&w=3840&q=100)
German chief of defence orders swift expansion of warfare capabilities
Germany's Chief of Defence, Carsten Breuer, has ordered the German military to be fully equipped with weapons and other material by 2029, a document seen by Reuters on Sunday shows.
By 2029, Russia may have reconstituted its forces sufficiently to attack NATO territory, according to estimates by Breuer and other senior military officials at NATO.
The document entitled "Directive Priorities for the Bolstering of Readiness", which Breuer signed on May 19, said Germany will meet the goal with the help of funds made available by the loosening of the country's debt brake in March.
The defence ministry in Berlin did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In the directive, Breuer sets priorities for the weapons that should be acquired or developed most urgently, reflecting in part priorities NATO has previously laid out.
Among them, Breuer lists the strengthening of Germany's depleted air defences, in particular with a view to intercepting drones.
Last year, sources told Reuters that NATO will request Berlin to at least quadruple its air defences, ranging from systems with a longer range, such as the Patriot, to short-range systems.
Another priority is a capability to launch deep precision strikes, according to the document, effectively hitting targets at a distance of more than 500 kilometres (310 miles) and far behind enemy lines.
In addition to pushing for Germany's ammunition stocks to be replenished, Breuer also orders Germany to raise its stockpiling targets for all types of ammunition.
Other priorities listed in the document are the swift expansion of Germany's capabilities in electronic warfare and the establishment of a resilient system of "offensive and defensive capabilities" in space.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil price outlook weakens on OPEC+ hikes, lingering trade concerns
Analysts have revised down their oil price forecasts for the third consecutive month as swelling OPEC+ supply and lingering uncertainty around the impact of trade disputes on fuel demand weigh on prices, a Reuters poll showed. A survey of 40 economists and analysts in May forecasts Brent crude will average $66.98 per barrel in 2025, down from April's $68.98 forecast, while U.S. crude is seen at $63.35, below last month's $65.08 estimate. Prices have averaged roughly $71.08 and $67.56 so far this year respectively, as per LSEG data. While tensions have somewhat eased between the U.S. and other trade partners, trade conflicts still loom as a key factor that could weaken oil demand, said Tobias Keller, analyst at UniCredit. "On the supply side, oil prices will be heavily influenced by OPEC+ production decisions , while geopolitical tensions... pose ongoing risks of disruption and price volatility," Keller added. Eight OPEC+ members began unwinding output cuts earlier this year, agreeing to larger-than-expected increases of 411,000 bpd for May and June. The members may decide on a similar output hike for July at a meeting on Saturday, sources have told Reuters. The move "seems driven by a desire to punish non-compliant members rather than support oil prices at any specific level. Compliance will be hard to enforce, especially in Kazakhstan," said Suvro Sarkar, lead energy analyst at DBS Bank. Meanwhile, analysts polled by Reuters expect global oil demand to grow by an average of 775,000 barrels per day in 2025, with many pointing to elevated trade uncertainty and the risk of economic slowdown as key concerns. This compares to the 740,000 bpd 2025 average demand growth forecast from the International Energy Agency earlier this month. With U.S. consumption and China oil demand constrained by fuel efficiency gains, economic uncertainty and the shift to electric mobility, "demand growth is largely coming from the resource nations themselves," said Norbert Ruecker, head of economics & next generation research at Julius Baer. Meanwhile, Russia's war in Ukraine continues to pose a geopolitical risk premium for oil. Analysts say markets have largely priced in the uncertainty. "Potential de-escalation efforts and the possibility of lifting sanctions on Russian oil could further lower prices," said Sarkar.
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Spurned by Trump? Global universities now wooing foreign students as US administration ratchets up pressure
Universities around the world are stepping in to welcome students affected by US President Donald Trump's recent actions against academic institutions. They are aiming to attract students, researchers and part of the international education market that has long been a major source of revenue for the United States. Osaka University in Japan is offering support for those looking to move from US universities. This includes waiving tuition fees, providing research funding and helping with travel arrangements. 'We see this as a loss for all of humanity,' said Masaru Ishii, dean of the graduate school of medicine at Osaka University, according to Reuters. Other universities in Japan, including Kyoto and Tokyo, are also exploring similar offers. In China, Xi'an Jiaotong University is actively encouraging students from US institutions such as Harvard to consider transferring. It has promised simplified admissions and full support for those who move. Hong Kong's government has told its universities to attract skilled students and researchers from the US as well. The move comes after President Trump's administration made cuts to research funding, limited visas—especially for Chinese students and proposed higher taxes on top universities. Last week, the US government revoked Harvard University's ability to enrol foreign students, although a court later overturned that decision. According to Jessica Turner, head of London-based analytics company Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), other countries are quickly trying to fill the gap. 'Germany, France and Ireland are becoming more attractive options in Europe,' she told Reuters. 'In Asia-Pacific, students are also looking at New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan and mainland China.' The crackdown has hit Chinese students particularly hard. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the government would 'aggressively' tighten visa rules for Chinese nationals. There are over 275,000 Chinese students currently enrolled in US universities. Their presence contributes significantly to university income and helps feed talent into US tech firms. In 2023, international students—mostly from India and China added more than $50 billion to the US economy, according to the US Department of Commerce. Many students are now rethinking their plans, just as the academic year nears. Dai, a 25-year-old student from Chengdu, told Reuters she may now choose to study in Britain instead of the US. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said, asking to be identified only by her surname. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.' Students from the UK and the European Union are also becoming more hesitant about studying in the United States. Tom Moon, deputy head of Oxbridge Applications, a consultancy that supports university applicants, said his firm had been contacted by international students in the US who want to transfer to Canada, the UK or Europe. He said a recent survey found that 54% of clients were now 'less likely' to study in the US compared to earlier in the year. British universities have reported more interest from students currently in the US, according to Universities UK, a group that promotes British institutions. But it's still too early to tell whether this will result in more actual enrolments. Some students, like 18-year-old Canadian Ella Ricketts, are worried about the financial cost of transferring. She currently studies at Harvard on a scholarship. 'When I applied, the only university I considered in Europe was Oxford,' she said. 'But I realised I wouldn't be able to afford the international fees and there weren't enough scholarships or aid available.' If she can't stay at Harvard, she said she would probably apply to the University of Toronto. Interest in US universities appears to be dropping. QS reported that visits to its 'Study in America' online guide had fallen by 17.6% over the past year, with interest from India down by more than half. 'Enrolment trends usually take six to 18 months to become clear,' Turner said. 'But reputational damage lasts longer, especially when students are unsure about visas and work opportunities.' Caleb Thompson, a 20-year-old Harvard student from the US, told Reuters that international students bring value to American universities. 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study,' he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'Can't rule out strategic miscalculation': Pakistani general warns of escalation risk despite India-Pak troop drawdown
Despite signs of de-escalation along the India-Pakistan border, with both sides beginning to reduce troops after their worst clashes in decades, a top Pakistani military general has warned that the risk of future escalation remains high read more General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff committee, speaks during an interview with Reuters on the sidelines of the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue security summit, in Singapore, May 30, 2025, in this screengrab from a video. Reuters Despite signs of de-escalation along the India-Pakistan border, with both sides beginning to reduce troops after their worst clashes in decades, a top Pakistani military general has warned that the risk of future escalation remains high. General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, who is in Singapore to attend the Shangri-La Dialogue forum, said while there was no move towards nuclear weapons during the conflict, it was a dangerous situation. 'Nothing happened this time, but you can't rule out any strategic miscalculation at any time, because when the crisis is on, the responses are different,' General Mirza said in an interview to Reuters, cautioning that while the immediate crisis may be easing, the underlying tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours remain dangerously volatile. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said that the risk of future escalation has grown, as the recent fighting extended beyond the disputed region of Kashmir, claimed in full by both countries but controlled in parts, into each country's mainland. Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started the process of drawing down troop levels. 'We have almost come back to the pre-22nd April situation… we are approaching that, or we must have approached that by now,' said Mirza, the most senior Pakistani military official to speak publicly since the conflict. According to Reuters, India's ministry of defence and the office of the Indian chief of defence staff did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the remarks by Mirza. The latest round of hostilities between the long-time rivals was triggered by an April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that left 26 civilians dead, most of them tourists. New Delhi accused Pakistan-backed 'terrorists' of carrying out the assault, a claim Islamabad firmly denied. In response, India launched missile strikes on May 7, targeting nine terrorist hideouts across the border. Pakistan retaliated with its own strikes, prompting both countries to amass additional troops along the frontier. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery in four days of clashes, their worst fighting in decades, before a ceasefire was announced on May 10. Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan this month that New Delhi would target 'terrorist hideouts' across the border again if there were new attacks on India. India and Pakistan have fought three major wars, two of them over Kashmir, and have been involved in numerous armed skirmishes over the decades. New Delhi holds Islamabad responsible for terrorism in Kashmir that began in 1989 and has claimed tens of thousands of lives. Pakistan, however, insists it offers only moral, political, and diplomatic support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination. 'This (conflict) lowers the threshold between two countries who are contiguous nuclear powers…in the future, it will not be restricted to the disputed territory. It would come down to (the) whole of India and (the) whole of Pakistan,' Reuters quoted Mirza as saying. 'This is a very dangerous trend,' he added. Reuters had earlier reported that the swift de-escalation of hostilities was partly the result of behind-the-scenes diplomacy involving the United States, India, and Pakistan, with Washington playing a key role in brokering peace. However, India has rejected any suggestion of third-party involvement in the ceasefire, maintaining that all engagement with Pakistan must be strictly bilateral. General Mirza cautioned, however, that international mediation may prove more difficult in future crises, citing the absence of formal crisis management mechanisms between the two countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The time window for the international community to intervene would now be very less, and I would say that damage and destruction may take place even before that time window is exploited by the international community,' he was quoted as saying. Pakistan was open to dialogue, he added, but beyond a crisis hotline between the directors general of military operations and some hotlines at the tactical level on the border, there was no other communication between the two countries. New Delhi has maintained a hard line on any possible rapprochement. 'If there are talks, it will only be on terrorism and PoK," Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said on Friday. 'If Pakistan is serious about talks, it should hand over terrorists…to India so that justice is served,' he added. Mirza said there were no backchannel discussions, or informal talks, to ease tensions. He also said he had no plans to meet General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, who is also in Singapore for the Shangri-La forum. 'These issues can only be resolved by dialogue and consultations, on the table. They cannot be resolved on the battlefield,' Mirza added. With inputs from agencies
