Trump Tariffs Threaten to Pile More Pain on Thailand's Rice Sector
orkers load milled rice into a sack before distribution to exporters at a rice mill, as Thai rice farmers face pressure following the imposition of tariffs, which are currently paused, by U.S. President Donald Trump, in Nakhon Pathom province, Thailand, April 18, 2025.
NAKHON PATHOM, Thailand, April 23 (Reuters) – Thai farmer Daeng Donsingha was already worried for her family of nine when rice prices in the world's second-largest exporter of the staple crashed this year after India resumed exports.
Now, she's also fretting over the tariffs unleashed by U.S. President Donald Trump, which could slash demand for Thai rice in its most valuable foreign market and create turmoil in an export industry worth billions of dollars.
'The problem is that the price of rice is very low, while other costs such as fertilisers and farmland rent is higher,' the 70-year-old farmer said, after selling her harvest at a rice mill in central Thailand. 'I'm losing money.'
Thailand is among Southeast Asian nations hardest hit by Trump's proposed measures, facing a 36% tariff on goods unless ongoing negotiations are successful before the U.S president's moratorium on the tariffs ends in July.
'If the U.S. imposes the tariff, our jasmine rice will be too expensive to compete,' said Chookiat Ophaswongse, honorary president of the Thai Rice Exporters Association.
Last year, Thailand shipped 849,000 metric tones of rice to the United States, mainly of its most expensive fragrant jasmine variety, worth 28.03 billion baht ($735 million), according to the association.
In all, Thailand exported 9.94 million tons of rice in 2024, worth 225.65 billion baht ($6.82 billion), with the U.S. as its third-largest market by volume, but most lucrative.
Potential U.S. tariffs would stall exports and hand the advantage to Thailand's main regional competitors, like Vietnam, where prices are significantly lower, said Chookiat, whose association is targeting exports of 7.5 million tons this year.
'From $1,000 per ton, the price would rise to $1,400 to $1,500,' he said. 'Importers will shift to Vietnamese jasmine rice, which is only $580 per tonne.'
Rice from Vietnam is cheaper because production costs are lower, farmers grow different varieties of the crop and bring in multiple harvests.
'WON'T SURVIVE'
Farmers in Thailand, Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, have already been on edge because of a 30% drop in domestic prices after India resumed exports in September. The country accounted for 40% of world rice exports in 2022 before the ban was introduced.
Analysts say there is no room for Thailand to cut prices to compete.
'Our production costs are high, while our yield is low,' said Somporn Isvilanonda, an independent agricultural economist. 'If we dump prices, farmers won't survive.'
The industry and farmers are pinning their hopes on negotiations between a Thai delegation led by Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira and the United States.
Rice shipments, however, are already sliding. Overall exports fell 30% in the first quarter as countries delayed buying decisions and India's return boosted supply, according to the exporters association, forecasting a similar decline over the next three months.
The concessions Thailand is proposing to counter Trump, including bringing tariffs of U.S corn down from 73% to zero, would also hurt Thai farmers, according to industry groups.
A flood of cheap imported corn could further depress prices of broken rice and rice bran, which are extracted during rice milling and used in animal feed, said Banjong Tangchitwattanakul, President of the Rice Millers Association.
On April 8, four farm groups, including rice millers, petitioned the government to block imports of U.S. corn and soybean meal, arguing they would squeeze prices of domestic crops for animal feed, according to a copy of the letter seen by Reuters.
The government has pledged that any concession it makes in negotiations with the United States will not undermine domestic industries.
But for farmers like Daeng, decisions made halfway across the world could jeopardise her livelihood.
'My children have been following the news,' she said, 'They were telling me that 'we won't be able to survive, mum, if things go ahead like this.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
17 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Trump opens door to sales of version of Nvidia's next-gen AI chips in China
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested he might allow Nvidia to sell a scaled-down version of its next-generation advanced graphics processing unit chip in China, despite deep-seated fears in Washington that Beijing could harness U.S. artificial intelligence capabilities to supercharge its military. The move could open the door to China securing more advanced computing power from the U.S. even as the two countries battled for technology supremacy, critics said. "Jensen (Huang, Nvidia CEO) also has the new chip, the Blackwell. A somewhat enhanced-in-a-negative-way Blackwell. In other words, take 30% to 50% off of it," Trump told reporters in an apparent reference to slashing the chip's computing power. "I think he's coming to see me again about that, but that will be an unenhanced version of the big one," he added. Earlier, the Trump administration confirmed an unprecedented deal with Nvidia and AMD to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales of some advanced chips in China. The move sent shivers across Washington, where China hawks of both parties have long sought to keep Beijing generations behind U.S. AI technology. "Even with scaled-down versions of flagship Nvidia (chips), China could spend and buy enough of them to build world-leading, frontier-scale AI supercomputers," said Saif Khan, a former director of technology and national security at the White House National Security Council under former President Joe Biden, who heavily restricted U.S. AI chip exports abroad. "This could directly lead to China leapfrogging America in AI capabilities.' It was reported in May that Nvidia was preparing a new chip for China that was a variant of its most recent state-of-the-art AI Blackwell chips at a significantly lower cost. Nvidia has not disclosed the existence of the chip, or its capabilities compared with its U.S. offerings. But the flagship U.S. version of the Blackwell chip, which Nvidia unveiled in March, is up to 30 times faster than its predecessor. Trump on Monday defended the agreement calling for Nvidia and AMD to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from their China sales, after his administration green-lighted exports to China of less advanced AI chips known as the H20 last month. The Trump administration halted sales of Nvidia's H20 chips to China in April, but the company said last month it had won clearance to resume shipments and hoped to start deliveries soon. "The H20 is obsolete," Trump said on Monday, arguing China already had it. "So I said, 'Listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country.'" The deal is extremely rare for the United States and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding the resignation of Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, over his ties to Chinese companies. The U.S. Commerce Department has started issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China, a U.S. official said on Friday. Washington does not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips compromises national security, a second U.S. official said on Sunday. The second official did not know when or how the agreement with the chip companies would be implemented but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenue to the U.S., a company spokesperson said, "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," the spokesperson added. A spokesperson for AMD said the U.S. approved its applications to export some AI processors to China, but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all U.S. export controls. China's foreign ministry said the country has repeatedly stated its position on U.S. chip exports. The ministry has previously accused Washington of using technology and trade measures to "maliciously contain and suppress China."
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Nikkei Stock Average Share Gauge Hits New Record High
TOKYO, Aug 12 (Reuters) – Japan's Nikkei share gauge .N225 climbed to a record high on Tuesday, following similar feats this year by other global markets. The Nikkei 225 rose as much as 2.1% to 42,689.74 in early trade, exceeding the previous high of 42,426.77 set on July 11, 2024. In a roller-coaster ride in 2024, the Nikkei had exceeded a record that had stood since 1989 during Japan's bubble economy. Japan's broader Topix .TOPX has been setting successive record highs since July 24 and also scored a new all-time high on Tuesday. The U.S. Standard & Poor's 500 .SPX and MSCI's broadest gauge of global equities .MIWD00000PUS have been charting new peaks since June. Global equities tumbled after U.S. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement of sweeping tariffs on imports from dozens of countries into the U.S. Shares have since more than recouped those losses as trade concerns abated and enthusiasm over artificial intelligence companies soared.
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Trump takes over D.C. police and deploys national guard in Washington
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 national guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city's police department, an extraordinary assertion of presidential power in the nation's capital. Trump's move, which bypassed the city's elected leaders, was emblematic of his second-term approach, which has seen him wield executive authority in ways with little precedent in modern U.S. history and in defiance of political norms. The president cast his actions as necessary to "rescue" Washington from a purported wave of lawlessness. Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since. "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," Trump told a news conference at the White House. It is the second time this summer that the Republican president has deployed troops to a Democratically governed city. A federal trial began on Monday in San Francisco on whether Trump violated U.S. law by deploying national guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. And Trump signaled that other major U.S. cities with Democratic leadership could be next, including Chicago, a city that has long been beset by violent crime, although it was down significantly in the first half of the year. "If we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster," Trump said at the White House, adding, "Hopefully LA is watching." During Trump's election campaign, his law and order platform often had racial undertones. He singled out majority Democratic cities like Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — all cities with large Black populations — when he spoke about rampant crime in urban areas. Hundreds of officers and agents from more than a dozen federal agencies have fanned out across Washington in recent days. Attorney General Pam Bondi will oversee the police force, Trump said. The U.S. Army said the national guard troops would carry out a number of tasks, including "administrative, logistics and physical presence in support of law enforcement." Between 100 and 200 of the troops would be supporting law enforcement at any given time. The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, noting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, soared in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities. However, violent crime dropped 35% in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26% in the first seven months of 2025, according to city police. Bowser struck a diplomatic tone at a news conference, saying she and other members of her administration would work with the federal government, even as she again rejected Trump's claim of widespread crime. While Bowser said the law appeared to give the president broad power to take temporary control of the police force, the city's attorney general, Brian Schwalb, earlier called Trump's actions "unlawful" and said his office was "considering all of our options." Over the past week, Trump has intensified his messaging, suggesting he might attempt to strip the city of its local autonomy and implement a full federal takeover. The District of Columbia operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council. Trump on Monday invoked a section of the act that allows the president to take over the police force for 30 days when "emergency" conditions exist. Trump said he was declaring a "public safety emergency" in the city. Trump's own Federal Emergency Management Agency is cutting security funding for the National Capital Region, an area that includes Washington and parts of Maryland and Virginia. The region will receive $20 million less this year from the federal urban security fund, amounting to a 44% year-on-year cut. Trump also vowed to remove homeless encampments, without providing details on how or where homeless people would be moved. The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, as President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, advocates for the homeless said. The president has broad authority over the 2,700 members of the D.C. National Guard, unlike in states where governors typically hold the power to activate troops. Guard troops have been dispatched to Washington many times, including in response to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters, and during 2020 protests over police brutality.
