logo
Trump trade war pushes firms to consider stockpiling; analysts call it ‘short-term opportunistic' move

Trump trade war pushes firms to consider stockpiling; analysts call it ‘short-term opportunistic' move

Malay Mail27-04-2025

PARIS, April 27 — Stockpiling is the reflex response by firms to the imposition of tariffs, but with the rapidly-changing position of the Trump administration, companies are finding that it isn't so straightforward this time around.
Whether it's the luxury, electronics or pharmaceutical sectors, US President Donald Trump's unpredictability complicates the calculations of firms.
Some companies didn't wait for Trump's April 2 announcement of massive 'reciprocal' trade tariffs: they had already begun shipping more of their goods to the United States.
In the end, Trump backed down quickly on the 'reciprocal' tariffs, pausing them for 90 days except for China.
That still left the global 10 per cent tariff in place, as well as the 25 per cent tariffs on European steel, aluminium and cars.
French cosmetics firm Clarins didn't hesitate and stepped up shipments to the United States at the beginning of the year.
'We've built up three months of stocks, which represents US$2 million (RM8.7 million) in goods,' said Lionel Uzan, the head of Clarins's US operations.
With all of its products made in France, Clarins had few other options to mitigate the tariffs.
Discreet stockpiling
Even if they don't all acknowledge it so openly, firms in many different sectors are stockpiling their products in the United States.
In March, exports of Swiss watches to the United States jumped nearly 14 per cent compared to the same month last year.
More striking is Ireland, which plays host to a number of international pharmaceutical firms.
Its exports to the United States jumped 210 per cent in February to nearly €13 billion (RM64.7 billion), with 90 per cent of those being pharmaceutical products and chemical ingredients.
Fermob, a French manufacturer of metal garden furniture that sells around 10 per cent of its products in the United States, said it began planning for US tariffs once the result of the presidential election became known in November.
It stepped up production in January and February.
'We've sent around 30 per cent of our extra stock to the United States,' said the company's chief executive, Baptiste Reybier.
That extra production has benefitted transportation firms.
Lufthansa Cargo said it has seen in recent weeks 'an increase in demand for shipments to the United States'.
The trade war 'has incited companies to accelerate certain stages in their supply chains', it told AFP.
'A similar trend was seen for the delivery of cars from the EU to the United States,' it said.
The phenomenon also concerns US-made goods.
The Japanese newspaper Nikkei reported recently that Chinese tech firms were snapping up billions of dollars of artificial intelligence chips made by US firm Nvidia in anticipation of Washington imposing export restrictions.
'Short-term approach'
Stockpiling is not a solution, however, said analysts.
Matt Jochim, a partner at consulting firm McKinsey who helps companies with supply chain issues, called stockpiling 'a very short-term opportunistic' move.
He said the practice has limits as tariffs are constantly changing and it isn't always practicable.
'In a lot of the electronics space, it's also hard to do, because the technology changes so quickly, you don't want to get stuck with inventory of chipsets or devices that are the prior version,' he said.
Fermob said it was taking a measured approach to stockpiling.
'Otherwise, you're replacing one risk with another,' the manufacturer's Reybier said.
'You have to finance stocks and there is also the risk of not having sent the right product.'
Having a local subsidiary with warehouses also helped, Reybier added.
'It's too early to say whether we should have sent more or not.' — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown
'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown

New Straits Times

time39 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown

FOR Stephen Miller, the architect of United States President Donald Trump's hardline migration policy, the protests in Los Angeles were nothing less than the frontline of a "fight to save civilisation itself". Hyper-loyalist Miller, 39, has carved out a niche as Trump's most powerful and hawkish adviser on the Republican's signature issue of immigration. A combative presence on the White House driveway, Miller is frequently rolled out in public to double down on the president's comments in front of the cameras and frequently spars with reporters. But the sharp-suited adviser's comments on Los Angeles — which echo hard-right talking points about the decline of the West as it faces an "invasion" of migrants — underscored that the topic is not just political for him, but existential. His fingerprints have been all over the White House's unprecedented assertion of its right to use presidential power to pursue its agenda, often using centuries-old or rarely cited laws to deport migrants. And Miller, who is formally Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser, is at the sharp end of things, too. It was Miller who, according to the Wall Street Journal, issued US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with orders last month to step up its work after the number of daily deportations under Trump fell below those carried out by Joe Biden's administration last year. Those orders led to the immigration raids on a Home Depot in Los Angeles that triggered clashes between protesters and federal agents — and Trump's decision to send in thousands of troops. Miller has since taken to social media to battle Democrats who accuse Trump of authoritarianism. "We've been saying for years this is a fight to save civilisation. Anyone with eyes can see that now," he said on X on Sunday. A few days earlier, he set out his right-wing worldview more explicitly as he pushed for Trump's new "big, beautiful" spending bill, which contains provisions for migration. "We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the West if we don't control migration," he wrote on June 4. Critics say such comments echo the far-right "replacement theory" about migration undermining Western society. Indeed, during Trump's first term, Miller's hardline stance made him something of an outlier. As a young firebrand, Miller was one of the architects of the so-called "Muslim travel bans" in Trump's first presidency, which later ran into legal difficulties after they were poorly drafted. Miller largely avoided the chaotic feuding that engulfed Trump's first White House, resulting in somewhat more moderate voices winning out on immigration policies. Miller, however, remained loyal, and stuck by his boss even as Trump's first term ended in the disgrace of the US Capitol attack on Jan 6, 2021. In the second Trump administration, Miller's views have become mainstream. "I call Stephen 'Trump's brain'," Republican former House speaker Kevin McCarthy told the New York Times just before Trump's inauguration. Miller was the driving force in particular behind the use of an obscure 200-year-old wartime law to deport undocumented migrants — and a vocal defender when that crackdown saw a man wrongly deported to El Salvador. He also outraged Democrats when he said on May 9 the White House was "looking into" suspending habeas corpus, which would prevent migrants targeted for mass deportations from appealing for their right to appear in court. One blip, however, came when Miller and his wife Katie found themselves caught up in the split between Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Katie Miller had been a senior adviser and spokesman in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. But the couple now find themselves, professionally speaking, on opposite sides of the break-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful.

Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year
Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Barbie-maker Mattel teams up with OpenAI, eyes first AI-powered product this year

The Mattel company logo is pictured at the entrance of the Montoi plant in the municipality of Escobedo, Mexico March 15, 2022. REUTERS/Daniel Becerril (Reuters) -Mattel has teamed up with OpenAI to develop toys and games with artificial intelligence, and expects to launch its first AI-powered product later this year, the Barbie-maker said on Thursday. The company, which also makes Hot Wheels and Uno cards, plans to "bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate play experiences with an emphasis on innovation, privacy, and safety," it said. The move comes at a time when toy manufacturers are battling muted demand backdrop as consumers rein in spending to brace for the economic fallout of U.S. President Trump's shifting trade policy. Mattel will also incorporate OpenAI's advanced AI tools like ChatGPT Enterprise into its business operations to enhance product innovation, the company said. "With OpenAI, Mattel has access to an advanced set of AIcapabilities alongside new tools to enable productivity, creativity, and company-wide transformation at scale," said OpenAI operating chief Brad Lightcap. Over the last year, Mattel has relied on producing films, TV shows and mobile games based on its products such as Hot Wheels and Barbie to offset a slowdown in its core toy business. Last month, Mattel withdrew its annual forecast and said it would raise prices on some products sold domestically in a bid to mitigate higher supply chain costs. (Reporting by Savyata Mishra in Bengaluru; Editing by Leroy Leo)

Most G7 members ready to lower Russian oil price cap without US
Most G7 members ready to lower Russian oil price cap without US

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

Most G7 members ready to lower Russian oil price cap without US

FILE PHOTO: Russian flag with stock graph and an oil pump jack miniature model are seen in this illustration taken October 9, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File photo BRUSSELS/PARIS (Reuters) -Most countries in the Group of Seven nations are prepared to go it alone and lower the G7 price cap on Russian oil even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to opt out, four sources familiar with the matter said. G7 country leaders are due to meet on June 15-17 in Canada where they will discuss the price cap first agreed in late 2022. The cap was designed to allow Russian oil to be sold to third countries using Western insurance services provided the price was no more than $60 a barrel. The European Union and Britain have been pushing to lower the price for weeks after a fall in global oil prices made the current $60 cap nearly irrelevant. The sources, who declined to be named, said the EU and Britain are ready to lead the charge and go it alone, backed by the other European G7 countries and Canada. They said it is still unclear what the U.S. will decide, though the Europeans are pushing for a united decision at the meeting. Japan's position also remains uncertain, they said. "There is a push among European countries to reduce the oil price cap to $45 from $60. There are positive signals from Canada, Britain and possibly the Japanese. We will use the G7 to try to get the U.S. on board," one of the sources said. The White House had no immediate comment. During the G7 finance ministers meeting in the Canadian Rockies last month, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained unconvinced there was a need to lower the cap, according to sources. However some U.S. Senators may endorse the idea, including Lindsay Graham, who in recent weeks told reporters he supports lowering the cap. Graham is pushing a hard-hitting new set of Russia sanctions that could impose steep tariffs on buyers of Russian oil. The EU has proposed lowering the price to $45 a barrel in its latest 18th package of sanctions. The package must have unanimity from member states in order for it to be adopted, which could take several weeks. Russia's largest export grade, Urals, trades at around a $10 a barrel discount to the Dated Brent benchmark out of Baltic ports. Brent futures have been trading below $70 a barrel since early April. Sources said Washington's buy-in was not essential to lower the cap owing to Britain's dominance in global shipping insurance, and the EU's influence on the Western rules-abiding tanker fleet. The U.S., however, does matter when it comes to dollar-denominated payments for oil and its banking system. The EU and its Western allies have been progressively cracking down on Russia's shadow fleet of tankers and related actors, which work to circumvent the cap. The pressure has started to hurt Moscow's revenues and Western allies hope this will push more of the oil trade back under the cap. Russia's state-owned oil producer Rosneft reported a 14.4% slump in profits last year. (Reporting by Julia Payne and John Irish; Additional reporting by Jarrett Renshaw in Washington; Editing by Jan Harvey)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store