
‘Bombs and bullets were like rain': 50 years on from the fall of Saigon and the end of the Vietnam war
The day that Saigon fell, Xuan Phuong, a war correspondent, could only hear shouting and commotion. It was 30 April 1975, and helicopters were frantically lifting personnel and civilians from the US embassy. Phuong, who had travelled down from the north, was initially held back by troops who said fighting was still continuing. When she was finally able to reach the centre of the city the following day, 1 May, she found chaos. Clothes and luggage were scattered and discarded along the streets. Buildings were being looted.
It felt like a dream, Phuong, now 96, said. She stood inside the Presidential Palace on 2 May, watching as the president of South Vietnam, Duong Van Minh, surrendered.
'He left through the palace's back door, because at the front there were all the tanks [of the North Vietnamese],' said Phuong.
North Vietnam was victorious and the country was to be reunified after a decades-long war that had killed as many as 2 million Vietnamese civilians. For the US, which lost 58,000 servicemen, the episode was one of its most humiliating in history.
On Wednesday, Vietnam will celebrate the 50th anniversary of 30 April, known officially as the Liberation of the South and National Reunification Day, with huge parades planned in what is now Ho Chi Minh City, after the revolutionary leader. In the run-up to celebrations, streets and alleys have been lined with the red flag and the gold stars of the nation, and fighter jets have roared through the skies above, rehearsing formations.
The Trump administration has told its senior diplomats in Vietnam not to participate in anniversary events, according to a report in the New York Times – a decision that has dismayed veterans who have dedicated their lives to reconciliation.
Relations between the US and Vietnam have shifted vastly since the war, from former foes to close economic partners – though some fear the decades of progress is being put at risk. This month, an US announcement of a punishing 46% tariff against Vietnam, which would devastate the country's economic growth targets, left leaders in Hanoi staggered. Months earlier, drastic cuts to foreign assistance were unveiled. Many fear this could jeopardise projects that assist the victims of Agent Orange, which has left 3 million people, many of them children, with continued serious health problems, or the work of teams that are cleaning up huge amounts unexploded ordnance left behind.
Although North Vietnam won the war, the entire country was left traumatised by the years of conflict, said Prof Dr Pham Hong Tung.
'[People] lost their relatives. They were wounded … They had some very terrible memories,' he added.
Vietnam faced conflict with Cambodia and China. Its economy was left in tatters, worsened by the Communist party's limits on private enterprise and severe US economic sanctions, including a trade embargo. Reforms initiated in 1986 transformed the country into a market-oriented economy, ushering in a period of rapid economic growth, though it remains a communist one-party state, and frequently jails dissidents.
Over the past 50 years, Ho Chi Minh City, has transformed into a city of skyscrapers as well as becoming a crucial manufacturing hub. Its streets are crammed tightly with motorbikes and its restaurants and markets increasingly drawing international tourists.
Phuong, who now lives in the centre of the city, was born in 1929 into an aristocratic family in Hue, in South Vietnam. She left her home aged 16 to join the struggle against French rule, swapping a life of plenty to one where she slept in the jungle. She worked making explosives, in an overrun hospital and for the ministry of foreign affairs before becoming a journalist.
She did not see her family throughout the war. By the time she entered Saigon in 1975, she found that her mother and siblings had already fled.
'I had been away from my family for so long,' she said. 'I was very disappointed. Even my hair turned white. I was distraught.'
Her family were among the more than 1.5 million people who fled, fearing persecution and incarceration in 're-education' camps under the new Communist leaders. Between 200,000 and 400,000 died as they made their journey, according to the UN.
On the walls of Phuong's apartment there are Vietnamese paintings, Buddhist sculptures and black and white photographs taken during the war. An image shows Jane Fonda, who visited Hanoi in 1972, in a white shirt, a camera hanging from her neck. Vietnam, one of America's most divisive conflicts, and the focus of protest songs, attracted various high-profile visitors, whom Phuong was often assigned to assist while working at the ministry. On one occasion, she was tasked with finding a tailor to make Vietnamese clothing for Fonda, who had arrived in short clothes unsuitable for a war zone, she recalled.
Phuong began working with foreign journalists and travelled to the centre of the country, where the heaviest fighting was taking place. 'Bombs and bullets were like rain,' she says. At night, her team sheltered in a vast network of tunnels. 'For people who have lived only over ground, you cannot imagine it. But at that time there was no choice,' she said.
Today the same tunnels, which stretch for 2,000km and, in parts, are more than 20 metres deep, have been reinforced and transformed into tourist attractions. Visitors, armed with flashlights on their phones, clamber down into the network of narrow pathways.
The surrounding Quang Tri Province remains the area worst affected by landmines and unexploded ordnance. There have been 8,600 casualties since 1975, said Hien Xuan Ngo, of Project Renew, which conducts clearance work, assists victims and educates the community.
'In certain areas … local people, because of economic pressure, sometimes they defy the risks,' he added. US funding has been critical to clearance efforts.
Project Renew's work was temporarily paused when Trump froze foreign assistance, though it has since been given an exemption.
Vietnam and the US had grown closer under Joe Biden, upgrading their relationship. Now, Hanoi now faces an increasingly delicate balancing act between Washington and Beijing, underlined by the looming imposition of a 46% tariff. The US accuses Vietnam of allowing Chinese companies to use its territory as a conduit to avoid tariffs that were imposed on China during the last Trump administration. The country's economy is closely intertwined with both countries.
Vietnam has always sought to avoid taking a side in the China-US rivalry. 'The pressure from China [was] a motivation for Vietnamese people to normalise the relationship with America and the west and south Asian countries,' said Prof Dr Pham Hong Tung, the director of the Institute of Vietnamese Studies and Development Sciences. 'The Vietnamese people are very practical,' he added, though the past is not forgotten.
Has Phuong forgiven the US? There are others, worse affected than her, who deserve an apology. 'For those who want to ask about forgiveness, go and visit the cemetery. There are a lot of the cemeteries in Vietnam filled with graves of people who died during the war. Many were only 17, not more than 20 years old,' she said.
Phuong was eventually able to meet her mother in Paris, in 1989.
Her mother barely recognised her on the day they were reunited at the airport. 'My mother's first reaction was to step back and look at me. In my 80-year-old mother's mind she still thought of me as 16 years old,' she said. 'My mom hugged me and we cried. No one around us understood why,' she said. Her mother never returned to Vietnam.
As the 30 April approached Phuong's friends visited the graves of those who died, and offered prayers. She will watch the parades, but from home, she said, and will spend time with friends 'to talk about our memories, to read poems, and cheer one another – it has been a long life'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
a day ago
- The National
Peter Krykant spoke from Scotland to the world – but work isn't done
Peter Krykant stepped into that void. Peter first caught my attention when he openly dared to break the law by opening a safe consumption space. I was working to end the drug war in the United States at the time, lobbying Congress and the White House, and Peter's actions were galvanising. 'How a Man With a Van Is Challenging UK Drug Policy' was how the New York Times described Peter in a 2020 article. His actions were inspiring. I was reminded of the civil disobedience of the racial justice movement of the 1960s, of the ability to make the law – this seemingly entrenched part of society – look cruel, unjust, and stupid. Peter Krykant in his safe consumption van"I obviously don't want to be arrested, but I'm willing to put myself in that position and I think it'll only reflect badly on the government if that happens," he told the BBC. His bravery was enlivening. It was not just his boldness that caught my attention; it was also the other aspects that drove him. Peter never chose to work on drug policy. He had lived experience. He knew first-hand the stigma that comes with using drugs, where terms like 'junkie' or 'fiend' are common parlance, even in the media. His battle was not just with politicians; but with society itself. He showed us all the value of centring people with lived experience when it comes to changing policy. In a social media post a week ago discussing overdose death, Peter lamented: 'I lost my first family member when I was 15, my uncle. Then my cousin around 17 years ago. Another cousin December 2018, my aunt and uncle's only child, then in September 2021 the youngest death, my cousin who left a 5-year-old daughter. 'I carried his coffin. His daughter standing over the grave asking when daddy would be back, it doesn't get any easier.' (Image: Twitter/Peter Krykant) The politicians feared him because he did not cower. Invites to meet with the first minister or calls with other leaders, attention from the media, a rise in profile, these things can often make someone play the political game of access, plaudits, and incremental change. Not Peter. He continued to speak truth to power and call them out for inaction. He didn't care who he offended or if an invite was rescinded. His was a crusade to save his friends and family. When I started to write about Scottish drug policy, I felt a sense of imposter syndrome, as someone who was not living in Scotland. A good friend connected me with Peter, who was then always there to help guide me. I asked him about what impacted people were asking for, what policy changes he wanted, and included them in my articles. When we finally met at the International Drug Policy Reform Conference in Arizona in October 2023, he was warm, full of banter and good chat, reminding me of friends I miss from back home. READ MORE: Peter Krykant: Scotland must act on drug deaths even if the UK won't Peter and I were not especially close, but in recent months, his social media posts revealed someone who was struggling and there is now guilt that I could have reached out to connect again amid his challenges. I am sure those closer to him feel similar. His legacy is centring impacted voices in the drug policy debate and advancing a saner drug policy in Scotland, notably the opening of a legal safe consumption room in Glasgow. But his fight goes on. Drug deaths are astronomical – and the day after he died one Scottish newspaper led its front page with the headline 'Safe drugs room sparks 175 complaints on needles litter'. Peter would have torn this newspaper apart for its NIMBYism, the stigma, and the desire to lambast a life-saving intervention because of litter complaints when drug deaths have just risen by a third. Peter's legacy is strong, and he will be sorely missed across the globe, but the hard work remains. Michael Collins is a native Glaswegian who lives in Atlanta. He is the former director for national affairs at Drug Policy Alliance.


Spectator
3 days ago
- Spectator
Has deporting illegals become illegal?
The circus around Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia – whose full name the New York Times likes to trot out as if citing an old-school English aristocrat – speaks volumes about the immigration battle roiling the US. Our friend Kilmar is what we fuddy-duddies insist on calling an illegal immigrant. The Salvadoran crossed clandestinely into the US in 2012. As for what he's done since, that depends on whom you ask. According to his GoFundMe page, Kilmar is a 'husband, union worker and father of a disabled five-year-old'. Left-wing media portray 'the Maryland man' – a tag akin to Axel Rudakubana's 'a Welshman' – as an industrious metalworker devoted to his family. His wife has rowed back on the temporary protective order she once requested, claiming she'd been over-cautious. Yet according to the Trump administration, Kilmar is a member of the notoriously violent street gang MS-13 who's derived his primary source of income from smuggling hundreds of illegals over the southern border for several years. Choose A or B. In 2019, Kilmar was arrested for loitering along with three other men, one a suspected MS-13 member. He was carrying marijuana, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. From his clothing, tattoos and, more persuasively, a 'past proven and reliable' confidential source who verified he was an active gang member using the moniker 'Chele', police adjudged that Kilmar was a gangbanger, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. He was turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement – whose acronym, ICE, reinforces its rep as cold-hearted – which moved to deport him. Kilmar (of course) contested his removal. The immigration judge hearing Kilmar's case concurred that the defendant was indeed a gang member and deportable; the Salvadoran (of course) appealed the decision, which nevertheless was upheld. Kilmar (of course) then filed for asylum, as well as for a 'withholding of removal'. A subsequent immigration judge stayed his deportation to his home country, where his wellbeing might be endangered by local gangs. Now, you might suppose that putting yourself in the way of other famously rivalrous gangs would come with the territory when you join one yourself. Like, inter-gang violence seems a natural hazard of this line of work. But it's not only British immigration judges who are soft touches. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the millions of gate-crashers Kilmar (of course) remained in the US. In 2022, he was pulled over for speeding while driving eight other Hispanic men of uncertain immigration status in an SUV altered to add a third row of seats for extra passengers. The officers suspected human-trafficking; Kilmar's driving licence had expired; a run of his number plate through the database turned up a federal note on likely membership of MS-13. Yet when the patrolmen contacted the feds, ICE (of course) declined to pick him up. So Kilmar was (of course) released without charge. Even so, his claim that he was merely transporting construction workers between jobs did not, under investigation, hold up. Fast-forward to 2025 and why this otherwise obscure Salvadoran who is or is not a thug merits such a detailed lowdown. Meaning (of course) that this case has to do with Donald Trump – whose evil minions in March flew more than 230 purported criminals to a Salvadoran prison, including none other than Kilmar, whom ICE did finally pick up (no 'of course' there). The flights' timing was judicially dodgy. The planes did or didn't take off after a federal judge ruled that the flights could not proceed until the deportees were given the opportunity to challenge their removal. The administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which directed Trump to 'facilitate' Kilmar's return to the US. Because, remember, there was only one country to which he could not be deported because of that credulous 2019 decision: his own. Hence the Justice Department's acceptance that Kilmar's deportation was an 'administrative error'. During this proxy war with Trump, Democrats have pretended to hair-tear over poor Kilmar, mouldering away in a nasty foreign prison and deprived of due process. But the story I just laid out has due process, not to mention leniency or even dereliction on the part of the authorities, up the wazoo. Meanwhile, after slyly getting their jurisprudential ducks in a row, last week Trump and co finally got Kilmar flown back to the US, only to arrest him immediately for human-trafficking – with every intention of convicting the guy and then deporting him right back to El Salvador. What do we make of this farce? The American commentariat has focused on a potential showdown between Trump and the judiciary, claiming to fear a flat-out executive refusal to follow court orders but secretly rather hoping that Trump does defy the courts and thus reveals himself as an unconstitutional tyrant. I view this absurd tale through a different lens. All these trials and flights for a lone illegal alien are expensive. The amount of 'due process' the American justice system affords every single illegal makes deportation at any scale impossible. There isn't enough time and money and there aren't nearly enough judges to make any but a token gesture toward the mass deportation of illegals that Trump has promised. That amounts to a victory not just for Democrats but also for disorder. I'd assess the odds that Kilmar is a thug at about 90 per cent. But proving membership of unofficial allegiances in court is a bastard. If every individual deportation case must be adjudicated according to exacting evidentiary rules and appeal procedures, America's drastic, undemocratic demographic change will proceed inexorably. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the staggering ten million gate-crashers during the Biden administration alone. What are the chances of that? In New York at the weekend, ICE raids were impeded by LA-style crowds of righteously indignant protestors screaming: 'Let them go! Let them go!' The officers just doing their jobs looked beleaguered, tired, numb and pre-defeated. After all the ICE agents' thankless labours, what proportion of their detainees will still get to stay in the country in the end? I'll take another stab at 90 per cent.


The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Fulbright board quits due to Trump administration's political meddling
All 12 members of the prestigious Fulbright program's board have reportedly resigned in protest of what they describe as unprecedented political interference by the Trump administration, which has blocked scholarships for nearly 200 American academics. The board, according to a memo obtained by the New York Times, accused the state department of acting illegally by cancelling awards already approved for professors and researchers due to travel overseas this summer, following a year-long selection process that concluded over the winter. The administration is also reviewing applications from approximately 1,200 foreign scholars already approved to study in the US, potentially disrupting exchanges that were due to begin with acceptance letters in April. 'We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute,' the board's members wrote in their resignation letter. The mass resignation represents a significant escalation in tensions between the Trump administration and academic institutions. The White House has been systematically targeting higher education, with 45 universities currently under investigation as part of Trump's anti-DEI crackdown, including dozens of state schools and two Ivy League institutions. The administration has also been freezing federal funding to major universities, with more than $1bn in funding frozen for Cornell University, almost $800m for Northwestern University, and $8.7bn in federal grants and contracts under review for Harvard University. Now, secretary of state Marco Rubio is reportedly considering whether Harvard should be investigated for violating federal sanctions by collaborating on a panel with Chinese officials blacklisted by the US government. According to sources who spoke anonymously to the New York Times, the department's public diplomacy office has begun sending rejection letters to scholars based primarily on their research topics. Areas of study reportedly targeted include climate change, migration, gender studies, race and ethnicity, and various scientific disciplines. The public diplomacy office is headed by Darren Beattie, a political appointee previously dismissed from the first Trump administration after speaking at a conference attended by white nationalists. The board also raised concerns about proposed budget cuts that would slash funding for educational and cultural affairs from $691m to $50m. 'Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago,' the board concluded in their letter.