
Trump tariffs, copper chaos, and the metals that still matter – Saxo Bank - Middle East Business News and Information
President Trump continues to wield considerable influence over global markets, including commodities. In July, attention centered on intense trade negotiations ahead of the self-imposed August 1 deadline. While a framework deal was reached between the U.S. and EU, and talks with China continued ahead of the mid-August expiry of a 90-day tariff truce, other U.S. trading partners struggled to secure agreements.
Despite these negotiations, markets experienced an eerie calm, allowing U.S. equities to extend their rally. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq both hit record highs, supported by surprisingly strong U.S. economic data. That strength delayed rate cut expectations, lifted Treasury yields, and gave the dollar a modest boost after months of weakness.
Precious metals spent July consolidating their first-half gains. Silver and platinum extended their rallies, regaining some ground versus gold, which continues to trade in a narrow range after hitting a record high of $3,500 in April. Platinum briefly reached a year-to-date gain of 61%, while silver came close to $40—its highest since 2011, though still below the all-time peak of $50.
Also supporting silver and platinum early in the month was a surge in High-Grade copper prices in New York, which hit a record $5.8955/lb on July 8. This followed President Trump's surprise suggestion of a 50% tariff on copper imports—double what markets had priced in. The remark drove the premium over LME copper in London to a record 34%, sparking a rush to ship copper into the U.S. ahead of the deadline.
That trade unraveled last week when Trump, in a sudden reversal, announced that refined copper—traded on futures exchanges—would be excluded from the tariff until at least January 2027. The New York premium collapsed within minutes, leaving traders nursing losses and U.S. warehouses with copper inventories at a 21-year high. With imports set to dry up, U.S. prices may now fall below global benchmarks to clear the excess.
While New York copper grabbed headlines, LME copper remained relatively stable, trading around $9,550 per ton ($4.33/lb). Our medium- to long-term bullish view remains unchanged. The tariff reversal only underscores copper's strategic role in the global energy and digital transition. Demand is expected to rise sharply due to the electrification of transport, industrial reshoring, and rapid expansion of AI-driven data centers.
Supply, meanwhile, remains constrained by underinvestment and recent disruptions—including a mining accident in Chile. As a result, copper prices are likely to remain volatile but biased higher, supported by both near-term momentum and long-term structural tailwinds. It is increasingly becoming the defining commodity of the energy and digital age.
Precious Metals: Focus Shifts to Tariffs and Fed Policy
After a stellar first half, investment metals entered a consolidation phase in July, with some volatility triggered by copper's sharp moves. Gold has traded sideways for four months, allowing silver and platinum to catch up. With year-to-date gains near 27% for gold and silver and nearly 50% for platinum, investors are naturally asking: is the rally over?
We don't believe so. Recent data weakness in the U.S. has reopened the door for Fed rate cuts. Friday's dismal jobs report, including sharp downward revisions to prior months, has led markets to almost fully price in a cut at the next FOMC meeting on 17 September, with more expected into 2026. The effective Fed funds rate is now seen 125 basis points lower by next September.
The key drivers that have propelled metals higher in recent years remain intact, and additional tailwinds could emerge in the second half. Most notably, the mentioned prospect of lower U.S. interest rates could reignite demand, especially for metal-backed ETFs by reducing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like precious metals, compared to short-dated government bonds.
To understand gold's enduring appeal—and by extension, that of silver and platinum—it's important to recognise what sets these metals apart. Precious metals are politically neutral, unlike sovereign bonds or fiat currencies. They are universally recognised as a store of value, not tied to the creditworthiness of any nation, which is why central banks are increasingly allocating to gold as a core reserve asset.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
6 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
EU Welcomes Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Agreement
Nada Mustafa The European Union (EU) welcomed the meeting held in Washington between Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister (PM) Nikol Pashinyan, under the auspices of U.S. President Donald Trump, which witnessed the initial signing of a peace treaty and the establishment of relations between the two countries. In a joint statement published on the European Council's official website, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that the signing of the political declaration at the White House represents a major development paving the way for lasting and sustainable peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan, crowning years of EU efforts in this path. The statement added that the next step is to ensure the timely implementation of the agreed measures, guaranteeing steady progress toward the full normalization of relations. The European leaders expressed their strong support for the normalization process and the EU's readiness to invest in regional connectivity projects and full openness, bringing benefits to the peoples divided by the legacy of conflict and bringing the region closer to peace, stability, and sustainable prosperity. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid Videos & Features Story behind Trending Jessica Radcliffe Death Video News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani


Egypt Independent
10 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump says Qatari jet could be ready for use as Air Force One in 6 months. Experts are deeply skeptical
President Donald Trump told reporters last month the donated Qatari jet could be ready for his use as Air Force One in February 2026, well ahead of the long-delayed delivery of two presidential planes from Boeing through a more traditional acquisition process. 'They say February,' Trump said in late July, when asked by a reporter when he expected to be flying on the new plane. 'Much sooner than the others. The others are being built.' But former Defense officials and aviation analysts express deep skepticism about how realistic that timeline is, citing the immense task of upgrading a foreign government's plane to meet Air Force One's distinct requirements and ensuring it is safe and secure for a president to fly on, especially internationally. Andrew Hunter is a former assistant secretary of the Air Force under the Biden administration. He oversaw an annual budget of more than $54 billion for hundreds of acquisition programs, including Air Force One. He thinks it would be 'challenging, if not impossible,' to complete the jet in that timeframe without Trump waiving some of the requirements that typically need to occur before a president can fly on a new plane. 'It would not be possible to replicate all the capabilities of an Air Force One on (the donated jet), on any time frame shorter than what they're doing with (the Boeing program),' he said. Beyond the timeline concerns from an aviation perspective, the plan to use a donated Boeing 747-8 from Qatar poses a lot of questions and has drawn bipartisan scrutiny. Many are skeptical of the legality and ethics of accepting such a gift. Others are worried about the threat to security, based on how much goes into a jet fit for the leader of the United States. But Trump remains undaunted and continues to project optimism about the timeline. 'We'll get this one a year-and-a-half, two years earlier (than the Boeing planes),' the president told reporters in late July. The contracted jets continue to undergo renovations in San Antonio. The Qatari plane was previously parked in the city as well while awaiting upgrades, but open source aircraft tracker ADS-B Exchange shows the jet flew to Fort Worth Alliance Airport on June 29. The plane has rarely popped up on the open source tracker since then, with it last being recorded in late July at the Texas airport. Too soon? Refurbishments on commercial jets that don't have the strict and complicated requirements of Air Force One can take weeks or months depending on how much work needs to be done and the age of the aircraft. For example, according to aviation website Simply Flying, certain maintenance checks involving the complete disassembly of a plane are done every six to 12 years. That comprehensive inspection typically takes between three to six weeks. But security concerns mean what the Qatari plane needs to undergo is even more arduous than that disassembly, experts say, and is very likely to take longer. This February 15, 2025 photo shows a Boeing 747 on the tarmac of Palm Beach International airport after US President Donald Trump toured the aircraft. Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images The plane can be ready by February, said Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at boutique aerospace and defense management consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory, but not with the capability or security that an Air Force One needs, raising the possibility that the administration may plan to cut corners in order to deliver it in that timeframe. 'It is absolutely going to be ready to start flying in February,' Aboulafia said, 'and instantly transmitting every onboard conversation to anybody around the world who has a connection to it.' 'It's very different from stripping a plane down and inspecting it,' Aboulafia said. 'Very different – overhauling systems, overhauling engines, doing what you need to do to get the plane operationally ready. That's an extremely different job than scanning it for security risks, very different.' Retrofitting and installing the required security and communications equipment on a second-hand plane from another government, even a friendly one, is a monumental task, CNN has reported. US spy and security agencies tasked with the overhaul will need to essentially strip the aircraft down to its frame and rebuild it with the necessary equipment. The more changes made to the plane itself, said Frank Kendall, the Air Force secretary under the Biden administration, the more that will need to occur to ensure that it meets air-worthiness requirements, taking longer. 'There's a chance Trump will never get this airplane no matter what,' Kendall, who now does consulting work, said. However, Kendall, echoing other experts, said the donated jet could be ready in February, 'if the president waives almost all Air Force One unique requirements and minimizes modifications to the airplane.' 'It would probably result in a plane that would only be used inside the US,' he said. The White House and the Air Force did not respond to a request for comment. It's not clear where the upgrade process currently stands, and the experts CNN spoke to have not seen the jet in person. In early July, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his Qatari counterpart signed an agreement outlining the terms of the jet's 'unconditional donation,' CNN previously reported, although the terms have not been formally announced. An addendum to the agreement reviewed by CNN last month said the Air Force 'is in the process of finalizing the transfer of registration and will immediately begin execution of the required modifications.' New Air Force One a long time coming Conversations about replacing the decades-old planes currently used by the president began years ago under former President Barack Obama. Momentum began picking up under the first Trump administration when he struck a deal to purchase two existing aircraft from Boeing, but the addition of a plane donated by the Qatari royal family has added a strange and some say concerning twist to the saga. In 2018, Boeing confirmed it received a $3.9 billion contract for two new presidential planes. By 2022, the president of the United States was supposed to be in a new plane. A Boeing 747-8, one of two that had originally been ordered by a now-bankrupt Russian airline and later earmarked for an Air Force One replacement project, is seen parked at Victorville Airport in Victorville, California, U.S., March 26, 2019. Mike Blake/Reuters/File But that timeline also didn't pan out, leading Trump to find an alternative. When the president announced he planned to accept a jet from Qatar, it raised a lot of eyebrows. Several Republican senators expressed misgivings about the idea, noting the potential for security and legal risks. Trump's plan for the plane to go to his presidential library upon leaving office raised additional ethical concerns. And while Trump has said it would be stupid to turn down a 'free, very expensive airplane,' officials say renovating the jet could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. When asked how much it would cost to retrofit the new plane, Trump deflected. Officially, the price tag to retrofit the Qatari plane for use by the president is classified, but Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers in June that it will 'probably' cost less than $400 million. 'That's up to the military. I really don't know. I haven't been involved,' Trump said last month. 'It's their plane, it's, you know, the Air Force,' he said. 'They'll be spending that amount of money.' The Air Force is looking to fund the upgrades by transferring hundreds of millions of dollars from the vastly overbudget Sentinel program to an unspecified classified project, sources familiar with a congressional notification about the transfer previously told CNN. Sentinel is a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile system that is being developed to replace the US' aging Minuteman III missiles. Boeing's jets in San Antonio still hold promise Boeing's contract to replace two Air Force One jets had an original delivery date of 2022 – but now the planes are potentially expected by 2027, a timeline that would deliver them while Trump is still in office. It's one to two years earlier than Boeing had most recently predicted, after a global pandemic, supply chain issues and other problems stalled production and the company incurred losses totaling $2.5 billion on the program. Hunter, the former Air Force assistant secretary, argues one of the biggest design challenges of the program is finishing interior design work on the aircraft. In 2021, Boeing fired GDC Technics, which was hired as a subcontractor to design and build the interiors of the new planes, and later sued the company, citing delays. GDC Technics countersued and later filed for bankruptcy. Boeing declined to comment on where the interior work stands. While the Qatari jet will require a major overhaul to ensure its safety, security and operability as it carries the president, the new Boeing jets are following the more traditional route, made in the United States by a well-known manufacturer. And Aboulafia sees promise in the troubled company, which is trying to turn a corner. 'Everything is kind of turning around,' Aboulafia said. 'They just had the second clean quarter for their defense unit, which was amazing … I have a much higher level of confidence in all of their programs, really, as a consequence of the management changes.' Delivering the planes in the next two years – which Darlene Costello, the Air Force's acting acquisition chief, suggested was possible during her testimony before House lawmakers in May – would mark a significant acceleration for the project. 'I would not necessarily guarantee that date, but they are proposing to bring it in '27, if we can come to agreement on the requirement changes,' Costello said, referring to contract requirements that are being loosened to get to that earlier date – such as the Air Force 'relieving' Boeing of some of the top-clearance security requirements for workers performing work on the aircraft, which has also been blamed for some of the delays. Kendall, the former Air Force secretary, said at the forefront of the minds of those working on a new plane, should be safety and security, rather than cost or speed. 'As Defense Department acquisition executive, I was responsible for both Marine One and Air Force One,' Kendall said. 'Over the years, the people that set the requirements for these aircraft and that work at the White House are not constrained by time or money unless directed otherwise by the president. They're constrained by their imaginations about which scenarios might occur in which they might need something to support or protect the president. Those 'requirements' dictate both cost and schedule.' CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo, Natasha Bertrand, and Chris Isidore contributed to this report.


Egypt Independent
11 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Apple just got a big win in Trump's tariff war. It may have bigger concerns
Apple CEO Tim Cook should be breathing a sigh of relief. The White House on Wednesday ratcheted tariffs on Indian imports up by an additional 25 percent, raising the total levies on one of the United States' most crucial trading partners to 50 percent when they kick in later this month. But smartphones are exempt from President Donald Trump's new levies on India, marking a crucial win for the tech giant as it approaches its most important time of the year: its annual September iPhone launch followed by the holiday season. Apple will also dodge incoming new tariffs on semiconductors, since it's committed to building iPhone components in the United States, Trump said Wednesday. That's not to say tariffs won't hurt; CEO Tim Cook said tariffs will likely cost the company $1.1 billion this quarter. But analysts say Apple has bigger concerns, such as its future product strategy and approach to artificial intelligence, a burgeoning field that the tech behemoth is perceived to be behind in. Under different circumstances, such high tariffs could have spelled trouble for Apple. The iPhone is Apple's most important product, making up the majority of its revenue. Most iPhones sold in America come from India. And the Americas, which includes the United States, is Apple's largest market. 'In terms of the longer-term issues, more than a year out, I would say tariffs are probably 20 percent of it,' said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, who has covered Apple for decades. 'I think what's going on the regulatory environments (is) probably 25 percent, and 55 is related to how they're going to capitalize on AI.' Tariffs are a hurdle but manageable Tariffs are a challenge for Apple, but one that analysts seem confident the company can manage. A combination of Apple's diversified supply chain – which it partially shifted to areas like India and Vietnam around five years ago to reduce reliance on China during COVID – along with its high margins and Cook's operations expertise put the company in a strong position. Supply chain resilience is 'supposed to allow you to adjust tactically to any major changes that comes unexpected,' said Runar Bjørhovde, a research analyst for market research firm Canalys. That held true even before Apple committed to investing an additional $100 billion in the United States to manufacture iPhone parts domestically on Wednesday. While moves like these don't directly impact tariff policy, they do likely help Apple curry favor with the administration, especially as Trump has pressed Apple to build its iPhones domestically. 'Look, he's not making this kind of an investment anywhere in the world, not even close,' Trump said. 'He's coming back. I mean, Apple is coming back to America.' Some analysts already expected that the iPhone would be exempt from the upcoming levies on India ahead of Wednesday's tariff announcement. But the back-and-forth tariff policies, which have changed multiple times throughout the year, make it challenging to predict what could happen in the future. 'Because (smartphones are) such an important category, the relationship that Apple has with both administrations, and specifically, even the US administration, we do think that they will be able to maneuver against this threat,' said Nabila Popal, senior director with the International Data Corporation's data and analytics team. 'But it is important, of course. It does present a risk.' That said, analysts largely believe India and China are Apple's only two options for producing US-bound iPhones at scale. And since iPhone models available in the United States don't precisely match those sold elsewhere, Apple can't just redirect iPhones intended for different markets. New iPhones sold in America, for example, don't have physical SIM card slots anymore, and they support millimeter wave 5G, the kind of connection that provides faster, low-latency speeds but usually only at a short distance. 'It's a massive tactical nightmare to deal with,' said Bjørhovde. 'Because you have to try and find a sweet spot and figure out what comes next.' Cook said iPhones will continue to be assembled outside of the United States for 'a while' during an event at the Oval Office announcing the new $100 billion investment on Wednesday. But he pointed to the company's strategy of instead producing iPhone components stateside. 'Well, if you look at the bulk of it, we're doing a lot of the semiconductors here, we're doing the glass here, we're doing the Face ID module here, and so there's a ton of it, and we're doing these for products sold elsewhere in the world,' Cook said. 'And so there's a lot of content in there from United States.' Apple's AI troubles The narrative that Apple is behind in AI has been looming over the company all year – and some analysts see it as a more challenging issue to overcome than tariffs. Apple delayed a high-profile upgrade to its Siri assistant that would have enabled it to provide more personalized answers and act across apps, bringing it up to speed with the agent-like capabilities that Google and OpenAI are pursuing with their digital helpers. And the company's rivals are still using that setback as ammunition to promote their own products over Apple's. Just this week, Google posted an ad for its upcoming Pixel 10 phone that said: 'If you buy a new phone because of a feature that's coming soon, but it's been coming soon for a full year, you could change your definition of soon.' Apple's initial batch of AI features also didn't launch in time for the iPhone 16's arrival last September. At the same time, many of Apple's peers are seeing booming returns from their AI investments. Nvidia (NVDA) and Microsoft (MSFT) both hit four trillion dollars in market capitalization in July, a milestone Wall Street previously thought Apple (AAPL) might reach first. That's partially because of their fundamentally different products and business models. Apple is a consumer hardware company. In contrast, Microsoft, Meta (META) and Nvidia also provide the tools that businesses rely on to support AI-powered services and features, like cloud computing, chips and AI models. Still, Apple saw stellar earnings results for the June quarter, surpassing expectations for iPhone sales – including in China – and overall revenue. But during Apple's earnings call, analysts pressed Cook about his perspective on AI and what it means for the company's products. Those questions ranged from whether AI services might be eating into search engine usage, whether the forthcoming Siri upgrade could drive future new products and whether Apple would consider acquiring AI companies to further its product roadmap. 'Taking a step back, we see AI as one of the most profound technologies of our lifetime,' Cook said in his opening remarks during the earnings call. 'We are embedding it across our devices and platforms and across the company. We are also significantly growing our investments.' But Apple can't risk falling too far behind when it comes to the iPhone's AI capabilities. By doing so, it could create an opportunity for Samsung, Google and Qualcomm – the three of which dominate the Android phone space – to pull ahead, says Ted Mortonson, managing director and technology sector strategist at financial services company Baird. 'What's more important with investors is, after the iPhone 17, what do they really do?' he said. 'I mean, as far as generative AI and AI functionality, that that's the real focus on Apple right now.'