
US Prices Continued Rise in July as Trump Tariffs Impact Consumer Costs
Prices were 2.7 percent higher last month compared with a year ago, according to the consumer price index, which measures the prices of a basket of goods and services. Though inflation dipped down in the spring, the annualised inflation rate jumped up 0.4 percent since April.
Though the inflation rate stayed stable between June and July, core inflation, which excludes the volatile energy and food industries, went up 3.1 percent over the last month — a higher pace than what was seen in June.
The report is the latest to show that the US economy is experiencing some turbulence from Trump's unparalleled shakeup of US trading policy, despite insistence from Republicans that the economy is 'firing on all cylinders.'
On top of a 10 percent universal tariff on all imports, Trump has set higher tariffs for dozens of countries, including the US's top trading partners. On Monday, hours before a midnight deadline, Trump delayed enacting steep tariffs on China for another 90 days while negotiations continue.
Although many of these tariffs only went into effect 7 August, Trump's 10 percent universal tariff, along with higher tariffs on certain industries like steel and aluminium, have been in effect since the spring.
Economists say that it takes time for tariffs to show up in consumer prices. Some retailers have been stocking up their inventory to delay the impact of tariffs and keep prices stable. But the jump in prices suggests that companies have started to pass down costs to customers, as leaders of companies like Walmart, Nike and Macy's have said would happen.
Tariffs have also hit the labor market harder than economists had anticipated. Data released earlier this month dramatically revised down job figures that initially showed a healthy job market. The government had reported 291,000 jobs were added to the economy in May and June, but the revision brought the total down to 33,000.
The increase in prices and the shrinking labor market has thrown the US Federal Reserve into a tight spot. The Fed's twin mandate is to maximise employment while keeping inflation in check.
Trump has lambasted the central bank, arguing it needs to cut rates interest rates in order to spur growth. But Fed officials have refrained from a rate adjustment, citing uncertainty about the impact of Trump's tariffs on prices.
Trump has spent the last few months directing his ire at economic officials — first at the Fed, and now at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which collects and reports economic data.
The White House cut BLS's budget, which has forced the agency to downsize its data collection and could ultimately impact the accuracy of its data on pricing and the labor market.
Just hours after July's job figures report showed a sluggish month of job growth, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of BLS. Citing no evidence, Trump claimed that the job figures 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' The move has alarmed some economists who said the move undermines the credibility of the institution.
By Lauren Aratani
Learn more:
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
The latest US inflation data, covering the weeks after the Trump administration's tariffs kicked in, shows prices for clothing declined at their fastest pace in years. Consumers shouldn't get complacent though — many experts say sticker shock is still coming.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump to Hold Off Hiking China Tariffs Over Russia Oil Purchases
US President Donald Trump said he will hold off on raising tariffs on Chinese goods over the country's purchases of Russian oil, citing progress he said was made with Vladimir Putin toward ending the war in Ukraine. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump said Friday in a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity after his summit with Putin. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.'
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street Joins Consumer Advocates to Call for Edit to GENIUS Act on Stablecoins
Wall Street bankers are hammering away at some provisions of the new U.S. stablecoin law that was hailed by President Donald Trump and the crypto sector as a huge first step toward establishing a fully regulated U.S. industry, and the banks are joined by unusual bedfellows from the consumer-advocate world in sounding alarms. Hoping to revise and cut provisions that might threaten aspects of the current financial system, the American Bankers Association and other bank lobbying groups aligned in a letter this week with Americans for Financial Reform — usually a staunch opponent of Wall Street's policy aims — and the National Consumer Law Center. One provision of the stablecoin law known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act lets a stablecoin-issuing subsidiary of a state-chartered uninsured depository institution run money-transmission and custody services nationwide, which the bankers argue bypasses existing state licensing and oversight. Their letter asked several key U.S. senators to insist that whole section be erased entirely. "Ignoring state law in this regard invites regulatory arbitrage, allowing certain uninsured depository institutions special privileges to operate across state lines as federally insured banks currently do, but without the panoply of regulatory and supervisory requirements, or limitations on preemption applicable to those institutions," the August 13 letter argued. The bank lobbyists, also cooperated in a separate effort to protect deposits and other core aspects of their businesses from the GENIUS Act, arguing in another letter to lawmakers this week that the law leaves an opening for crypto firms to offer returns on stablecoins. While the law bans stablecoin issuers themselves from offering interest or yield, it doesn't stop the issuers' affiliates or exchanges from doing so indirectly. The bankers fear a massive loss of deposits and money-market fund activity from the resulting rivalry stablecoins might offer. "Congress must protect the flow of credit to American businesses and families and the stability of the most important financial market by closing the stablecoin payment of interest loophole," according to the groups, including the ABA, Bank Policy Institute, Financial Services Forum and others. Banks turn deposits into loans, so the lack of deposits threatens necessary U.S. lending. Faryar Shirzad, the chief policy officer at U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase, criticized the banks' position in postings on social media site X. "Congress shouldn't be in the business of passing legislation that takes away consumer choice and the opportunity for the average person to earn returns on their hard-earned dollars," he wrote, additionally arguing that the $6 trillion figure on what desposits may be at stake is overblown. "Let's play along for a second," Shirzad added. "If customers really would move $6T away from banks into stablecoins, what does that say about what value consumers feel like they're getting from their banks?" The GENIUS Act was signed into law by President Trump, but the bigger and more complex legislation to regulate U.S. crypto markets is still pending. That future bill, which already passed the House of Representatives as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, could still overhaul provisions of the stablecoin law, even before that new law is converted into rules by the U.S. financial regulators. That's what the bankers are advocating, alongside their temporary customer-advocate allies. Adds comment from Coinbase's Faryar Shirzad. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Key for Fed Is Retaining Inflation-Fighting Credibility: Misra
JPMorgan Asset Management Core Plus Bond ETF Portfolio Manager Priya Misra believes if the Fed starts the process of cutting rates based on data, inflation forecasts and where the expectations are leading, they will retain their inflation-fighting credibility. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data