Texas Democrats slam GOP redistricting plan as "grossly unfair" and "deeply undemocratic"
Republican state lawmakers unveiled a draft congressional map on Wednesday that would turn five U.S. House districts currently held by Democrats into GOP-leaning seats — an idea blessed by President Trump as Republicans angle to hold onto their narrow congressional majority in next year's midterms.
One Democratic member of Congress whose district could be impacted called the proposed map "grossly unfair," arguing Black and Latino communities are being "scrambled" and intentionally fractured for political gain.
"They've already gerrymandered the map — and now they're trying to make it 30 to 8 in favor of Republicans," the lawmaker told CBS News, referencing the state's congressional delegation. "This is grossly unfair and starts a dangerous domino effect. If Texas lights the fire, it will spread to other states like California and New York. It's going to be a mess across the country."
The Democratic representative also argued that Texas Republicans are banking on maintaining the historic margins they saw among Hispanic voters in November's election, but warned that recent polling shows a softening in GOP support among Latino voters — particularly in the wake of backlash over the Trump administration's deportation policies.
Those voters "may not be there," the lawmaker said, cautioning the strategy could backfire and jeopardize Republican gains.
Another top Democrat who has previously run statewide in Texas echoed the concern, calling the proposal "deeply undemocratic."
"We're seeing losses of representation for people of color in Texas," the Democrat said. "Five of the affected districts are Latino-majority seats. They're not just stacking the deck — they're doing it without any expectation of being held accountable. But they will be held accountable."
Mr. Trump has publicly encouraged Texas Republicans to reshape the state's congressional districts, predicting to reporters earlier this month a "simple redrawing" could net five extra seats for his party. The GOP currently controls 25 of Texas' 38 House districts, which were last redrawn after the 2020 Census.
House Republicans are defending a razor-thin seven-seat majority in next year's congressional elections — a challenging task since the party that controls the White House almost always loses upwards of a dozen seats in the midterms.
Texas' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called the state legislature into a special session, and on Wednesday, lawmakers released an early draft map — though changes could be made. It will need to pass the GOP-controlled state House and Senate.
The map would improve the GOP's edge by tilting two Democratic seats in the Rio Grande Valley to the right, making a pair of districts in the Dallas and Houston area redder and merging two Democratic seats near Austin into one.
For example, Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar — who already represents a district won by Mr. Trump in 2024 — would lose parts of the San Antonio suburbs under the new map. And the Dallas-area district held by Democratic Rep. Julie Johnson would be redrawn to stretch more than 100 miles from Dallas County to deep-red parts of rural North Texas.
Texas Republicans have pledged to ensure the redistricting plans are constitutional. Abbott has argued the maps need to be redrawn due to "constitutional concerns" raised by the Justice Department. CBS News has reached out to the Texas GOP for comment.
But Democrats have blasted the map, which Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin called a "blatant gerrymander" and a "likely violation of the Voting Rights Act." Rep. Greg Casar — whose Austin-area district would be merged with that of fellow Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett — called the move "illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans."
The governors of some Democratic states, including California and New York, have floated launching their own mid-decade redistricting processes, with an eye to creating more blue seats. But those plans could require constitutional amendments since, unlike Texas, those two states have put independent commissions in charge of redistricting.
Meanwhile, some experts have suggested Texas' plan to create five extra GOP-leaning districts could make some of those newfound red seats more competitive, by distributing Republican voters across more districts.
The state has also undergone significant demographic changes in recent elections. The fast-growing Dallas and Houston suburbs have shifted toward Democrats, but the once reliably blue Rio Grande Valley has become redder with more Hispanic voters supporting Republican candidates.Hunter Woodall
contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker rallies with Texas Democrats, calls Trump a ‘cheater'
Joined by national and state Democratic leaders, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker accused President Donald Trump and Republicans of trying to cheat American democracy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections by redrawing Texas' congressional maps. The 60-year-old Illinois leader, a possible presidential contender, said Democratic governors cannot ignore Trump's aggressive steps, which under the Texas GOP plan would push as many as five House Democrats out of office. Such a move would provide national Republicans with a slightly heftier cushion next year to protect their slim majority in the House of Representatives as they prepare to defend Trump's agenda and other controversial moves. "Donald Trump is a cheater... and if they're going to cheat, then all of us have to take a hard look at what the effect of that cheating is on democracy, and that means we've all got to stand up and do the right thing," Pritzker said at an Aug. 5 press conference, flanked by Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin along with Texas Democrats and others. "So as far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table," he added. The comments underscore a noticeable shift within the Democratic ranks among even institutionally-minded party and elected leaders who have been hesitant to embrace the mantra of "fighting fire with fire." But many grassroots progressives and their allies have demanded for months that the party take a more aggressive approach, citing how the administration and its MAGA-aligned allies have been bending several U.S. institutions to their will since Trump's return to power. Asked if Texas is providing Democratic-controlled state leaders with a roadmap on how to draw their own maps, Martin told reporters at the press conference that the party will fight back in the same way. "Our constitution is under assault. Voting rights are being completely violated," he said. "Now is not the time for one party to play by the rules while the other party has completely ignored it." Earlier in the day, Trump, appearing on CNBC by telephone, said Republicans were "entitled" to the five new seats drafted by a Texas House committee on Aug. 2, and called out the group of Texas Democrats who fled to liberal-leaning states, saying those places have been using the same tactics when crafting their congressional districts. "Do you notice they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered," he said. "California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress. It's all gerrymandered." This story will be updated. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says Texas GOP, Trump cheating democracy
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at ‘Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further
"And worse than that, it's just not right," the MSNBC host says Texas Republicans are trying to gerrymander the state even further in their favor, and on Tuesday morning, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough could do nothing but scoff at how 'idiotic' their plan is, on top of being anti-democratic. During their discussion, the 'Morning Joe' hosts zeroed in on the fact that Texas Democrats deliberately left the state this week, to avoid Republicans forcing through a vote to redraw the districts and grab another five house seats. More than that, the MSNBC hosts scoffed at the response of Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, who angrily said that the politicians 'abandoned their posts and turned their backs on the constituents they swore to represent.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video Jimmy Fallon Jokes Trump Fired the Weatherman So Now the East Coast Heat Wave Doesn't Exist | Video Roku Debuts Ad-Free Subscription Service Howdy in Partnership With Lionsgate, WBD, FilmRise Seth Meyers Leaves Jenna Ortega Speechless With Suggestion for Combatting Her 'Resting Bitch Face' | Video 'Oh, my goodness, it's almost like Lincoln talking to Congress at the beginning of the Civil War. The stakes are so high. Oh wait, no they're not Willie!' Scarborough mocked. 'To do what's right for the people of Texas? To take the vote away from anybody in Texas who's basically a Democrat by gerrymandering the districts?' Scarborough then explained how the redistricting would be 'so out of whack' that, even if state legislative races came down to a 50/50 split by voters, Republicans would still win handily. 'That guy, and the rest of the Texas legislature, and Greg Abbott want to rig the system,' Scarborough said. 'They want to make sure that Republicans are over-represented on election day. They want to rig the process. And so they're acting so indignant about it!' The MSNBC host then called out the 'short-sightedness' of the Republicans' plan, arguing that it would open the door for blue states to do the exact same thing. 'If Texas achieves what they want to achieve, then California will go back! And then they will draw up even more rigged lines that will help Democrats,' Scarborough said. 'And New York State will do it, and who knows? Maybe then Florida decides to — I mean, it really is, it's an idiotic thing to do.' 'They used to do it every 10 years, and now, I don't know if the President told them to do this or somebody else told them to do it, but it's just stupid,' he continued. 'And worse than that, it's just not right.' You can watch the full discussion from 'Morning Joe' in the video above. The post 'Morning Joe': Scarborough Scoffs at 'Idiotic' Plan to Gerrymander Texas Further | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says JPMorgan, Bank of America Refused His Business
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump accused two of the nation's largest banks of rejecting his business, following as his administration was preparing an executive order threatening financial institutions who refused to work with certain customers on ideological grounds. PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole All Hail the Humble Speed Hump 'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' Trump said in an interview Tuesday with CNBC. Trump said he had been 'informed by my people' that JPMorgan Chase & Co. had asked him to close accounts he held for decades within 20 days, and that Bank of America Corp. declined his attempt to deposit more than $1 billion with their company. 'I ended up going to small banks all over the place,' Trump said. The president added that he believed banking regulators during the Biden administration had been ordered to 'do everything you can to destroy Trump, and that's what they did.' 'Banks are not afraid of anything but a regulator — their regulators and their wives,' Trump said. He didn't offer exact dates for his dealings with JPMorgan and Bank of America, though he suggested the latter occurred between his two presidential terms. The defeat in New York's civil fraud suit against Trump and his real estate company last year put restrictions on his ability to do business in the state. That included a three-year ban on the Trump Organization getting loans from New York-chartered banks. Trump has asked a Manhattan appeals court to overturn the civil fraud verdict. Trump was asked on Tuesday about a Wall Street Journal report that his administration was drafting an order that would direct bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated federal laws in closing certain accounts. Any direction from the White House would require both banks and regulators to review and submit their findings of how they engage with their customers. In the draft of the executive order being circulated among industry participants, banks would undergo a 120-day review process of their rationale for closing customer accounts, the people familiar with the matter said. Financial regulators would also undergo their own review process, between 120 and 180 days, to examine how they regulate and impose restrictions on banks that could lead to account closures, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing nonpublic information. The order also would call for any criminal findings that come from the review process to be submitted directly to the Department of Justice, said the people. A final executive order is expected to be submitted at some point this week, though timing and the material itself could change, they added. A representative for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both JPMorgan and Bank of America have previously denied rejecting business on ideological grounds. 'Desperately Needed' 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' Trish Wexler, a JPMorgan spokesperson, said in a statement. 'We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.' 'We welcome the Trump administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity to banks,' Bank of America spokesperson William Halldin said in a statement. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework.' The Bank Policy Institute also said rules need to be reworked. 'The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion,' Austin Anton, a Bank Policy Institute spokesperson, said Tuesday. 'The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place.' Federal banking regulators have said they'll remove reputation risk from their bank exams, aiming to eliminate a factor that lenders have blamed for forcing them to exit some client relationships. Conservatives have complained that major Wall Street firms have debanked gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies, religious groups and cryptocurrency firms. Trump aired that complaint to Bank of America Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan directly during a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year. 'We serve more than 70 million clients and we welcome conservatives. We are required to follow extensive government rules and regulations that sometimes result in decisions to exit client relationships,' a representative for Bank of America said in an emailed statement at the time. 'We never close accounts for political reasons and don't have a political litmus test.' Bank of America, the second-largest US bank, had restricted lending to companies that make assault-style guns used for non-military purposes, following shootings at a high school in Florida early in 2018. Citigroup Inc. also announced its own set of restrictions for clients selling guns that year. In June, Citigroup ended a seven-year policy that placed restrictions on firearms sales by its retail sector clients, citing recent legislative developments and concerns over access to banking services. The Trump Organization sued Capital One Financial Corp. in March, accusing it of closing hundreds of the real estate company's accounts in 2021 for political reasons. The president's company claims the bank ended the decades-old relationship 'simply because Capital One believed that the political views at the time favored doing so.' In a setback for Trump's company, a federal judge in July granted Capital One's request to delay the exchange of evidence in the case until after the bank's motion to dismiss is resolved. Capital One argues its agreements with the Trump Organization allowed it to close its accounts for any reason and that it gave the business plenty of advanced notice. The bank also says Trump's company has failed to provide any evidence that the accounts were closed for political purposes. Earlier this year JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s Jamie Dimon on Capitol Hill offered his support to a restructuring of US financial regulators. Bank of America went on to loosen its gun restrictions and made similar changes to its energy-lending policies, including dropping a blanket ban on financing for Arctic drilling, according to an environmental and social risk policy from late 2023. The issue of debanking customers has come up outside of the US as well. In the UK, it prompted an outcry a few years ago, when right-wing politician Nigel Farage — who now leads the Reform UK party — revealed NatWest Group Plc's upmarket Coutts unit had closed his account, saying his political views were a factor in that decision. The subsequent row led to the resignation of the bosses of NatWest and Coutts, while Farage had vowed to campaign for others who were been 'debanked' on questionable grounds. A preliminary review by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority found no evidence that banks were dropping customers for their political opinion. --With assistance from Hannah Levitt, Erik Larson and Hadriana Lowenkron. (Updates with details on draft executive order in paragraphs 10-13) Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
