Most unverified PDS beneficiaries from Punjab in Ludhiana, Centre reveals
According to official data, nearly 3.6 lakh beneficiaries in Ludhiana have failed to complete their biometric authentication, amounting to around 10% of such cases across Punjab. These individuals are now likely to be weeded out from the PDS system, which provides free wheat to eligible ration card holders, officials said.
Notably, Punjab has a total of 33,48,204 ration card beneficiaries where Ludhiana alone accounted for over 18.1 lakh of them during the time of the drive. Of these, around 46,439 individuals, including deceased and migrant beneficiaries have already been removed from the system.
A senior official from the food and supplies department asserted that Ludhiana's high number of unverified beneficiaries is largely due to its large migrant population. Many of these individuals frequently move in and out of the district in search of work, making it difficult for officials to reach them and complete biometric verification during the e-KYC drive.
Officials further explained that under the PDS, each beneficiary in Punjab is entitled to receive 15kg of free wheat every quarter. However, as per fresh instructions from the Centre and the state food and supplies department, free wheat for the July–September quarter will only be given to families whose heads have completed the verification.
Drive aimed at transparency
The e-KYC drive is part of the Centre's larger push for transparency and accountability in foodgrain distribution under the National Food Security Act (NFSA), through the ONORC scheme. The initiative aimed at plugging loopholes in the system through digital drive, where each beneficiary was mandated to verify their eligibility through biometric authentication.
In a March 17, 2023 notification, the central government had directed all states and UTs to ensure 100% e-KYC coverage at fair price shops (ration depots) to prevent misuse of subsidies, and outdated records from the system. The aim of this drive was not just to remove bogus entries but also to create space for new, deserving beneficiaries to be brought into the fold, officials stated.
When contacted, district food supplies controller (Ludhiana West), Sartaaj Singh Cheema, said, 'Around 80% of beneficiaries in Ludhiana district have completed their e-KYC. As of now we have not received any official instructions regarding the distribution of free wheat to these excluded beneficiaries in the next quarter.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Delhi High Court to examine if Centre has power to order cuts in Udaipur Files movie
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) asked the Centre if it had the authority to pass an order directing six cuts in the film Udaipur Files-Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder, while exercising revisional powers. 'You have to exercise the powers within the four corners of the statute. You can't go beyond that,' a Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said. The court posed the question after being informed that the Centre, while exercising its revisional powers under the Cinematograph Act, had suggested six cuts to the producers of the movie, in addition to a disclaimer. The court was also informed that the film has been recertified, but not issued to the producers, because the matter is pending in the High Court. The court was hearing a plea by Mohammed Javed, one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, objecting to the release of the film on the ground that it would prejudice his case during the trial. Senior advocate Maneka Guruswamy, representing Mr. Javed, submitted that six witnesses have been examined till now in the case and 160 witnesses remain. 'I was 19 years old when I was arrested. I am Accused No. 8 in the trial. I was released on bail by the Rajasthan High Court because there was no connection between me and the allegations. I am a citizen of this country and am entitled to a fair trial,' Ms. Guruswamy said. 'My right to a fair trial is jeopardised by the release of the film,' she argued. While Ms. Guruswamy concluded her arguments, the submissions of Additional Solicitor-General Chetan Sharma, who was representing the Centre and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), remained inconclusive and the court said it would continue the proceedings on August 1. Besides Mr. Javed's plea, another petition has been filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani. It could not be heard due to the non-availability of the counsel. Kanhaiya Lal, an Udaipur-based tailor in Rajasthan, was murdered in June 2022, allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous, for sharing a social media post in support of former BJP leader Nupur Sharma after her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Our security forces did not let LeT terrorists escape to Pak, says Amit Shah in RS; slams Cong over 'votebank' politics
Union Home Minister Amit Shah informed the Rajya Sabha about the successful conclusion of Operation Mahadev, a counter-terror mission linked to Operation Sindoor. Security forces neutralized three high-profile Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorists, including A-grade commanders Suleiman alias Faizal Jatt and Afghan, along with Jibran. Suleiman was involved in attacks like the Pahalgam and Gagangir incidents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday addressed the Rajya Sabha amid the ongoing political debate over Operation Sindoor during the second week of its the Parliament's Monsoon revealed details of a related counter-terror mission codenamed Operation Mahadev , which recently concluded with the elimination of high-profile Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) Home Minister reiterated that three LeT terrorists were neutralised during the operation: Suleiman alias Faizal Jatt, Afghan, and Jibran — all described as high-ranking operatives."Suleiman was an A-grade commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba unit. He had fired shots using his own rifle during the Pahalgam attack and the Gagangir incident. Our security forces ensured he couldn't escape Kashmir and flee to Pakistan," Shah added that Afghan was also listed as an A-grade commander, while Jibran held a senior rank within the same terrorist revealed that the Intelligence Bureau (IB) first received leads about the terrorists' presence on May 22. 'Following that, the IB and military intelligence conducted further investigations. Around July 22, their precise location was identified,' he told the the public sentiment surrounding the Pahagalm attack, Shah shared that he had received messages from citizens across the country—particularly from families of the victims—calling for justice. 'They said, 'these terrorists should be shot in the head.' Coincidentally, during the encounter, they were indeed shot in the head,' he the operation as a response to national outrage and a signal of the government's zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, Shah reiterated that the mission was a joint success for Indian intelligence and security in a sharp political rebuttal, Shah took aim at Congress leader P. Chidambaram, who had earlier demanded Shah's resignation and questioned the legitimacy of the government's claims regarding Operation Sindoor and the nationality of the terrorists involved.'Mr. P. Chidambaram demanded my resignation and questioned the Indian government's Operation Sindoor. He repeatedly challenged the evidence that those involved in the Pahalgam attack were Pakistani terrorists,' Shah said during his a direct counter-question, the Home Minister asked, 'Today, I want to ask him—who was he trying to protect? Pakistan? Lashkar-e-Taiba? Or the terrorists themselves? Aren't you ashamed of this?'Shah went on to highlight the timing of the encounter, adding, 'But by God's grace, on the very day he raised these questions, all three terrorists were killed.'
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Delhi High Court questions Centre's jurisdiction to recommend six cuts in ‘Udaipur Files'
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Union government whether it had the jurisdiction to recommend six cuts in the Hindi film Udaipur Files, which is reportedly based on the 2022 killing of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, Live Law reported. A division bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela asked the government whether revisional powers granted by Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act allow the government to pass such an order. 'You have to exercise the powers within the four corners of the statute,' the court said. 'You can't go beyond that.' The film was originally scheduled to be released on July 11. The Delhi High Court had temporarily stayed the release on July 10 and directed the Union government to examine the film's content. The Centre had recommended six cuts to the film, besides directing that it should be released with a disclaimer. On Wednesday, the court questioned whether the Centre's actions ventured into it acting as an appellate authority instead of a revisional authority, The Indian Express reported. Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the Centre and the Central Board of Film Certification, informed the court that the film had passed through a two-stage filter test, PTI reported. First, the censor board recommended 55 cuts, followed by an additional six cuts suggested by the review committee, bringing the total to 61 edits, Sharma said. Kanhaiya Lal killing In June 2022, Lal, a tailor, was killed in Rajasthan's Udaipur for purportedly sharing a social media post in support of suspended Bharatiya Janata Party Spokesperson Nupur Sharma. She had made disparaging remarks about Prophet Muhammad during a television debate in May 2022. The assailants and several other persons accused in the matter were arrested by the Rajasthan Police. A video showed two men claiming responsibility for the killing of Lal as they brandished the cleavers used in the murder. The murder case was investigated by the National Investigation Agency and the persons accused in the matter were charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The trial is underway in a Special NIA Court in Jaipur. The High Court had stayed the release of Udaipur Files while hearing a batch of petitions, including one filed by Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, seeking a ban on the film. The petitioners had alleged that the film is communally provocative and vilifies the Muslim community.
