logo
'Kaan Kholke Sun Le...' No third-party role in Pak ceasefire: EAM in RS

'Kaan Kholke Sun Le...' No third-party role in Pak ceasefire: EAM in RS

Hans India2 days ago
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday clarified that there was no phone call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump between April 22, the day the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.
"I want to tell them (Opposition), woh kaan kholke sun le... (listen carefully) From April 22 to June 16, where wasn't one phone call between President Trump and PM Modi," Jaishankar said in the Rajya Sabha.
The minister's remarks came amid Opposition's questions to the government on Donald Trump claiming credit for the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan military conflict. Jaishankar also reiterated that there was no third-party intervention in the India-Pak ceasefire, and that all issues with Pakistan will be dealt with bilaterally. The government has time and again rejected Trump's assertion that a mediation from the United States led to the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan back in May.
"...When Operation Sindoor commenced, a number of countries were in touch with us to see how serious the situation was and how long it would go... We gave the same message to all the countries... that we were not open to any mediation," Jaishankar said.
He clarified that all countries which got in touch with India were informed that a fight with Pakistan would continue until a request through the channel of the DGMO in Pakistan.
"If that fighting was to stop, Pakistan must make a request. And that request could only come through the channel of the DGMO...," Jaishankar added. Repeating what PM Modi said on Tuesday, Jaishankar said US Vice President JD Vance called on May 9, warning that Pakistan was planning a huge attack on India. To this, PM Modi replied that India's response would be appropriate, he said. ''Hum goli ka jawab gole se denge (We will respond to bullets with missiles)',' the Prime Minister had said earlier.
Speaking about the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians, Jaishankar noted that that incident was "absolutely unacceptable" and crossed India's "red line". "When the Pahalgam attack happened on April 22, it was a shocking attack for a variety of reasons...The manner in which people were killed in front of their families, the fact that their faith was asked before killing them, the intent of destroying the economy of Jammu and Kashmir, which had returned to normalcy and prosperity after the end of Article 370. All of this angered the country," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP MPs go full throttle against Trump even as govt hails enduring India-US ties amid tariff tension
BJP MPs go full throttle against Trump even as govt hails enduring India-US ties amid tariff tension

The Print

time8 minutes ago

  • The Print

BJP MPs go full throttle against Trump even as govt hails enduring India-US ties amid tariff tension

BJP Lok Sabha MP Nishikant Dubey took a dig at Trump's recent declaration on developing an oil reserve in Pakistan. 'What can a beggar country give to India?' he asked on social media. 'This is America's own revelation. Pakistan has only 25 percent of oil and gas reserves for its own expenses. According to America, the Turkmenistan, Iran, and Qatar oil and gas pipeline is the only final option to meet Pakistan's needs. What will a beggar country give to India? India does not care about anyone more than its farmers, small traders, and the country's security. This is Modi's strong India,' he posted. New Delhi: While the Indian government has made a measured response to the 25 percent trade tariff imposed by Donald Trump, many in the BJP have taken up the role of hitting out at Trump's policies, with some BJP MPs suggesting the government diversify its trade to other countries, namely Latin America, Africa and the Global South, and, like Vajpayee, who faced US sanctions, choose a new path. In another post, Nishikant Dubey suggested, 'Govt should take up the challenge like Vajpayee. Our government conducted a nuclear test in 1998, and the United States imposed trade and financial sanctions; India's economy grew at a rate of 8 percent until 2008. The Modi government has both an opportunity and a challenge; we will succeed.' In another post, Dubey drew a parallel between PM Modi and Singapore founding father and former prime minister Lee khan Yew. While replying to Rahul Gandhi, he said, 'Malaysia declared Singapore a dead economy and expelled it in 1965. Where is Singapore today, and where is Malaysia? @RahulGandhi-ji, Lee Kuan Yew and Modi-ji are made of the same metal, the country will laugh at your Pakistan-supported, America-supported, China-supported talk.' After Trump's 'dead economy' jibe, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, who briefed Parliament on 31 July had two messages in his statement—one for the domestic constituency and another for the US. Responding to the American President's jibe, Goyal said, 'In just over a decade, India has rapidly transformed from being one of the fragile five to the fastest growing major economy in the world. Today international institutions and economists see India as a bright spot in the global economy. India is contributing almost 16 percent to global growth.' Goyal's message to voters at home was that India would not compromise on national interest. Not wanting to upset sensitivities of farmers, Piyush Goyal's statement focused on protecting the agriculture sector. But unlike the government's measured stance, many BJP MPs suggested that India identify a new country for its exports. Rajya Sabha MP Dinesh Sharma said, 'India's economy is the fastest-growing economy in the world. The issue of tariffs being imposed by the US is still under discussion… (The Opposition) has started declaring results even before that. On the other hand, India has made trade agreements with Britain, European countries, Russia, and many other major countries. India is a country that does not rely solely on exports. We are moving towards self-reliance. If there is a shortfall in exports from one place, we move towards fulfilling it from other places.' BJP Lok Sabha MP from Gujarat Hemant Joshi told ThePrint, 'Trump has a habit of making unilateral statements and later retracting. Earlier he made several statements and later made a U-turn. So let's wait for our conclusion of the trade deal with America, but knowing our prime minister, he will not bow under any pressure.' BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal, whose organisation Confederation of All India Traders works to protect interests of small traders, said, 'This is an unfortunate statement by the American President. The Indian economy is booming and such statements are not required at the ongoing trade talks. But the government will protect the interests of exporters once the talks are concluded.' But Trump's outburst has given the Opposition another opportunity to corner the Modi government. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said, 'Everybody knows this except the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister. Everybody knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact… The entire world knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. BJP has finished the economy to help Adani.' 'The foreign minister gives a speech and says that we have a genius foreign policy. On one hand, America is abusing you; on the other hand, China is behind you. When you send your delegation to the world, no country condemns Pakistan. How are they running this country? There is total confusion… He (PM Modi in his speech) did not take the name of Trump, China… The military chief of Pakistan who carried out this Pahalgam attack… President Trump is having lunch with him, and they are saying we had a huge success,' he added. BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya and MP Anurag Thakur attacked Rahul Gandhi for saying India was a dead economy. But sources say, the BJP's real challenge is not Rahul Gandhi, but the emerging geo political situation which can disrupt the Modi government's leverage on foreign policy and domestic politics. A senior BJP leader said, 'We can counter Rahul Gandhi any time, but not Trump. Knowing the importance of the India-US relationship, a poor trade deal will diminish our leverage on the diplomatic front and in our domestic constituency. The PM has invested so much in the relationship with the US president, but Trump's outreach to Pakistan and the changing geo political situation can create a major diplomatic challenge for India. Our challenge is to safeguard our export interests and protect the warmth of the India-US relationship.' (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Trump tariff forces India to shed illusion. Stop conflating status with power

CM Hemant Soren terms SIR threat to constitutional rights, vows to block it in Jharkhand
CM Hemant Soren terms SIR threat to constitutional rights, vows to block it in Jharkhand

New Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

CM Hemant Soren terms SIR threat to constitutional rights, vows to block it in Jharkhand

RANCHI: Politics has intensified over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voters, coinciding with the commencement of the monsoon session of the Jharkhand Assembly on Friday. The ruling alliance has announced it will protest against the SIR both inside and outside the House on 4 August, while opposition parties have termed the planned protest as dishonest and absurd. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), which leads the ruling coalition, has declared that SIR will never be allowed to be implemented in Jharkhand under any circumstance. Chief Minister Hemant Soren, during a meeting with ruling party MLAs ahead of the monsoon session on Thursday, alleged that SIR poses a threat to the constitutional rights of ordinary citizens. 'The INDIA alliance is against this decision of the Election Commission,' said Soren. 'Several issues were discussed during the meeting, including the SIR in Bihar. The INDIA bloc is against the decision of the Election Commission, and we also protest this,' he said. 'Whatever is happening in Bihar regarding SIR itself shows how the constitutional institutions are being misused by the central government,' he added. According to State Finance Minister Radha Krishna Kishore, a resolution will be passed in the Assembly opposing the implementation of SIR in Jharkhand, which will then be forwarded to the central government. 'SIR is just a political conspiracy; the BJP is deliberately imposing it on non-BJP ruled states through the Election Commission,' he alleged. 'The poor and the weaker sections are affected by the governance and policies during the BJP regime. Through SIR, the BJP is trying to exclude the poor and the weaker sections from the opportunity to vote,' said the finance minister.

'Dubious sources': MEA on UK report accusing India of 'transnational repression'
'Dubious sources': MEA on UK report accusing India of 'transnational repression'

Hindustan Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Dubious sources': MEA on UK report accusing India of 'transnational repression'

India on Friday strongly dismissed a British parliamentary committee report that named it among countries allegedly involved in "transnational repression" in the United Kingdom, calling the allegations "baseless" and rooted in dubious, anti-India sources. Some of the details related to India cited in the report was provided by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a pro-Khalistan organisation banned in India (AFP) The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) asserted that the report's references to India, released by the UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights on July 30, were based on "unverified" inputs from banned or discredited organisations. "We have seen the references to India in the report and categorically reject these baseless allegations," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in response to media queries. He further stated that, 'These claims stem from unverified and dubious sources, predominantly linked to proscribed entities and individuals with a clear, documented history of anti-India hostility.' The report, titled 'Transnational Repression in the UK', listed India alongside countries such as China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, and others accused of targeting dissidents, journalists, and activists on British soil. Some of the details related to India cited in the report was provided by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a pro-Khalistan organisation banned in India under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and other UK-based Sikh groups. 'The deliberate reliance on discredited sources calls into question the credibility of the report itself,' Jaiswal added. India has consistently raised concerns with UK authorities about the activities of extremist groups based in the UK that promote separatist agendas, particularly those advocating for Khalistan, which India considers a threat to its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store