logo
How US-China Chip War Is Evolving Under Trump

How US-China Chip War Is Evolving Under Trump

NDTV23-05-2025

The United States has taken aim at China's Huawei over the cutting-edge chips powering artificial intelligence (AI), part of a shifting technology dispute between the two largest economies.
AFP looks at how the US-China chip war is evolving under US President Donald Trump:
Focus Back On China
A US government statement this month showed how the Trump administration is seeking to change the ways the US limits China's access to state-of-the-art semiconductors needed to develop AI.
The US Commerce Department said on May 12 that it would rescind the "AI Diffusion Rule", which was issued by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden to shield American chips from Beijing.
Set to take effect on May 15, the rule would have imposed three tiers of curbs, allowing trusted nations to freely import AI chips but controlling or banning their export to lower-tier countries like China.
It "would have stifled American innovation" while harming US diplomatic ties with "dozens of countries", the commerce department said.
The same statement reminded companies that using Huawei Ascend -- the Chinese tech giant's most advanced chip -- "violates US export controls".
It warned of "potential consequences" if US-built AI chips were used to train Chinese AI models.
The announcement aimed to "refocus the firepower" of AI curbs squarely on Beijing, said Lizzi Lee, a fellow on the Chinese economy at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Manoj Harjani, a research fellow at Singapore's S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, agreed, saying the policy turn meant "the spotlight (would be) clearly on China and Huawei".
Different From Biden
Analysts told AFP that Trump's approach to chip controls marks a distinct shift from Biden.
The latter relied on multilateral coordination with allies to keep Beijing out of the loop, said Marina Zhang, an associate professor at the University of Technology Sydney's Australia-China Relations Institute.
In contrast, Trump's recent measures "adopt a more selective and bilateral approach", Zhang told AFP.
"(The policies are) flexible enough to accommodate allies' demands and protect US firms' global market positions, yet continue to aggressively target specific Chinese companies like Huawei through unilateral measures," she said.
Harjani noted that Trump was often viewed as a leader who "does not care much for allies and partners".
His chip policy, Harjani said, "runs counter to this assumption" as it includes efforts to create new AI-focused partnerships with allies.
Beijing Backlash
Beijing has accused Washington of "bullying" and abusing export controls to "suppress and contain" China.
The fighting talk shows that Beijing "will not yield easily", Zhang said.
However, she said the restrictions would significantly hamper Huawei's access to "crucial" US chipmaking technology.
"The AI competition has entered an accelerated and potentially dangerous phase, complicating future negotiations" on global AI governance, Zhang added.
China has already made impressive strides in AI development, with homegrown startup DeepSeek shaking up the technology sector this year with a chatbot that seemingly matches the performance of US competitors at much lower cost.
Chinese firms like Alibaba and Xiaomi have announced huge investments in AI in what experts say feeds into a national goal to cut reliance on foreign suppliers.
"It's part of a broader mobilisation happening domestically," Lee said.
"The strategy is not to beat the US -- it's to be good enough in the short term, while buying time to build domestic capacity and catch up to the cutting edge."
Tech Rivalry
The AI rivalry is playing into broader trade tensions between Beijing and Washington.
The two sides traded tit-for-tat tariff hikes after Trump took power, but this month dramatically slashed levies on each other's goods for 90 days, signalling a detente for now.
Lee, from the Asia Society, said the trade truce was "never going to hold tech policy at bay", noting the US backlash against Huawei just days after crunch bilateral trade talks in Geneva, Switzerland.
"Tariffs can be dialled up or down. Tech competition, by contrast, is hardening into the architecture of national security policy for both sides," she said.
"If the US doubles down on blacklisting key Chinese AI players, it's hard to imagine Beijing making big concessions elsewhere."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla stock slides over 5% after Elon Musk criticizes Donald Trump, President says he's disappointed
Tesla stock slides over 5% after Elon Musk criticizes Donald Trump, President says he's disappointed

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tesla stock slides over 5% after Elon Musk criticizes Donald Trump, President says he's disappointed

Tesla Shares Drop Over 5% Amid Musk-Trump Fallout Donald Trump Is Very Disappointed With Elon Musk Live Events False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk Denies Being Consulted on the Bill Analysts Weigh In on Risks for Tesla FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Tesla shares dropped over 5% on Thursday after investors noticed the growing tensions between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and US president Donald Trump, as per a report. The slide comes as Musk openly criticized Trump's massive tax legislation, stirring speculation that the once-friendly relationship between them may be coming to an end, according to a Reuters who called himself Trump's 'First Buddy' and led the administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, took to his social media platform X to call the legislation a 'disgusting abomination,' as per the report. The Tesla CEO said, "It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk," as quoted by responded by pointing out that Musk was upset because the bill would remove the electric vehicle mandates and said, "Don't know if we'll have a great relationship anymore," as quoted in the READ: Cargo ship carrying electric vehicles catches fire off Alaska – key points you need to know The US president also told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday that, "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate," as per a post shared by Musk on his X went on to respond to Trump's accusations on X, by saying, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" as per Musk's X a portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management, Jed Ellerbroe told Reuters, "The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies," as quoted in the are worried because Elon Musk publicly criticized President Trump's tax bill as the tension might hurt Tesla's called it a 'disgusting abomination' and said it cancels out cost savings his government efficiency team worked hard to achieve.

Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'
Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'

Mint

time40 minutes ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'

During a meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, President Donald Trump remarked that it might be better to allow Ukraine and Russia to 'fight for a while' before stepping in to separate them and pursue peace. Comparing the conflict to a quarrel between two young children who despise each other, Trump said he had conveyed this analogy to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their phone conversation the previous day. Chancellor Merz, seated alongside Trump, emphasised their shared condemnation of the ongoing war, describing it as 'terrible' and highlighting Trump's role as a key figure capable of ending the bloodshed. However, Merz was clear that Germany firmly supports Ukraine, noting that Kyiv targets only military objectives and not Russian civilians. 'We are trying to get them stronger,' he added. This marked the first in-person meeting between the two leaders, who exchanged pleasantries including a gift from Merz to Trump—a gold-framed birth certificate of Trump's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, who emigrated from Germany. Their discussions were expected to cover a range of issues including the war in Ukraine, trade relations, and NATO defence spending. Since assuming office on 6 May, Merz and Trump have spoken several times by phone, with German officials describing the relationship as 'decent' and Merz seeking to avoid the antagonism that characterised Trump's dealings with his predecessor, Angela Merkel. Merz, a conservative with a strong business background and former rival to Merkel, has been active in diplomatic efforts surrounding Ukraine, travelling to Kyiv shortly after taking office and hosting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin last week. A White House official indicated that Trump planned to raise topics such as Germany's defence spending, trade, Ukraine, and concerns over 'democratic backsliding,' suggesting that shared values like freedom of speech have deteriorated in Germany and should be restored. Merz responded by saying he was open to discussing German domestic politics but stressed that Germany generally refrains from commenting on American internal affairs. Under Merz's predecessor, Olaf Scholz, Germany became the second-largest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the United States. Merz has pledged to maintain this support and recently committed to assisting Ukraine in developing long-range missile systems free from range restrictions. Despite his comments on letting the conflict play out, Trump did not rule out sanctions, warning that 'when I see the moment where it's not going to stop … we'll be very, very tough,' signalling that sanctions could be imposed on both Ukraine and Russia. Domestically, Merz's government is intensifying efforts to strengthen the German military, a campaign initiated by Scholz following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Trump, who criticised Germany during his first term for failing to meet NATO's 2% GDP defence spending target, is now demanding that allies increase their contributions to at least 5%. The upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month is seen as a crucial opportunity for Germany to commit to this higher spending level.

How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State

India.com

time42 minutes ago

  • India.com

How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State

New Delhi: Pakistan is broke. Its economy is shattered. Foreign reserves are vanishing. Yet it keeps getting blank cheques. Weeks after the International Monetry Fund (IMF) handed it over $1 billion in emergency funds plus an additional $1.3 billion in loans, the nuclear-armed state got another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). India protested. The world ignored. And it is not the first time. Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'? The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight: Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages. 1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working. 2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit. 3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers. Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives. And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier. The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not. Who Really Benefits? Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure. These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store