logo
Tax law: NA body says govt has bypassed Parliament

Tax law: NA body says govt has bypassed Parliament

ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance on Friday categorically conveyed to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that the government has bypassed Parliament for promulgating Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025, and urgently communicated ordinance to the FBR's field formations for recovery from taxpayers.
The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance discussed the situation arising from the Promulgation of Ordinance No IV/2025 with particular reference to concerns of stakeholders and trade bodies.
Chairman of the committee MNA Syed Naveed Qamar expressed serious concern that it is abuse of power to promulgate an ordinance for recovery from taxpayers without giving them right of appeal. FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood responded that there is no abuse of power through promulgation of this ordinance. The ordinance has been cleared from the federal cabinet as well as the president of Pakistan.
NA body adopts report on Tax Laws (Amendment) Bill: Restrictions on transactions of non-filers from July 1
The chairman of the committee directed the Law and Justice Division to immediately table the ordinance before the parliament for urgent action on this legislation.
'The government has urgency to promulgate the ordinance instead of making it part of the Finance Bill (2025-26). We have also same urgency to review the ordinance,' he added.
The representative from the Ministry of Law and Justice informed the committee that the ordinance would be presented as a bill in the current National Assembly session, which would subsequently, be referred to the committee for consideration and report.
The committee chairman questioned, what was the urgency to take these recovery measures through ordinance. The representative of the Law Division stated that there was an urgency but he failed to explain the urgency of the government.
The committee deliberated on the urgency and rationale behind the ordinance while expressing concerns over its potential impact on various sectors across the country. Members emphasised that amendments to the law must be carefully evaluated to avoid unintended consequences on other categories.
Naveed Qamar stated that the FBR has no answer to convince the committee about the urgency for promulgating this ordinance.
'We are waiting for the Ordinance to come to us in the form of a bill and we will question and securitise this ordinance,' Qamar said.
The FBR chairman requested the committee that the ordinance is promulgated for a limited time period and the committee should give them 1-2 months to see the operations of the ordinance.
The amendments in tax laws could have been passed through Finance Bill (2025-26), but you have shown urgency, the chairman committee responded.
MNA Mirza Ikhtiar Baig stated that the Ordinance is totally contradictory to the FBR's commitment of business friendly environment. The trade bodies including Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has strongly agitated against the said ordinance.
The committee members also raised question about the repercussions of the Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025 on judiciary.
At one stage, the FBR chairman stated that it is the prerogative of the legislator to reject this legislation.
The FBR chairman explained that the FBR only wants to implement the orders of the High Courts. This ordinance introduces only three carefully scoped amendments, addressing urgent legal, administrative, and enforcement gaps in the tax system.
Although the courts are now resolving cases promptly, a procedural lacuna in the law previously allowed taxpayers a 30-day delay in making payments on confirmed demands—even when the matter had been conclusively decided by the apex courts. As a result, billions in confirmed revenue remained unrealised despite clear court verdicts. The amendment through Sections 138(3A) and 140(6A) seeks to curtail this delay and allow for swift implementation of final judgments issued by the Supreme Court and High Courts, the FBR chairman added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBR reforms: PM Shehbaz orders 3rd-party validation
FBR reforms: PM Shehbaz orders 3rd-party validation

Business Recorder

time14 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

FBR reforms: PM Shehbaz orders 3rd-party validation

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Monday directed the authorities to enlist internationally recognised firms to conduct third-party validation of reforms under way in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), as part of broader efforts to combat corruption and improve institutional transparency. The prime minister, while chairing a high-level review meeting on FBR's performance, said that the government is committed to transforming Pakistan into a stable global economy through sustained institutional reforms. Sharif linked the reform drive to what he described as a 'historic' victory in the recent military conflict with India, stating that 'Pakistan must now channel its national momentum into economic rebuilding.' Faceless customs assessment system: PM orders countrywide enforcement 'After our historic victory, it's time to show the same resolve in rebuilding and reforming,' he said. 'We are determined to turn Pakistan into a stable global economy.' He said institutional reforms were being implemented rapidly across sectors, with a particular focus on eliminating corruption and improving transparency in governance. He expressed satisfaction with recent progress in the FBR, particularly highlighting the performance of the newly introduced Faceless Customs Assessment (FCA) system. The FBR officials briefed the PM that the FCA system – designed to reduce human discretion in customs clearance – had resulted in a rise in revenue and a reduction in clearance times. He was also informed about ongoing reforms at Pakistan Revenue Automation Limited (PRAL), which is leading the digitisation of tax services. It was briefed that a simplified digital tax return system is expected to be launched soon, with interfaces available in Urdu and other local languages to improve accessibility for taxpayers. Expressing satisfaction with the ongoing reforms at FBR, Sharif said the engagement of global auditing firms would help validate the reform process and ensure credibility and transparency. He reaffirmed the government's commitment to economic stability and reform. 'Insha'Allah, we will succeed in making Pakistan economically stable,' he said. The meeting was attended by Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar, the chairman of the FBR Rashid Mahmood Langrial, and senior officials from relevant departments. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Sec 179(4) Customs Act: Power of FBR to grant extension ‘narrower': SC
Sec 179(4) Customs Act: Power of FBR to grant extension ‘narrower': SC

Business Recorder

time17 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Sec 179(4) Customs Act: Power of FBR to grant extension ‘narrower': SC

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court noted that the power of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) under Section 179(4) of the Customs Act, 1969 to grant extension of time is much narrower and circumscribed. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Munib Akhtar, ruled that while hearing an appeal of Director, Directorate General, Intelligence and Investigation (Customs) against the decision of the Sindh High Court (SHC), and dismissed it. Dr Farhat Zafar, representing the petitioner (DG Intelligence and Investigation (Customs) submitted that in this case an extension of time was granted by the FBR and therefore, the impugned decision of the SHC is not sustainable. She relied on paragraphs 11 and 12 of the judgment of larger bench of the Supreme Court, which upheld the principles laid down in the case of Collector of Sales Tax, Gujranwala and others v Messrs Super Asia Mohammad Din and Sons and others 2017 SCMR 1427 (Super Asia). SHC judgment: SC reserves verdict on DG Customs Valuation's pleas The court noted that these paras dealt with Section 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and considered the possibility of the grant of an extension of time in terms thereof. Section 74 was held to apply in terms as stated in para 12 of the judgment in Super Asia. The judgment said this matter (extension of time) has arisen under the Customs Act, 1969, which Section 179 (4) says; 'The Board shall have the powers to regulate the system of adjudication including transfer of cases and extension of time-limit in exceptional circumstances.' The court noted that the power to grant an extension by the Board under Section 179(4) of the Customs Act, 1969, is circumscribed, and is to be exercised only in 'exceptional circumstances'. On the other hand, Section 74 of the 1990 Act provides that the Board is empowered to grant an extension to the extent found 'appropriate'. The court said that there is an obvious and clear difference between the two provisions; the power under Section 179(4) is much narrower and circumscribed. Therefore, the paragraphs of Super Asia sought to be relied upon by counsel for the petitioner have no relevance. It stated that the Larger Bench has also made some observations with regard to Section 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. The judgment also said that, on a query from the Court, the counsel for the petitioner has candidly stated that the permission/ letter of extension that was granted by the Board was not placed on the record before the Appellate Tribunal. The judgment said that indeed, this was specifically noted by the Tribunal in its order; i.e., 'However, the plea taken by the respondents is that they have taken approval from FBR as mentioned in Section 179(4) but no such approval was placed before the Tribunal'. The court noted that the matter came before it from a tax reference and it is well established that beyond the stage of the Appellate Tribunal, it is only questions of law that can be taken to the High Court. It is also well settled that the record on the basis of which the questions of law can be decided is in terms of the record as it stood before the Appellate Tribunal. The judgment said that record cannot be added to and certainly not on a point that requires factual determination. Since the position is that the FBR letter by which it is claimed extension of time was granted by the Board was never placed on the record before the Appellate Tribunal, it is impermissible for any reliance to be placed on the same in this Court. The Court; therefore, declined to entertain this point, saying; 'Any departure from the well settled position would allow a party to a tax reference to alter the record either before the High Court or this Court which is not permissible.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

3 big cases: IHC allows FBR Rs36.14bn tax recovery
3 big cases: IHC allows FBR Rs36.14bn tax recovery

Business Recorder

time17 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

3 big cases: IHC allows FBR Rs36.14bn tax recovery

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) has given orders in favour of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) allowing tax recovery to the tune of Rs36.14 billion in three big cases during last week. Details released by the Ministry of Finance on Monday revealed that in a significant legal breakthrough, the FBR has secured court decisions in its favour involving cases worth Rs36.14 billion, following strict directives from Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Through improvement in tax recovery procedures, the FBR has been able to get decisions in favour of the FBR. These cases to the tune of trillions are pending in High Courts and major bottleneck in tax recovery proceedings against the taxpayers. Law promulgated for sudden tax recovery The IHC last week ruled in favour of FBR in multiple long-pending cases, including three major tax disputes. The Ministry of Finance stated that the most important among them was the case against Bahria Town (Pvt) Ltd, where the court upheld a recovery of Rs26.446 billion in favour of the FBR. This particular case had been pending in appellate forums since last over two and a half years. Two other corporate cases, collectively valued at Rs9.7 billion, were also decided in favour of the tax authority. The success follows a comprehensive legal strategy implemented under the prime minister's instructions to resolve long-standing litigations that had locked up trillions of rupees in revenue. These legal wins are being hailed as a testament to the government's commitment to economic reforms and effective revenue collection. According to the Ministry of Finance, these developments mark a major milestone in unblocking stalled revenue and reflect the FBR's improved legal capacity under enhanced governmental oversight. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store