logo
Jim Chalmers doubles down after Treasury advice revealed Albanese Government can't meet 1.2m housing target

Jim Chalmers doubles down after Treasury advice revealed Albanese Government can't meet 1.2m housing target

West Australian3 days ago
The Government will not meet its 1.2 million homes target and cannot fix the budget without raising taxes and cutting spending, according to leaked advice from Treasury bureaucrats.
In advice released by mistake in a freedom of information request, the Treasurer's department warned in its post-election ministerial briefing the target to build 1.2 million by mid-2029 'would not be met' and suggested changing it.
The briefing offered ministers options to speed up housing construction and better leverage existing grants to States, identified a 'dysfunctional' funding model for infrastructure such as water and sewerage connections, and said there were challenges with the responsiveness, capability and speed of key agency Housing Australia.
It also advised 'tax should be raised as part of a broader tax reform' and 'improvements to the budget will need to come from economic growth, additional revenue and spending reductions'.
Another crackdown on superannuation tax breaks for wealthy Australians was suggested.
The information was released to the ABC, which was asked to delete the document released under freedom of information laws after it realised it had not blacked out several headings and subheadings from redacted sections.
The ABC said it decided to publish details because they provide insight into the department's thinking of key economic issues facing Australia.
Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Monday said he was 'pretty relaxed' about the accidental release of the document, which also canvassed tax reform and global economic volatility.
'The point that the incoming government brief makes is the same point that I've been making (Housing Minister) Clare O'Neil and others have been making, is that we will need more effort to reach that substantial, ambitious housing target,' he said.
'We're investing tens of billions of dollars. We're working well with the States and territories and local governments. We're engaging with the industry. We're trying to get the capital flowing. I've changed the tax arrangements for build-to-rent… but we'll need to do better, and we'll need to do more. And the advice just reflects that.'
Master Builders Australia estimates, based on housing approvals figures from May, that the nation will build just over a million homes by mid-2029 at the current construction rate.
This falls short of the target by almost 160,000 homes, or 13.3 per cent.
In WA, Master Builders estimates more than 125,000 homes will be built over that time, falling short of the State's share of the target by 3.4 per cent.
Dr Chalmers insisted the target could still be met and said it wasn't a mistake to aim so high.
'We'd rather have a big, ambitious, difficult target, and work around the clock to meet it in all of the ways that I've run through today, than to continue the approach of our predecessors, which was to build too few homes,' he said.
'It's not the worst thing from time to time for it to be understood in the broader community that this will be a difficult target to meet, but if we all do our bit, we all play our part … then we can build the homes that people desperately need.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I have marital advice for our anti-Semitism envoy
I have marital advice for our anti-Semitism envoy

The Advertiser

time2 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

I have marital advice for our anti-Semitism envoy

Turns out that the federal government's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal and I have a lot in common. We are both oldish. We are both Jewish. And we are both so very married. I reckon Segal must have been married to John Roth for close to 40 years. Same! Same! My spouse and I got married in 1983. Now I'd like to think I know my spouse better than I know the back of my hand (and he is far more interesting than my wrinkled, be-veined specimen). Shocking news this week that not all couples married for decades have a clue about their partners. The Australian Electoral Commission donation records show that Henroth Investments gave $50,000 to Advance Australia in 2023-24. Segal's husband, John Roth, is a director of Henroth. And Segal claims she didn't know about the donation. I asked one of my kids about this. She said: Maybe rich people don't know where $50k goes. Maybe. But I think I'd know if my husband was supporting a divisive disgusting political organisation and if he was, I'd then file for divorce. Even if she didn't know before the weekend, she knows now. For those who don't know, Advance Australia campaigns against immigration (Mr Roth, pretty sure you are from a family of migrants), it campaigns against Welcome to Country. It was part of the ugly campaign against the Voice to Parliament. Which is weird. Is it just opposed to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament? Or all voices to parliament? And if so, why is it not campaigning against special envoys on anti-Semitism and Islamophobia? Let me be straight with you. These special envoys are just voices to parliament with direct access to government. They act as advocates and advisors for their specific cause. I would dearly love to wipe out both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and am thrilled that the government decided these two forms of bigotry and hatred needed to be addressed in this particular way. So let's also address one elephant in the room. While Israel continues to commit mass murder in Gaza, anti-Semitism will continue to rise. There's a link between military operations (also known as war) conducted against Palestinians by Israel and the resultant rise in anti-Semitic behaviours. Three studies all found a clear correlation - including one paper by Deakin University academic Matteo Vergani and others that examined 673 incidents between October 2013 and September 2017, well before this current razing of Gaza. The other elephant? Why not a special envoy to address the hatred of Aboriginal people in this country? Yes, Australians voted against the Voice to Parliament. Why did this government give Australians the chance to be racist bigots, the chance to play to their lowest natures? Anthony Albanese could have had an entire phalanx of Indigenous envoys to write reports and make recommendations on how to fix the problem, so devastatingly expressed in the coroner's report into the death of Kumanjayi Walker. Racism coming out of our bleeding ears. So, if 50 grand is unimportant, how about the sentiment of the man who gives this money to a bunch of racists? Can't you tell the measure of a man by the company his money keeps? Or is it only racism against Jews which concerns you? Because if so, you are part of a much bigger problem. Which brings me to your report. One of the key recommendations in your report is that all levels of government should adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism. As Josh Bornstein writes: "In part, this definition states that it is anti-Semitic to target the state of Israel and/or claim the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour." I'm a Jew. I want to be able to criticise Israel freely. I especially want to do that now as Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza relentlessly, continues its mass slaughter of starving civilians. The IHRA definition also says it is anti-Semitic to draw comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. I'm assuming that means you can't mention the G-word. But in an extraordinary essay, leading genocide scholar Omer Bartov writes: "Discrediting genocide scholars who call out Israel's genocide in Gaza as anti-Semitic threatens to erode the foundation of genocide studies: the ongoing need to define, prevent, punish and reconstruct the history of genocide. Suggesting that this endeavour is motivated instead by malign interests and sentiments - that it is driven by the very hatred and prejudice that was at the root of the Holocaust - is not only morally scandalous, it provides an opening for a politics of denialism and impunity as well." Australia could adopt the Jerusalem definition, one which doesn't spend two-thirds of its focus on Israel. Dear Jillian, in your wafty deer-in-headlights performance, utterly lacking in facts, on the ABC's 7.30, you thought it was OK to suggest that you would monitor the outputs of the ABC and SBS. I mean, Lawyers for Israel already did that. It campaigned hard against Antoinette Lattouf's brief appearance on ABC Sydney. It led to Lattouf losing her gig. It led to the ABC losing $2 million in fighting a futile court case. And I'll tell you what else it led to. It led, in my view, to people using the phrase "Jewish lobby", one of the most ill-conceived and racist phrases ever. I would not for one minute complain about social media posts sharing Human Rights Watch information. And there are many Jews here and elsewhere who rightly criticise the use by Israel of starvation as a weapon of war. The prospect of you trying to censor what the ABC broadcasts is so horrific. We don't need more censors in this country. We don't need lobby groups like Lawyers for Israel trying to silence those with valid opinions LIA doesn't like. Or you don't like. Which brings me to the federal government. How is it even possible that it did not do a check on those adjacent to Segal? My mind is boggled by this. And how did it think it was appropriate to nominate a person to this role who so clearly supports Israel's current behaviour? Jews experience anti-Semitism every single day in this country and that's what needs to be urgently addressed. If you conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism you make it worse for all of us, you make anti-Semitism far more likely. Turns out that the federal government's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal and I have a lot in common. We are both oldish. We are both Jewish. And we are both so very married. I reckon Segal must have been married to John Roth for close to 40 years. Same! Same! My spouse and I got married in 1983. Now I'd like to think I know my spouse better than I know the back of my hand (and he is far more interesting than my wrinkled, be-veined specimen). Shocking news this week that not all couples married for decades have a clue about their partners. The Australian Electoral Commission donation records show that Henroth Investments gave $50,000 to Advance Australia in 2023-24. Segal's husband, John Roth, is a director of Henroth. And Segal claims she didn't know about the donation. I asked one of my kids about this. She said: Maybe rich people don't know where $50k goes. Maybe. But I think I'd know if my husband was supporting a divisive disgusting political organisation and if he was, I'd then file for divorce. Even if she didn't know before the weekend, she knows now. For those who don't know, Advance Australia campaigns against immigration (Mr Roth, pretty sure you are from a family of migrants), it campaigns against Welcome to Country. It was part of the ugly campaign against the Voice to Parliament. Which is weird. Is it just opposed to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament? Or all voices to parliament? And if so, why is it not campaigning against special envoys on anti-Semitism and Islamophobia? Let me be straight with you. These special envoys are just voices to parliament with direct access to government. They act as advocates and advisors for their specific cause. I would dearly love to wipe out both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and am thrilled that the government decided these two forms of bigotry and hatred needed to be addressed in this particular way. So let's also address one elephant in the room. While Israel continues to commit mass murder in Gaza, anti-Semitism will continue to rise. There's a link between military operations (also known as war) conducted against Palestinians by Israel and the resultant rise in anti-Semitic behaviours. Three studies all found a clear correlation - including one paper by Deakin University academic Matteo Vergani and others that examined 673 incidents between October 2013 and September 2017, well before this current razing of Gaza. The other elephant? Why not a special envoy to address the hatred of Aboriginal people in this country? Yes, Australians voted against the Voice to Parliament. Why did this government give Australians the chance to be racist bigots, the chance to play to their lowest natures? Anthony Albanese could have had an entire phalanx of Indigenous envoys to write reports and make recommendations on how to fix the problem, so devastatingly expressed in the coroner's report into the death of Kumanjayi Walker. Racism coming out of our bleeding ears. So, if 50 grand is unimportant, how about the sentiment of the man who gives this money to a bunch of racists? Can't you tell the measure of a man by the company his money keeps? Or is it only racism against Jews which concerns you? Because if so, you are part of a much bigger problem. Which brings me to your report. One of the key recommendations in your report is that all levels of government should adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism. As Josh Bornstein writes: "In part, this definition states that it is anti-Semitic to target the state of Israel and/or claim the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour." I'm a Jew. I want to be able to criticise Israel freely. I especially want to do that now as Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza relentlessly, continues its mass slaughter of starving civilians. The IHRA definition also says it is anti-Semitic to draw comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. I'm assuming that means you can't mention the G-word. But in an extraordinary essay, leading genocide scholar Omer Bartov writes: "Discrediting genocide scholars who call out Israel's genocide in Gaza as anti-Semitic threatens to erode the foundation of genocide studies: the ongoing need to define, prevent, punish and reconstruct the history of genocide. Suggesting that this endeavour is motivated instead by malign interests and sentiments - that it is driven by the very hatred and prejudice that was at the root of the Holocaust - is not only morally scandalous, it provides an opening for a politics of denialism and impunity as well." Australia could adopt the Jerusalem definition, one which doesn't spend two-thirds of its focus on Israel. Dear Jillian, in your wafty deer-in-headlights performance, utterly lacking in facts, on the ABC's 7.30, you thought it was OK to suggest that you would monitor the outputs of the ABC and SBS. I mean, Lawyers for Israel already did that. It campaigned hard against Antoinette Lattouf's brief appearance on ABC Sydney. It led to Lattouf losing her gig. It led to the ABC losing $2 million in fighting a futile court case. And I'll tell you what else it led to. It led, in my view, to people using the phrase "Jewish lobby", one of the most ill-conceived and racist phrases ever. I would not for one minute complain about social media posts sharing Human Rights Watch information. And there are many Jews here and elsewhere who rightly criticise the use by Israel of starvation as a weapon of war. The prospect of you trying to censor what the ABC broadcasts is so horrific. We don't need more censors in this country. We don't need lobby groups like Lawyers for Israel trying to silence those with valid opinions LIA doesn't like. Or you don't like. Which brings me to the federal government. How is it even possible that it did not do a check on those adjacent to Segal? My mind is boggled by this. And how did it think it was appropriate to nominate a person to this role who so clearly supports Israel's current behaviour? Jews experience anti-Semitism every single day in this country and that's what needs to be urgently addressed. If you conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism you make it worse for all of us, you make anti-Semitism far more likely. Turns out that the federal government's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal and I have a lot in common. We are both oldish. We are both Jewish. And we are both so very married. I reckon Segal must have been married to John Roth for close to 40 years. Same! Same! My spouse and I got married in 1983. Now I'd like to think I know my spouse better than I know the back of my hand (and he is far more interesting than my wrinkled, be-veined specimen). Shocking news this week that not all couples married for decades have a clue about their partners. The Australian Electoral Commission donation records show that Henroth Investments gave $50,000 to Advance Australia in 2023-24. Segal's husband, John Roth, is a director of Henroth. And Segal claims she didn't know about the donation. I asked one of my kids about this. She said: Maybe rich people don't know where $50k goes. Maybe. But I think I'd know if my husband was supporting a divisive disgusting political organisation and if he was, I'd then file for divorce. Even if she didn't know before the weekend, she knows now. For those who don't know, Advance Australia campaigns against immigration (Mr Roth, pretty sure you are from a family of migrants), it campaigns against Welcome to Country. It was part of the ugly campaign against the Voice to Parliament. Which is weird. Is it just opposed to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament? Or all voices to parliament? And if so, why is it not campaigning against special envoys on anti-Semitism and Islamophobia? Let me be straight with you. These special envoys are just voices to parliament with direct access to government. They act as advocates and advisors for their specific cause. I would dearly love to wipe out both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and am thrilled that the government decided these two forms of bigotry and hatred needed to be addressed in this particular way. So let's also address one elephant in the room. While Israel continues to commit mass murder in Gaza, anti-Semitism will continue to rise. There's a link between military operations (also known as war) conducted against Palestinians by Israel and the resultant rise in anti-Semitic behaviours. Three studies all found a clear correlation - including one paper by Deakin University academic Matteo Vergani and others that examined 673 incidents between October 2013 and September 2017, well before this current razing of Gaza. The other elephant? Why not a special envoy to address the hatred of Aboriginal people in this country? Yes, Australians voted against the Voice to Parliament. Why did this government give Australians the chance to be racist bigots, the chance to play to their lowest natures? Anthony Albanese could have had an entire phalanx of Indigenous envoys to write reports and make recommendations on how to fix the problem, so devastatingly expressed in the coroner's report into the death of Kumanjayi Walker. Racism coming out of our bleeding ears. So, if 50 grand is unimportant, how about the sentiment of the man who gives this money to a bunch of racists? Can't you tell the measure of a man by the company his money keeps? Or is it only racism against Jews which concerns you? Because if so, you are part of a much bigger problem. Which brings me to your report. One of the key recommendations in your report is that all levels of government should adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism. As Josh Bornstein writes: "In part, this definition states that it is anti-Semitic to target the state of Israel and/or claim the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour." I'm a Jew. I want to be able to criticise Israel freely. I especially want to do that now as Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza relentlessly, continues its mass slaughter of starving civilians. The IHRA definition also says it is anti-Semitic to draw comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. I'm assuming that means you can't mention the G-word. But in an extraordinary essay, leading genocide scholar Omer Bartov writes: "Discrediting genocide scholars who call out Israel's genocide in Gaza as anti-Semitic threatens to erode the foundation of genocide studies: the ongoing need to define, prevent, punish and reconstruct the history of genocide. Suggesting that this endeavour is motivated instead by malign interests and sentiments - that it is driven by the very hatred and prejudice that was at the root of the Holocaust - is not only morally scandalous, it provides an opening for a politics of denialism and impunity as well." Australia could adopt the Jerusalem definition, one which doesn't spend two-thirds of its focus on Israel. Dear Jillian, in your wafty deer-in-headlights performance, utterly lacking in facts, on the ABC's 7.30, you thought it was OK to suggest that you would monitor the outputs of the ABC and SBS. I mean, Lawyers for Israel already did that. It campaigned hard against Antoinette Lattouf's brief appearance on ABC Sydney. It led to Lattouf losing her gig. It led to the ABC losing $2 million in fighting a futile court case. And I'll tell you what else it led to. It led, in my view, to people using the phrase "Jewish lobby", one of the most ill-conceived and racist phrases ever. I would not for one minute complain about social media posts sharing Human Rights Watch information. And there are many Jews here and elsewhere who rightly criticise the use by Israel of starvation as a weapon of war. The prospect of you trying to censor what the ABC broadcasts is so horrific. We don't need more censors in this country. We don't need lobby groups like Lawyers for Israel trying to silence those with valid opinions LIA doesn't like. Or you don't like. Which brings me to the federal government. How is it even possible that it did not do a check on those adjacent to Segal? My mind is boggled by this. And how did it think it was appropriate to nominate a person to this role who so clearly supports Israel's current behaviour? Jews experience anti-Semitism every single day in this country and that's what needs to be urgently addressed. If you conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism you make it worse for all of us, you make anti-Semitism far more likely. Turns out that the federal government's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal and I have a lot in common. We are both oldish. We are both Jewish. And we are both so very married. I reckon Segal must have been married to John Roth for close to 40 years. Same! Same! My spouse and I got married in 1983. Now I'd like to think I know my spouse better than I know the back of my hand (and he is far more interesting than my wrinkled, be-veined specimen). Shocking news this week that not all couples married for decades have a clue about their partners. The Australian Electoral Commission donation records show that Henroth Investments gave $50,000 to Advance Australia in 2023-24. Segal's husband, John Roth, is a director of Henroth. And Segal claims she didn't know about the donation. I asked one of my kids about this. She said: Maybe rich people don't know where $50k goes. Maybe. But I think I'd know if my husband was supporting a divisive disgusting political organisation and if he was, I'd then file for divorce. Even if she didn't know before the weekend, she knows now. For those who don't know, Advance Australia campaigns against immigration (Mr Roth, pretty sure you are from a family of migrants), it campaigns against Welcome to Country. It was part of the ugly campaign against the Voice to Parliament. Which is weird. Is it just opposed to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament? Or all voices to parliament? And if so, why is it not campaigning against special envoys on anti-Semitism and Islamophobia? Let me be straight with you. These special envoys are just voices to parliament with direct access to government. They act as advocates and advisors for their specific cause. I would dearly love to wipe out both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and am thrilled that the government decided these two forms of bigotry and hatred needed to be addressed in this particular way. So let's also address one elephant in the room. While Israel continues to commit mass murder in Gaza, anti-Semitism will continue to rise. There's a link between military operations (also known as war) conducted against Palestinians by Israel and the resultant rise in anti-Semitic behaviours. Three studies all found a clear correlation - including one paper by Deakin University academic Matteo Vergani and others that examined 673 incidents between October 2013 and September 2017, well before this current razing of Gaza. The other elephant? Why not a special envoy to address the hatred of Aboriginal people in this country? Yes, Australians voted against the Voice to Parliament. Why did this government give Australians the chance to be racist bigots, the chance to play to their lowest natures? Anthony Albanese could have had an entire phalanx of Indigenous envoys to write reports and make recommendations on how to fix the problem, so devastatingly expressed in the coroner's report into the death of Kumanjayi Walker. Racism coming out of our bleeding ears. So, if 50 grand is unimportant, how about the sentiment of the man who gives this money to a bunch of racists? Can't you tell the measure of a man by the company his money keeps? Or is it only racism against Jews which concerns you? Because if so, you are part of a much bigger problem. Which brings me to your report. One of the key recommendations in your report is that all levels of government should adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism. As Josh Bornstein writes: "In part, this definition states that it is anti-Semitic to target the state of Israel and/or claim the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour." I'm a Jew. I want to be able to criticise Israel freely. I especially want to do that now as Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza relentlessly, continues its mass slaughter of starving civilians. The IHRA definition also says it is anti-Semitic to draw comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. I'm assuming that means you can't mention the G-word. But in an extraordinary essay, leading genocide scholar Omer Bartov writes: "Discrediting genocide scholars who call out Israel's genocide in Gaza as anti-Semitic threatens to erode the foundation of genocide studies: the ongoing need to define, prevent, punish and reconstruct the history of genocide. Suggesting that this endeavour is motivated instead by malign interests and sentiments - that it is driven by the very hatred and prejudice that was at the root of the Holocaust - is not only morally scandalous, it provides an opening for a politics of denialism and impunity as well." Australia could adopt the Jerusalem definition, one which doesn't spend two-thirds of its focus on Israel. Dear Jillian, in your wafty deer-in-headlights performance, utterly lacking in facts, on the ABC's 7.30, you thought it was OK to suggest that you would monitor the outputs of the ABC and SBS. I mean, Lawyers for Israel already did that. It campaigned hard against Antoinette Lattouf's brief appearance on ABC Sydney. It led to Lattouf losing her gig. It led to the ABC losing $2 million in fighting a futile court case. And I'll tell you what else it led to. It led, in my view, to people using the phrase "Jewish lobby", one of the most ill-conceived and racist phrases ever. I would not for one minute complain about social media posts sharing Human Rights Watch information. And there are many Jews here and elsewhere who rightly criticise the use by Israel of starvation as a weapon of war. The prospect of you trying to censor what the ABC broadcasts is so horrific. We don't need more censors in this country. We don't need lobby groups like Lawyers for Israel trying to silence those with valid opinions LIA doesn't like. Or you don't like. Which brings me to the federal government. How is it even possible that it did not do a check on those adjacent to Segal? My mind is boggled by this. And how did it think it was appropriate to nominate a person to this role who so clearly supports Israel's current behaviour? Jews experience anti-Semitism every single day in this country and that's what needs to be urgently addressed. If you conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism you make it worse for all of us, you make anti-Semitism far more likely.

Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet
Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet

'I don't want to get too much into the baby boomer stuff,' Humphries says when asked about the generational tensions at play. 'I know they feel like they're getting slammed all the time. But if your own children can't afford to live in the city that you're in, you lose out, too – emotionally, through a loss of family time, or financially, when they essentially come to you as a bank.' Though Humphries is well-known for his pointed political work, previously creating sketches for SBS The Feed and ABC's 7.30 (as well as most recently hosting 7News' axed weekly comedy segment The 6.57pm News), this is a rare longer work that allowed him to explore a topic in greater depth and a promising local commission from Binge. 'It's liberating to go beyond two-and-a-half minutes,' he says. Loading The documentary – led by director Bill Code (Al Jazeera, The Guardian) and co-written by him, Craig Reucassel (War on Waste), Humphries and long-time collaborator Evan Williams (7.30, The Feed) – is careful to point the finger at the system that created the crisis, rather than the people who benefit from it. But the stories of those suffering the consequences are what Humphries found most affecting. 'We're all aware of the difficulties that people are going through,' he said. 'But it's a different thing to actually sit down with them. When doing the proof-of-concept for this documentary, I spoke with a nurse who has to live an hour and a half away from the hospital. They would travel that long after doing a 12-hour shift. 'There's often this mentality of, 'You should get a better job and work harder.' But how does that work? What is a nurse – an essential worker – supposed to do differently? … If our nurses and teachers can't live in the city where they're supposed to work, then how does society work?' Other talking heads include rental advocate turned Victorian Socialists senate candidate Jordan van den Lamb, AKA @PurplePingers; former Labor leader Bill Shorten, briefly reflecting on his attempts to change housing tax policy; and ABC finance journalist Alan Kohler, explaining how those tax systems work while drinking champagne in a bath like Margot Robbie in The Big Short. Notably, he is fully clothed. 'I think if he were naked – and I say this with great love and respect for Alan, I'm sure that under that suit, he's a fine specimen – it would have distracted from the actual issues,' Humphries says. 'He was a very good sport.' But, as Kohler notes from his bathtub, when it comes for solutions to these issues 'there's no one silver bullet'. Loading 'The big mindset shift that we're pushing for in this documentary is just reiterating that a house is for housing people,' Humphries says. 'The idea that a house is an investment that should increase in value is not something we should be aspiring to.' 'I understand that sort of selfish urge to want your place to go up in value, but I'm not buying into that system. It's not good for society.' It's something the comedian has actually been thinking about a lot, long after filming. 'The great irony of this is that finally, at 39, I literally have this week moved into my first house,' he says, laughing. 'The timing is obviously not ideal for publicity. But this is something that I hoped I would have been able to do a decade ago. 'Of course, now that I've crossed that threshold, I'm now one of those people anxiously observing the interest rates and living under a different kind of tyranny ... I'm still just as outraged as I was a week ago.' Does he think fellow Australian home-owners will follow his lead, rejecting the pursuit of endless profit and putting pressure on politicians to create change? 'I'm hopeful, but not optimistic. I want to have hope!'

Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet
Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Is property investing ‘morally wrong'? Inside Mark Humphries' biggest project yet

'I don't want to get too much into the baby boomer stuff,' Humphries says when asked about the generational tensions at play. 'I know they feel like they're getting slammed all the time. But if your own children can't afford to live in the city that you're in, you lose out, too – emotionally, through a loss of family time, or financially, when they essentially come to you as a bank.' Though Humphries is well-known for his pointed political work, previously creating sketches for SBS The Feed and ABC's 7.30 (as well as most recently hosting 7News' axed weekly comedy segment The 6.57pm News), this is a rare longer work that allowed him to explore a topic in greater depth and a promising local commission from Binge. 'It's liberating to go beyond two-and-a-half minutes,' he says. Loading The documentary – led by director Bill Code (Al Jazeera, The Guardian) and co-written by him, Craig Reucassel (War on Waste), Humphries and long-time collaborator Evan Williams (7.30, The Feed) – is careful to point the finger at the system that created the crisis, rather than the people who benefit from it. But the stories of those suffering the consequences are what Humphries found most affecting. 'We're all aware of the difficulties that people are going through,' he said. 'But it's a different thing to actually sit down with them. When doing the proof-of-concept for this documentary, I spoke with a nurse who has to live an hour and a half away from the hospital. They would travel that long after doing a 12-hour shift. 'There's often this mentality of, 'You should get a better job and work harder.' But how does that work? What is a nurse – an essential worker – supposed to do differently? … If our nurses and teachers can't live in the city where they're supposed to work, then how does society work?' Other talking heads include rental advocate turned Victorian Socialists senate candidate Jordan van den Lamb, AKA @PurplePingers; former Labor leader Bill Shorten, briefly reflecting on his attempts to change housing tax policy; and ABC finance journalist Alan Kohler, explaining how those tax systems work while drinking champagne in a bath like Margot Robbie in The Big Short. Notably, he is fully clothed. 'I think if he were naked – and I say this with great love and respect for Alan, I'm sure that under that suit, he's a fine specimen – it would have distracted from the actual issues,' Humphries says. 'He was a very good sport.' But, as Kohler notes from his bathtub, when it comes for solutions to these issues 'there's no one silver bullet'. Loading 'The big mindset shift that we're pushing for in this documentary is just reiterating that a house is for housing people,' Humphries says. 'The idea that a house is an investment that should increase in value is not something we should be aspiring to.' 'I understand that sort of selfish urge to want your place to go up in value, but I'm not buying into that system. It's not good for society.' It's something the comedian has actually been thinking about a lot, long after filming. 'The great irony of this is that finally, at 39, I literally have this week moved into my first house,' he says, laughing. 'The timing is obviously not ideal for publicity. But this is something that I hoped I would have been able to do a decade ago. 'Of course, now that I've crossed that threshold, I'm now one of those people anxiously observing the interest rates and living under a different kind of tyranny ... I'm still just as outraged as I was a week ago.' Does he think fellow Australian home-owners will follow his lead, rejecting the pursuit of endless profit and putting pressure on politicians to create change? 'I'm hopeful, but not optimistic. I want to have hope!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store