
Judge slams Siti Bainun: 'Even an animal would not inflict such harm'
Judge Datuk Azman Abdullah had requested that the prosecution present the photographs before the three-member bench delivered its unanimous decision to dismiss the 33-year-old's appeal against her conviction and 12-year prison sentence for abusing and neglecting Bella, who is now clinically 18 years old.
Azman, sitting with Datuk Azmi Ariffin and Datuk Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, viewed the photographs displayed on the bench's monitors and explained by deputy public prosecutor Nor Azizah Mohamad.
After several minutes of deliberation, Azman, who delivered the judgment, said that Siti Bainun, entrusted with Bella's care, should have shown compassion.
"No animal would even think about inflicting injuries as we have just seen. Let this serve as a reminder to the appellant and society that they must respect the law and its consequences. We cannot simply act against someone as we wish, especially someone vulnerable," he said.
Siti Bainun, standing in the dock beside a prison warder, appeared composed while her family members observed from the public gallery.
She maintained a stoic expression, occasionally staring at the courtroom floor, and was immediately escorted out of the dock after proceedings, waving goodbye to her family. She is serving her sentence at Kajang Women's Prison.
Several activists who had championed Bella's cause were also present in court.
Azman said that the injuries sustained by Bella, who was 13 at the time, were corroborated by eyewitness accounts, medical officers, and specialists.
He said that the injuries were non-accidental, not self-inflicted, and occurred over multiple incidents rather than a single event.
Medical reports and photographs revealed serious injuries, including burn marks on her underarms and old wounds on her head, face, back, stomach, and thighs.
"Bella was under the appellant's care through a magistrate's court order from Sept 24, 2020 until she turns 18. On the clash of evidence regarding SP5 as raised by the defence, it was immaterial and did not affect the prosecution's case. SP5 remained a credible and trusted witness with no ulterior motives, acting only on the appellant's instructions," he said.
Deputy public prosecutor Nor Azizah Mohamad described the charges as serious, urging the court to maintain the sentence imposed by the Sessions Court, which she said was proportionate.
"Bella is a disabled girl who was abused and neglected by someone entrusted with her care. The injuries are severe, and while the wounds may heal, the trauma and scars will remain for life. Disabled children should be protected, yet Bella suffered at the hands of her caregiver," she said.
In response, defence lawyer Mohd Haijan Omar argued that Siti Bainun, convicted on May 3, 2023, had already served over two years in prison. He requested that the court consider her status as a first-time offender and the alleged severity of the injuries in seeking a reduction of her sentence.
Earlier, the panel dismissed Siti Bainun's application to present new evidence, citing a lack of exceptional circumstances and failure to meet the required legal threshold.
On May 2 last year, then Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Datuk Noorin Badaruddin (now a Court of Appeal judge) upheld the Sessions Court's decision by Judge Izralizam Sanusi, which sentenced Siti Bainun to 12 years' imprisonment for the abuse and neglect of Bella.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Syed Saddiq turns down offer to return as Muda president
KUALA LUMPUR: Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman has declined an offer to return as Muda president following his acquittal of corruption charges. The Muar member of parliament said he needs more time to decide on the position. "I have informed the party's leadership that I need a little bit more time. I want to spend time with my family, focus on my constituency work in Muar, and continue fundraising for local needs. "I've already relayed my decision to the party leadership, and I will leave it at that," Free Malaysia Today quoted as saying. On June 26, Muda's acting president, Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, offered the party's presidency back to Syed Saddiq. Syed Saddiq, who was the Muda president, vacated his post during his corruption trial. He was acquitted of four charges of abetting criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of party funds and money laundering. A three-judge Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the former youth and sports minister's appeal, setting aside his conviction, seven-year prison sentence, RM10 million fine and two strokes of the rotan.


Borneo Post
4 hours ago
- Borneo Post
High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use
Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. – Stock photo SIBU (Aug 15): The High Court here today dismissed Mohamad Fadzlan Shaini's appeal against his conviction and sentence for consuming dangerous drugs. Fadzlan was sentenced by the Kapit Sessions Court on Nov 14 last year to seven years' imprisonment and three strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to consuming amphetamine and methamphetamine under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, with sentencing under Section 39C(2) of the Act. In rejecting the appeal, High Court Judge Wong Siong Tung said the Sessions Court had complied with procedural requirements, including explaining the charge and its consequences to the appellant in Bahasa Malaysia, and found no evidence to challenge the legality of the proceedings. Regarding Fadzlan's mental health, the court noted that the medical report presented was neither submitted to the Sessions Court nor conclusive about his fitness to plead. Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. The court also found no evidence that a police officer had influenced Fadzlan's guilty plea. Affidavits submitted failed to show any direct communication between the officer and the appellant. Judge Wong concluded that the appellant's grounds were inconsistent and lacked credibility, upholding the conviction and sentence. Fadzlan, who had a previous drug offence, was represented by lawyer Harold Emparak, while Deputy Public Prosecutor Mark Kenneth Netto represented the prosecution. appeal dismiss drugs jail Kapit Sibu


Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Couple awarded RM160,000 in unpaid overtime claims
The Court of Appeal rejects the factory's argument that the couple enjoyed flexible working hours, although their contract stated it was from 5am to 8pm. PUTRAJAYA : A couple, who worked as cooks at a factory canteen in Johor, was awarded a total of RM162,420 in unpaid overtime claims after the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling earlier this year. A three-member Court of Appeal bench, chaired by Justice Lim Chong Fong, said the Employment Act limited a person's shift to eight hours a day but the couple's contract stipulated that they should work from 5am to 8pm. Despite siding with the couple, the appellate court allowed only one-third of the total amount demanded by Ee Yueh Horng and Tan Ei Guan as it said part of the claims were already factored into the overall calculation. Sinppa Industries Sdn Bhd will now have to pay the wife RM96,732 and the husband RM65,688. The amount is inclusive of 5% interest, calculated from the date the complaint was filed in the Labour Court on March 12, 2023. Ee and Tan were employed from 2019 to 2023 by the aluminium manufacturer based in Ayer Hitam. The wife's monthly salary was RM3,000 while the husband, who doubled as a part-time security guard, earned RM2,000. The factory had paid termination benefits and other outstanding amounts owed to them. Ee subsequently filed a claim for RM290,196 and Tan for RM197,066. These were dismissed outright by the labour tribunal and later affirmed by the High Court in Muar. Today, lawyer T Vijaya Sandran told the Court of Appeal that the couple was responsible for preparing three meals a day, cleaning the canteen and grocery shopping. He said they were allowed only two days off in a month. Lawyer Ina Shafina Sahima, who represented the company, submitted that the couple had enjoyed flexible working hours although their contract stated it was from 5am to 8pm. Lim, who sat with Justices Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Ahmad Kamal Shahid, rejected the argument. Lawyer Abraham Mathews also represented the couple. Ina was assisted by Nur Syarah Syazwan Amad Saturi.