Julia Stiles reveals past struggle with disordered eating that was triggered by industry pressures
The actress, 44, who has three children with her husband Preston Cook, added that only since becoming a mother did she start to heal her relationship with food.
She said: 'In my twenties and early thirties, being an actress, there was so much focus on your appearance and how you're going to fit into certain clothes.'
Julia added: 'I'm not the first person to say this - and even coming from a mother who never emphasised those things - food and all that stuff was so stressful.'
Speaking on the latest episode of How to Fail With Elizabeth Day, the actress explained: 'I couldn't help but have a disordered relationship with it all.
'I'm not talking about an eating disorder - it was just restrictive, regimented, stressful. I always worried that it was going to be out of my control. Like, what if I gain weight?
Julia continued: 'There was stress around what your body looks like and trying to mould your body into a certain size.
'As an actress, we go and promote on a red carpet, and we have to wear sample sizes from fashion designers. So it's always, "Are we going to fit into the sample size?"'
Julia the revealed the useful advice she was told by fellow actress Julia Roberts, 57, while they were filming the 2003 movie, Mona Lisa Smile.
Julia said: 'She was an amazing example for us, and she was so maternal with all the young women on that set. She was coming from a lot of experience of being not just a woman, but also a woman where your appearance is focused on so heavily.
'She said to us, "You're going to look back on these photos of you in your twenties and be like, I was beautiful - why didn't I see that?" And she's totally right!'
Julia now has three children - Strummer, seven, Arlo, three, and Henry, two - with her husband Preston, a camera assistant whom she met on the set of Blackway.
They married in 2017 after being engaged for two years.
Julia said: 'I think my relationship with my body and food and diet and exercise and my appearance radically changed when I had kids.
'Being pregnant, nourishing a baby, growing a baby, all that stuff - and then also directing a movie, which is similar to having a baby in some ways - creatively and spiritually.
'When I decided I wanted to have kids, I started looking at things differently: I need this machine to work, so I need to fuel my body and I need to nourish it and I need to fuel this baby and nourish it. And everything just fell into place. I relaxed.
'I naturally wanted to eat the things that were going to make me feel better and help me grow. It all just became easier.
'And having a baby - three babies now - I'm like, woah, my body can do magical, wonderful, amazing things. And when I relaxed and I started to trust it more, everything fell into place. It's doing totally what it's supposed to do.'
Julia has just directed her first feature film, Wish You Were Here, which she says has also helped to change her attitude to diet and her body to be more positive.
She said: 'It was the first time I was on a film set - seeing cameras, grips and electrics, hair, makeup, and the costume department - and I wasn't stressed about the snack table.
'With directing, I'm not focused on every little detail of my appearance. I'm focused outward on the task at hand. So I don't have time to think about all the imperfections.
'I actually need to fuel my body so that I can get through the 15-hour workday... If I have the afternoon to get through and I'm losing energy, I'm going to have some M&M's and I don't care. Or I need this egg sandwich in the morning because I need my brain to focus and I need energy.'
Declaring her past body image issues 'a waste of f***ing time', Julia added that, sadly, she believes a lot of women silently struggle with similar problems.
She said: 'I've moved on. I've learned to be kinder in the way I think about my body and look at my body - to be kinder to myself but also trust your body... When I got pregnant, had children - even going into labour - trusting my body that it would know what to do just changed everything on a cellular level. And the same thing with directing a movie.
'I would be running on fumes, like, no sleep having just had a five-month-old baby. I didn't have time to think about, am I going to get back in shape to fit into those sample sizes?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dakota Johnson's new movie takes on the ruthless world of New York Dating - but it's not your average rom-com?
Materialists Cert: 15, 1hr 56mins Matthew Bond review - Mail On Sunday Rating: The first film that screenwriter Celine Song directed as well as wrote was the delightful Past Lives (2023), which explored the choices we make in life, particularly when it comes to relationships. It earned her an Oscar nomination, critical acclaim and, for an arthouse film, commercial success. Her follow-up, Materialists, is an altogether bigger affair with a cast led by Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans and explores similar territory only without the magic and gentle spirituality of its predecessor. That's because it's set in the ruthless world of New York dating. Johnson plays Lucy, a successful senior executive at an agency that looks down its nose at apps and still believes in the old-fashioned art of match-making, at least for those who can afford it. Its demanding clients are not so much looking for love as wealth, good looks and compatible levels of education. For women, the height of a prospective husband is everything while, for men I'm afraid it's still youth. But Lucy knows it's more complicated than that, which is why she's already on her ninth successfully arranged wedding. So why is she herself still single, despite being magnificently courted by the absurdly eligible Harry (Pascal) while being shambolically pursued by her handsome but impoverished actor ex-boyfriend, John (Evans)? Song's screenplay is smart, insightful and funny, albeit in a familiar Sex And The City kind of way. So it's probably a good thing it's also bleak, cynical and occasionally depressing, at least for balance. Johnson is excellent, the ubiquitous Pascal as charming as ever and Evans just a little bit too good to be true. Materialists lacks the emotional depth of Past Lives but it's well-made, watchable and will make you think. And possibly hope, too. Laruskha Ivan-Zadeh - Daily Mail review Rating: Do soul mates exist? That question unites the week's two biggest releases, which answer it in two, very different ways. Materialists is a movie about beautiful people chasing the perfect partner. Lucy (Dakota Johnson) reckons she's got it all worked out. She's a professional matchmaker in Manhattan, responsible for nine weddings and counting, who firmly believes that 'Marriage is a business deal, and always has been, since time eternal.' Commitment is not about love, it's about currency, market forces and 'math', with Lucy's personal 'non-negotiable' being that, as well as being tall and handsome with a full head of hair (be warned, this movie is not an ego-boost for shorter, bald men), her future husband will be eye-wateringly rich. Enter hunk-of-the-moment Pedro Pascal, a tall, handsome, hirsute moneybags with a $12million penthouse in Tribeca. However, this being a (sort of) romcom, also re-enter Lucy's ex, John (Chris Evans), a tall, handsome struggling theatre actor, with a head full of hair, but empty coffers, who Lucy broke up with because he was, er, broke. So, who will win her hand? The answer isn't as obvious as might first appear. Because this isn't cheese puff Hollywood escapism of the glossy sort that Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey popped out in the 2000s – it is the 'difficult' second feature from writer /director Celine Song, whose wistful romance Past Lives was arguably the finest film of 2023. Materialists is similarly based on authentic lived experience. Song worked as a matchmaker when she first came to New York, and her script here poses interesting questions most of us can relate to about the balance sheet between romance and rationalism. Bottom line: are you really going to make it long term with someone of different background and values, particularly if you always end up squabbling about money? Unfortunately, the Materialists' parts are better than its whole. Excellent and effortless as the three leads are, their dialogue can feel forced. Sometimes it's deliberate, like when Pascal's smoothy-chops woos Lucy with the line: 'I want to be with you for your immaterial assets.' But other times not. It is occasionally very witty and well-observed. Song has set out to deconstruct the romcom, but the way she reconstructs it proves kind of disappointing. As we wait to find out if love conquers all, you will likely feel unconvinced by where the happy ending lies.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge rules Alex Jones' Infowars to be sold once again, paving way for The Onion to renew its bid
Months after conspiracy theorist Alex Jones mocked The Onion after the satirical news outlet's proposed purchase Jones' Infowars was rejected by a federal bankruptcy court, a state judge ruled this week that the far-right platform can once again be sold – clearing the way for The Onion to resurrect its bid. In a Wednesday hearing in Texas district court, Judge Maya Guerra Gamble ordered the assets of Infowars' parent company Free Speech systems to be handed over to a court-appointed receiver, who will then start the process of selling them off in order to pay the roughly $1.3 billion that Jones owes the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims. The families, who have spent nearly three years attempting to collect on the judgment in federal bankruptcy court, were awarded the damages over Jones' repeated false and baseless claims that the Sandy Hook shooting was a 'hoax' and that the children killed were crisis actors. Last year, The Onion – backed by the Sandy Hook families – had won a court-ordered auction to purchase Infowars, with plans to turn the far-right conspiracy outlet into a parody site that would mock the conservative media ecosphere. Additionally, The Onion said that it planned on entering into an advertising agreement with gun-control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety. That sale was blocked in December, however, after a federal bankruptcy judge ruled that the acquisition was flawed and that he would not approve the sale, citing issues regarding the transparency of the process. That allowed Jones to keep Infowars for the time being – and he celebrated on-air by using music from Star Wars to mock The 'We are deeply disappointed in today's decision, but The Onion will continue to seek a resolution that helps the Sandy Hook families receive a positive outcome for the horror they endured,' Ben Collins, CEO of The Onion's parent company Global Tetrahedron, said after the December ruling. A giddy Jones, meanwhile, read Collins' statement on his show at the time alongside the 'Imperial March' from The Empire Strikes Back. 'I told you guys. We weren't going down,' Jones boasted. While halting the sale to The Onion, the federal bankruptcy judge suggested to the Sandy Hook families that they should go take their case to state court to get what they're owed from Jones, of which he has yet to pay a dime. And now, according to Gamble's ruling, it appears that Jones could soon be locked out of the Infowars studios. According to Wednesday's order, the receiver has the power 'to collect all accounts receivable… change the locks to all premises at which any property is situated… access all storage facilities, safe-deposit boxes, [and] real property… and exercise control over any website [of Jones].' Additionally, the receiver can turn to local law enforcement for help 'carrying out his duties and exercising his powers.' Unsurprisingly, Jones was not happy about the ruling. 'I'm pretty p*ssed off and wound up,' he grumbled on Wednesday's broadcast, telling his viewers: 'This fight is your fight.' Attorneys for the families, meanwhile, said that the judge's order was a 'critically important step closer to achieving the goal' of 'holding Alex Jones accountable for years of harm,' specifically noting that it could finally lead to Infowars shuttering for good. 'The receiver is now authorized to liquidate his business assets, and we look forward to the corrupt media empire that Jones built finally being dismantled,' attorney Chris Mattei, who represents the Connecticut-based families, told NPR. 'The families are pleased that the court has placed InfoWars parent company into receivership, which will finally lead to accountability for Alex Jones' monstrously cruel harassment," Mark Bankston, another lawyer for the families, stated. As for the likelihood that The Onion can finally complete its purchase of Infowars now that it's in a receivership, legal experts said that it may not be a 'panacea' but the conditions are now more 'favorable' for a sale. 'From a creditor's point of view, you're most often better off under state law … because the state court may be able to operate with greater speed and flexibility…[and fewer] constraints than the bankruptcy judge has to deal with,' Larry Ponoroff, dean and professor emeritus at Tulane Law School, told NPR. Reached for comment, Collins told The Independent that while he wasn't at liberty to fully discuss the situation right now, he could say that 'we're working on it.' Throughout this entire process, Jones has also insisted that even if the Infowars brand and property are taken from him, he will continue to stay on the air by stating another company. Still, because a bankruptcy judge ruled his behavior 'willful and malicious,' the families could continue to make claims on any money Jones makes in the future through other business ventures. In June, Jones was accused by the trustee overseeing his personal bankruptcy of trying to shield assets of more than $5 million to avoid paying on the Sandy Hook judgment. This included allegations that Jones fraudulently transferred $1.5 million to his wife, $800,000 to his father and attempted to hide his ownership of two condominiums with a combined value of $1.5 million.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Wrexham smashes its transfer record by signing Broadhead in a deal worth up to $13.5M
Wrexham's spending moved into a new stratosphere Thursday when the team owned by Hollywood celebrities signed winger Nathan Broadhead from Ipswich in a club-record deal that could reportedly reach 10 million pounds ($13.50 million). It took the Welsh club's outlay in the transfer market to more than 20 million pounds ($27 million) in this window as Wrexham reshapes its squad for life in the second-tier Championship following an unprecedented three straight promotions. The 27-year-old Wales international is a former Wrexham academy player and a versatile forward who was a fringe player at Ipswich in the Premier League last season. 'He's a local boy who had a real desire to come and play for his hometown club," Wrexham manager Phil Parkinson said in the team's announcement. Among Wrexham's other signings over the last couple of months is former England defender Conor Coady and New Zealand international Liberato Cacace. Lewis O'Brien also joined from Nottingham Forest for what was reportedly a club-record fee of around 3 million pounds ($4 million). Wrexham, which started its Championship campaign last weekend with a 2-1 loss at Southampton after conceding two late goals, is owned by actors Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney and has gained outside investment via the New York-based Allyn family. It is also the subject of the Emmy-winning 'Welcome to Wrexham' documentary, which takes viewers behind the scenes at the club and has boosted the team's global appeal primarily because of the presence of Reynolds. ___
