Black fluid oozing from suitcase leads to bust at Adelaide Airport
Using intelligence-led screening and officer intuition, Australian Border Force (ABF) officers conducted a full examination and searched the luggage of a man who had arrived at Adelaide Airport on July 29 from overseas.
The officers allegedly identified a black fluid oozing from the handle of the man's suitcase.
A presumptive test of the substance returned a positive result for heroin, with about 500g removed from the suitcase.
SA man charged with allegedly smuggling 500g heroin into Adelaide in a suitcase (Source: Australian Federal Police)
ADVERTISEMENT
The 47-year-old Australian-Afghan dual citizen was charged with one count of importing a marketable quantity of a border controlled substance in the Adelaide Magistrates Court.
The maximum penalty for this offence was 25 years' imprisonment.
ABF Superintendent Jody Griswood said this detection highlighted the vigilance and experience of ABF officers on the front line, who were crucial in stopping harmful substances from reaching Australian streets.
"ABF officers at the border are highly trained, experienced and alert. They know exactly what to look for when selecting travellers and their baggage for further examination," Griswood said.
SA man charged with allegedly smuggling 500g heroin into Adelaide in a suitcase (Source: Australian Federal Police)
"This isn't an isolated case and it's not based on luck."
AFP Detective Acting Superintendent Simon Lalic said agencies worked together to disrupt anyone who attempted to import harmful, illicit substances into Australia.
"Criminals are motivated by greed. They have no regard for the significant harmful impacts these illicit drugs have on our community."
The man was expected to reappear in court in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Five years on, Beirut blast victims still await justice and answers
Yesterday NZT, hundreds took to the streets of Beirut to mark the fifth anniversary of the blast and to demand accountability. An investigation led by Judge Tarek Bitar was finally reopened earlier this year after almost four years of delay because of political interference. 'It's just disgusting really that there's been no accountability, no justice, and five years on and it's just not even to the point where we've got proper answers,' said Copland, an Australian who at the time of the blast had been working for the United Nations in Beirut. 'Isaac was just a child, and we got caught up in this web of negligence, corruption, and crimes.' A helicopter drops water on a fire after the explosion in the port of Beirut on August 4, 2020. Photo / Lorenzo Tugnoli For The Washington Post Firefighters responding to the explosion. Photo / Lorenzo Tugnoli, For The Washington Post The longtime head of the Hezbollah militant group, Hasan Nasrallah, had derailed attempts to investigate the explosion after Bitar had called several officials close to the group in for questioning. 'The country will head to ruin if this judge continues on this path,' Nasrallah said in a 2021 speech before sending supporters to the Beirut courthouse to intimidate Bitar, triggering an armed clash. Hezbollah's critics alleged that an investigation could reveal the extent of the group's illicit activities in the port. What followed was a prolonged push by Hezbollah and its allies to have the judge recuse himself after suspects filed complaints accusing Bitar of bias, further delaying the investigation. Copland had then taken matters into her own hands, lobbying the Australian Government to take the lead on a statement at the UN Human Rights Council urging Lebanon to complete the investigation and safeguard its independence. This year's anniversary of the port blast comes after the war that erupted last year between Hezbollah and Israel, and as the group faces a new political reality after the killing of senior leaders, including Nasrallah. The group's new leadership has taken a less combative approach. 'The port investigation right now is not Hezbollah's biggest priority,' said David Wood, a senior Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group. He added that the group is in a weaker position and has been forced to adopt a less confrontational stance after the war. Earlier this year, the group acquiesced to the election of Joseph Aoun as President and Nawaf Salam as Prime Minister, paving the way for the probe to resume. Lebanon's new Justice Minister, Adel Nassar, said the Government is committed to ensuring that the judiciary conducts its work independently. 'A state that is not capable of giving answers and accountability after a tragic event or crime this horrific will be a state missing a major element of its proper existence,' he said. The reopening of the probe may eventually provide closure to survivors who have watched justice evade them for years. 'Nothing is okay until the indictment is released. This is what the Lebanese victims' families demand. The pain, the grief and the anger of injustice are even more than before,' said Mireille Khoury, whose 15-year-old son Elias died of injuries sustained in the blast. The commemoration included a minute of silence in front of the partially destroyed port grain silos that stand as a stark reminder of the disaster. Many families hope to see the site turned into a memorial for the victims. People stage a commemoration in memory of those who lost their lives in the 2020 explosion to mark the fifth anniversary of the blast in Beirut. Photo / Getty Images Lebanon's new Transport Minister, Fayez Rasamny, said in an interview that no final decision has been made regarding the demolition or preservation of the silos. 'We at the ministry and across the Lebanese government are approaching this matter with the utmost sensitivity and respect for the victims of the August 4 tragedy,' Rasamny said. Culture Minister Ghassan Salamé has added the silos to a list of historic buildings, meaning they cannot be torn down easily. In the absence of an official memorial, artist Nada Sehnaoui has sought to keep the memory of the victims alive through a mural she made near the blast site that features their photos covered in glass. Sehnaoui took the initiative, she said, because Lebanese governments have proved reluctant to remember tragedies in the past, such as the country's long civil war. 'It's public amnesia. To this day, we do not have a memorial for the civil war,' she said. 'This memorial is for the present and the future.' After consulting with Isaac's parents, the Australian Embassy in Beirut erected a swing in his memory at a Beirut museum, where the boy once loved to run around in the courtyard, Copland said. 'I do think that these memorials make a difference,' she said. Copland added that she will not have closure for her loss, but hopes justice prevails. 'I think we have to work as hard as we can to seek accountability, because that's what Isaac and all of the other victims deserve,' she said.
Techday NZ
a day ago
- Techday NZ
Online scams trap one third of victims in Australia, New Zealand
Recent research from Trend Micro has revealed that online scams are a prevalent threat in both Australia and New Zealand, affecting a substantial proportion of the population in each country. The study, which surveyed 1,025 Australian and 517 New Zealand consumers aged 18 and over, found that two-thirds of participants in both countries had been targeted by online scams, and a significant share had fallen victim. In Australia, 27% of respondents reported having fallen for an online scam, whereas in New Zealand, the figure was higher at 33%. Financial loss and delayed detection According to the survey, nearly one-third of scam victims in both countries only realised they had been targeted after experiencing financial losses or failing to receive goods they had paid for. This demonstrates how easily such scams can go unnoticed until consequences become serious. Common scam tactics The research highlights a shift in scamming techniques, with perpetrators increasingly exploiting digital convenience and emotional triggers rather than relying solely on traditional, technical methods. In Australia, 25% of scam victims reported being deceived by promoted items on social media marketplaces or retail sites that appeared legitimate, while in New Zealand, this affected 32% of victims. Other methods include investment scam texts (19% in Australia, 17% in New Zealand), and urgent messages from impostors posing as official organisations demanding payments or personal data (18% in Australia, 9% in New Zealand). Scammers frequently manipulate digital communication behaviour. In both countries, 39% of users had been asked to switch to another app during an online conversation - a tactic often used by scammers to continue their schemes in environments with fewer security controls. In Australia, 13% of victims were contacted by impostors posing as trusted acquaintances, while in New Zealand the figure was 18%. Other platforms used include dating apps and messaging services, through which false trust is established to increase the scam's credibility. Risks of overconfidence and device use The widespread daily use of smartphones is creating more opportunities for cybercriminals. In Australia, 46% of respondents use their phones 1-4 hours each day, 27% for 5-8 hours, and 12% for more than 8 hours. In New Zealand, 45% use their mobile devices 1-4 hours daily, 30% for 5-8 hours, and 14% for more than 8 hours. Despite high engagement with banking, shopping, and social functions on these devices, many consumers are not employing security best practices. Nearly half of Australians (47%) and half of New Zealanders (50%) do not use antivirus or security software on their mobile devices. The survey also revealed that 87% of Australians and 88% of New Zealanders use banking apps on their phones, yet 61% and 62% respectively do not use virtual private networks (VPNs) for added protection. Among those not using security software, 39% in both countries believe their phones are secure as is, while significant proportions rely on their own caution or remain unaware of available protections. Cost concerns also deter 17% of respondents in both countries from adopting security solutions. Stigma and underreporting Embarrassment continues to suppress the true scale of online scams, with many victims hesitant to disclose their experiences. In Australia, although 88% of victims share their experience, nearly four in ten of those who remain quiet (38%) do so out of shame. In New Zealand, while 81% disclose their ordeal, almost half (47%) of silent victims cite embarrassment as the reason. Advocacy for awareness and protection "Scam culture has gone mainstream. Our research shows Australians are unknowingly putting themselves at risk, placing trust in their devices, their instincts and everyday platforms without the right protection in place," said Ashley Millar, Director, Consumer Education and Marketing at Trend. "With the increasing sophistication of technology, scams are no longer easy to identify, making them harder to spot – even for the most cautious consumers. That's why education is critical, understanding how scams work is the first step to avoiding them. But when awareness slips or instincts fail, having antivirus and mobile security in place is an essential safety net," he finished. Advice for consumers Trend Micro recommended several basic precautions to mitigate scam risks. These include being sceptical of unverified sources, not switching to different apps during conversations, pausing before clicking on links or providing personal information, installing security software on smartphones, and staying updated on evolving scam tactics. The findings underline how digital habits and confidence in online platforms can expose users to significant risks if appropriate security and awareness measures are not followed.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Kmart accused of links to slave labour factories
Retail giant Kmart is facing accusations it misled customers on its ethical credentials by sourcing clothing supplies from factories in China with links to slave labour. An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group. In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It said this region in China's west has been well-documented for "systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people". The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive. Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said. "We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain," she said. The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain. Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers. "Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights – but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang," Ms Kanis said. Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery. Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks. Wesfarmers, the parent company of Kmart, has been contacted for comment.
