Opposition criticises rent control plans as ‘recipe for rocketing rents'
Three opposition politicians raised a line in a Department of Housing press release that said landlords can increase rents to the market rate after six years of any tenancies created from March 1 2026.
It said: 'All landlords will have the right to reset rent where the rent is below market at the end of each six-year tenancy, unless a 'no-fault eviction' occurs.'
Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald said the proposed 2% nationwide rent cap was an attempt to 'hide your blushes' as landlords can 'hike up rents' now and in the future.
She said allowing landlords to reset rent to full market rate every six years was 'the death knell' of Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs).
She said plans to restrict rent increases except in cases where renters leave tenancies voluntarily, would see one renter replaced by another whose rent will have 'ballooned'.
'Students will be amongst the first hit by your actions. Finding affordable rental accommodation has been a constant struggle for students and their families, but you are now ensuring that this will be even harder.
She said the plan would see investment funds build expensive rental properties and charge 'extortionate' rent.
'Your first major action in housing is to enable big landlords to hike up extortionate rents even further,' she said.
'At a time when government should be acting to cut rents and to ban rent increases, at a time when people across the state fork out on average new rent of 2,000 euros a month – here in Dublin, of course, rent can hit 3,000 euros per month or even higher – but instead, you create a new opportunity for tens of thousands of landlords to jack up their rents.'
Labour leader Ivana Bacik said the Government had performed a 'screeching U-turn' on RPZs.
She said the RPZs scheme had been called into question before, and was now being extended nationwide.
'So perhaps we should start calling you the Grand Old Duke of Cork, because you led your men up to the top of the hill before marching them all the way back down again. And it's just a mercy, I suppose, that they weren't sent over the top – a mercy for renters.'
She said the 'panicked announcement' was sowing fear among renters and uncertainty among investors.
'You're extending the RPZ, sure, but if you're hollowing out what is meant by an RPZ, if you're reducing protection to those within RPZs then that doesn't have the desired effect.'
Social Democrats deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan said that according to the line in the press release, renters will face 'astronomical rent increases they cannot afford every six years'.
'You're throwing renters under the bus. Incredibly, you're planning even more favourable treatment for vulture funds than already exists.
'They currently pay almost no tax, they charge some of the highest rents in the country, and now, when it comes to rent regulation, you're rolling over to them yet again.
'So Taoiseach, who is in charge here? Is it the Government, or is it the vulture funds?'
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy said the Taoiseach had been asked the same question three times about the line in the Department of Housing press release.
He said that rents being 'reset' to the market rate when a tenant leaves a tenancy was 'a recipe for rocketing rents'.
'Not just new landlords, not just big landlords, not just small landlords, every single landlord, which means existing tenants, new tenants – yes, please, if the minister could inform the Taoiseach of what's going on here, what's in the policy, that'd be very, very helpful.
'So what you're saying to existing, new tenants – all of them – is they get the limited protection of the 2%, or (inflation) if it's new, for six years. At six years, it's a free-for-all. They get to reset to market rate.
Taoiseach Micheal Martin said he was accused of getting rid of RPZs months ago, when 'it was never, ever contemplated to end RPZs'.
'What is now emerging are probably the strongest set of rent protection measures we've ever had in the history of the state.'
Responding to the criticism of the line in the press release, the Taoiseach suggested the plan does include a provision for when a renter voluntarily leaves that rents can be rematched to the market rate.
'Forget all the noise, the sound and the fury, and go through it detail by detail. This is a well-balanced package.'
He said the State is the lead investor in housing in Ireland, contributing more than seven billion euro a year, but the Department of Housing said that around 20 billion euro is needed to get to 50,000 houses a year.
'Now, where do people think we're going to get to 20 billion from?
'I don't believe you can replace all of it by 100% state either constructive housing, state rental housing or whatever.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK Government ‘committed' to Acorn carbon capture project in Scotland
Scotland Office minister Kirsty McNeill said details on how much cash will go to the Acorn project in Aberdeenshire are 'commercially sensitive' and cannot be made public. However she stressed the announcement of development funding for the scheme in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review was a 'guarantee' of support for it. Pressed on how much cash will go towards it, Ms McNeill told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme on Thursday: 'We are looking at what it will take to make this project successful, but the fact that it has been announced at a spending review gives you a real signal of our commitment to this.' Her comments came after Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison complained there was 'no figure' for the funding and 'no timeframe' for when money will be made available for Acorn. The scheme, which proposes storing emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea, had previously been overlooked for funding, despite repeated calls from the Scottish Government and others for it to be backed. Its supporters point to environmental benefits from the initiative, while developing Acorn is also seen as being key for securing a future for Grangemouth following the recent closure of the oil refinery. Ms Robison said: 'We have been pursuing the Treasury to get a handle on what the figure is, and what it is for and what the timeframe is, because we need confirmation of that, because giving confidence around this project is really important and we don't have that.' Ms McNeill, speaking ahead of a visit to the area by UK Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, said: 'Those figures weren't made available yesterday because they are commercially sensitive, but they will be made available in the fullness of time. 'The fact that the Chancellor stood up and said this from the despatch box is a guarantee to those communities that we are backing them. 'It was the number one ask of a number of Scottish stakeholders and I am delighted we were able to deliver it. 'We are committed to the Acorn project, which is why we have announced the development funding for it.'
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks
The Chancellor has repeatedly said the cost of Wednesday's spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now 'live within their means'. But economists have warned a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn. Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: 'I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.' But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion. She rejected the suggestion she was a 'Klarna Chancellor' who had announced a 'buy now, pay later' spending review. She said: 'The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right.' Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected. In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. But Thursday's worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour's promises on tax and borrowing. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: 'Ms Reeves is now going to have all her fingers and all her toes crossed, hoping that the OBR will not be downgrading their forecasts in the Autumn. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' The Chancellor acknowledged the reduction in GDP was 'disappointing', and blamed 'uncertainty' caused by Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall. But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of 'economic vandalism'. He said: 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.' Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as 'a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax' and urged ministers to pursue a 'bespoke UK-EU customs union' to compensate for the impact of US tariffs. The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools. The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a 'National Health State'. But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. On Thursday, Ms Reeves rejected claims her decision on policing, which will see forces' 'spending power' increase by 2.3% above inflation each year, would mean cuts to frontline police numbers.
Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks
Rachel Reeves failed to rule out further tax rises in the autumn as new figures showed the economy shrank more than expected in April. The Chancellor has repeatedly said the cost of Wednesday's spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now 'live within their means'. But economists have warned a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn. Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: 'I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.' But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion. She rejected the suggestion she was a 'Klarna Chancellor' who had announced a 'buy now, pay later' spending review. She said: 'The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right.' Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected. In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. But Thursday's worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour's promises on tax and borrowing. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: 'Ms Reeves is now going to have all her fingers and all her toes crossed, hoping that the OBR will not be downgrading their forecasts in the Autumn. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' The Chancellor acknowledged the reduction in GDP was 'disappointing', and blamed 'uncertainty' caused by Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall. But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of 'economic vandalism'. He said: 'Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.' Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as 'a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax' and urged ministers to pursue a 'bespoke UK-EU customs union' to compensate for the impact of US tariffs. The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools. The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation's Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a 'National Health State'. But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
