Actor Tyler Ten will treat himself to Shin Ramyun instant noodles after winning big at Star Awards 2025
The 29-year-old was named Best Rising Star and was also one of the three Most Popular Rising Stars, along with fellow young guns Zhang Zetong and Ayden Sng. It would be the last time the trio are eligible for the award, as it's only open to stars with five or fewer years of experience, and they will battle for the Top 10 Most Popular Artiste awards next year.
It's about time Ten had his moment of glory. A finalist at Star Search 2019, he was a face to watch from the get-go. There was hardly anyone taller, fitter, or more heartthrob-by than him in the competition. You can still say the same about him and his competition now.
He just took longer to get here than, say, Star Search 2019 champ Zhang Zetong, who was last year's big winner.
But its Ten's time now.
And you get the impression he knows it.
When we ask why he looked so nervous – like a kid awaiting his PSLE results – before presenter Huang Biren announced his name, Ten said: 'My heart was pounding… A lot of people have been giving me support and they believe that I would get this award. I felt stressed that I wouldn't be able to go on the stage to thank them.'
He didn't want to be disappointed again after going home empty-handed the last few Star Awards.
'The past few years I tried to manifest and believe I would win but it turned out to be a big disappointment. So this year I tried to do something different. I just didn't think about it. I believe that when the time comes, it will come.'
He's had a great year, of course. His role as a psycho killer in Best Drama, Unforgivable, showed he's not just a pretty face, but one with acting chops. And of course, there's his star-making turned as lovable gangster Bai Ah Li in Emerald Hill, which in no doubt, has skyrocketed his popularity.
When Ten went on stage, dressed in a chest-baring suit, host Guo Liang said he looked so anxious, his pecs were tensed up.
'I'll take that as a compliment,' laughed Ten.
We asked how many push-ups he did before getting dressed. He said: 'I didn't. All I did was go on a fast two nights ago until noon today. I believe in fasting and it helps regenerate your cells. It's good for your health. I do it about once a week.'
He must be starving now. Surely, he must be hankering for a big meal after the awards.
'I don't think I can tonight because everywhere is closed by now,' he said. 'So tomorrow I'll order a huge Nutella cake and finish it all by myself. I have been dieting and cutting out sugar. I love chocolate. I love Nutella. Hopefully it will satisfy all my cravings," he added, laughing.
Tomorrow seems too far away a celebration for something he has been anticipating for so long, we tell him.
'Okay I think I will eat instant noodles when I get home, Shin Ramyun. I love it, I haven't had it in months."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
30 minutes ago
- CNA
The Projector's closure and Singapore's struggle to embrace unconventional dreams
How long was The Projector living on borrowed time? It's hard to be certain. What's clearer is that the local independent cinema, which announced its sudden exit from the market on Tuesday (Aug 19), was always more than a screen for arthouse films. Its distinct offerings made it a defiant presence in the sea of sameness that is Singapore's cinema landscape. It also kept its edge by doubling up as an events venue, holding themed parties, intimate concerts and dialogues with filmmakers. It had character and soul, and it was the direct opposite of what many Singaporeans would label as 'cookie-cutter'. And for 11 years, it worked. But I suspect that very difference also ultimately sealed its fate. The Projector's shock announcement on Tuesday marked a complete reversal from its plans less than a month ago to resume screenings at its Golden Mile Tower outlet. It said it would enter "voluntary liquidation", citing rising costs, changing audience habits and other pressures. And it's not just smaller players like The Projector struggling with high rents and the increasing competition from streaming services for audiences' time, attention and money. Cathay Cineplexes, owned by listed entertainment firm mm2 Asia, currently owes millions in rent to mall landlords. Six of its cinemas closed over the span of around three years – with more closures possibly looming. In a July bourse filing, mm2 Asia said it was mulling several options, including winding up its cinema business entirely to address its 'ongoing financial challenges'. As of August this year, only four Cathay Cineplexes cinemas remain in operation. On one hand, it's tempting to see this solely as evidence of a broader, arguably irreversible, shift in Singaporeans' attitudes towards cinemagoing. Even the biggest players are no longer immune. Yet the way I see it, the end of The Projector is a loss for Singapore as a whole. Its closure doesn't just mean decreased access to independent films in theatres, nor is it simply the disappearance of a venue that made the city a little less dull. It feels instead like a reminder of how difficult it still is to succeed through unconventional paths in Singapore. And perhaps it's time we recognised that in such a reality – which extends far beyond cinema – we are all worse off. A "REBEL CINEMA" THAT TOOK RISKS I still remember my surprise when The Projector opened its doors in 2014. I hadn't believed there would be a sustainable market for independent film showings in Singapore. The movie buffs who would show up might have been loyal, but they were always in the minority. And when it comes to our lifestyle interests, in my view, Singaporeans have long leaned towards rather homogenous, mainstream tastes. Take our shopping malls for example. Even as some places have rebranded malls as lifestyle destinations, the majority have stuck to an expected formula. Uniqlo: Check. NTUC FairPrice supermarket: Check. Kopitiam food court: Check. Broadly speaking, it's understandable that offerings with mass appeal would be key to consistently high footfall, and by extension, long-term financial viability. Likewise in cinemas, one would assume commercial blockbusters or movies that spark strong social sentiment after their Hollywood release would attract larger audiences in Singapore. Even so, The Projector seemed to show a growing appetite for the independent arts and culture scene. I believed its mere presence would, in time, nurture a deeper appreciation for raw creativity – the kind inseparable from the boldness that drives risk-taking and boundary-pushing. Its founder Karen Tan told CNA Lifestyle in 2022 that the cinema had always been motivated by 'the desire to do something different and always question the status quo'. It was a 'rebel cinema', so to speak. The team wasn't afraid of the 'messiness of experimentation and collaboration', she'd said, which allowed it to 'do a lot more'. 'While we're not afraid to take big risks, it's always a calculated risk as well. So we enter a space with a plan to foster spontaneity and organic interaction and string a deliberately loose framework around it. 'For a business to do that, it requires a certain appetite for risk and trust that people will respond.' While Singaporeans may have finally responded after 11 years, The Projector's death (and life) would be in vain if we failed to grasp its deeper message. A society that doesn't support alternative spaces, or that discourages deviation from the norm, is fundamentally incompatible with creativity. And when creativity withers, so too does our ability to remain an innovative, competitive nation. You don't need to be a cinephile to realise the cost of that possible future. CULTIVATING A SIMILAR SPIRIT OF RISK-TAKING We lose far more than just a cinema with The Projector's closure. After all, our physical environment can both reflect and reinforce the culture we live in. In this case, it may highlight our struggle to step away from safe decisions and pursue alternative dreams. Despite the rhetoric around embracing failure, a culture built on the tried-and-true doesn't turn experimental overnight. Even our rebellions are measured. Aim high, but don't overstep. Follow your passions, but keep them on the side. Go niche, but never without a safety net. Moreover, Singapore's emphasis on productivity feels increasingly at odds with the spirit of risk-taking it wants to cultivate to stay competitive in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). Not every risk will pay off when we judge its success mainly by productive output. But experimentation like The Projector matters, because even failed attempts can give rise to learning, resilience and the conditions for future breakthroughs. This willingness to try, despite the risk of failure, is the essence of creativity. Like a muscle, it grows stronger when we support what AI can never replicate: The act of being human. In the many eulogies for The Projector so far, it's clear the cinema created a rare space for just that. Cinemas function as a 'third place'. The sociological term refers to a social setting outside home ('first place') and work or school ('second place'), where people gather, interact and build meaning together. Thriving third places are seen as hallmarks of a city's cultural maturity. They signal that society values creativity, leisure and diversity, not just economic growth. The thing is, we tend to forget that building such spaces takes time and effort. This inconvenience runs counter to the Singaporean psyche that prizes efficiency and productivity, yet it is precisely what creates a deeper sense of belonging. So in Singapore, independent spaces often exist on precarious ground from the get-go. Their survival (or lack thereof) then becomes symbolic of whether the city can sustain a richer, more varied urban life. How long was The Projector living on borrowed time? In hindsight, the answer is clear: Since before it opened, if I'm being honest. Its very ethos of daring to dream was already in tension with Singapore's instinct to drift towards the mainstream. And yet, I don't resonate with the jadedness that seems to follow after such spaces close. I don't see The Projector's closure as a cautionary tale against risk-taking. If anything, its existence paved the way for fellow rebels. It gave us permission to wholeheartedly pursue the risks we truly believe in, if only so we remember everything it stood for. In the cinema's announcement on Tuesday, Tan too acknowledged that the place might be closing, but it hopes its 'spirit will live on in the conversations, ideas and communities we've nurtured'. 'If Singapore wants to thrive, it must find a way for creative and cultural businesses to survive because culture is the cornerstone of identity and civil society,' she said. The Projector proved that this reality is possible, despite the odds. Because while the outcome of risk-taking, status quo-breaking and boundary-pushing may not always endure, true rebels know the magic lies in the attempt. And we will all be better for it.
CNA
17 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Celebrating Singapore's Retro Dance Party Culture with DJ Aldrin and the Mambo Prince
CNA938 Rewind - Celebrating Singapore's Retro Dance Party Culture with DJ Aldrin and the Mambo Prince In 'Culture Club', Melanie Oliveiro examines deejay and retro dance party culture with DJ Aldrin, a pioneer of Singapore's electronic music scene and dancer, Claudio Chock, fondly known as the Mambo Prince. The multiple award-winning DJ Aldrin, will talk about his career so far and clubbing trends he's noticed through the decades. Chock will talk about how he lit up the dance floor at Zouk's popular Mambo Nights for the past two decades. Vinnie Quek - co-founder of content cooperative, Bassis Asia, will talk about how both creatives will be performing at SquareRoom - a one-night-only retro dance party at the newly revamped D'Marquee @ Downtown East.
CNA
17 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - The Moving Stories Behind Fashion for Cancer 2025
CNA938 Rewind - The Moving Stories Behind Fashion for Cancer 2025 In 'Made in SG', Melanie Oliveiro finds out what's new about Fashion For Cancer or FFC 2025, a charity fashion show with cancer survivors as runway models. Vanessa Ong, FFC 2025's fund raising committee member, will reveal how the team chose this year's cancer survivors and ambassadors who'll be dressing up for the runway show. Ong will also say how much FFC aims to raise to fund cancer research and patient support. Cancer survivor and artist, Melissa Tan, will talk about her role as an FFC fund raising partner and Linda Pennington will describe what's expected of her as an FFC 2025 model ambassador, among other roles.
