logo
Trump delivers shock verdict on Washington Commanders name change after NFL team dropped controversial Redskins

Trump delivers shock verdict on Washington Commanders name change after NFL team dropped controversial Redskins

Daily Mail​23-04-2025
President Donald Trump wouldn't quite endorse the Washington Commanders changing the NFL team's name back to the 'Redskins' - which was considered a slur by a number of Native American groups.
He did voice support for the Kansas City Chiefs - and mocked Cleveland for changing the name of its MLB franchise from Indians to Guardians.
Trump was asked if he'd tie the Commanders' football stadium deal in Washington, D.C. to reverting the name back to the original.
'Now Washington, the Redskins, perhaps that's a little different, a little different,' he said. 'I think it's a superior name to what they have right now,' he also volunteered.
He added that, 'we're about bringing common sense back to this country.'
The 'Redskins' name had been at the center of controversy for decades since a movement to begin phasing out the use of Native Americans as mascots began in the 1960s.
For years, the National Congress of American Indians - a non-profit organization that represents indigenous tribes in the nation's capital - viewed the nickname as a racial slur.
The NCAI and a number of individual tribes and indigenous people protested the name and lobbied former team owner Dan Snyder to change the name.
Attitudes on the nickname changed over time and by the mid-2010s, studies had shown a growing animosity among American Indians toward the name. Additionally, the sight of fans of different races donning Native headdresses and 'war paint' had become far too common.
In the wake of the murder of George Floyd and the subsequent protests for racial equality in 2020 as well as pressure from the league and its sponsors, the team abandoned the 'Redskins' moniker and played as the Washington Football Team for two seasons. In 2022, it was announced that the team would be re-branded as the Commanders.
Following Snyder's sale of the franchise to Josh Harris, fans have lobbied the new owner to revert to the old name.
Additionally, the Native American Guardians Association - an organization which vocally opposes the removal of Native American mascots - launched a petition to bring the name back.
After Trump was re-elected, many fans hoped that he could somehow force the team or the NFL to bring the 'Redskins' name back.
However, as both the NFL and the Commanders are private businesses, Trump has no authority to force a name change.
A fan of the Redskins in 2019, wearing a native headdress and 'war paint' in Miami
Additionally, the team's attempts to move from its current home in Landover, Maryland and back into the DC city limits at a new venue on the site of the old RFK Stadium could be a roadblock to bringing back the old identity.
The Commanders were founded in Boston in 1932. The city was awarded a franchise by the NFL under the ownership of George Preston Marshall.
Initially, the team was known as the Boston Braves and shared the name with a National League baseball team (which eventually moved to Milwaukee, then to their current home of Atlanta) and shared the same stadium, Braves Field.
After just one season under the Braves moniker and at Braves Field, Marshall changed the name to Redskins and moved the team to Fenway Park. Eventually, they moved to Washington in 1937.
Marshall had been accused of racism throughout his career in football as he promoted a 'gentleman's agreement' in the league to not sign any black players. That 'agreement' held up until 1946.
It wasn't until 1962 that the Redskins finally integrated (the last team in the NFL to do so) after Marshall was threatened by then-Attorney general Robert Kennedy and Interior Secretary Stewart Udall.
The two cabinet members said that if the team didn't sign a black player, the government would revoke the franchise's lease on DC Stadium (now RFK Stadium).
In that year's NFL Draft, Marshall selected Syracuse running back Ernie Davis, the first black player to ever win the Heisman Trophy. When Davis refused to play for the team, he was traded to the Cleveland Browns for running back Bobby Mitchell and he became the team's first black player.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights
Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights

President Donald Trump's super PAC holds nearly $200 million after donations from Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights. The funds may be spent to take on rivals in both the Democratic and Republican parties. During the first half of this year, the Trump group MAGA Inc. gathered about $177m in total from Musk, TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass, Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, and others, a Thursday filing with the Federal Election Commission states. Trump has held several fundraisers this year, costing as much as seven figures a seat, The New York Times noted. The dinners, which have often been held at one of the president's properties, have allowed lobbyists and executives to make their case to Trump about their business interests. The filing states that the super PAC has $196.1m in cash on hand. Politicians haven't previously been so meticulous about raising money when they don't have a campaign in the future. Comparatively, a group backing term-limited former President Barack Obama raised $356,000 in the first half of 2013. That June, it had $3.4 million in cash on hand. MAGA Inc. has collected almost double the money as the Republican National Committee. But the RNC is restricted by contribution limits. Yass donated $16m to MAGA Inc. while Horowitz and Andreessen jointly contributed $6m. Trump has boosted the crypto industry from which his group collected several seven-figure donations. The group also received a $5m donation from a crypto entity co-founded by Sam Altman, the chief of OpenAI. Some Republicans have grown confused as to why Trump has been raising so much money for the group. Some of the president's top supporters have pushed for him to run for an unconstitutional third term. Trump aides have said it would be unwise not to take money that is essentially up for the taking. The funds can be used to attack the president's enemies. With such a sizable money pot, MAGA Inc. is set to play a significant role in Republican primaries, boosting the value of an endorsement from Trump. Some conservatives have grown worried about the amount of money collected by the Super PAC, with the group likely to be a bigger spender in the 2026 midterm elections than groups connected to the Republican leadership in Congress. As of June 30, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds held $32.7m and $29.7m. Filings show that a super PAC supported by the crypto industry, Fairshake, had $140m on hand, according to filings. Musk at first said he would spend roughly $100m on Trump's political operation, but in the end, he spent only $5m. Musk and Trump's close relationship has since come to an apparent end. Musk also contributed $5m each to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds some weeks after his public feud with the president. But soon after, following the passage of Trump's budget bill, Musk said he would leave the Republican Party to start his own party.

Palestinian lives lost in the pursuit of food aid in Gaza, in photos
Palestinian lives lost in the pursuit of food aid in Gaza, in photos

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Palestinian lives lost in the pursuit of food aid in Gaza, in photos

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Trump's team ‘concerned' after it emerged a secret Government unit silenced critics of migrant hotels
Trump's team ‘concerned' after it emerged a secret Government unit silenced critics of migrant hotels

The Sun

time18 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Trump's team ‘concerned' after it emerged a secret Government unit silenced critics of migrant hotels

DONALD Trump's team are 'greatly concerned' after it emerged a secret Government unit silenced critics of migrant hotels. Staff working for Technology Secretary Peter Kyle asked social media firms to remove posts critical of asylum hotels and 'two-tier policing'. 2 Tech giants, including TikTok, were warned the posts were 'exacerbating tensions' on the streets after the Southport riots. A US State Department spokesman said: 'President Trump has taken a strong stand defending free speech. "We are monitoring developments in the UK closely and with great concern.' Nigel Farage this week demanded an apology after the TEch Secretary sensationally claimed he is "on the side" of paedos like Jimmy Savile. Peter Kyle sparked a blazing row by alleging the Reform Party leader's vow to repeal online safety laws amounts to backing predators gaining access to children. Mr Kyle declared: 'If Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. "And Nigel Farage is saying he's on their side.' Furious at the inflammatory accusation, Mr Farage hit back, branding the comments "disgusting" and demanding a retraction. He fumed: "Peter Kyle's comments on Sky News are disgusting. "He should do the right thing and apologise." However, the Tech Secretary refused to back down, stating: "If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. "It is as simple as that."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store