Bosnian Serb separatist leader stripped of electoral mandate after ban
The commission's decision against Milorad Dodik will take effect after an appeals period expires. An early election for president of Bosnia's autonomous Serb Republic would then be called within 90 days, commission member Suad Arnautovic told reporters.
The Russian-backed Dodik has rejected the verdict, which banned him from government for six years, saying he would keep going to work and vowing to seek help from both Moscow and U.S. President Donald Trump.
The nationalist Serb Republic (RS) government also dismissed the sentence and Dodik's SNSD party invited the opposition to join it in the formation of a national unity government.
"Surrender is not an option," Dodik said on his X profile after the electoral commission's decision, which was issued in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo and has little chance of being enforced without cooperation by Bosnian Serb authorities.
Dodik's lawyer Goran Bubic said his team would ask Bosnia's Constitutional Court to suspend implementation of the jail sentence and political ban pending the outcome of his appeal.
Leaders of Serbia, Russia and Hungary, opens new tab- all Dodik's backers, dismissed the jail term and ban, saying they were politically motivated.
Dodik, who has long advocated secession of the RS from Bosnia, was sentenced in February for defying decisions of the Constitutional Court and international peace envoy, whose role is to prevent multi-ethnic Bosnia sliding back into civil war.
Dodik has seen through the passage of separatist laws in the RS parliament that were later temporarily suspended by the Constitutional Court. He also ignored a summons by state prosecutors, who then issued an arrest warrant for him.
Bosnia is suffering its worst political crisis since the 1992-95 war, which killed around 100,000 people. The peace accord divided the Balkan state into autonomous Serb and Bosniak-Croat federal entities with a weak central government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani is making his messaging for the mayoral race clear: Me vs Trump
As he heads into November's general election for New York City mayor, Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani has a warning: If he loses, the next mayor could be in Donald Trump's pocket. Mamdani has launched a 'five boroughs against Trump' tour to draw attention to the president's agenda and how the administration's impact has already been felt throughout the city — from threats to food stamps and healthcare to immigration raids and courthouse arrests. 'There is no borough that will be free from Donald Trump's cruelty,' Mamdani told supporters in Manhattan Monday. But he's also using the tour to tie his opponents — former Governor Andrew Cuomo, current mayor Eric Adams, and Republican challenger Curtis Sliwa — to the president. The race for the Democratic primary saw Mamdani relentlessly focus his campaign around affordability, including no-cost childcare, freezing rent in tens of thousands of rent-controlled apartment units, boosting taxes on corporations and the wealthiest residents to fund free buses, and creating city-owned grocery stores in one of the country's most expensive places to live. That platform remains at the center of his campaign, but Mamdani is ringing alarm bells about the future of the city under the Trump administration with an ill-equipped mayor at the helm — or, worse, one that works in concert with the president. 'We see far too many parallels between Donald Trump and Andrew Cuomo, far too many stories that make clear that both administrations have been characterized by corruption, by a sense of impunity,' Mamdani told reporters Monday at the offices of the 1199SEIU labor union, which had endorsed Cuomo in the primary but is now backing Mamdani. 'We know a fraud when we see one,' he said. Cuomo, who resigned from the governor's office under a cloud of sexual misconduct allegations, conceded to Mamdani in the Democratic primary after losing by nearly 13 points. Then, he entered the general election as an independent, arguing that he faced off against Trump as governor and can do it again as New York City mayor. 'Trump will flatten him like a pancake,' Cuomo recently wrote on X. 'There's only one person in this race who can stand up to Trump: the one who already has, successfully and effectively.' Trump and Cuomo spoke directly about the mayor's race on a recent phone call, according to The New York Times. Both Trump and Cuomo have denied speaking to one another, though the president has been briefed by allies about how best to keep Mamdani out of the race. Mamdani said the call is 'disqualifying' and a 'betrayal of New Yorkers.' 'While housing experts are ringing the alarm, Andrew Cuomo is ringing Donald Trump's cell,' Mamdani told supporters in Brooklyn Tuesday. In a recent meeting with New York business leaders, Cuomo also said he was not 'personally' looking for a fight with the president and said their relationship was more like a 'dysfunctional marriage.' Adams, meanwhile, has avoided speaking out against the president after the Department of Justice dropped federal corruption charges against him in an apparent effort to win his support for the president's anti-immigration agenda. The current mayor has said he is not beholden to anyone, including the president, while insisting he can develop a working relationship with Trump for the city's benefit. Sliwa, the longshot Republican candidate taking another stab at the mayor's race after losing in 2021, has even urged the president to stay out of the race. 'Every day it's Trump versus Zohran Mamdani, it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' Sliwa said in a recent radio interview. 'Every day that Cuomo and Adams talks about you, 'you drop out, you job out,' it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' he said. 'The fact is that the president has three candidates in this race,' Mamdani recently told WNYC. 'One that he's directly been in touch with, another that he bailed out of legal trouble and now functionally controls, and the final one literally being a member of the same Republican Party.' Mamdani, a 33-year-old Ugandan-born Democratic socialist, would be the city's first-ever Muslim and Indian American mayor, if elected. He has faced a wave of racist and Islamophobic attacks since securing the Democratic primary, including from Republican members of Congress and the White House. Trump has repeatedly questioned Mamdani's citizenship, falsely branded him a communist, threatened to arrest and deport him, and suggested his administration would 'run' New York City should he win in November. 'I'm not getting involved,' Trump told reporters during a Cabinet meeting last month. 'But I can tell you this. I used to say we will not ever be a socialist country. Well, I'll say it again. We're not gonna have it,' he continued. 'If a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same. But we have tremendous power at the White House to run places where we have to.' While Mamdani touts endorsements from former Cuomo backers and other prominent New York Democrats on his latest tour, the latest Siena Research Institute poll shows the Democratic nominee in the lead with 44 percent of the vote, followed by Cuomo at 25 percent. Sliwa is at 12 percent and Adams is in single digits with 7 percent, the poll found. Mamdani has picked up key endorsements from progressive powerhouses Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, as well as prominent New York Democratic officials like state Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler — all of whom are targets of the president and his party. But he has not received any full-throated endorsements from New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, as national Democrats fear Mamdani's democratic socialist agenda could be a liability for moderates in a high-stakes race to take back control of Congress in 2026. 'Every seat matters, every race matters, and who is mayor of New York is crucial,' Nadler said. 'New York City needs a leader who won't give Trump an inch, who won't flinch or bargain away our rights.' If elected, Mamdani's fight with the White House would 'be delivered forcefully, rhetorically, through conversations, both public and private,' including staffing up the city's legal departments with dozens of attorneys to push back against Trump threats to send in federal troops, he said. He also argues that his election would also serve as its own signal that the city is fighting back against Trump with 'a governance that is actually characterized by competence and by compassion.'
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
We feel duped and insulted by this Labour government
Lord Falconer's assessment of the government (Starmer's team seen as 'tired, same-again politicians', says Labour peer, 9 August) does not acknowledge the depth of feeling on current issues, and his advice for the future is itself 'same-again' and 'tired'. After the last general election, Keir Starmer promised us hope and an assurance that the 'broadest shoulders' would help to turn around the country after 14 years of disastrous and deeply damaging Conservative rule. However, the public clearly didn't think that axing disabled people's benefits or removing heating allowances from pensioners fitted the 'broadest shoulders' definition. Rather large 'fuck-ups', as Falconer puts it, in a handful of weeks. The pro-Israel, pro-US foreign policy agenda, while a terrible genocide unfolds in Gaza, has also proved deeply unpalatable. The public feel duped and insulted by this 'blue' Labour government, with its unashamedly authoritarian assault on democracy. I agree with the 'same old, same old' sentiment: same lower- and middle-income earners paying the same price for the same old financiers, political lobbyists, rightwing campaign groups, global corporations, arms manufacturers and their vested interests. Yes, the 10-year NHS plan is welcome, but the failure to tax the super-rich and initiatives such as the environmentally catastrophic planning reforms outweigh any positive steps. Falconer suggests No 10 should unapologetically drive through ideological change, but that approach is doomed. Less of the tone-deafness and failure to read the room, and more consultation, more humanity, are what the people BorgesStowmarket, Suffolk Charles Falconer's critique of Labour in government sums up the situation very well. I would just add that disillusionment and absence of hope combine to make this an unhappy, uneasy country. Yet our government apparently fails to see any link with increasing polarisation, conflict and crime. It's proving a costly failure for us all, but especially for the people who are marginalised and vulnerable. We should expect JonesLondon
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
Aug 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form."
