logo
Anna's Law aims to protect victims from re-traumatization

Anna's Law aims to protect victims from re-traumatization

Yahoo28-05-2025
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WGN) — A bill requiring additional training for police handling sexual assault cases is one Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker signature away from becoming law.
WTVO-TV, WGN's sister station, reports that the bill, called Anna's Law, would amend the Illinois Police Training Act to require the additional training while an officer is in their probationary period, to learn how to handle cases in which the officer knows either the victim or the abuser.
The bill is for Anna Williams, who says police did not listen to or believe her when she filed a sexual assault report. The training would help law enforcement officials avoid re-traumatizing a victim and instead promote best practices for sensitively handling cases.
Sponsored by Illinois State Senator Mary Edly-Allen (D-Libertyville), Anna's Law, Senate Bill 1195, aims to minimize the trauma experienced by victims by providing training programs for officers.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Turns Out Research Tax Breaks Alone Can't Conjure Developers
Turns Out Research Tax Breaks Alone Can't Conjure Developers

Forbes

time27 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Turns Out Research Tax Breaks Alone Can't Conjure Developers

In the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), Congress revived a lapsed tax break that lets companies immediately deduct the cost of research and development (R&D). This was a big win, on its face, for innovation and U.S. job creation. At first glance, it has much promise: job postings for R&D should surge, tech startups are scrapping overseas hiring plans, and software engineers are hot again. So far, so good. But here is the catch—or at least a potential catch: what happens when you juice demand for domestic tech labor without increasing the supply? What happens if, in fact, you reduce supply by constraining immigration? Ultimately, you may find yourself not accelerating innovation—but inflating labor costs. Incentives Without Infrastructure The new version of Section 174 lets companies fully expense R&D costs in the same year they are incurred. However, expensing is limited to domestic costs. That is a huge incentive to hire within the U.S., particularly for high cost, labor-intensive tech startups. It is also a welcome return to the pre-2017 status quo, when the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act phased in a requirement that forced companies to amortize R&D costs over five years domestically, and fifteen years abroad. However, unlikel capital, labor is not instantly and infinitely scalable. You can't conjure a mid-career artificial intelligence engineer or a competent data scientist out of thin air. And, if you enact policies that curtail immigration, you can't call one from abroad either. As it turns out, we've made it harder, not easier, to bring in new talent—and now we've accelerated demand for the talent we do have. A Subsidy for Scarcity You can squint at the numbers and begin to see this shift already. Demand for U.S. based R&D roles is up 15-20% in just the past month, according to staffing firms. And some companies are now paying as much as 20-25% more to hire U.S. based engineers. The deduction, in effect, is being offset by wage inflation. The R&D shift isn't so much a tax incentive for innovation as a subsidy for talent scarcity. While immigration might normally ease that pressure, it is hardly a footnote in today's policy playbook. On the boats and on the planes, people simply aren't coming to America. If you can't import more talent, and you can't afford the rising cost of domestic labor, your only option as a startup is to scale back. This is the quiet paradox of modern innovation policy. We subsidize supply chains, enact tariffs by social media post and whim, fund domestic fabs, and now write off R&D wages – all in the interest of international competitiveness. But if the workforce can't scale with those policies, the policy just cannibalizes itself. Hiring slows, projects get delayed, marginal innovation doesn't happen, and companies we claim to support are left treading water in a labor-crunched economy, unable to fulfill the demand for domestic products that our ill-considered policies helped create. Normally, labor market imbalances can also resolve themselves through expanded domestic training pipelines: STEM programs, coding bootcamps, workforce grants, and more money flowing to education. But none of that is happening—at least not at scale. Even if the current administration reverses course and makes educational initiatives a priority, they can take years to yield results. So what happens next? If you can't import more talent, you can't train more talent, and you can't afford the rising cost of domestic labor, plans need to change. The question becomes, 'should we hire at all or wait out the current political climate and see what 2028 brings?' The Labor Market Becomes the Bottleneck In theory, Section 174 is pro-growth and innovation. In practice, it may just be another short-term sugar rush—juicing the labor market without adding any actual economic nutrients. We're frontloading cost savings, backloading the labor problem, and hoping that somewhere in there innovation still occurs. There is a better way, of course: R&D expensing is good policy. But it needs to be paired with other tools, like high-skilled visa reform, targeted immigration pipelines, and sustained and predictable domestic training investments. Otherwise, we're just creating a bidding war for a small pool of engineers and calling it progress. Turns out, tax breaks can nudge companies toward domestic hiring—they just can't conjure a developer that doesn't exist.

Teen accused of killing mom, stepdad in Carroll County denied bond
Teen accused of killing mom, stepdad in Carroll County denied bond

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Teen accused of killing mom, stepdad in Carroll County denied bond

A teenage girl accused of shooting her mother and stepfather to death in their Carroll County home in February appeared in court on Tuesday morning for a bond hearing. The judge denied Sarah Grace Patrick, 17, bond, meaning she will remain in jail. Channel 2's Candace McCowan will have more from the courtroom on Channel 2 Action News at Noon. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Patrick was arrested last month after police say she shot and killed James, 45, and Kristin Brock, 41. She is charged with two counts of murder and two counts of aggravated assault. The Carroll County courtroom was packed with supporters of Patrick and other family members of the victims. Defense attorneys argued that because Patrick has no previous criminal history and is not a flight risk, she should be released on bond. The judge, however, found that she does pose a risk of fleeing and intimidating witnesses. Patrick will next appear in court on Sept. 22 for an arraignment. The judge is eyeing a potential trial start date of Jan. 5, 2026. RELATED STORIES: Daughter charged after mother, stepfather shot to death inside Carroll County home Family offering reward for answers in murder of Carroll County couple Couple found shot to death in their own bed in Carroll County The couple's 5-year-old daughter is the one who found their bodies. Patrick is the person who called 911 to report the deaths. 'To come in their home, while they were sleeping and to kill both of them with three children and leave them parentless…it's just hard,' added Kristin Brock's father, Dennis Nolan, in the days following the shooting. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

Detroit anchor Hank Winchester, cleared of sexual misconduct, blasts investigation
Detroit anchor Hank Winchester, cleared of sexual misconduct, blasts investigation

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Detroit anchor Hank Winchester, cleared of sexual misconduct, blasts investigation

Days after his attorneys announced he had been cleared in a criminal investigation, Detroit-based broadcast reporter Hank Winchester called the ordeal "the worst nine weeks of my life." Winchester, AGE, who serves as an anchor on NBC's WDIV-TV in Michigan, returned to his podcast "The Morning After with Kelly Stafford & Hank" to shed some light on a scandal that wracked the local news community. "I've lost both my parents. I've had testicular cancer. I've gone through a divorce," the veteran journalist said. "Nothing compares to this." The Aug. 18 podcast appearance marked his first since a local TV station reported that he was being investigated by law enforcement for sexual misconduct and that his home in Beverly Hills, California, had been searched. At a press conference on Aug. 15, Winchester's attorney, Neil Rockind, said he had been "exonerated and cleared," describing his client as "the victim of baseless and unfounded allegations." The Oakland County Prosecutor's Office said in a statement that same day that the Beverly Hills Police Department had presented their findings, and "it was concluded there was no cause to file any charges against Mr. Winchester." Winchester, an Emmy-winning consumer affairs reporter who has been with WDIV since 2001, spoke candidly about what he called "an emotionally exhausting process." More: Tom Llamas steps up to 'NBC Nightly News' anchor with 'a lot of Cuban coffee' He also talked philosophically about what he has learned from the more than two months he spent mostly at home as the investigation proceeded. "It's an opportunity for me to take a step back and say, like, OK, this happened. What's the lesson? What can be learned? How can it make life better?" he said. "As much as it was insane and horrific and devastating, I have to lean into that, and that's what I'm doing." For her part, Winchester's co-host, Stafford, discussed how angry she has felt about the way he was "painted in the past nine weeks," which she saw as "the complete opposite man you are." "This is where the media has got to do a better job," she said, telling the media to "get on your computers and report the new news.' Despite his negative feelings about the investigation, Winchester said he had "the utmost respect" for police and prosecutors. "I will let you know that there was an allegation that was made against me by someone and police have a responsibility in these situations to investigate allegations," the anchorman said. "But they should also take the time to investigate the person making the allegation." Fired ABC anchor Terry Moran, axed for slamming Trump, reveals next move Calling the ordeal a "dark chapter of my life," he added that the past nine weeks had changed his perspective. "What is important to me today is much different than what was important to me before this started," he said. Winchester, who was placed on leave from WDIV in June, did not address the status of his future at the Detroit NBC affiliate. In a message to the Free Press, part of the USA TODAY NETWORK, sent Friday, Aug. 15, via email, WDIV vice president and general manager Bob Ellis stated the station has reached out to Winchester to discuss next steps.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store