Duracell sues Energizer, claiming ad campaign features ‘misleading' battery life claims
America's top battery brands are locked in a power struggle over battery life claims.
Duracell has filed a lawsuit against Energizer, accusing the rival battery maker of running a deceptive advertising campaign.
In a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan on June 13, Duracell — which is owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway — alleged that Energizer's new ad campaign falsely states that its Energizer MAX batteries outlast Duracell Power Boost batteries by 10%.
The ad's claims have caused Duracell to suffer 'irreparable reputational harm, including the tarnishing of its brand and loss of goodwill,' Duracell said in the complaint.
Duracell alleged that the sole basis for Energizer's 10% claim is a comparison of the two brands' AA batteries under one industry standard, but battery performance is also measured by other standards, the company said.
'The Energizer MAX False Advertising is a clear effort by Energizer to expand its market share – at Duracell's expense – by confusing and misleading consumers about the comparative performance of Energizer MAX batteries and Duracell Power Boost batteries with blantantly false advertising in a transparent, and unfair, effort to drive sales,' the complaint said.
Energizer's new ad campaign, which launched earlier this month, has been featured on numerous television channels, as well as on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, the lawsuit said.
One YouTube ad features Energizer's mascot, the Energizer Bunny, engaging in a head-to-head showdown with a battery that looks like a Duracell battery.
'There's no competition. Energizer MAX outlasts Duracell Power Boost by 10%,' the ad says. 'No fluff, just facts.'
Duracell is seeking to halt Energizer's ads and for Energizer to pay monetary damages.
Energizer did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4
Top Senate Republicans are running into some resistance from several key senators about the details of President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' potentially complicating plans to deliver that package by their own July 4 deadline. Hours after unveiling central tenets of the Senate GOP's measure, at least one GOP senator – conservative Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – said he is currently opposed to the bill, saying it doesn't do enough to control US spending. He added there's 'no way' the bill can be fixed in time to pass by July 4. 'Not by July 4th. No way. We haven't had the discussions we need,' Johnson said. Two more GOP senators were noncommittal on the bill but raised issues with one major piece of it – a crackdown on the so-called provider tax that some states rely on to help fund their Medicaid programs. Those included Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine. Hawley said he was taken 'completely off-guard' by the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of Trump's bill. 'This is a major departure from the House framework. This took me totally by surprise,' Hawley told reporters after he stepped out of a meeting on the bill with his fellow Republican senators. Collins confirmed to reporters that she also has problems with the provider tax, but declined to go into the details of the bill. Asked if she had been consulted throughout the process and had been listened to, she said: 'Sometimes yes and sometimes no.' And it's not just those three: Sen. Rick Scott of Florida wouldn't say he is a yes, signaling he wants to see even more reforms to Medicaid. And Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, too, was noncommittal, saying, 'I'm still reading.' The early reactions from those senators previews a tricky battle ahead for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who can afford to lose only three GOP votes on Trump's final tax and spending bill. Thune and his leadership team must satisfy their hard-right members, like Johnson and Scott, without losing equally vocal Republicans like Hawley, who has vowed to tank any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. GOP leaders are racing to put their bill on the floor next week, eager to deliver Trump a win on tax breaks, spending cuts and additional military money, particularly as he faces a quickly escalating international crisis in the Middle East. But multiple rank-and-file Republicans are eager to make their own changes to Trump's bill, aware that the giant policy measure may be their only chance to get their own priorities passed. Ultimately, GOP leaders are betting that there aren't enough Republicans in their chamber willing to defy Trump and that they will get the votes they need, even if it takes more time. 'Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote,' Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota told reporters.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Much Have Baggage Fees Airlines Changed Since 2024?
Major U.S. airlines have started charging at least $5 more for checked bags since the beginning of 2024. This increase was to help offset rising costs and also help generate more revenue. Consequently, these price changes can alter which is your best flight option and require more research time. Below are the current fees and corresponding changes (listed alphabetically). CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - MAY 27: Passengers retrieve luggage from a baggage carousel after arriving at Midway Airport on a Southwest Airlines flight on May 27, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. Beginning tomorrow, Southwest Airlines will begin to charge most passengers $35 for their first checked bag and $45 for their second, ending its longstanding free checked bag policy. (Photo by) Getty Images On January 2, 2025, Alaska Airlines upped its first and second checked bag fees to $35 and $45, respectively. The rate is the same whether you pay the fee online or at the airport. You previously paid $30 (first bag) and $40 (second bag). In November 2024, American Airlines increased its first checked bag fee by $5 for domestic basic economy and main cabin flights within the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. You now pay $35 when paying the fee online or $40 at the airport. Second bags now cost a flat $45 for most routes in either bottom-tier ticket class. Delta increased its first and second checked bag fees in March 2024 by $5. You now pay $35 for the first checked bag and $45 for the second checked bag on domestic flights. These fees apply to the Delta Main Basic, Delta Main, and Delta Comfort fare classes. In April 2024, JetBlue pivoted to multi-tiered pricing. In addition to being a first or subsequent checked bag, your fee also depends on whether it's peak or non-peak season, and how close to check-in you pay your fee. Blue, Blue Basic, and Blue Plus pay the following fees: More Than 24 Hours Before Departure (Off-Peak): Within 24 Hours of Departure (Off-Peak): More Than 24 Hours Before Departure (Peak): Within 24 Hours of Departure (Peak): Prices include a $10 savings per bag when you pay your domestic itinerary fees at least 24 hours before departure. The savings discount is $5 per bag for transatlantic flights. These fee increases are approximately $10 above the previous base rate. United Airlines increased its checked bag fee by $5 in most markets for departures on or after February 24, 2024. Prepaying for your suitcases at least 24 hours before takeoff saves money. Domestic flights have the accompanying baggage charges: Shocking most flyers and discount airline enthusiasts, Southwest Airlines ditched its long-time two-bag-fly-for-free policy. Since May 28, 2025, most fares incur the following fees: One personal item and a carry-on bag are still complimentary with all fare classes. You automatically avoid both fees by purchasing the top-tier Business Select® Fare or by being a Rapid Rewards® A-List Preferred Member. A-List members and Rapid Rewards credit card customers can waive the first checked bag fee. The precise fee waivers differ by airline, although everyday travel hacks include: Moreover, due to strict European Union carry-on standards, U.S.-based airlines may also be tightening the maximum allowable carry-on dimensions to select destinations. These are the first major fee changes since 2018 when the legacy airlines last increased their baggage fees. Be sure to check the latest fee schedules and luggage policies to avoid any surprises at airport check-in. Most airlines have a baggage fee calculator to estimate your costs for domestic and international flights before booking a flight. Related Articles:
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Medicaid cuts, other details from Senate committee's tax bill text
The GOP-led Senate Finance Committee on Monday released its proposal for President Donald Trump's agenda bill that calls for enacting sweeping cuts to Medicaid and preventing a multi-trillion dollar tax hike on Americans. The committee would maintain many of the provisions contained in the legislation that the House narrowly approved last month, including making permanent essentially all the individual income tax cuts contained in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which are set to expire at year's end, and instituting work requirements in Medicaid for the first time. But the committee is calling for some notable changes to the package, including lowering the cap on state and local tax deductions, instituting deeper cuts to Medicaid, slowing the elimination of some clean energy tax credits and making permanent several business tax breaks and a beefed-up child tax credit. Senate committees are racing to release their versions of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' in hopes of passing their package next week so the two chambers can work out a final deal and send it to Trump by July 4. In the legislative text unveiled Monday, the Senate Finance Committee would permanently extend the current $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions, potentially blowing up a carefully constructed deal in the House to lift the cap on state and local deductions to $40,000 for married couples. However, the committee noted in a summary of its provisions that the cap is 'the subject of continuing negotiations.' The $10,000 cap, which was instituted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was a major sticking point in the House negotiations. Speaker Mike Johnson worked out an agreement with GOP lawmakers from high-tax states to raise the cap to $40,000 for those making $500,000 or less. But Senate Republicans have expressed disdain for the deal because of its price tag and because it primarily benefits taxpayers from blue states. Rep. Mike Lawler, a New York Republican, issued a stern warning to Senate Republicans earlier on Monday: Any changes to pare back the deal, he said, would cause the bill to collapse in the House. 'After engaging in good faith negotiations, we were able to increase the cap on SALT from $10,000 to $40,000,' Lawler said in a statement. 'That is the deal, and I will not accept a penny less. If the Senate reduces the SALT number, I will vote NO, and the bill will fail in the House.' Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee are also calling for making permanent several tax breaks for businesses, including allowing companies to immediately deduct the cost of equipment and research and development in the year the expense was incurred. These are designed to enhance the economic growth potential of the package but would also increase the cost. The committee would also permanently beef up the child tax credit to $2,200, in contrast to the House, which would increase the credit to $2,500 from 2025 through 2028. And while the Senate committee would keep Trump's campaign promises to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, it would place caps on that relief –- allowing tipped workers to deduct only up to $25,000 in tip income and limiting the deduction for overtime pay to $12,500 for a single worker. Those tax breaks would only be in place from 2025 through 2028, as in the House version. But the Senate measure would provide a more generous deduction for senior citizens than the House bill: $6,000 versus $4,000. The provision would be in effect from 2025 through 2028 in both versions of the bill. In a contentious move, the committee would cap most states' ability to levy provider taxes on certain health care providers – notably, hospitals – to 3.5% by 2031, down from the current 6% limit. However, that provision would only apply to the 40 states and the District of Columbia that have expanded Medicaid to low-income adults. States that have not expanded Medicaid, which are largely GOP-led states, would be restricted from increasing the rate of their current provider taxes, which would not have as sizable an impact. The issue of provider taxes has divided GOP lawmakers, with conservatives arguing that states use these taxes to get more federal Medicaid matching funds, while more moderate members worry that limiting such taxes could hurt hospitals, particularly those in rural areas. States use the revenue they raise from taxing providers to boost provider rates and fund health-related initiatives, among other uses. Every state except one levies at least one type of provider tax. Also, the Senate would require more parents to work, volunteer, go to school or participate in job training for at least 80 hours a month to maintain their Medicaid benefits. The committee would mandate that parents of children ages 15 and older would be subject to the work requirement, while the House version exempted parents of dependent children. The Senate's changes would likely result in even more people losing their Medicaid coverage than the House provisions, which would increase the number of uninsured Americans by 7.8 million in 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The Senate Finance Committee text would kill a consumer tax credit for electric vehicles and quickly phase out tax credits helping homeowners defray the cost of energy efficient appliances and rooftop solar, ending those by next year. The Senate text differs somewhat from the House bill on energy tax credits for businesses producing electricity. Like the House bill, it hits wind and solar producers particularly hard, phasing out clean energy tax credits for those projects starting next year, with the credit ending by 2028. However, companies generating electricity with zero-emission sources like nuclear, geothermal or hydropower can claim the credit for a longer period of time. The Senate text would also terminate a tax credit for companies that make clean hydrogen, something favored by the oil and gas industry. The Senate committee would raise the debt limit by $5 trillion, compared to $4 trillion in the House version, providing more time for Trump to enact his policies without needing to negotiate a deal with Democrats to address the cap. The US hit its roughly $36 trillion debt ceiling in January. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to address the cap before its August recess to allow the agency to continue paying the nation's bills in full and on time, preventing a default that would likely have catastrophic global economic consequences.
