Kmart accused of links to slave labour factories
An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group.
In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.
It said this region in China's west has been well-documented for "systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people".
The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive.
Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said.
"We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain," she said.
The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain.
Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers.
"Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights – but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang," Ms Kanis said.
Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery.
Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks.
Wesfarmers, the parent company of Kmart, has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Could changing the incentives for power companies make electricity cheaper?
High power prices now seem normal in New Zealand, especially in winter. Could incentivising power companies to invest in generation capacity, rather than return dividends to the government, lower costs for individuals and businesses alike? One sign that electricity in New Zealand is expensive? The Powerswitch website, a service that lets you input some information and figure out if you could be getting a better deal with another plan. 'In June, we saw double the previous month's record for users,' says Paul Fuge, who runs Powerswitch on behalf of Consumer NZ, with funding from the Electricity Authority. Thousands of people are logging on every day – many of whom, Fuge says, find they could be paying up to $500 less a year just by switching plans. Retail power prices have increased 11% over the course of the year, Consumer says, partly because of changes in transmission costs and revenue limits for lines companies. There's a flow-on effect, Fuge says. 'Lots of people underheat their homes to save money but it's a false economy. People get cold and sick, end up in hospital, more kids don't go to school – it costs New Zealand more and makes it harder to participate in the economy.' It's not just individuals and households being affected by high power prices. When retail prices increase, wholesale power is pricier, too, although the cost fluctuates a lot more than a household plan. Manufacturers across New Zealand have said that power costs threaten their businesses; Winstone Pulp and Oji Fibre Solutions, paper mills that closed last year, said that the cost of electricity in New Zealand was one reason they couldn't continue. 'We should be in a position where our country has abundant renewable energy that is low cost and secure,' said Karen Boyes, the executive director of the Major Electricity Users Group, in an interview on Q + A in July. Fluctuating power prices make it hard for businesses to plan for the future. 'You need certainty for more than three to six years if you're going to keep investing in infrastructure,' she said. Headlines about expensive power are a kind of déjà vu; back every winter, as reliable as plunging temperatures and grey skies. Fuge, who gets a firsthand look at how much power prices hurt people through Powerswitch, feels this. 'We think markets are good for consumers, they drive innovation – but the results we're seeing aren't what you'd expect from a thriving competitive market,' he says. One response from the government has been to commission a review of the electricity sector, which began in February this year and is reportedly completed but yet to be made public. It follows a review of electricity prices conducted under the previous Labour government in 2018-19, and a review of the wholesale market in 2021. New Zealand's electricity market operates as a group of private companies, with generators Contact, Meridian, Genesis and Mercury publicly listed and traded on the New Zealand (and for some also the Australian) stock exchange. But the New Zealand government owns 51% of each company (except Contact, which is fully privately owned), meaning it gets paid dividends from electricity profits. Ed Miller, an economist, has calculated that the government gets nearly a billion dollars of returns from dividends and taxes from electricity generation each year – the figure was $980m in 2024. The companies also return money to their private shareholders, $655.8m in 2024. That's money that isn't being invested in generation – and, Miller argues, means individuals and businesses will continue to experience high electricity prices. The scarcity drives the price of electricity up, decreasing how much generating companies are willing to invest in increasing the amount of power they make. The power companies exist under the State-Owned Enterprises Act, which expects them to maximise returns, without the government making business decisions. 'That's a function of the market – the incentives to build [generation] relative to the risks aren't right,' Fuge says. It's worth noting that generators are investing in growing how much power they make as well as figuring out ways to make existing assets more efficient. Better batteries will increase Meridian's solar output; Genesis opened a new solar farm in Canterbury in April; Contact's geothermal plant near Taupō, which cost $924m to build, has been running at full capacity since November 2024; Mercury is building dozens of new wind turbines in Northland, and there are myriad other projects which have been approved or designed, though construction hasn't started yet. But after Meridian, Genesis and Mercury were partially privatised in the early 2010s, there were three years of the power companies making no investments in new renewable generation. As of 2024, the companies had spent $1.38bn since being publicly listed on new renewable energy projects, while paying out $9bn of dividends. Spending on generation has increased since 2019, and the companies have also invested lots of money in maintaining existing electricity infrastructure, which is often ageing. 'The new generation capacity is essentially late – we have a six to seven-year investment debit,' Miller says. Making electricity more abundant could lead to cheaper prices. 'You could have a lot more compassion in the system – lower-income users get cheaper electricity, you have more flexibility to support businesses in serious financial distress with cheaper electricity,' Miller says. 'The rules of the market presented to the gentailers are not to change generation or have the retailers price cheaper,' Fuge says. 'But if you don't like the rugby being played, you don't blame the players, you change the rules.' Miller says that increasing the incentives for gentailers would require reimagining the State-Owned Enterprise Act, which mentions dividends rather than profit. In the law, there's no reason for companies to reinvest profits to grow generation, or to support electricity users in need, whether they are low-income people or struggling businesses. Instead of David Seymour's vision of asset sales, the state would have to retain partial ownership of the electricity companies, rather than selling off its remaining 51% share. 'As long as electricity is a private market, we will contend with this,' he says. 'There's no single magic bullet,' Fuge points out. But with an estimated 40,000 people having had their power cut off in the last year due to not paying bills, there are lots of reasons to rethink the system that sells electricity.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Could Trump's tariffs force NZ to rethink its trade diversity?
Italy got the same deal as us, 15%. The Italian Institute of International Political Studies dug into the numbers and found that the country's agricultural, pharmaceutical, and automotive sectors are likely to be hit the hardest, with the country's GDP projected to dip by 0.2%. On the other hand, the likes of Australia and the UK have secured a 10% tariff. So, how will the duties actually affect Kiwi businesses? Or is it really American consumers who'll pay the price? University of Auckland Emeritus Professor of Law Jane Kelsey told The Front Page it's hard to know the impact. 'It's very hard to be specific about what the consequences would be, and when people put figures on that, you should be quite skeptical. 'Tariffs are kind of blunt instruments, so it will mean that exports from New Zealand imports into the US will have a higher cost for importers in the US and consumers in the US. That could affect how much New Zealand goods they buy,' she said. She said New Zealand has a 'pretty basic export commodity model' and suggests that recent events should serve as a 'wake-up call to start thinking differently' about the diversification of our domestic market. 'There are real opportunities here, and we seem to have an aversion to taking those opportunities. 'It's not simply about diversifying to other markets, but it's also about rethinking our domestic economic model, which is currently based largely on the housing market and secondly on relatively low-value-added exports to a relatively small number of countries. 'But, we have a great difficulty generating that discussion here. There was a Productivity Commission report several years ago, before it was disbanded, that set out a process for diversification, which would thicken our domestic production, and that, unfortunately, seems to have fallen on deaf ears,' she said. Listen to the full episode to hear more about: Why the World Trade Organisation is 'in chaos'; The erosion of the rules-based trading system over successive US governments; And why it might be a mistake to view Trump's tariffs as purely economic. The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Otago Daily Times
14 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Social media firms 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material: watchdog
Australia's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still 'turning a blind eye' to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries. In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple AAPL.O, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports. The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's GOOGL.O video-sharing site. 'When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services,' eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement. 'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.' A Google spokesperson said 'eSafety's comments are rooted in reporting metrics, not online safety performance', adding that YouTube's systems proactively removed over 99% of all abuse content before being flagged or viewed. 'Our focus remains on outcomes and detecting and removing (child sexual exploitation and abuse) on YouTube,' the spokesperson said in a statement. Meta META.O - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - has said it prohibits graphic videos. The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft MSFT.O, Skype, Snap SNAP.N and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia. The report on their responses so far found a 'range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services'. Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms. It said platforms were also not using 'hash-matching' technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. 'In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff,' Inman Grant said.
