logo
Remembering JP: The man who challenged a regime with words and will

Remembering JP: The man who challenged a regime with words and will

Time of India25-06-2025
Dr Navneet Anand is a communications professional with a rich tapestry of experience spanning 25 years across media, academia, and the corporate sector. A graduate of Hindu College in Delhi University, Anand went on to complete his MA, MPhil and PhD in Sociology (communications) from Jawaharlal Nehru University, he has been a journalist previously with The Times of India, The Indian Express, and The Pioneer. As the founder-director of GreyMatters Communications & Consulting, Navneet has lent his expertise to a myriad of projects, including serving as a Public Communication Expert for a World Bank initiative, International Labour Organization, many Government and private agencies in India. His corporate journey includes a notable tenure as General Manager of Corporate Affairs & Communication at Fortune 500 company, Reliance Industries Limited. Navneet seamlessly integrates his extensive professional background with his rigorous academic training. He is the author of two acclaimed books, including 'The Media Effect' (2003), and regularly contributes to esteemed national and international journals and publications. A distinguished educator, Navneet imparts knowledge on journalism, social media, marketing & strategic communication, and public relations at esteemed institutions such as Indian Institute of Mass Communication, IIMs, IP University, Delhi University and JNU. With a passion for training and development, Navneet has empowered over 2,500 officials from government, police, and PSUs, while delivering over 500 lectures and training sessions. For insights on social and political issues, reach out to him at navneet@thegreymatters.in. LESS ... MORE
On the night of June 25, 1975, as darkness fell on Indian democracy with the proclamation of Emergency, another light was burning strong: that of Jayaprakash Narayan, or JP, whose movement had shaken the very foundations of Indira Gandhi's government. On this day, we remember not only the suspension of democratic rights but also the courage of a man who dared to dream of 'total revolution' and used the media as a force to unite, awaken and mobilise.
JP's story is not of a conventional politician but of a restless and relentless crusader committed to change. Often called the 'second Mahatma,' JP was a freedom fighter, socialist, thinker, and above all, a wonderful communicator. In the 1970s, as India battled inflation, unemployment, and rising corruption, JP emerged as the conscience-keeper of the nation. He galvanised students, the middle class and even disillusioned civil servants into a mass movement that came to be known as the JP Movement.
What made JP's movement truly unique was how he communicated his ideas. Like Gandhi before him, JP understood the power of words. But unlike Gandhi, who worked in a colonial setting, JP worked within a democratic structure where the press was relatively free, at least until the Emergency struck. He used this space to full effect.
JP started a weekly magazine called Everyman's, aimed at reaching students, intellectuals and the broader civil society. In this magazine, he laid out his philosophy of total revolution: a call for deep-rooted transformation in social, economic and political life. His writings spoke not only about corrupt leaders but also about how democracy had lost its moral centre. JP believed that change had to be triggered by the people at the bottom, and not by those at the top, and saw a vital role for the farmers, workers, students, and small traders who made up the backbone of the country.
In his editorials and pamphlets, JP called on students to rise not just against fee hikes and hostel mess charges, but against a system that had become unresponsive and unjust. He was clear: this was not a movement to seize power but to empower the people to take control of how they were governed.
When protests erupted in Gujarat and Bihar in 1974, sparked by students' discontent, JP gave the movement both moral authority and organisational direction. He travelled, addressed huge rallies and wrote tirelessly. Through his journal Everyman's, he kept the movement alive, countered misinformation, and provided ideological clarity. Remember there was no social media in those days and it was largely the print media that shaped public opinion, and JP had mastered this art.
Of course, his activism came at a price. As the movement gained strength, the government cracked down. Press freedom was one of the first casualties of the Emergency. JP's magazine was banned. Prominent newspapers were censored. Editors were arrested or silenced. Yet, the movement found ways to survive. Underground pamphlets circulated. International media picked up the cause. On August 15, 1975, the Times of London carried an ad demanding, 'Free JP,' reminding the world that India's independence now needed rescuing from within.
Despite adversities, JP never gave up the habit of writing and continued to write even while in jail. His prison diary spoke of his commitment to non-violence and democracy. He was clear that the movement must not mirror the authoritarianism it opposed. Change, he believed, must come peacefully, and must uphold the values of democracy, even if it took longer.
JP's call for 'Sampoorna Kranti' or total revolution was not about overnight miracles. It was about rebuilding India from the grassroots-reforming education, fighting caste inequality, restoring dignity to labour, and ensuring that every citizen had a voice. His use of media was never just about headlines. It was about nurturing a political culture based on debate, ethics and participation.
The Emergency ended in 1977. Indira Gandhi was defeated. A new government came to power, the first non-Congress government at the Centre. JP was hailed as a national hero. Masses cheered him as the man who restored democracy without firing a single bullet. Yet, he remained modest. Power, he often said, was not his goal; awakening the people was.
History, of course, is not without its ironies. The Janata government that came to power after the Emergency could not live up to its promises. JP's health failed. He watched helplessly as the ideals of his movement were diluted. Critics would later say that JP was not an organiser, that his revolution lacked structure. But perhaps JP's real achievement lay elsewhere; not in forming a government, but in showing that people still had the power to question and to act.
Today, when the role of media is being debated once again, its freedoms, its responsibilities, and its influence, it is important to remember how JP used it. Not to amplify power, but to hold it accountable. Not to divide people, but to unite them. Not to create fear, but to awaken hope.
As we look back at that June night 50 years ago, let us also look forward. JP reminded us that democracy is not a gift we inherit, but a responsibility we carry. His words, written on fading pages of Everyman's, still echo: 'My interest is not in the capture of power but control of power by the people.'
That is a message worth remembering: every day, but especially today.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home
Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home

Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home

A month ago, I carried five tiny kittens home from the street. They were stranded in a house about to be demolished, shivering, hungry, and still too young to eat on their own. Today, they are healthy, curious, and very sure they own my home. It is astonishing how quickly an animal can change when it is given care. This week's Supreme Court order that every street dog in Delhi be relocated to a shelter within eight weeks is, at its heart, about care — or rather, the lack of it. Yes, the threat of rabies is real. Yes, we need solutions to incidents of aggression and population growth. But there is a difference between solving a problem and sweeping it out of sight. Even if the order were legally sound, the reality on the ground makes it impossible to execute. To begin with, we don't know exactly how many dogs there are in Delhi. There hasn't been a count in 10 years. The 'estimate' offered by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is around 8 lakh. Against those numbers, Delhi has just 20 temporary shelters, none of them government-run. Building and running enough facilities to house every dog would cost crores. We struggle to build bridges for decades, yet we are expected to build and staff thousands of shelters in two months. Ironically, the same MCD that has already failed to meet sterilisation targets and hasn't supplied anti-rabies vaccines in the numbers needed is now being tasked with the creation of humane shelters. Not once has the Court asked the civic body for accountability. But the most important reason to doubt the effectiveness of this order is neither legal nor logistical, it's logical. Mass removal simply doesn't work. We know this from Turkey, where a similar programme descended into mass culling, only for the stray population to rebound. The sterilise-vaccinate-return approach, enshrined in Indian law, exists because it works. Remove the dogs who already have a place, and you create space for new ones who don't. If the intent is to curb rabies cases in Delhi, then this order does more harm than good. To start with, panic fanned by WhatsApp messages declares that 2,000 people die of rabies every day in the national capital. Yet, the government's own figures — given in a reply to a question in the Lok Sabha just months ago — tell a very different story. According to official data, in 2024, there were 54 'suspected human rabies deaths' in the entire country — none from Delhi. The root cause of death by rabies is the shortage of rabies vaccines at government hospitals. Sending every single stray to a shelter cannot be a one-stop solution to India's rabies crisis. Look at Romania, where, after shelters were filled and streets emptied, unsterilised and unvaccinated dogs moved into the emptied territories. Beyond the failures of policy and denial of science, though, there is something more troubling: The absence of care. Article 51A(g) of our Constitution, which asks us to show compassion to all living creatures, is meant to shape how we live and the principles we live by. The persistent caricature of those who oppose this verdict is the elite South Delhi aunty, feeding pedigreed dogs in her gated colony. In truth, most community dogs live in less privileged neighbourhoods, sustained by families who cannot keep them inside their small homes but still take responsibility for them. I think of a friend who found a dog abandoned outside his home. He took the dog in, not into his house but into his life. Neighbours feed him. Someone else covers the cost of vaccinations. In winter, children in the lane make sure he has a blanket. This is what a community of care looks like: Fragile, improvised, but deeply human. The real cause of Delhi's stray population is abandonment. What happens when the dog bought for a child's birthday is dumped a year later? When he mates with another discarded pet, producing a litter born into homelessness? The owners face no penalty. But the puppies will be rounded up, sent to overcrowded shelters, where they will disappear. Even if Delhi somehow found the space and money overnight, removing sterilised, vaccinated dogs from their territories will undo years of rabies control and leave the streets more unsafe. The alternative is not a mystery. It is in our laws already: Large-scale sterilisation and vaccination, strict enforcement against illegal breeding and abandonment, public education on responsible pet ownership, and support for communities that care for animals where they are. The Supreme Court may have, in all its wisdom, passed the order that it has. Yet, the Chief Minister still has the chance to step in and stop an unworkable, unlawful order from taking effect — and to choose care over cruelty disguised as efficiency. Inhumanity is easy. It is also a sign of our times. But care — for each other, for the animals who live alongside us — is what makes a city worth calling home. The writer is national spokesperson, NCP (SP)

India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does
India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does

Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does

Between December 2022 and July 2025, China accounted for about 47 per cent of all crude oil and 44 per cent of the coal exported by Russia, as against India's corresponding purchase shares of 38 per cent and 20 per cent. Despite that, US President Donald Trump has slapped India with a 25 per cent 'penalty' for buying Russian energy. This rate, to be effective from August 27, would take the total tariff on Indian goods imported into the US to 50 per cent. China has not only escaped such punishment, but has actually seen a lowering of the duty on its goods from 145 to 30 per cent since May 12. On Monday, Trump extended his trade truce with China for a further 90-day period till November 10. At the same time, his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has threatened additional 'secondary tariffs' on India if the outcome of Trump's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin isn't favourable. This blatantly divergent treatment, further eroding the credibility of the current Western sanctions regime, has significantly to do with relative economic leverage — China is seen to possess much more of it. The most visible demonstration of that was when, in early April, it imposed export restrictions on rare earth elements and magnets that are indispensable, whether for auto, aerospace, defence, semiconductor, renewable energy or consumer electronics manufacturing. China could use its virtual global monopoly over the mining and processing of these critical minerals to bring Trump to the negotiating table. Rare earths apart, China also played the trump card of being a massive buyer of US agricultural produce — from soyabean, cotton and coarse grains to beef, pork and poultry meat — sharply reducing the imports of these to signal its capacity for retaliation in any unilateral trade war. On the face of it, India does not have that sort of economic leverage. Barring, say, pharmaceutical products, much of what it exports to the US — readymade garments, gems and jewellery, frozen shrimps, basmati rice or even steel and aluminium — aren't items for which there are no alternative suppliers. Nor are Indian imports of California almonds comparable to the humongous quantities of Midwest US soyabean and corn that China was, until recently, sourcing to feed its swine and poultry birds. Given how much it stands to lose in any prolonged trade war — the worst-affected industries are also the most employment-intensive — the best approach for India to adopt is strategic patience. What the Indian foreign policy establishment and its trade negotiators should emphasise is the country's importance to global economic and regional stability, which aligns with the US's own long-term interests.

Rubio hails India-US ties as he extends warm wishes on Independence Day
Rubio hails India-US ties as he extends warm wishes on Independence Day

First Post

time12 minutes ago

  • First Post

Rubio hails India-US ties as he extends warm wishes on Independence Day

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday released a statement wishing India on its Independence Day. In the statement, Rubio hailed strong ties between the 'world's largest and oldest democracies'. India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington, The meet with Jaishankar was Rubio's first as secretary of state. Image Courtesy: @DrSJaishankar/X Amid strained ties, the US Department of State released a statment, wishing India on its 78th Independence Day. On Friday, the department released a statement hailing the strong ties between the 'world's largest and the oldest democracies.' In his wishes, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that India and the US share a vision in the Indo-Pacific region and a partnership across different sectors. 'On behalf of the United States, I extend our congratulations and warm wishes to the people of India as they celebrate their Independence Day on August 15,' Rubio said in a statement on Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The historic relationship between the world's largest democracy and the world's oldest democracy is consequential and far-reaching. Our two countries are united by our shared vision for a more peaceful, prosperous, and secure Indo-Pacific region.' 'Our partnership spans industries, promotes innovation, pushes the boundaries of critical and emerging technologies, and extends into space,' the statement further reads. Rubio insisted that both nations should work together to overcome the modern challenges that the world currently faces. 'Working together, the United States and India will rise to the modern challenges of today and ensure a brighter future for both our countries,' Rubio averred. India-US ties remain strong amid tensions India-US ties have deteriorated significantly after Trump announced nearly 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods. The White House argued that the tariffs were imposed because India purchased Russian oil amid the ongoing Ukraine war, with senior officials in the Trump administration accusing India of helping Russia in the conflict. While economic ties between the two nations have witnessed a strain, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday underlined the importance of defence ties between India and the United States, terming them as a key component of the overall bilateral relationship. 'The India–US defence partnership, underpinned by foundational defence agreements, is an important pillar of the bilateral partnership,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at a media briefing on Friday. 'This robust cooperation has strengthened across all domains. We are expecting a US Defence Policy Team to be in Delhi in mid-August. The 21st edition of the joint military exercise 'Yudh Abhyas' is also expected to take place later this month in Alaska. Both sides remain engaged to convene the 2+2 Intersessional meeting at the working level towards the end of this month,' he added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, on the recent Human Rights report issued by the US State Department, Jaiswal reiterated India's strong objection, saying such assessments were 'a mix of imputations, misrepresentations and one-sided projections' that showed 'a poor understanding of India's democratic framework, pluralistic society and robust institutional mechanisms for protecting human rights.' Jaiswal also noted that no decision had yet been taken on whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi would attend the United Nations General Assembly next month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store