Pubs and restaurants are ‘under threat' after Labour's tax hikes — with a third now running at a loss
LAST ORDERS Pubs and restaurants are 'under threat' after Labour's tax hikes — with a third now running at a loss
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
PUBS and restaurants are being driven into the ground by Labour's tax hikes - with a THIRD now operating at a loss.
A damning industry survey reveals the number of boozers at risk of closure has increased 11 per cent in the last three months.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
Landlords are now warning punters that putting up drink prices is the only way they can survive.
The average price of a pint has already soared to £5.17 in Britain, and The Sun's Save Our Sups campaign is calling for more support for the countries' embattled locals.
In a rare joint intervention, four trade bodies have come together today to warn hospitality is 'under threat' due to April's National Insurance rises and Business Rates whack.
They are demanding urgent relief for the pub and restaurant sector which they claim was saddled with £3.4billion extra costs.
As well as a third of bosses disclosing they are in the red, their survey also revealed six in 10 have been forced to cut staff to save money.
Sounding the alarm are UK Hospitality, the British Beer and Pub Association, the British Institute of Innkeeping and Hospitality Ulster.
They said: 'Hospitality is vital to the UK economy but is under threat from ongoing costs rises, which the April increases have only exacerbated.
'Jobs are being lost, livelihoods under threat, communities set to lose precious assets, and consumers are experiencing price rises when wallets are already feeling the pinch.'
Meanwhile, a separate report showed private sector activity is at its weakest since 2022.
The Confederation of British Industry also blamed Rachel Reeves' £25billion NICs hikes for hurting businesses.
Locals Heartbroken as Auchenmalg's Only Pub, The Cock Inn, Closes Down
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Huge closing down sale for prestigious jewellers shutting after 165 years
SHUTTING UP Huge closing down sale for prestigious jewellers shutting after 165 years Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) IT's the end of an era for one of Scarborough's most prestigious stores, which is set to shut after 165 years. Bright & Sons jewellers on St Nicholas Street has been a Scarborough fixture for generations. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Bright & Sons kept its Sheffield ties by joining with jewellers H. L. Brown in 1957 Credit: Bright & Sons 3 The closure comes after many other well-known names have vanished from the high street Families have passed through its Victorian doors to mark engagements, weddings, anniversaries and christenings. But after struggling with tough trading conditions and refusing to compromise on quality and service, the jeweller will close its doors for good at the end of October. A huge closing-down sale has now begun, with stock including new and antique jewellery, watches, rings, necklaces and keepsakes available at reduced prices. Shoppers can also find selected pieces online, with the sale offering a last chance to pick up a bargain while saying farewell to a store that has been part of Scarborough life for more than a century. Bright & Sons has a proud history stretching back to 1859, when founders Frederick and Herbert Bright moved from Sheffield to open the business. The link with Sheffield remained strong when the store joined forces with jewellers H. L. Brown in 1957. 'It is very much a sad goodbye,' said Kerri Amos, at parent company H. L. Brown in Sheffield. 'We know the community in Scarborough will feel it and all of us here in Sheffield are feeling it too.' Over the years, Bright & Sons has been known for its personal service and high-quality pieces, with many of its staff staying for decades. Store Closures Sweep Across the US – How Will It Impact Your Shopping Experience One of its most famous commissions came in 1897, when the jewellers created a ceremonial chain for the Mayoress of Scarborough to mark Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee. Director of H. L. Brown, Richard Pool, based at Barbara Cattle jewellers in York, said customers would be given a warm welcome there after the Scarborough shop closes. Many loyal shoppers already make the trip to York, keeping the historic link alive. The closure follows a string of well-known names disappearing from the high street. In Grimsby, G Hewitt & Son jewellers shut earlier this year after 154 years, launching a huge farewell sale before finally closing its doors. Budget giant Poundland has also been shutting shops at pace, with 68 stores set to go by mid-October. Several Birmingham branches have already gone, including Kings Heath, Sheldon and Erdington, with bargain hunters offered up to 75 per cent off stock before shutters came down. Wilko collapsed last year, forcing hundreds of stores to close, while chains like M&Co and Paperchase also vanished from town centres across the country. Boots has announced plans to shut 300 shops, Iceland has been closing branches, and even fashion favourite Topshop disappeared after being bought out by ASOS. House of Fraser has shrunk its empire year after year, Debenhams vanished from the high street in 2021, and Marks & Spencer has confirmed more closures as it reshapes its business. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April. A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024. Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aggressive job cuts fuelled by Reeves £25bn NI tax raid: Employers cut staff for 11 months in a row
Britain's private sector employers have been cutting jobs for 11 months in a row in the latest evidence of the damaging impact of Labour's £25billion employer national insurance raid. A closely-watched business survey by financial firm S&P Global showed job numbers were being reduced 'at an aggressive rate' in August. 'Employment was again a weak spot as total workforce numbers decreased for the 11th month running and at a marked pace,' the report said. Separate data showed the number of new job postings fell in July after firms 'took a kicking' from last autumn's Budget. Businesses are still counting the cost of the rate of employer National Insurance (NI) rising from 13.8p per cent to 15 per cent and the cut in salary threshold for paying it from £9,100 to £5,000. The move has sharply raised the cost of hiring staff and particularly damaged sectors such as retail and hospitality that are more reliant on lower-paid and part-time workers. It has been largely blamed for the sharp rise in unemployment since the general election, with more than 200,000 people joining the dole queue. S&P's findings were revealed as part of a wider purchasing managers' index (PMI) survey of the private sector which showed business activity growing at the fastest pace in a year. The findings will be welcomed by Rachel Reeves as she hopes for a turnaround after a growth slowdown in the second quarter. But they showed a contrast between accelerating growth in the services sector, which ranges from bars and hotels to accountants and solicitors, and contraction for manufacturers battered by tariff uncertainty. The report also outlined the continuing pain being caused by the Chancellor's NI hike. It resulted in 'another robust rise in prices charged by private sector firms' this month – with inflation at an 18-month high. 'Payroll numbers... continue to be cut at an aggressive rate by historical standards as firms cite weak order books and concerns over rising staff costs due to the policies announced in the autumn Budget,' said Chris Williamson, the chief business economist at S&P Global. Separately, the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, said a 'summer slowdown' had hit new job postings which fell 9.2 per cent last month compared to June, to 652,733. Chief executive Neil Carberry said: 'Business optimism took a kicking after last autumn's Budget, with spring tax rises in particular weighing on employers thinking. 'The fear of further costs, worries about the impact of the Employment Rights Bill and new tax rules are all on employers' minds. 'If ministers want growth, they must deliver stability and backing for businesses.' On a brighter note, a monthly consumer confidence reading published by market research firm GfK ticked higher following this month's Bank of England interest rate cut. Neil Bellamy, consumer insights director at GfK, said: 'The improved sentiment on personal finances is welcome, but there are many clouds on the horizon in the form of inflation and rising unemployment. 'There's no shortage of speculation, too, about what the autumn Budget will bring in terms of tax rises.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Why a capital gains tax raid is the last thing homeowners need
A new tax on the sale of expensive homes would cause the property market to grind to a halt, and would be unlikely to raise much revenue, experts say. The government is said to be considering a shake-up of property taxes in the budget this autumn as it tries to fill a multibillion-pound black hole in the public finances. Many options seem to be under discussion, according to widespread reports this week, but most appear to be aimed at those selling high-value homes. The Times reported on Wednesday that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, was considering charging capital gains tax (CGT) on the sale of main homes worth £1.5 million or more. This would be on top of stamp duty paid by buyers, which raised £13.8 billion in the 2023-24 tax year. CGT raised £13 billion in that year. Jonathan Brandling-Harris from the London estate agency House Collective said: 'Handing sellers a large CGT bill on sale will simply discourage them from moving.' Geoff Wilford from the estate agency Wilfords London said: 'It would be the single worst decision any government could make for the housing market. It would grind activity to a halt. Instead of boosting Treasury receipts, it would kill them off completely.' At the moment the sale of your main home is exempt from CGT. If it wasn't, the Treasury would make an estimated £31 billion a year. CGT is charged at 24 per cent for higher rate taxpayers and 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers on the sale of assets including second homes, shares and art, for example. HM Revenue and Customs said that not charging CGT on the sale of main homes costs it £31 billion a year. Heather Powell from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg said: 'Abolishing this relief would be hugely controversial and would mean the end of the principle that no tax is payable on the sale of your family home.' Tom Bill from the estate agency Knight Frank said that because CGT is only charged on sales, many homeowners would simply decide to stay put. He said: 'If CGT applied from when the property was last bought, it would divide sellers into two groups: those sitting on a gain and those who are not. 'Anyone with a taxable gain would think twice before selling, which would reduce transaction numbers. That's despite the government seeming to want a predictable flow of revenue that is skewed towards the wealthiest homeowners.' • Ben Wilkinson: This tax policy chaos does not bode well Homes worth more than £1.5 million make up about 1 per cent of the 1.2 million property sales in England every year, and about 5 per cent of the sales in London, according to Hamptons. The average gain on the sale of a £1.5 million-plus home in England and Wales in the past 20 years was £836,219 — a rise of 71 per cent. The CGT bill on that gain for a higher-rate taxpayer would be £199,973. Aneisha Beveridge from the estate agency Hamptons said that when buyers of more expensive homes were last hit by big changes to property taxes, sales fell. Stamp duty moved from a 'slab' system where a single 5 per cent rate was charged to a 'slice' system where bands of the purchase price were taxed at 2 per cent, 5 per cent and 10 per cent. The change left anyone buying a home worth less than £935,000 paying less, but those who bought higher-value homes paying more. Under the old system someone buying a £1.5 million home would have paid 5 per cent across the entire property's value — £75,000. They now pay £93,750. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts In 2014 about 4 per cent of homes sold in London went for more than £1.5 million, according to Hamptons. Last year 2.9 per cent sold at that level, once you accounted for property price inflation, the lowest share on record. Beveridge said: 'What we saw with the stamp duty changes was that demand for those homes at the top end of the market slowed because they became much more expensive, so people did not move as often.' A property sales tax on expensive homes would have a knock-on effect on all those further down a sales chain if the sellers at the top simply decided not to move. Wilford said: 'Imagine finally deciding to move after decades only to be stung with a bigger bill for selling than you would ever have paid for buying. That leaves a very sour taste.' Experts argue that anything that deters older homeowners from downsizing is bad news for the market in general. Some 53 per cent of homes in England and 35 per cent of homes in Scotland have at least two spare bedrooms, according to Nationwide Building Society. Polling of 4,300 people by Barclays suggested that 37 per cent of those with one or more spare bedrooms were over 65. • How could Rachel Reeves reform stamp duty and other property taxes? Barclays said that those who downsize should be given grants or be allowed to offset any moving costs against their stamp duty bill. Brandling-Harris said: 'Downsizers should be helped because every move they make unlocks the housing ladder beneath them — freeing up family homes for those moving up the ladder, and so starter homes for first-time buyers. That's why the focus should be the exact opposite of a sellers' tax: rather than penalising people for moving, we should be encouraging it.' Wilford added: 'Downsizing is already a daunting process. People want to stay near friends, family and their GP yet often suitable homes locally are scarce. 'Add in the emotional attachment to the family home, the slog of clearing out a lifetime of belongings, plus legal fees, removals and surveys, and it is no wonder many decide it is easier to stay put — they just don't want the hassle. Add a seller's tax into the mix and you risk wiping out a whole segment of the market that keeps the housing ecosystem moving.'
