AI systems from Google and OpenAI soar at global maths competition
To OpenAI researchers, it is another clear sign AI models can command extensive reasoning capabilities that could expand into areas beyond maths.
The optimism is shared by Google researchers, who believe AI models' capabilities can apply to research quandaries in other fields such as physics, said Jung, who won an IMO gold medal as a student in 2003.
Of the 630 students participating in the 66th IMO on the Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia, 67 contestants, or about 11%, achieved gold medal scores. Google's DeepMind AI unit last year achieved a silver medal score using AI systems specialised for maths. This year, Google used a general-purpose model called Gemini Deep Think, a version of which was previously unveiled at its annual developer conference in May.
Unlike previous AI attempts that relied on formal languages and lengthy computation, Google's approach this year operated entirely in natural language and solved the problems within the official 4.5-hour time limit, the company said in a blog post. OpenAI, which has its own set of reasoning models, similarly built an experimental version for the competition, according to a post by researcher Alexander Wei on social media platform X. He noted the company does not plan to release anything with this level of maths capability for several months.
This year marked the first time the competition coordinated officially with some AI developers, who have for years used prominent maths competitions such as IMO to test model capabilities. IMO judges certified the results of the companies, including Google, and asked them to publish results on July 28.
"We respected the IMO board's original request that all AI labs share their results only after the official results had been verified by independent experts and the students had rightly received the acclamation they deserved," Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis said on X on Monday.
OpenAI, which published its results on Saturday and first claimed gold medal status, said in an interview it had permission from an IMO board member to do so after the closing ceremony on Saturday.
The competition on Monday allowed cooperating companies to publish results, said Gregor Dolinar, president of IMO's board.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
5 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
The silent thief: AI exploits creators under the guise of innovation
As we ride the wave of technological advancement, we must ensure that innovation does not come at the cost of exploitation. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to astonish the world with its capabilities, from writing articles and generating images to composing music and producing reports, there is an urgent, overlooked reality that demands our attention — the silent, systematic exploitation of intellectual property by AI systems. While society celebrates innovation, many creators remain muted, their voices drowned out by the roar of technological progress. Their books, music, artwork and more are being used to train machine learning models; the data informs the patterns the algorithms learn, often without the creators' consent, credit or compensation. Behind the promise of technological advancement is a quiet but pervasive form of abuse: AI masquerades as innovation. The legal, ethical and cultural implications of AI unchecked require urgent policy responses. Generative AI systems, such as large language models (LLMs) and image generators, rely on data, much of which is derived from human-created books, articles and artworks. Most of these systems are trained on large datasets containing copyright content scraped from the internet, including subscription-based platforms and pirated sources. Although this is done under the legal doctrine of 'fair use', which is peculiar to the United States, the fairness of that usage is indeed questionable. When a creator's life work is repurposed to drive a billion dollar AI enterprise without their awareness or permission, this raises serious concerns of intellectual property (copyright) infringement. Recent legal battles in the US have brought this issue to the forefront. Authors, including David Baldacci and John Grisham, have acted against OpenAI for using their books in training datasets. The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI copied their works wholesale, without permission. As of now, the case remains unresolved, but it has already sparked global debate about ownership, consent, and compensation in the AI era. It is commendable that countries in the European Union have resorted to making use of the 'Opt-in' system. The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is a prime example of the opt-in consent regime. The DPR requires a data subject's consent to be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous. It is a framework that contrasts sharply with the 'opt-out' model, which treats silence as consent (European Commission, 2023). The EU's approach affirms the creator's right to decide how their work is used. This model offers a compelling blueprint that African countries should seriously consider adopting. Africa's creative industries, from our musicians and poets to fashion designers and filmmakers are unique and increasingly recognised on the global stage. Yet, they remain underprotected. We lack comprehensive AI policies, and enforcement of our copyright laws is weak. If we do not act now, our artists' voices may be digitised, globalised and monetised without them ever knowing or benefiting. We must demand and get involved in making sure that AI systems trained on African content ensure transparency, compensation and consent. Our lawmakers should champion an 'opt-in' regime that aligns with ethical standards being proposed in other parts of the world. If African creativity is valuable enough to train billion-dollar platforms, then it is valuable enough to protect. This issue is not only legal, it is ethical. Creativity is not merely data. Every poem, painting or photograph represents hours of human thought, feeling and labour. To treat such expressions as mere raw material for machines, without recognition or reward, is to devalue the soul of human creativity. Africa, often excluded from global intellectual property conversations, must not remain silent. Our policymakers must strengthen copyright laws, create ethical frameworks for AI development and prevent the exploitation of African content by international tech firms. To strike a balance between AI innovation and intellectual property protection, clear legal frameworks that promote responsible AI development while safeguarding creators' rights must be developed. This includes transparent licencing systems such as opt-in or opt-out mechanisms for the use of copyrighted content in training datasets; mandating disclosure of data sources; and creating fair compensation models for creators. Yes, AI can empower us but only if it respects the very people who make creativity possible. As we ride the wave of technological advancement, we must ensure that innovation does not come at the cost of exploitation. Rachelle Anesu Chaminuka is a legal professional with expertise in entrepreneurship and intellectual property.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Consumer take-home pay holds steady amid inflation and economic uncertainty
Consumer take-home pay, tracked in the BankservAfrica Take-home Pay Index (BTPI), held steady in June 2025, after three months of moderation, due to the favourable inflation rate and expectations of an interest rate cut on July 31. Image: IOL / AI Consumer take-home pay, tracked in the BankservAfrica Take-home Pay Index (BTPI), held steady in June 2025, after three months of moderation, due to the favourable inflation rate and expectations of an interest rate cut. However, while average salaries might increase by 5% this year based on current conditions, future earnings and unemployment levels may be adversely impacted by external factors impacting on the economy, an economist has warned. 'The nominal average take-home pay of R17 310 in June 2025 declined marginally by 0.1% on May's R17 325. However, it was still well above the R15 514 level a year earlier,' said BankservAfrica's Head of Stakeholder Engagements Shergeran Naidoo. He said the economic outlook had deteriorated in recent months even though the first six months of data from the index signaled that 2025 would, on average, be a good salary year. Inflation adjusted take-home pay moderated marginally by 0.2% month-on-month to R14 804 in June, compared to R14 827 in May, but was still notably up on year-ago levels. 'The significant moderation in consumer inflation in 2024 has had a positive impact on the purchasing power of salary earners and the scenario continues into 2025, with the latest headline CPI figure at only 3% for June 2025,' said Independent Economist Elize Kruger. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading After challenging years for salary earners, due to the sluggish local economy and the elevated inflation rate, 2024 turned out to be the best year since 2015, with an average real salary increase of 1.5%. 'With inflation forecast to average 3.5% in 2025 - unlike 4.4% in 2024 – and the broader industry suggesting an average salary increase above 5%, 2025 will be the second consecutive year of a real increase in earnings,' said Kruger. She said the favourable inflation environment had created ample scope for the South Africa Reserve Bank to cut interest rates further, in addition to supporting salary earners' consumption expenditure and softening the impact of global headwinds on the local economy. 'Carpe Diem Research Services forecasts a 25 basis percentage points cut at the Monetary Policy Committee meeting tomorrow, July 31, 2025,' said Kruger. She said this was likely to be the final cut in the current downward cycle. She said that even though 2025 had turned out to be a volatile year so far, real consumption expenditure had held up well, which was encouraging for an economy heavily reliant on consumer spending. 'Even with confidence levels slipping in the first quarter, the level of real final consumption expenditure by households was 2.8% higher compared to a year earlier. Early indications from StatsSA indicate that the performance continued in the second quarter, with real retail sales in the first five months of the year up by 4.3%,' she said. However, there had been downward revisions to growth prospects - locally and globally - and high levels of uncertainty, fueling low confidence and a pause on investment decisions. 'This could affect employment levels and earnings in the coming months, in an economy with an already high unemployment rate of 32.9%,' said Kruger. Additionally, tensions between the US and South Africa, coupled with uncertainty over the tariff landscape beyond August 1, presented a growing concern for the economy and its trade outlook, she said. Visit:
Mail & Guardian
a day ago
- Mail & Guardian
AI didn't kill writing — we did
(Graphic: John McCann/M&G) Being a grammar snob is so 2012 but I'm probably not alone in this one. Seeing the em dash (—) go mainstream wasn't on the cards for many years. But now, it's everywhere, tucked into every second article, LinkedIn sermon and long-form X post that wants to sound groundbreaking but falls flat. It wasn't always like this. Outside of yellowing novel pages, em dashes, especially those without spaces on either side, were prevalent in prestige American texts. They belonged in literary-leaning publications like The Atlantic, Vanity Fair, The New York Times, Pitchfork… publications with writers and editors who know how to break rhythm with elegance for a readership that gets it. Now the em dash has gone corporate. The issue is not that it's going mainstream, but how it's being used. Blame the machine It's ChatGPT's fault. And that of all other large language models (LLMs) like Google's Gemini and Elon Musk's Grok. For better or worse, LLMs are widely used in writing today. But, while they can assist, most LLM-generated text lacks that personal touch. It reads broad and glossy. Emotionally neutral and safe. You can often tell when a piece of writing has been LLM generated, not just by its tone, but by its punctuation. The em dash appears like a glitch in the code, levitating where a comma, semicolon, colon or even just a space would've worked better. It's like narrative duct tape — functional but overused. And yet, humans are letting it slide. Or worse, they are copying the style without realising why. The popularity of AI in SA ChatGPT is the fifth-most visited website in South Africa, after Google, YouTube, Facebook and, sadly, Hollywoodbets. Globally, it received 4.7 billion visits in April alone, up 51% from just two months earlier. In the AI search space, ChatGPT now commands over 80% of the traffic. People are using it to write everything from school essays to corporate blogs and press releases. Financial challenges, rife in the media space all over the world, are pushing publications to quietly consider the use of AI-generated articles. I've heard the whispers and read the actual texts. One never knows the prompts people are feeding LLMs, but the output speaks volumes. Whole articles, captions and bios that sound templated. You can feel the generic thrum of machine-generated rhythm. Deeper than punctuation To me, as an emerging writer in the 2010s, the em dash was aspirational. My Lenovo didn't have the symbol on the keyboard, but my Mac made it easier, though still a two-key job. In my delusions, I felt the em dash elevated my writing and set it apart because em dashes were never common in South African writing. Echoing the New York Times style I admired, I'd open with anecdotal leads and pepper the body with em dashes, only to have them stripped out by sub-editors and replaced with spaced hyphens, en dashes or colons and commas. But today, it's a different story. This isn't to say an em dash is a sign of LLM-generated text. But in a South African text, it does make you pause. There are times when it's the only punctuation that truly works for cutting across a thought, or surprising the reader, but when you start seeing it everywhere, it becomes suspicious. And points not just to laziness, but no care. LLMs aren't writers. They're tools. With access to nearly the entire internet, they're brilliant at research, summarising, organising thoughts and even giving technical feedback. But relying on LLMs to write for you, no edits, no effort, is the plastic surgery of writing. 'Basically, AI is a very fancy autocomplete,' It generates responses by predicting the most likely next word based on training data, not by truly understanding meaning. Which means, if you are going to use it, edit. Start with the punctuation then move on to the other tells. First, the clause trio, a rhythm AI loves: three short, punchy phrases or words. Those are usually used to punctuate the 'it's not just …, it's a …' structured sentence. Next, the Oxford comma, a largely American habit, now cropping up in every other LinkedIn post and amapiano press release. Then there's the overly measured tone — serious, but generic. Works best for motivational speakers and, eh, life coaches. Even when humans write this way without the use of AI, sadly, the work just reads … suspect. So what now? Write like a human? Writers are starting to worry. There have been cases where AI filters flag human work as machine-written. X users told one writer to ditch the em dashes, colons and semi-colons altogether. It's Editors already have a list of blacklisted phrases. Now, that list includes the punctuation marks and indicators mentioned above — or your work may be dismissed as synthetic. Worse, when Which brings us to a bigger question: what is AI doing to writing? Experts argue that, outside the generic sentence-stitching, relying on LLMs is detrimental to our thinking and reasoning capacity. 'It turns you from an active seeker of information into a passive consumer of information and I don't know if, in the long term, that is a good shift for us to be making,' says Celia Ford, an American science journalist, in Ford admits that, through technological tools, humans have been doing a lot of 'cognitive off-loading'. She mentions calendar reminders, GPS and even the idea of writing stuff down instead of memorising it. But, there's a caveat. 'When we let LLMs write essays or code for us,' she says, 'we are giving up something that feels, at least to me, pretty central to humanness; critical thinking and creativity, and we are risking letting these tools think for us, instead of aiding us in our own thinking.' Always invite AI to the table However, despite the concerns, the fact is AI is not going anywhere. It may be bad for the environment, but so are fossil fuels and many other technologies we can't live without. In an era when publications are understaffed, leading to minimal time spent on editing drafts, I can't imagine working without Grammarly, which is still a form of AI. It doesn't write, it's not generative like LLMs, it assists, it refines what you've already put on the page. But sometimes it can suck the soul out of your writing. That's when the human brain should take over. But, overall, it helps improve the quality of your draft. Refusing to use AI at all, as noble as it might be, is backward and somewhat masochistic, but also on-brand for humans. All new technologies get criticised by purists. Guns were once seen as cowardly in combat. Cars were dismissed as loud and dangerous by horse riders. Even typewriters were accused of ruining handwriting. How about digitally produced music? We've come a long way. Mollick gets it. 'We have never built a generally applicable technology that can boost our intelligence,' he writes. 'Now humans have access to a tool that can emulate how we think and write, acting as a co‑intelligence to improve (or replace) our work.' He's not afraid of collaboration, however, and he embraces the machine and encourages us to do the same: 'Always invite AI to the table.' 'In field after field,' he writes, 'a human working with an AI co‑intelligence outperforms all but the best humans working without an AI.' Tech changes every art form Technology has transformed all major art forms. In electronic music, computers gave us hi-hats that rattle faster than any drummer could ever play, creating a texture musicians weren't familiar with. What is the world without trap music and EDM? In the 16th century, the camera obscura projected scenes onto a canvas, allowing artists to trace subjects, leading to more immersive art. CGI has made entire universes possible. Marvel's billion-dollar empire couldn't exist without it. Mark Zuckerberg recently said most Meta code will be handled by AI going forward. 'It can run tests, it can find issues, it will write higher quality code than the average very good person on the team already,' Zuck said in a podcast interview with Dwarkesh Patel. Writing: What will AI bring? Maybe speed. Maybe a new kind of prose. Hopefully not just more em dashes in your feed, but a deeper shift in how we think on the page. That's only possible if the human stays in control. If we surrender the process completely, what's left is not writing, just passive copy and paste. But there are more efficient ways to use LLMs. 'It's not that the LLM is giving me the answers,' said David Perell in his visual essay The Ultimate Guide to Writing with AI, 'it's that the LLM is helping me ask good questions … like shining a spotlight in different corners of my brain and helping me find treasure boxes of insight I would've never found on my own.' Stacy Schiff, biographer of There are lines. Where they are drawn is deeply subjective. But, seeing no line at all should be collectively condemned.
