Most incumbents return in La Grange, La Grange Park; referenda succeed
Referendums in Western Springs and La Grange Public School District 102 appeared to have won by large margins.
In La Grange Park, incumbent Trustee Jermaine Stewart lost his bid for reelection to Nick Diaferio as four candidates vied for three spots on the Village Board. Fellow incumbents Jamie Zaura and Karen Koncel appeared to retain their seats, according to unofficial election results from April 1.
La Grange Park Village President James Discipio said he looked forward to working with Diaferio, but he was disappointed by Stewart's defeat.
'That's the Democratic process and Jermaine understands that,' Discipio said. 'But he's a tremendous loss to our staff and our board. He has done so many great things with our CRC (Community Revitalization Committee). He's a true gentleman.'
In La Grange, all three Village Board incumbents were returned to office, with Lou Gale winning 28.6%, Peggy Peterson 25.6% and Glenn Thompson 25.2%, according to unofficial election results. Challenger Carla Carter fell short in her first attempt at elected office with 20.6% of the votes.
The village presidents of both towns are returning after unchallenged campaigns.
'I think things are going great, and I appreciate the resident's support and the support from the Board,' La Grange President Mark Kuchler said after the election. 'I think we've accomplished a lot in the last couple years, and I'm looking forward to accomplishing a lot more.'
Kuchler said his main focus for the immediate future is to get the village's sewer projects started.
'My hope is that we get the permitting approved by MWRD (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) in the relatively near future and that we can go out to bid on the project in 2025,' he said.
He spoke to the issue of liquor laws in La Grange that were the focus of much campaign discussion, particularly an ordinance requiring restaurants to derive at least 60% of their revenue from food sales and no more than 40% from liquor.
Some thought the 60/40 rule should be relaxed or done away with altogether, but Kuchler disagreed with any drastic changes.
'I think a lot of it is really misunderstood,' he said. 'It really applies only for restaurants, first of all. We do have a license that would apply for wine bars if they were to come into town. The Wooden Paddle asked for an exception for their second floor banquet space and we gave that to them. We work with businesses that are interested in La Grange and are appropriate.'
This is Kuchler's second term he's won outright, after having been appointed when Tom Livingston resigned. He said he's not even thinking about a third term.
Discipio, having just won his sixth term in office, said he has no plans to retire anytime soon.
'I love what I do,' he said. 'As long as my community supports me and they think I'm doing a good job — and they trust us — I will continue as long as I'm able to, give to my community.'
He said he's appreciative of his long time in office.
'I'm so privileged and grateful for the opportunity to serve the residents again, with the board doing good things for the community,' he said.
Most other municipal posts in La Grange and La Grange Park were unopposed.
In the La Grange Park District, newcomer Brad Carter will join incumbents Robert Vear and Chris Weber.
In the Community Park District of La Grange Park, candidates running unopposed included Alexandria Zuck, Sheri Sauer and Mike Marusic and they all won seats as commissioners.
The La Grange Park Public Library Board will return trustees Karen Snow-Bartholomai, Sarah Krall and Allison Demes O'Brien.
The La Grange Public Library elected three brand new trustees, Bethany Griffin, Jessica Dangler and Jennifer Hopkins.
A $45 million infrastructure bond referendum was passed by Western Springs voters, 72.44% to 27.56% opposed.
General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $82 million were approved by La Grange Public School District 102 voters by a margin of 67.56% approve to 32.44% opposed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican: ‘We've gotten lucky' with Mamdani
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said Monday his party has 'gotten lucky' with the Democrats' nominee for New York City mayor as Zohran Mamdani makes his case ahead of the November election. 'We've gotten lucky — bad for America, good for Republicans — with Mr. Mamdani in New York,' Kennedy told NewsNation's Leland Vittert. 'If I didn't know better, I would think he was a Republican plant. If I didn't know better, I'd think that Republicans had created Mr. Mamdani in a petri dish in a genomics lab.' 'He's clearly from what I call the Gary Busey wing — the cray cray wing — of the Democratic Party. That's bad for New York, but it's certainly good for Republicans,' the Pelican State Republican added, mentioning the actor turned reality star. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, recently shocked political observers with his win over political heavyweight and former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's primary. Cuomo is now running as an independent against Mamdani. While Mamdani has faced criticism from within the party, some Democrats have defended his rise. In a Sunday interview, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) pushed back against Democratic criticism of the mayoral candidate. 'I don't know why they're attacking him. I think it's stupid when maybe we're not in 100 percent agreement, right? But he has some ideas that are clearly, you know, attracting people. It's OK to say, 'I disagree with this, this and this, but I agree with that,'' Gallego said. 'But the idea that we're again, we're just going to throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us, I think, is dumb,' he added. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Texas Democrat spends night in Legislature protesting police shadowing in redistricting battle
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Democratic Texas lawmaker opted to spend the night in the state House chamber and remain there Tuesday rather than allow a law enforcement officer to shadow her while Republicans try to prevent further delays to redrawing U.S. House maps. Rep. Nicole Collier overnight stay stemmed from Republicans in the Texas House requiring returning Democrats to sign what the Democrats called 'permission slips,' agreeing to around-the-clock surveillance by state Department of Public Safety officers to leave the floor. Collier, of Fort Worth, refused and remained on the House floor Monday night. The Democrats' return to Texas puts the Republican-run Legislature in position to satisfy Trump's demands, possibly later this week, as California Democrats advance new congressional boundaries in retaliation. Lawmakers had officers posted outside their Capitol offices, and suburban Dallas Rep. Mihaela Plesa said one tailed her on her Monday evening drive back to her apartment in Austin after spending much of the day on a couch in her office. She said he went with her for a staff lunch and even down the hallway with her for restroom breaks. 'We were kind of laughing about it, to be honest, but this is really serious stuff," Plesa said in a telephone interview. "This is a waste of taxpayer dollars and really performative theater.' Collier, who represents a minority-majority district, said she would not 'sign away my dignity" and allow Republicans to 'control my movements and monitor me.' 'I know these maps will harm my constituents,' she said in a statement. "I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' 2 states at the center of an expanding fight The tit-for-tat puts the nation's two most populous states at the center of an expanding fight over control of Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The battle has rallied Democrats nationally following infighting and frustrations among the party's voters since Republicans took total control of the federal government in January. Dozens of Texas Democratic lawmakers left for Illinois and elsewhere on Aug. 3, denying their Republican colleagues the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. Republicans now hold 25 of Texas' 38 U.S. House seats. They declared victory Friday, pointing to California's proposal intended to increase Democrats' U.S. House advantage by five seats. Many absent Democrats left Chicago early Monday and landed hours later at a private airfield in Austin, where several boarded a charter bus to the Capitol. Cheering supporters greeted them inside. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows did not mention redistricting on the floor but promised swift action on the Legislature's agenda. 'We aren't playing around,' Republican state Rep. Matt Shaheen, whose district includes part of the Dallas area, said in a post on the X social media platform. Democrats promise to keep fighting Even as they declared victory, Democrats acknowledged Republicans can now approve redrawn districts. Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu said Democrats would challenge the new designs in court. Lawmakers did not take up any bills Monday and were not scheduled to return until Wednesday. Trump has pressured other Republican-run states to consider redistricting, as well, while Democratic governors in multiple statehouses have indicated they would follow California's lead in response. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. The president wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the midterms during his first presidency. After gaining House control in 2018, Democrats used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. Nationally, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Redistricting typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade after the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions, giving Newsom an additional hurdle. California Democrats start redrawing process Democratic legislators introduced new California maps Monday. It was the first official move toward the fall referendum asking voters to override the independent commission's work after the 2020 census. The proposed boundaries would replace current ones through 2030. Democrats said they will return the mapmaking power to the commission after that. State Republicans promised lawsuits. Democrats hold 43 out of California's 52 U.S. House seats. The proposal would try to expand that advantage by targeting battleground districts in Northern California, San Diego and Orange counties, and the Central Valley. Some Democratic incumbents also get more left-leaning voters in their districts. 'We don't want this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we cannot run away from this fight,' said Democrat Marc Berman, a California Assembly member who previously chaired the elections committee. Republicans expressed opposition in terms that echoed Democrats in Austin, accusing the majority of abusing power. Sacramento Republicans said they will introduce legislation advocating independent redistricting commissions in all states. Texas' governor jumped to the president's aid Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott launched the expanding battle when he heeded Trump's wishes and added redistricting to an initial special session agenda that included multiple issues, including a package responding to devastating floods that killed more than 130 people last month. Abbott has blamed Democrats' absence for delaying action on those measures. Democrats have answered that Abbott is responsible because he effectively linked the hyper-partisan matter to nonpartisan flood relief. Abbott, Burrows and other Republicans tried various threats and legal maneuvers to pressure Democrats' return, including the governor arguing that Texas judges should remove absent lawmakers from office. As long as they were out of state, lawmakers were beyond the reach of the civil arrest warrants that Burrows issued. The Democrats who returned Monday did so without being detained by law enforcement. The lawmakers who left face fines of up to $500 for each legislative day they missed. Burrows has insisted Democratic lawmakers also will pay pick up the tab for law enforcement who attempted to corral them during the walkout.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Shari Redstone hoped Trump's '60 Minutes' suit would root out anti-Israel bias at CBS News
Shari Redstone said she partly welcomed President Trump's lawsuit against CBS News because she believed it could address the network's anti-Israel bias — even as she revealed that it was the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks that finally moved her to sell CBS parent Paramount. 'We needed more balance,' Redstone, the former chair of Paramount Global, told The New York Times in interviews conducted after Paramount's $8 billion sale to Skydance Media closed earlier this month. 'Part of me thought, maybe Trump could accomplish what I never got done,' the entertainment heiress told the Times. 6 Shari Redstone, former Paramount chair, told the New York Times she partly welcomed Trump's lawsuit against CBS, hoping it would address the network's perceived anti-Israel bias. Evan Agostini/Invision/AP Redstone told the Times that for years she had resisted entreaties from potential suitors eager to buy Paramount. But what pushed her to finally agree to sell the family business was the Oct. 7 massacre of an estimated 1,200 Israelis. 'Once that happened, I wanted out,' she told the Times. 'I wanted to support Israel, and address issues around antisemitism and racism.' But Redstone's plans for an exit were complicated by the 2024 presidential election. Weeks before voters went to the polling stations, Trump filed suit against '60 Minutes' alleging that the CBS News magazine show deceptively edited an interview with his Democratic opponent, then-Vice President Kamala Harris, in order to make her look good. Last month, both sides reached a $16 million settlement — sparking widespread outrage. In her wide-ranging interview with the Times that was published on Tuesday, the 71-year-old media heiress, whose ex-husband and son are both rabbis, had grown increasingly frustrated with CBS News coverage she viewed as hostile to Israel. 6 Redstone had been frustrated by CBS News coverage of Israel. The image above shows Israeli soldiers in the West Bank city of Nablus on Aug. 11, 2025. AFP via Getty Images She told the Times that her breaking point came just days before she withdrew from settlement talks with Trump in January of this year. CBS aired a '60 Minutes' segment featuring State Department officials who quit over American support for Israel's Gaza war — a piece the American Jewish Committee blasted as 'shockingly one-sided, lacked factual accuracy, and relied heavily on misguided information.' The segment focused on alleged Israeli atrocities while barely touching on the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack that sparked the conflict. Redstone wasn't alone in her concerns. Days after the segment aired, George Cheeks, who oversees CBS, shared Redstone's dismay about the Gaza episode and soon appointed veteran producer Susan Zirinsky as executive editor to review '60 Minutes' segments — stripping the show of its traditional independence from corporate interference. In April, the longtime executive producer of '60 Minutes,' Bill Owens, departed after Zirinsky's appointment undermined his autonomy. 6 President Trump sued CBS's '60 Minutes' for $20 billion over an edited Kamala Harris interview, which at the time complicated Paramount's $8 billion merger with Skydance. AP In June, Scott Pelley, the veteran '60 Minutes' correspondent, blasted his corporate bosses at Paramount on air, warning that 'honest' journalism at CBS might be ending if they went ahead and concluded a settlement with Trump. The anti-Israel bias allegations had been mounting for months at CBS News. In August 2024, the network's standards director Mark Memmott issued an internal directive ordering staff not to identify Jerusalem as part of Israel, calling its status 'disputed.' The memo sparked outrage from pro-Israel groups and contradicted US government policy recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Two months later, CBS executives reprimanded morning anchor Tony Dokoupil for pressing author Ta-Nehisi Coates about anti-Israel criticisms in his book. Dokoupil had asked whether Coates' writing belonged 'in the backpack of an extremist' — questions some CBS brass deemed too aggressive. Redstone defended Dokoupil in the wake of his rebuke. 'I think Tony handled that interview exceptionally well,' Redstone said at the time. 'I was genuinely proud of his efforts. Although it was difficult for me to oppose the company, I believe they erred in this instance… I have a voice in our platform, as does everyone.' 6 Trump alleged '60 Minutes' deceptively edited Kamala Harris's comments on Israel, sparking the lawsuit Redstone pushed Paramount to settle. 60 Minutes / CBS Redstone, who was widely criticized for backing a settlement rather than fighting in court, told the Times she was in favor of reaching a deal with Trump because the lawsuit was filed in Texas, where a more conservative judge would have been more hostile to CBS's position. She told the paper that 'this case was never as black-and-white as people assumed' — despite legal experts who said they were confident CBS News would prevail in court. 'I believe it was always in Paramount's best interest to settle,' Redstone told the Gray Lady in an interview published on Tuesday. 'We may not like the world we live in, but a board has to do what's in the best interest of shareholders.' While the criticism reached a fever pitch, Redstone's frustration boiled over as she battled cancer while trying to close the Paramount sale. Diagnosed with thyroid cancer that had spread to her vocal cords, she underwent surgery and radiation as critics including Matt Drudge of 'The Drudge Report' website branded her the 'Woman Who Destroyed CBS News.' Redstone was also hurt by criticism from Lesley Stahl, the longtime '60 Minutes' correspondent, according to the Times. In June, Stahl said she was 'angry' with Redstone over her handling of the Trump lawsuit. Stahl's comments were published at the same time that Redstone was undergoing treatments for cancer. 6 Redstone told the Times that criticism from CBS figures like Lesley Stahl was especially hurtful as she battled thyroid cancer during the merger fight. FilmMagic 'To have a news organization come under corporate pressure—to have a news organization told by a corporation, 'do this, do that with your story, change this, change that, don't run that piece.' I mean, it steps on the First Amendment, it steps on the freedom of the press,' Stahl said at the time. 'It steps on what we stand for. It makes me question whether any corporation should own a news operation. It is very disconcerting.' Trump's $20 billion lawsuit over CBS's editing of a Kamala Harris interview offered unexpected leverage. Though Redstone found most of Trump's claims 'hyperbolic,' she saw an opportunity. The network had edited Harris's answer about Israel between two broadcasts, sparking Trump's fury. CBS News executives refused to release the unedited footage, setting up a legal battle that threatened to derail the Skydance merger. Redstone pushed hard for settlement, arguing it was in shareholders' best interest. The board eventually agreed to pay $16 million toward Trump's presidential library — far less than Redstone expected. 'I was blown away,' she said of the settlement terms. 6 Redstone publicly backed 'CBS Mornings' co-host Tony Dokoupil (right) after he engaged in a tense interview with author Ta-Nehisi Coates over Israel last year. CBS Mornings But her reputation took another hit when The Post reported a mysterious 'side deal' worth $20 million in free advertising for Trump. Redstone knew nothing about it and was upset. 'I hope it isn't true,' she told the Times. Adding insult to injury, CBS didn't even consult Redstone before canceling Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' — she learned about it minutes before Colbert announced it on air, according to the Times. The Skydance deal valued Paramount at just $8 billion — a third of its worth when Redstone took control in 2019. Netflix now spends $15.3 billion annually on content versus Paramount's $4.4 billion. 'I just wanted to be free,' Redstone told the Times, ending four decades of her family's controversial reign over one of America's most influential news organizations. The Post has sought comment from Redstone and CBS News.
