
Seattle woman takes Navy's Blue Angels to court over social media censorship and 'acoustic torture' of cat
Lauren Ann Lombardi filed a federal lawsuit July 21 accusing the Blue Angels of infringing on her First Amendment rights. The complaint names Navy Cdr. Adam Bryan; L. Ben Bushong, the public affairs officer for the Blue Angels; and an unnamed social media administrator for the squadron, as defendants.
The lawsuit states that the Blue Angels perform shows in the Seattle area near Puget Sound every August using F/A-18E/F Super Hornet jets "with the subtlety of a military occupation" while reaching speeds of upwards of 700 mph, which produces extreme decibel levels.
During the shows, Lombardi "engaged in a familiar American pastime of complaining to her government about her government's actions through her government's social media accounts" to advocate for her elderly cat Layla, who suffered from congestive heart disease, and calling for the demonstrations in August 2023 and 2024 to end, the lawsuit states.
However, she was eventually blocked from commenting on the Blue Angels' Instagram page.
"These thin-skinned bureaucrats blocked Lombardi from commenting any further, thereby muzzling an American citizen while simultaneously blinding the broader public from witnessing legitimate grievances against their government," the lawsuit said of the people running the Instagram account.
Lombardi's messages appeared to show her displeasure and frustration with the noise levels from the performances.
"Stop with your F------ b------- you are terrorizing my cat and all the other animals and wildlife," one message states. F--- off" and "Nobody gives a f--- about your stupid little planes."
She also left multiple comments on the Blue Angels' Instagram posts or tagged their handle on other accounts' posts where she directed users to sign a Change.org petition, "We All Want to Feel Safe: No More Blue Angels Over Seattle."
When she was blocked from the Blue Angels account Aug. 5, 2023, Lombardi sent the group a direct message calling them "cowards." The message was never delivered because she was blocked.
Lombardi said her cat suffered in her final days because of the aerial performances.
"Whatever bandwidth Layla's walnut-sized brain could previously gorge upon had been narrowed to a single overwhelming frequency: pure debilitating terror," the lawsuit states.
"Every August was good until then, but no August would ever be the same again. Layla's condition continued to deteriorate and she left home again, for the final time. She spent her last week fighting for her life in a specialty hospital before being humanely euthanized on August 11, 2024, surrounded by her inconsolably grieving family. Layla's final days on Earth were marred by sadistic suffering — cowering in terror beneath furniture while her ailing heart struggled against the Blue Angels' relentless noise pollution. Layla died knowing only fear when she should have known only love."
The lawsuit noted that Lombardi respects and supports the U.S. military and that her criticism of the Blue Angels was focused on the "environmental and Constitutional harms caused by their demonstration practices and subsequent censorship activities."
She is asking a judge to force the Blue Angels to unblock her from the Instagram account, to order the defendants named in the lawsuit to take remedial First Amendment training and to award her the cost of attorney's fees.
A spokesperson for the Blue Angels told Fox News Digital the squadron doesn't comment on pending litigation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
25 minutes ago
- The Verge
The UK is slogging through an online age-gate apocalypse
People across the United Kingdom have been faced with a censored and partially inaccessible online landscape since the country introduced its latest digital safety rules on Friday. The Online Safety Act mandates that web service operators must use 'highly effective' age verification measures to stop kids from accessing a wide range of material, on penalty of heavy fines and criminal action against senior managers. It's primarily focused on pornography and content that promotes suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders, but the scope of 'priority content' also includes materials related to bullying, abusive or hateful content, and dangerous stunts or challenges. Effectively, web platforms must either set up an age verification system that poses potential privacy risks, default to blocking huge swaths of potentially questionable content, or entirely pull out of the UK. Residents are finding themselves locked out of anything from period-related subreddits to hobbyist forums — it's little wonder that they're turning to VPNs. Over the past several days, several large social media platforms have started requiring age verification in the UK to access certain features and types of content, in partnership with third-party software providers. Users typically have a choice between uploading bank card information, an image of government-issued ID, or a facial scan that estimates the user's age. Meta users likely won't have seen a huge difference over the weekend, as Facebook and Instagram rolled out age verification requirements a few years ago. Bluesky users in the UK, however, now can't access direct messaging capabilities until they complete the platform's new age verification process. Reddit has also blocked access to specific subreddits for UK-based users who don't complete its age verification process, some of which — r/periods, r/stopsmoking, r/stopdrinking, and r/sexualassault, for example — provide valued community support and resources for adults and minors alike. People are already finding loopholes for these systems. The face scanning systems for Persona and k-ID — the third-party verification software used by Reddit and Discord, respectively — can both be easily tricked using Death Stranding's photo mode. (Facebook and Instagram use a similar service called Yoti, which so far does not appear to have been fooled the same way.) X doesn't yet have a direct verification system, and is instead currently estimating age based on factors like account creation date, social connections, email addresses, and legacy verification. Accounts that don't have any of these signals in place are locked out of accessing certain content until X rolls out the ID and facial scanner-based checkers it's planning to release 'in the following weeks.' That includes protest footage and video game clips that depict violence — and users who aren't even based in the UK are reporting content restrictions as well. Outside the biggest platforms, some sites are entirely inaccessible. Cybersecurity company McAfee reports that more than 6,000 websites that host adult content have already implemented age assurance methods, but others have opted to geoblock their services in the UK. A wide variety of unrelated, innocuous websites have followed suit. That includes forums for owners of EV Renault vehicles, electronic music production, beaded jewelry patterns, and tech-focused blogs. Many smaller forums simply don't have the resources to support third-party verification systems or risk millions of dollars in fines. Wikipedia has voiced similar concerns over other Online Safety Act rules that could require it to verify its adult contributors, which the Wikimedia Foundation behind Wikipedia says could leave volunteers vulnerable to 'data breaches, stalking, lawsuits, or even imprisonment by authoritarian regimes.' As such, while it's still available for now, the platform is also considering blocking UK users to avoid compliance entirely. The UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, declined to offer an attributed on-the-record comment about the new age checks to The Verge. In unattributed statements to other outlets, it said it was 'now assessing compliance to make sure platforms have them in place, and companies that fall short should expect to face enforcement action.' UK residents have launched a parliamentary petition in response to the sweeping age verification requirements, urging the UK government to repeal the Online Safety Act, and describing it as 'far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society.' The petition has attracted more than 350,000 signatures at the time of writing, surpassing the 100,000 signatures needed to force the government to consider holding a debate over the demands. Meanwhile, some users have been finding ways to avoid undergoing verification entirely, expressing distrust over handing their personal information over to private overseas companies. Many restrictions can be evaded by using a VPN, which masks the user's true location by making it seem like they're in another country — one without the UK's rigid online safety rules. VPN apps currently occupy five out of the top 10 most popular free apps on Apple's iOS store in the UK. The top spot is currently held by Swiss-based VPN provider Proton VPN, which surpassed ChatGPT over the weekend. Proton VPN's general manager, David Peterson, told The Verge that it had seen a more than 1,800 percent increase in daily sign-ups from UK-based users since Friday. The UK is now one of the countries generating the highest usage for Proton VPN, according to Peterson, with the vast majority of new users signing up for free accounts. 'This clearly shows that adults are concerned about the impact universal age verification laws will have on their privacy,' said Peterson. 'The sign-up spike in the UK follows a similar pattern as when other governments put in place restrictions on communication or social media platforms, and shouldn't be surprising since services like Wikipedia, Reddit, and X are reportedly being asked to comply with age verification requirements.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jess Weatherbed Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Regulation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Security Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Web
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Unraveling claim Louisiana voted to force 9-year-old rape victim to carry pregnancy
Claim: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers voted "to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." Rating: What's True: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban, specifically allowing young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. What's False: The proposed bill did not reference or target any specific case of a pregnant 9-year-old. What's Undetermined: The claim originated from Louisiana state Rep. Patricia Moore's mention of a pregnant 9-year-old girl in her district. However, we were unable to independently confirm the existence or circumstances of the case. In July 2025, social media posts claimed that a nine-year-old girl in Louisiana was being forced to carry a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault. One Threads post (archived) with the claim reached over 85,000 reactions and 10,000 shares, as of this writing. It read: There is a nine year old CHILD in Louisiana being forced to carry a pregnancy that was the result of SA. A nine year old CHILD. Who cannot give birth naturally because she is a CHILD and will have to undergo a C Section if she or the fetus even survive. This should enrage you. This is not pro life. I will not argue (Threads user @savabigailbeluee) The claim first surfaced on social media in June 2025, when an X post (archived) claimed, "Louisiana votes to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." It also quoted Democratic state Rep. Patricia Moore allegedly saying, "I'm constantly hearing that God would take a bad situation and turn it into good," additionally claiming that Moore spoke out against a bill allowing abortions for child victims of rape "even after being made aware of the pregnant 9-year-old girl living in her district." Similar claims spread over the months on social media platforms including Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived) and Reddit (archived). In short, the claim was a mixture of true, false and undetermined information. In early June 2025, for the third year in a row, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban. Namely, the bill would have allowed young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. However, the proposed legislation did not reference any specific case of a pregnant 9-year-old. The claim stemmed from a statement by Moore, who said she was aware of a 9-year-old girl in her district who had become pregnant. In response to our request for clarification, Moore said she was informed of the case sometime in the last year by someone who did not disclose the child's name but said the girl was from Morehouse Parish. However, we were unable to independently verify the existence or circumstances of the child mentioned. Abortion law and recent bill on exceptions Louisiana's abortion ban took effect in 2022 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision eliminated federal protections for abortion and allowed individual states to set their own laws. Under the state's law, abortion is banned except in limited cases, such as when the pregnant woman's life is at serious risk, the fetus is "medically futile" or in cases of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage. There is currently no exception for rape or incest. The in-question legislation was Democratic state Rep. Delisha Boyd's third attempt to create exceptions to Louisiana's abortion law. The proposed bill aimed to allow abortions for victims under 17 who became pregnant as a result of specific offenses such as rape or sexual battery that, if committed against a minor, would make an abortion legal in those cases. The bill said the victim wouldn't need to provide a police report, forensic evidence or proof that someone was being prosecuted for the crime in order to get the abortion. Legislators discussed the bill during a House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice hearing on June 3, 2025. As shown in the image below, the bill that "provides for exceptions to the abortion laws of this state relative to rape and certain sex offenses" received three votes in favor and nine votes against. Therefore, the measure did not proceed to the House floor for further consideration. (Louisiana House of Representatives) You can access the full text of the bill here. A video circulating alongside the claims on Louisiana "denying abortion to 9-year-old rape victim" originated from an April 11, 2025, KLFY News 10 segment that aired before legislators voted on the bill. Moore mentioned pregnant 9-year-old Moore made the statement about the pregnant 9-year-old during the hearing at 38:57 of the video recording available via the Louisiana House of Representatives' official website. Moore stated that she was "aware of a nine year old, in [her] area, pregnant" and that she was struggling to reconcile her feelings about the case with her religious beliefs. Moore also added that her mother was raped at the age of 13 and had her at 14. "So I do struggle with it. I know we got to protect our children, but this point right now, I cannot vote yes," she said. Boyd, who authored the bill, also mentioned she was aware of a "Louisiana girl who was raped and gave birth at 13 years old and a 9-year-old girl who became pregnant after being sexually assaulted." All in all, while it's true that Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have allowed abortion in cases of child rape, there was no confirmed evidence that the decision directly affected a specific 9-year-old. Moore mentioned being aware of such a case during the hearing, but we were unable to independently verify the claim. As of this writing, Louisiana abortion law does not include an exception for rape or incest. - YouTube. Accessed 11 June 2025. Agenda - Administration of Criminal Justice. Accessed 11 June 2025. HB215. Accessed 11 June 2025. ---. Accessed 11 June 2025. LA House On-Demand Video. Accessed 11 June 2025. Louisiana House of Representatives 24-28. Accessed 11 June 2025. "Louisiana Lawmakers Reject Adding Exceptions for Some Rape Cases to Abortion Ban." AP News, 3 June 2025, Louisiana Laws - Louisiana State Legislature. Accessed 11 June 2025.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
TikToker facing charges after pranking workers at Chipotle, Pep Boys: police
A Phoenix area content creator is facing criminal charges after authorities say he went too far pranking multiple businesses over a four-month period. Heston Cobb, 21, known on social media as Heston James, was arrested on July 23 and charged with one count of third degree burglary, two counts of criminal impersonation, five counts of disorderly conduct and five counts of criminal trespassing, the Tempe Police Department announced in a press release. Police called the alleged crimes 'serious viral pranks that disrupted several local businesses.' What did the pranks entail? Between March and July, Cobb and a group of other men targeted businesses in Tempe, about 11 miles southeast of Phoenix, police said in the press release. The group went into stores such as Pep Boys, Jiffy Lube and Chipotle dressed as employees. Once inside, the men allegedly began disrupting businesses by entering employee-only areas. When they were asked to leave, they refused. Cobb, later identified as the leader of the group, told the others to start working, police said. The videos were uploaded to Cobb's social media pages. While his TikTok page has been deleted, he has an Instagram account with 1.2 million followers as of July 28, as well as a YouTube page with nearly 79,000 subscribers as of July 28. 'The videos garnered millions of views and potentially generated large amounts of money,' police said. Cobb recognized in previous videos In a compilation video titled "Top 5 Heston James moments," Cobb can be seen at a Target store pretending to be on the phone. "Go ahead and uh, bring the guys in," he said as a security worker tried to get him out of the store. In the next clip, a group of men dressed in red, as if they worked at Target, marched into the store, and Cobb directed them to "get to work." "Take over the lanes,' Cobb said. 'I need people at self-checkout." Another clip in the compilation shows a store employee telling Cobb he recognizes him. 'You look a lot like a guy who goes around recording videos of himself screaming in stores,' the employee said to Cobb, referencing another type of video Cobb had previously posted. In his other videos, he goes into stores yelling profanity. One clip he shared on his Instagram page on July 4 showed a group pulling up to a mechanic's shop in a white van and rushing inside. As of July 28, the video has over 1 million likes. 'Diligent police work' Police were able to connect the most recent retail pranks to each other once they began happening more often in Tempe, they said in their statement. 'Diligent police work connected 21-year-old Heston Cobb to the social media platforms as the leader of these pranks,' Tempe police added. Cobb captioned multiple videos "Bro pulled up with his own army of workers." Once viewers got wind of his arrest, they've been piling on comments. "Bro had a full page full of evidence," wrote one user on July 25. Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@