logo
NeoSmelt consortium selects Hatch to design Australia's largest ironmaking electric smelting furnace

NeoSmelt consortium selects Hatch to design Australia's largest ironmaking electric smelting furnace

Yahoo10-07-2025
Hatch will provide electric smelting furnace technology, complemented by project management and engineering services, for the NeoSmelt project
Hatch CRISP+ Smelting Furnace
Perth, Australia, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The NeoSmelt consortium has selected Hatch as a major technology and engineering contractor for the NeoSmelt project.
Hatch is responsible for project management and controls for the pilot feasibility study and engineering services for the electric smelting furnace and the balance of plant (BOP) infrastructure supporting the pilot. As part of this, Hatch will be responsible for the technology design of the Smelter Facility that is enabled by Hatch's electric smelting furnace technology (CRISP+).
This groundbreaking project aims to demonstrate that Pilbara iron ore can be used to produce lower-carbon[1] emissions molten iron using direct reduced iron electric smelting furnace (DRI-ESF) technology.
The project commenced feasibility studies in Q2 2025 and is targeting final investment decision for the pilot plant in 2026, with operations expected to begin in 2028.
'Hatch has been working collaboratively with the NeoSmelt consortium since the initial pilot furnace design was completed in 2023. This work leverages over 70 years of Hatch's capability and experience in smelting furnace technology across multiple industries. We are delighted to bring our smelting technology to accelerate decarbonization of the iron and steel industry,' shared John Bianchini, chair and CEO, Hatch. 'The pilot will seek to demonstrate the viability of a lower carbon[2] intensity technology ironmaking route using Pilbara iron ore in the difficult to abate iron and steel industry. We are extremely excited to be part of this extraordinary project.'
We congratulate the NeoSmelt consortium—BHP, BlueScope, Mitsui Iron Ore Development, Rio Tinto, and Woodside Energy—for the industry leading vision to progress this lighthouse project.
For more information, please contact:
Lindsay JancaGlobal Director, Public RelationsTel: +1 905 403 4199Email: media@hatch.com
About Hatch
Hatch is a global engineering, project delivery, and professional services firm. Whatever our clients envision, our teams can design and build. With seven decades of business and technical experience in the mining, energy, and infrastructure sectors, we know your business and understand that your challenges are changing rapidly. We respond quickly with solutions that are smarter, more efficient, and innovative. We draw upon our 10,000 staff with experience in over 150 countries to challenge the status quo and create positive change for our clients, our employees, and the communities we serve.
Find out more on www.hatch.com.
[1] [1] Lower-carbon has the characteristic of having lower levels of associated potential greenhouse gas emissions when compared to historical and/or current conventions or analogues, for example relating to an otherwise similar resource, process, production facility, product or service, or activity.
[2] Lower-carbon has the characteristic of having lower levels of associated potential greenhouse gas emissions when compared to historical and/or current conventions or analogues, for example relating to an otherwise similar resource, process, production facility, product or service, or activity.
Attachment
Hatch CRISP+ Smelting Furnace
CONTACT: Lindsay Janca Hatch Ltd media@hatch.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Santos wins legal battle against Fluor Australia on Gladstone LNG project
Santos wins legal battle against Fluor Australia on Gladstone LNG project

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Santos wins legal battle against Fluor Australia on Gladstone LNG project

Santos has welcomed a favourable ruling from the Queensland Supreme Court in its legal proceedings against Fluor Australia over the Gladstone LNG project. The court has ordered Fluor to pay approximately A$692m to Santos and its co-venturers, with additional amounts to be determined. The dispute stemmed from a 2011 engineering and construction contract for the Gladstone LNG project's production facilities. Santos contended that Fluor unjustly claimed and received payments under the contract and sought to recoup these amounts, including liquidated damages for project delays. Furthermore, Santos aimed to enforce a parent company guarantee from Fluor Corporation. On 14 July 2023, three referees, appointed by the court to review the case, submitted their final report, supporting Santos' position on cost recovery. The court has now largely upheld the referees' conclusions, confirming Fluor's obligation to pay the substantial sum to Santos and its partners. The final amount, which will include interest and legal costs, is expected to be confirmed in the upcoming weeks. In related news, Santos recently extended its exclusivity period with the XRG Consortium amid ongoing discussions regarding a proposed $18.7bn acquisition. The consortium, led by XRG, a subsidiary of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, along with Abu Dhabi Development Holding Company and Carlyle, is nearing the completion of its due diligence, as per the process and exclusivity deed signed on 27 June 2025. According to Santos, the XRG Consortium has not encountered any issues that would lead it to retract its non-binding indicative proposal. "Santos wins legal battle against Fluor Australia on Gladstone LNG project" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Australia court rules partly against Apple, Google in Epic Games lawsuit
Australia court rules partly against Apple, Google in Epic Games lawsuit

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Australia court rules partly against Apple, Google in Epic Games lawsuit

By Byron Kaye SYDNEY (Reuters) -An Australian court found the smartphone app stores of Apple and Google-owned Android were uncompetitive, local media reported on Tuesday, in a partial victory for Fortnite game developer Epic Games against the tech giants. Amid a years-long legal dispute brought by Epic against the dominant smartphone makers in several jurisdictions around the world, Australia's federal court found the phone makers' app stores had no protections against anti-competitive behaviour, the reports said. Epic Games had claimed Apple and Google's fees for downloads of its games were too high, and that the phone makers made it impossible for users to download its alternative app store. The Australian judgment, which ran to 2,000 pages, was not released by the court on Tuesday, but media said a judge's summary included the finding that the smartphone companies had not intentionally breached the law. In a post on X, Epic said the Australian court "just found that Apple and Google abuse their control over app distribution and in-app payments to limit competition". Epic is a U.S.-based games studio with backing from China's Tencent. "The Epic Games Store and Fortnite will come to iOS in Australia!" the Epic post said. "This is a WIN for developers and consumers in Australia!" Apple said in a statement it welcomed the court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, but strongly disagreed with its ruling on others. "Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate," the California-based tech giant said. A Google statement said the company welcomed the court's rejection of some Epic Games claims but "we disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape". "We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps."

Epic says Fortnite is coming back to iOS in Australia
Epic says Fortnite is coming back to iOS in Australia

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

Epic says Fortnite is coming back to iOS in Australia

Epic Games has announced that it's bringing Fortnite back to iOS in Australia, after the country's federal court ruled that Apple and Google's app marketplaces are anticompetitive. Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said on X that Fortnite will be made available on iPhones via the Epic Games Store 'at a date to be determined,' while the company navigates the complexities of Australia's antitrust ruling. Epic sued Google in Australia in March 2021, after suing Apple in November 2020. A single court is handling both cases in parallel, even though they weren't filed at the same time. On Tuesday, federal judge Jonathan Beach found that Apple and Google misused their app marketplace dominance and in-app purchase commission fees of up to 30 percent to reduce competition, the Australian Financial Review reports. However, Beach rejected Epic's claims that the tech giants had broken consumer law or engaged in 'unconscionable conduct' — meaning particularly harsh, unfair, or oppressive behavior that goes against societal norms. We are still awaiting further details from Beach's final judgment, which is more than 2,000 pages long and won't be released publicly. 'We welcome the court's rejection of Epic's demands that we distribute app stores from within the Google Play store, and Epic's attacks on other critical security protections that users rely on,' Google spokesperson Dan Jackson said in a statement to The Verge. 'However, we disagree with the court's characterization of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers,' Jackson said. 'We will review the full decision when we receive it and assess our next steps.' In a statement to Australia's ABC News, an unnamed Apple spokesperson said that the company welcomes the court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, but that it disagrees with other aspects of the ruling. 'Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate,' the spokesperson said. 'We continuously invest and innovate to make the App Store the safest place for users to get apps and a great business opportunity for developers in Australia and around the world.' Epic originally sued Apple and Google in the United States on August 13th, 2020, in two separate cases which went before two separate judges, with dramatically different results in each case. Epic largely lost its fight against Apple after attempting to take the fight all the way to the US Supreme Court, but Apple may lose a large degree of control over its App Store anyhow because it failed to comply with the district court's order. After removing Fortnite from the App Store in 2020 amid its feud with Epic, Apple later brought the game back to its iPhone app marketplace in May. Fortnite also returned to iPhones in the EU last year, but only via the Epic Games Store for iOS. Meanwhile in the US version of the Google trial, Epic has continually won: in late 2023, a jury unanimously decided that Google turned its Play Store and Play Billing system into an illegal monopoly, and a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just affirmed that decision at the end of July. That decision could blow up Google's control over its app store within weeks or months, unless Google gets the Ninth Circuit to grant a stay while it appeals to the US Supreme Court or grants a full en banc review of the three-judge panel's decision. Google is arguing that the Apple decision should be relevant to the Google decision, but so far US courts disagree. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Sean Hollister Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jess Weatherbed Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apps Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Mobile Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store