Trading Day: Play it safe, Uncle Sam
By Jamie McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
Glass half empty again
The optimism that infused Asian and European markets on Monday evaporated as the global trading session progressed, with U.S. investors taking a 'glass half empty' view on the current global uncertainty surrounding tariffs and outlook for economic growth.
Wall Street's underperformance ended up being pretty marginal, but there is little doubt that a re-rating of U.S. assets is underway. More on that below, but first, a roundup of today's moves on world markets.
I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at jamie.mcgeever@thomsonreuters.com. You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @reutersjamie.bsky.social.
If you have more time to read today, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
1. After 100 days under Trump, investors reassess theallure of 'brand USA' 2. China holds off on new stimulus, shows composure in UStrade war 3. Unexpected euro surge adds to Europe Inc's tariff misery 4. Amid Trump tariffs, China's trade and economy tsar stepsinto spotlight 5. Euro zone economy facing dark future, ECB policymakerswarn
Today's Key Market Moves
* Wall Street's big indexes sink as much as 1% intraday butrecover by the close of trade. The Dow ends up 0.3%, the S&P 500is essentially flat, and the Nasdaq dips 0.1%. * U.S. tech stocks fall 0.2%; real estate and energy leadthe gainers, rising 0.8% and 0.6%, respectively. * India's BSE Sensex rises 1.3% to a fresh high for theyear above 80300 points. * Britain's FTSE 100 rises for 11th consecutive session,its longest winning streak since December 2019. * The yen is the biggest G10 FX gainer, rising more than 1%to 142 yen per dollar. * Sterling jumps 0.9% and matches last September's high of$1.3434. If that breaks, sterling is at levels last seen morethan three years ago. * U.S. bond yields fall by as much as 7 basis points at theshort end, delivering a bull steepening of the curve. * The 'risk off' tone in U.S. trading lifts gold nearly 1%back up toward $3,350/oz. * Oil slides, Brent crude futures losing 1.5% to close at$65.86/bbl
Play it safe, Uncle Sam
The selling frenzy that rocked world markets three weeks ago may have stopped, but the relief rally that followed now appears to be fading, leaving investors nervously awaiting the next signal.
Absent an obvious catalyst like a surprise U.S.-China deal on trade, markets will likely lack direction this week but remain choppy. Several events, including month-end rebalancing, U.S. 'Big Tech' earnings, a Bank of Japan policy meeting and U.S. Q1 GDP and April payrolls, should see to that.
Benchmark equity indexes in Brazil, India and Japan have fully recovered their post-'Liberation Day' losses, Germany's DAX on Monday briefly revisited its April 2 close, while the MSCI All Country World Index and Asia ex-Japan index are both within a whisker of regaining their April 2 closing levels too.
U.S. President Donald Trump cooling his more belligerent rhetoric on tariffs and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell have certainly helped calm the horses, and financial conditions around the world are beginning to loosen again.
The dollar's continued decline has been a big part of that loosening, and the greenback retreated again on Monday. Many banks have slashed their long-term dollar forecasts, and there's a case to make that a weaker dollar would be a tailwind for markets and growth around the world in the years ahead.
But does that still apply if the dollar is slumping for negative reasons, like a global loss of faith in U.S. policy? What's more, stronger domestic exchange rates will harm non-U.S. companies' earnings and eat into their profit margins. Throw that on top of the tariffs that have still to come into effect, and it's easy to see why the recent sense of relief across markets is fading.
Companies in Europe, where the euro has surged around 10%, and Japan, where corporate sensitivity to the exchange rate is always high, may be particularly exposed.
UBS strategists argue that a diversified global portfolio should still include "substantial exposure to the world's largest economy and most developed financial markets," and in the more immediate term, they see scope for a 'tactical' recovery in U.S. risk assets, as has often been the case following periods of high volatility and investor pessimism.
But many will argue this can't last. Trade and economic uncertainty is too high, visibility is non-existent, and the damage done to markets and investor and business confidence runs much deeper than seems apparent right now.
The great US re-rate has begun
The panic selling of U.S. stocks and bonds following the Trump administration's 'Liberation Day' tariff bombshell may be over, but the re-rating of American assets is just getting started.
The question is just how big this reallocation will be. Money managers are aware that even a modest reduction in exposure could have a potentially huge impact on asset prices.
That's both because of the sheer size of U.S. markets relative to total global assets, and the outsized nature of overseas investors' U.S. holdings in nominal terms and as a share of their portfolios. In Treasuries, this overweight exposure is large; in equities it is massive.
To illustrate the big impact that even small changes in allocations could have, it's worth recalling some of the numbers involved here.
For instance, the global pension fund industry, which is significantly overweight U.S. assets, is worth around $58.5 trillion.
Foreign private sector investors have flooded U.S. markets in recent years, pouring a net $3.25 trillion into U.S. assets over the last three full calendar years, according to U.S. Treasury data. Consequently, America's net international investment position is currently negative $26 trillion.
U.S. stocks accounted for as much as 75% of the $80 trillion global market cap earlier this year. And at the end of last year, foreign investors owned 18% of U.S. stocks, a record-high share going back to 1945, according to strategists at Goldman Sachs.
Additionally, Japanese and euro zone investors' U.S. fixed income allocations comprise around 60% of their foreign fixed income holdings and about 15% of their total fixed income portfolios, according to strategists at Exante Data. European investors' U.S. allocation has roughly doubled over the last decade, they note.
PENDULUM SWUNG TOO FAR?
Looking ahead, the concern is not that we will see blanket selling of U.S. assets by foreign investors or that the dollar will no longer be considered the world's reserve currency. Those scenarios will probably not happen in our lifetimes.
But we are likely to see modest shifts that could have major price impacts. Anecdotal evidence suggests some Canadian and European pension funds that have baulked at the Trump administration's trade, economic and wider policy agendas, have already started reducing exposure to U.S. assets. They won't be the only ones.
"I think the coming months will see global portfolios moderately reduce U.S. allocations, more so overseas investors than domestic U.S. investors," says Rebecca Patterson, former chief investment strategist at Bridgewater Associates.
If global investors do trim their U.S. holdings, there will be both a one-off hit to asset prices and a long-term reduction in upside potential because the level of future demand will be weaker.
This will be mitigated if U.S. investors fill the gap. But that could be difficult.
At the end of last year, U.S. households' equity holdings as a share of their total assets and total financial assets were at record highs of 29.5% and 43.5%, respectively. Exante Data's team notes that around 95% of U.S. investors' fixed income holdings are already allocated domestically.
The 'anti-U.S.' pendulum may have swung too far in recent weeks. Bank of America's April global fund manager survey found that a record share of investors intend to cut their U.S. stock holdings, the U.S. corporate profit outlook is the gloomiest since 2007, and the outlook for the U.S. dollar is the most bearish since 2006.
The risk premium on U.S. markets has risen, with bond yields up and the 'term premium' on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note the highest in a decade. And for good reason, given the volatility seen since President Donald Trump's April 2 tariff announcement.
Prices are adjusting, as they should. How long that adjustment will take and how deep it will be remains to be seen.
The unmatched depth, liquidity and dynamism of U.S. financial markets are not in doubt. But in the new world order fast emerging from the Trump administration's 'America First' drive, U.S. assets' relative attractiveness certainly is.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* Chinese earnings, including from financial heavyweightsBank of China, HSBC, China Construction Bank and ICBC * European Central Bank Executive Board member PieroCipollone speaks * Bank of England deputy Governor Dave Ramsden speaks * Germany GfK consumer confidence (May) * U.S. consumer confidence (April) * Reaction to Monday's Canadian general election
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.
(By Jamie McGeever, editing by Bill Berkrot)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

11 minutes ago
China appears to downplay US trade deal Trump said was 'done'
HONG KONG and LONDON -- A spokesperson for China 's Ministry of Commerce on Thursday appeared to downplay what President Donald Trump said Wednesday was a "done" trade deal addressing export restrictions on rare earths and semiconductors. Speaking at a press conference, the spokesperson characterized the outcome of this week's trade negotiations in London as a "framework" to consolidate what was agreed to at negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, in May. This week's talks in the U.K. represented the "first meeting," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not offer further details on what was agreed this week, telling reporters, "New progress was also made in addressing each side's trade concerns." On rare earths, the spokesperson said China would issue export licenses based on "reasonable needs" and noted that "compliant applications have already been approved." Trump on Wednesday framed the talks as having reached a deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the relationship between the world's two leading economic powerhouses was "excellent." Trump said that the U.S. would get "a total of 55% tariffs" with China's tariffs set at 10%. Trump added, "Full magnets and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick referred to the agreement as a "handshake for a framework." Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping will now have to approve the framework, Lutnick said. That step would appear to mean there were some concessions that both leaders did not give their negotiating teams authority to negotiate away. "Once that's done, we will be back on the phone together and we will begin to implement this agreement," Lutnick said. "The two largest economies in the world have reached a handshake for framework."
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar hits fresh 2025 low as US tariff concerns pick up again
(Bloomberg) — The dollar (DX=F) extended its decline as worries over US tariffs increased after President Donald Trump said he would notify trading partners soon of unilateral levies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index slid as much as 0.6% to the lowest level since July 2023 on Thursday, extending the previous day's drop spurred by softer US inflation data. The euro rose to its strongest since November 2021. Traders will be monitoring US producer-price data due later Thursday for confirmation of subdued pressures. Some of its components feed into core personal consumption expenditure, the Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation. They will also watch an auction of 30-year Treasuries after yields surged last month on fiscal concerns. 'Dollar weakness has much more room to run,' said Vasileios Gkionakis, senior economist and strategist at Aviva Investors. He added the greenback's weakness despite rising yields show eroding investor confidence in US assets. The dollar's decline spilled into the currency volatility market, reinforcing the inverse correlation between the greenback and hedging costs recently. Demand was particularly pronounced in the one-week tenor, which captures the Fed's June 18 policy meeting. What Bloomberg's Strategists Say... 'Trader pricing still favors more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, although the precise timing flips around depending on the prevailing investor mood. But what is consistent is the US dollar ploughing a path to the downside as FX trader convictions firm.' — Mark Cranfield, Markets Live Strategist, Singapore Currency traders will also be watching the upcoming Group-of-Seven summit for any trade negotiation developments. 'We are watching the G-7 summit closely for pending trade deals between the US and its key trading partners (e.g., Mexico and Canada),' said Alex Loo, macro strategist at TD Securities in Singapore. 'Leaks this week may boost sentiment, especially the likes of Canadian dollar and Mexican peso.' (Updates with pricing, analyst quote and options section.) New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill
An array of economists — from the Congressional Budget Office to the Tax Foundation to the Penn-Wharton Budget Model — have reached a similar conclusion: Trump's signature legislation comes with a price tag in the neighborhood of $3 trillion over the next decade. They're all wrong, the White House says. And not just by a little. President Trump and his aides have instead offered claims that the bill will make money and that the final tally for both the tax-cutting legislation and other parts of the Trump agenda will usher in a new golden age not just for the US economy but also for government debt. The claims from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue go as high as $8 trillion in black ink (an $11 trillion chasm with the experts) in claims that go beyond what even Capitol Hill Republicans are projecting. As for reconciling the two, some economists essentially throw up their hands. "You can't square it because it's ridiculous," Erica York of the Tax Foundation said. "The bill unambiguously will increase deficits, it will not contribute that much to economic growth," she added, noting that the bill is largely focused on extending current tax rates that would not be expected to push the economy significantly upward from current levels. Yet the White House has remained steadfast even as this gap has led to increased tensions as the bill goes through another round of adjustments on Capitol Hill. A Wednesday appearance before Congress by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was marked by lawmakers — mostly Democratic, but some Republicans as well — raising the debt issue. In one colorful moment, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson of California asked Bessent to point to an independent expert "not on the payroll of this administration" who says this bill will not add to our debt. Bessent then cited Arthur Laffer, the former Reagan official and longtime Trump supporter who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the president's first term. The comment led to laughter in the chamber, with Thompson shooting back, "I don't think that one counts." It was a hearing where Bessent declined to repeat some of the administration's most aggressive claims, saying instead that "it remains to be seen" whether the bill will add to the national debt. Others have not been so restrained about the impact of Trump's overall agenda. "We're going to cut the deficit by $8 trillion over the next 10 years," press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered recently on Fox News. And a recent White House memo offered a slightly lower figure of about $6.7 trillion to $6.9 trillion in deficit reductions over the coming decade. One issue is that White House projections rely on a set of assumptions that are often internally contradictory, such as taking credit for taxes spurring economic growth while simultaneously saying they have no cost. Other parts of the bill would enact temporary tax cuts — and then take credit for lower costs there — while also claiming other permanent cuts are free. That's in addition to an overriding assumption at the White House that, essentially, things break historically right for the US economy and sustained 3% economic growth is in the offing. That's above even what House Republicans are projecting, as lawmakers there have rallied behind a lower (but still very aggressive) assumption of 2.6% growth. Both projections are unlikely, Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said. "Some people are at 2%, some people are at 1.6% ... that is the neighborhood," he said of a series of projections for growth that hover around 1.8%. He added in an interview that even if sustained 3% growth were to happen, "it would have very little to do with this tax bill." Yet the White House has repeatedly dismissed the experts. Trump budget chief Russ Vought recently told reporters that everything "is part of a coherent fiscal agenda" and that the combination of tax cuts, tariffs, additional promised spending cuts, and "reforms we can do ourselves" to programs like Medicaid will lead to good outcomes for the US bottom line. White House projections also fully embrace recent CBO projections of $2.8 trillion in tariff revenues over the coming decade. But that embrace appears to ignore a prediction in the same report that tariffs will "reduce the size of the U.S. economy" and also lead to a potential inflation increase of 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026. York has calculated that even two seemingly minor adjustments — taking the slightly lower but still very aggressive House estimate of 2.6% economic growth and factoring in the economic costs of tariffs — means the bill "is basically a wash or even negative for GDP." "They're picking and choosing," she added. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet And few are expecting tariffs to stay steady in the coming months, not to mention the coming years. Tariff levels are under active negotiation — two fronts this week are duties on goods from China and India — as the CBO report assumed rates remain steady not just during Trump's term, but also years after he is scheduled to leave office. The tariffs are also under a considerable cloud of legal uncertainty, with an appeals court ruling on Tuesday that Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs could stay in force for now while it considers whether they are legal. "Even if they are upheld by the courts, it still seems like the Trump administration is willing to negotiate them down somewhat," York noted, "and then what happens in four years when a new administration comes in?" Ben Werschkul is Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. David Foster is a graphic artist for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data