incident to a recent attack in Ghoksadanga, where a local BJP MLA's car was vandalized, suggesting a pattern of targeted violence against their party members. In response to these alleged attacks, Adhikari had previously called for a meeting with 65 BJP MLAs and had planned to directly confront the district police chief about the deteriorating law and order situation.
The Trinamool Congress, however, has vehemently denied orchestrating any attack, dismissing the entire incident as a "well-scripted drama" by the BJP. The Mamata Banerjee-led party maintains that the confrontation was politically motivated and designed to create controversy rather than being a genuine security threat.
Anticipating Adhikari's visit, the Coochbehar District Trinamool Congress had strategically announced a series of counter-programs aimed at challenging the BJP leader's presence in the area. TMC district president Abhijit De Bhowmik had declared that the party would conduct anti-NRC protests across 19 different locations throughout the district on the same day as Adhikari's visit.
These planned protests were scheduled to take place in various strategic areas including Baburhat, Ghughumari, Mathabhanga, Sitai, Changrabandha, Tufanganj, and Bhetaguri. The Trinamool Congress had mobilized thousands of supporters and positioned them at all entry points into Coochbehar until 2 PM, creating a tense atmosphere that required significant security deployment.
The widespread nature of the TMC protests and their strategic positioning at entry points suggests a coordinated effort to challenge Adhikari's movement within the district. This level of organization indicates the high political stakes involved and the intensity of the rivalry between the two parties in the region.
The incident has heightened political tensions in West Bengal, where the BJP and Trinamool Congress have been engaged in an ongoing battle for political supremacy. The attack on Adhikari's convoy represents another escalation in what both parties describe as systematic targeting by their opponents.
Local authorities deployed heavy security throughout the district in response to the planned protests and anticipated confrontations. Despite the significant police presence and the severity of the alleged attack, West Bengal Police has not yet issued any official statement regarding the incident or announced any arrests in connection with the convoy attack.
The absence of an official police response has raised questions about the handling of the situation and may contribute to further political controversy. Both parties are likely to use this incident to strengthen their respective narratives about political violence and victimization in the state.
This confrontation reflects the broader political climate in West Bengal, where tensions between the ruling Trinamool Congress and the opposition BJP continue to manifest in various forms of political conflict and street-level confrontations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shinde meets Modi, Shah, refutes suggestions of Mahayuti trouble
MUMBAI: Shiv Sena chief Eknath Shinde, who visited Delhi on Wednesday to meet prime minister Narendra Modi and home minister Amit Shah, rejected rumours that he was there to sort out his issues with his Mahayuti allies. Maharashtra's deputy chief minister said that he and his family members went to congratulate Modi on the success of Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev, and he later had a separate one-on-one meeting with him. New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde during a meeting, in New Delhi, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025. (PTI Photo)(PTI08_06_2025_000437A) (PTI) Accompanied by the Shiv Sena's MPs, Shinde also met Amit Shah. This is his third visit to the capital in the last one month amid speculation in political circles that he and his men have been cornered in the Mahayuti government. When media persons asked him if he was an indirect target of his allies, Shinde replied that his party had performed well in two elections and would also win the forthcoming local body polls. Speaking at a press conference, the politician showered fulsome praise on Modi and Shah, saying that Shah had just become the longest-serving home minister in the history of India, completing an uninterrupted term of 2,258 days. 'We met him to convey our heartfelt congratulations,' he said. Shinde called Shah's leadership 'decisive' and stated that from abrogating Article 370—thereby fulfilling the dream of Bal Thackeray—to leading Operation Mahadev against terrorism and effectively curbing Naxalism, the home minister had shown 'unwavering commitment and visionary leadership'. 'From cooperative development to national security, his contribution has been exemplary,' he gushed. The deputy CM took a snipe at the Thackeray cousins Raj and Uddhav when asked about a possible alliance between the two. 'So what will happen if the two come together?' he asked. 'People don't vote for names but for accomplishments. They don't vote for people who sit at home. Parties have a right to get into alliances but the people decide whom to vote for.' There were some questions on Thackeray attending the opposition alliance INDIA meet on August 7 but Shinde refused to answer them. The Shiv Sena chief announced that his party had extended its unconditional support to the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) for the upcoming vice-presidential election. He affirmed that his party remained one of the oldest and most trusted allies of the NDA.
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Top-secret letters by telecom providers blew lid off ‘illegal surveillance' during BRS regime
On December 6, 2023, a routine letter from a telecom service provider reached Telangana's Special Intelligence Branch (SIB) office in Hyderabad. Called a reconciliation letter in official parlance, it was marked 'top secret' and addressed to the then DIG of SIB. Just three days earlier, a new government had stormed to power in the state, with the Congress led by Revanth Reddy ousting K Chandrashekar Rao's BRS. The letter asked whether the service provider, Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, should continue legal interception or surveillance of a set of phone numbers. According to the letter, the numbers, included as an attachment, were under legal interception from November 16 to November 30, 2023 — the fortnight leading up to Assembly elections. Reconciliation letters are sent when the 15-day window of legal surveillance — or surveillance done in the interest of the state — expires and service providers need re-authorisation for another 15 days. This letter, and similar reconciliation letters for the same number of days sent by well-known private and public service providers to the SIB office, form the foundation of Telangana's case against five top police and intelligence officers and a TV channel operator, who are accused of indulging in the illegal surveillance of 600 individuals — using the state's anti-Naxal surveillance mechanisms — to benefit the BRS, The Indian Express has learnt. Those allegedly snooped on included politicians, party workers, bureaucrats, businessmen, a sitting High Court judge, as well as their spouses, drivers and even childhood friends, according to a perusal of official documents and detailed conversations with investigators. A chargesheet in the case was filed on June 8, 2024. According to investigators familiar with the probe and the chargesheet, the surveillance was carried out 'to ensure BRS's victory in the (Assembly) elections by monitoring potential political leaders of opponent parties as well as rebels in the BRS'. The reconciliation letter dated December 6, 2023, read, 'This is to inform you that during the above-mentioned period, we have received the request letters from legal interception of Mobile/IMEI/ILD numbers as per the attached details: Kindly confirm the authenticity of the said letters.' The telecom provider, Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, did not respond to queries from The Indian Express. While the mandate of the SIB, which was set up in 1990, is to track and prevent the activities of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), 'at least 600 numbers were found to be unrelated to Left Wing Extremism or the CPI (Maoist)', highly placed sources said. 'When probe agencies investigated further, they were found to be the numbers of politicians, bureaucrats, political party workers, businessmen and others from different walks of life,' a highly placed source said. The accused The accused in the case are former SIB chief and IPS officer T Prabhakar Rao, Deputy Superintendent of Police D Praneeth Rao, Additional Superintendents of Police M Thirupathanna and N Bhujanga Rao, former Superintendent of Police P Radhakishan Rao, and a TV channel owner, A Shravan Kumar Rao. While the Supreme Court had given Prabhakar Rao protection from arrest until August 5, Praneeth Rao, Thirupathanna, Bhujanga Rao and Radhakishan Rao were arrested and are out on bail. A Shravan Kumar Rao is lodged in a Central prison in Hyderabad in connection with a different case. The BRS, which was earlier called Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), was in power in the newly formed state of Telangana for 10 years starting 2014. BRS leader and two-time Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao also held the state intelligence portfolio. It was when the BRS lost elections to the Congress on December 3, 2023, that the case against the six blew open. On December 4, a day after the election results were announced, SIB chief Prabhakar Rao resigned from his official post. The very same day, allegedly on his instructions, Praneeth Rao and others destroyed 62 hard disks from the SIB office in an attempt to destroy evidence, investigators said. According to investigators, in the destroyed and formatted electronic devices, some of which were recovered from the Musi river in Hyderabad, were 'political profiles of BRS opponents generated through intelligence gathered illegally using SIB's resources or the state's resources'. Under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, surveillance in the interest of public safety, in case of a public emergency or in cases of incitement against the state is allowed with due authorisation. According to investigators, in this case, the designated authority for authorisation was Prabhakar Rao, and the review committee comprising the Chief Secretary, Secretary of the General Administration Department and the Law Secretary followed his lead. The allegations of illegal phone tapping first surfaced on March 10, 2024, when an Additional Superintendent of Police of the SIB lodged a complaint at Hyderabad's Punjagutta police station, accusing DSP Praneeth Rao of using illegal means to gather intelligence and then destroying the evidence. It was this complaint that would eventually prompt investigators to revisit the letters sent by telecom service providers with the list of those who were allegedly surveilled. According to officials, the charges against the accused include criminal conspiracy, public servants misusing their official position, causing disappearance of evidence, cyber terrorism, unauthorised and illegal surveillance and monitoring of phones, etc of targeted political leaders, their staff, family members, businessmen and their employees and bureaucrats. The counter The Indian Express reached out to all six accused in the case. Mohith Rao, advocate of M Thirupathanna, said, 'The Hyderabad police's contention that phones were intercepted and listened to is wrong. All that was obtained were legal CDRs of people linked to LWE. Also, A-1's (Prabhakar Rao's) subordinates were merely following legal orders passed to them by him.' Aakriti Jain, advocate on record for Prabhakar Rao, said that her client 'stands by the arguments in the Special Leave Petition filed in the Supreme Court'. As per this petition, he is a decorated police officer who, as SIB chief, did not indulge in illegal surveillance. On the alleged destruction of evidence, the petition read, 'The incident cannot be attributed to the petitioner, who had already vacated office hours earlier.' According to the petition, Prabhakar Rao left the SIB office at 4 pm after tendering his resignation on December 4. When contacted, Dasouju Sravan Kumar, a BRS MLC and spokesperson, said, 'Governments indulge in legal surveillance to check anti-social elements, including extremists, that too as per the law. The question of illegal surveillance or targeting of political leaders or others does not arise without the sanction of the apex committee comprising the Chief Secretary, the Home Secretary and the DGP. Unfortunately, the Hyderabad police, at the behest of the current Chief Minister, are on a futile fishing expedition which will not yield any results. They are trying to tarnish the image of the BRS leadership in the name of an investigation through an untenable and illegal SIT.'
Deccan Herald
37 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Fighting hate and other poisons
The Karnataka government has issued a 25-point Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in response to two alarming cases of water poisoning in government schools, one in Belagavi and another in Shivamogga. While both incidents raise grave concerns about child safety, the Belagavi incident is particularly sinister. Here, several students were hospitalised after a drinking water tank was poisoned in a communal plot to malign the school's Muslim headmaster and engineer his transfer. The three accused, including Sri Ram Sene leader Sagar Patil, have been remanded to judicial fact that children were targeted to further a hate-driven agenda exposes the grotesque extremes of religious fundamentalism. That the perpetrators believed they could act with such brazenness speaks of a deeper malaise: the normalisation of bigotry in politics. It is indeed concerning that when political ideologies turn into blind hatred, even innocent children are not spared. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has rightly questioned if Sri Ram Sene chief Pramod Muthalik or BJP leaders like B Y Vijayendra and R Ashoka would take responsibility for the incident. Yet, the BJP's silence has been deafening – no condemnation, no demand for a probe, no outrage. When children's lives are endangered, selective outrage is not just hypocrisy; it is government's SOP is a welcome and necessary step. Headmasters are now required to inspect school premises before classes begin, check for contamination or odour in water, and ensure water tanks are locked. Lavatories must be kept clean, first-aid kits must be maintained, and inspection details updated daily on the Students' Achievement Tracking System (SATS) portal. The Deputy Director of Public Instruction (DDPI), Block Education Officers (BEOs), and nodal officers are required to conduct regular checks. But this is not enough; the SOP will remain only on paper unless senior officers face consequences for lapses. Children should never be collateral damage in someone else's war; their lives should not be compromised, whether by poisoning, prejudice, or poor hygiene. However, the larger battle is against the ideological poison that has enabled this crime. The Belagavi incident cannot be seen as merely criminal. The accused should be prosecuted under the harshest laws. But beyond the courtroom, society must confront the hatred that fuels such violence. Politicians who stoke division, fringe groups that act with impunity, and citizens who remain indifferent are all to blame. The choice before us is clear: stand together and resist this toxic agenda or remain passive as hatred corrodes the very fabric of our society.
