Democrats say the fight for undocumented immigrant healthcare isn't over, despite budget deal
Last week, legislative leaders announced a bipartisan deal that would finally bring the legislature one-step closer to passing a two-year budget.
Progressive Democrats immediately opposed the deal, as it comes at the cost of healthcare for undocumented immigrants.
While 33 Democrats vowed not to support a bill ending the program, several party leaders said they have a plan to keep the program and still get the budget passed on time.
ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - Minnesota lawmakers are butting heads at the State Capitol as they try to pass a two-year budget.
The backstory
A program providing healthcare for undocumented Minnesotans took effect at the start of the year. The Department of Human Services has reported that it has already cost 32 percent more than projected, with almost triple the expected enrollment.
Democrats have argued that providing preventative healthcare is more cost-effective than forcing individuals to visit the emergency room when they need care.
Those opposed have vowed to vote 'no' on the measure, which could threaten a deal.
What they're saying
Rep. Cedrick Frazier told reporters Saturday that democrats were working on a plan that would ensure undocumented individuals continue to receive healthcare.
"We're talking to folks behind the scenes and we're going to work things out," he said.
DFL House Floor Leader Jamie Long told FOX 9 he anticipates the issue will be removed from the larger budget bill and voted on separately.
"Its going to be interesting to see if the DFL caucuses are able to pull together and actually stick to the deal they made or be de-railed by their far left flank," said GOP House Floor Leader Harry Niska.
What's next
Lawmakers in St. Paul acknowledged that it is likely – if not inevitable – that they are headed for a special session.
The legislative session is scheduled to end Monday at midnight, but as lawmakers continue to work through individual budget bills it is unlikely they will meet that deadline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Students face new cellphone restrictions in 17 states as school year begins
Jamel Bishop is seeing a big change in his classrooms as he begins his senior year at Doss High School in Louisville, Kentucky, where cellphones are now banned during instructional time. In previous years, students often weren't paying attention and wasted class time by repeating questions, the teenager said. Now, teachers can provide 'more one-on-one time for the students who actually need it.' Kentucky is one of 17 states and the District of Columbia starting this school year with new restrictions, bringing the total to 35 states with laws or rules limiting phones and other electronic devices in school. This change has come remarkably quickly: Florida became the first state to pass such a law in 2023. Both Democrats and Republicans have taken up the cause, reflecting a growing consensus that phones are bad for kids' mental health and take their focus away from learning, even as some researchers say the issue is less clear-cut. 'Anytime you have a bill that's passed in California and Florida, you know you're probably onto something that's pretty popular," Georgia state Rep. Scott Hilton, a Republican, told a forum on cellphone use last week in Atlanta. Phones are banned throughout the school day in 18 of the states and the District of Columbia, although Georgia and Florida impose such 'bell-to-bell' bans only from kindergarten through eighth grade. Another seven states ban them during class time, but not between classes or during lunch. Still others, particularly those with traditions of local school control, mandate only a cellphone policy, believing districts will take the hint and sharply restrict phone access. Students see pros and cons For students, the rules add new school-day rituals, like putting phones in magnetic pouches or special lockers. Students have been locking up their phones during class at McNair High School in suburban Atlanta since last year. Audreanna Johnson, a junior, said 'most of them did not want to turn in their phones' at first, because students would use them to gossip, texting 'their other friends in other classes to see what's the tea and what's going on around the building.' That resentment is 'starting to ease down' now, she said. "More students are willing to give up their phones and not get distracted.' But there are drawbacks — like not being able to listen to music when working independently in class. 'I'm kind of 50-50 on the situation because me, I use headphones to do my schoolwork. I listen to music to help focus,' she said. Some parents want constant contact In a survey of 125 Georgia school districts by Emory University researchers, parental resistance was cited as the top obstacle to regulating student use of social and digital media. Johnson's mother, Audrena Johnson, said she worries most about knowing her children are safe from violence at school. School messages about threats can be delayed and incomplete, she said, like when someone who wasn't a McNair student got into a fight on school property, which she learned about when her daughter texted her during the school day. 'My child having her phone is very important to me, because if something were to happen, I know instantly,' Johnson said. Many parents echo this — generally supporting restrictions but wanting a say in the policymaking and better communication, particularly about safety — and they have a real need to coordinate schedules with their children and to know about any problems their children may encounter, said Jason Allen, the national director of partnerships for the National Parents Union. 'We just changed the cell phone policy, but aren't meeting the parents' needs in regards to safety and really training teachers to work with students on social emotional development,' Allen said. Research remains in an early stage Some researchers say it's not yet clear what types of social media may cause harm, and whether restrictions have benefits, but teachers 'love the policy,' according to Julie Gazmararian, a professor of public health at Emory University who does surveys and focus groups to research the effects of a phone ban in middle school grades in the Marietta school district near Atlanta. 'They could focus more on teaching,' Gazmararian said. 'There were just not the disruptions.' Another benefit: More positive interactions among students. 'They were saying that kids are talking to each other in the hallways and in the cafeteria,' she said. 'And in the classroom, there is a noticeably lower amount of discipline referrals.' Gazmararian is still compiling numbers on grades and discipline, and cautioned that her work may not be able to answer whether bullying has been reduced or mental health improved. Social media use clearly correlates with poor mental health, but research can't yet prove it causes it, according to Munmun De Choudhury, a Georgia Tech professor who studies this issue. 'We need to be able to quantify what types of social media use are causing harm, what types of social media use can be beneficial,' De Choudhury said. A few states reject rules Some state legislatures are bucking the momentum. Wyoming's Senate in January rejected requiring districts to create some kind of a cellphone policy after opponents argued that teachers and parents need to be responsible. And in the Michigan House in July, a Republican-sponsored bill directing schools to ban phones bell-to-bell in grades K-8 and during high school instruction time was defeated in July after Democrats insisted on upholding local control. Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, among multiple governors who made restricting phones in schools a priority this year, is still calling for a bill to come to her desk. ___ Associated Press writers Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, and Dylan Lovan in Louisville, Kentucky, contributed. Jeff Amy, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prosecutors link LA contract to Smartmatic 'slush fund' as voting tech firm battles Fox in court
MIAMI (AP) — Smartmatic, the elections-technology company suing Fox News for defamation, is now contending with a growing list of criminal allegations against some of its executives — including a new claim by federal prosecutors that a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials was financed partly with proceeds from the sale of voting machines in Los Angeles. The new details about the criminal case surfaced this month in court filings in Miami, where the company's co-founder, Roger Pinate, and two Venezuelan colleagues were charged last year with bribing officials in the Philippines in exchange for a contract to help run that country's 2016 presidential elections. Pinate, who no longer works for Smartmatic, has pleaded not guilty. To buttress the case, federal prosecutors are seeking to introduce evidence they argue shows that some of the nearly $300 million the company was paid by Los Angeles County to help modernize its voting systems was diverted to a fund controlled by Pinate through the use of overseas shell companies, fake invoices and other means. Smartmatic itself hasn't been charged with breaking any laws, nor have U.S. prosecutors accused Smartmatic or its executives of tampering with election results. Similarly, they haven't accused Los Angeles County officials of wrongdoing, or said whether they were even aware of the alleged bribery scheme. County officials say they weren't. But the case against Pinate is unfolding as Smartmatic is pursuing a $2.7 billion lawsuit accusing Fox of defamation for airing false claims that the company helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox says it was legitimately reporting newsworthy allegations. Smartmatic said the Justice Department's new filing was filled with 'misrepresentations' and is 'untethered from reality.' 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do,' the company said in a statement. 'We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' Fox questions Smartmatic's dealings in LA Still, Fox has gone to court to try to get more information about L.A. County's dealings with Smartmatic. The network has long tried to leverage the bribery allegations to undermine Smartmatic's narrative about its business prospects – a key component in calculating any potential damages — and portray it as a scandal-plagued company brought low by its own legal problems, not Fox's broadcasts. South Florida-based Smartmatic was founded more than two decades ago by a group of Venezuelans who found early success working for the government of the late Hugo Chavez, a devotee of electronic voting. The company later expanded globally, providing voting machines and other technology to help carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia. It was awarded its contract to help with Los Angeles County elections in 2018. The contract, which Smartmatic continues to service, gave the company an important foothold in what was then a fast-expanding U.S. voting-technology market. But Smartmatic has said its business tanked after Fox News gave President Donald Trump's lawyers a platform to paint the company as part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Fox itself eventually aired a piece refuting the allegations after Smartmatic's lawyers complained, but it has aggressively defended itself against the defamation lawsuit in New York. 'Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News's coverage of the 2020 election,' the network's lawyers said in a court filing. Smartmatic has disputed Fox's characterization in court filings as 'lies' and 'another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation." LA clerk deposed about trip, gifted meal As part of its effort to investigate Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles, Fox has sued to force LA County Clerk Dean Logan to hand over public records about his dealings with Smartmatic's U.S. affiliate. Fox's lawyers also questioned Logan in a deposition about a dinner a Smartmatic executive bought for him at the members-only Magic Castle club and restaurant in Los Angeles and a Smartmatic-paid trip that Logan made to Taiwan in 2019 to oversee the manufacturing of equipment by a Smartmatic vendor. U.S. prosecutors claim that vendor was deeply involved in the alleged kickback scheme in the Philippines. The five-day trip included business class airfare, hotel and numerous meals as well as time for sightseeing, Fox said. 'The trip's itinerary demonstrates that the trip was not a financial inspection or audit. It was a boondoggle,' Fox said in court filings. Logan, who did not report the gifts in his financial disclosures, said in his 2023 deposition that the meal at the Magic Castle was a 'social occasion' unrelated to business and that he was not required to report the trip to Taiwan because his visit was covered by the contract. Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for Logan's office, said in a statement that the bribery allegations are unrelated to the company's work for L.A. County and that the county had no knowledge of how the proceeds from its contract would be used. All of Smartmatic's work has been evaluated for compliance with the contract's terms, Sanchez added, and as soon as Pinate was indicted he and the other defendants were banned from conducting business with the county. As for the trip to Taiwan, Sanchez said another county official joined Logan for the trip and the two conducted several on-site visits and conducted detailed reviews of electoral technology products that were required prior the start of their manufacturing. Logan's spouse accompanied him on the trip, but at the couple's own expense, the spokesman added. 'Unfortunately, this is an attempt to use the County as a pawn in two serious legal actions to which the County is not a party,' Sanchez said. Smartmatic has settled two other defamation lawsuits it brought against conservative news outlets Newsmax and One America News Network over their 2020 U.S. election coverage. Settlement terms weren't disclosed. Prosecutors claim bribe paid in Venezuela U.S. prosecutors in Miami have also accused Pinate of secretly bribing Venezuela's longtime election chief by giving her a luxury home with a pool in Caracas. Prosecutors say the home was transferred to the election chief in an attempt to repair relations following Smartmatic's abrupt exit from Venezuela in 2017 when it accused President Nicolas Maduro 's government of manipulating tallied results in elections for a rubber-stamping constituent assembly. Smartmatic has denied the bribery allegations, saying it ceased all operations in Venezuela in 2017 after blowing the whistle on the government and has never sought to secure business there again. "There are no slush funds, no gifted house," the company said. Instead, it accused Fox of engaging in 'victim-blaming' and attempts to use 'frivolous' court filings 'to smear us further, twisting unproven Justice Department allegations.' ___ Peltz reported from New York. Joshua Goodman And Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Prosecutors link LA contract to Smartmatic 'slush fund' as voting tech firm battles Fox in court
MIAMI — Smartmatic, the elections-technology company suing Fox News for defamation , is now contending with a growing list of criminal allegations against some of its executives — including a new claim by federal prosecutors that a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials was financed partly with proceeds from the sale of voting machines in Los Angeles. The new details about the criminal case surfaced this month in court filings in Miami, where the company's co-founder, Roger Pinate, and two Venezuelan colleagues were charged last year with bribing officials in the Philippines in exchange for a contract to help run that country's 2016 presidential elections. Pinate, who no longer works for Smartmatic, has pleaded not guilty. To buttress the case, federal prosecutors are seeking to introduce evidence they argue shows that some of the nearly $300 million the company was paid by Los Angeles County to help modernize its voting systems was diverted to a fund controlled by Pinate through the use of overseas shell companies, fake invoices and other means. Smartmatic itself hasn't been charged with breaking any laws, nor have U.S. prosecutors accused Smartmatic or its executives of tampering with election results. Similarly, they haven't accused Los Angeles County officials of wrongdoing, or said whether they were even aware of the alleged bribery scheme. County officials say they weren't. But the case against Pinate is unfolding as Smartmatic is pursuing a $2.7 billion lawsuit accusing Fox of defamation for airing false claims that the company helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox says it was legitimately reporting newsworthy allegations. Smartmatic said the Justice Department's new filing was filled with 'misrepresentations' and is 'untethered from reality.' 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do,' the company said in a statement. 'We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' Still, Fox has gone to court to try to get more information about L.A. County's dealings with Smartmatic. The network has long tried to leverage the bribery allegations to undermine Smartmatic's narrative about its business prospects – a key component in calculating any potential damages — and portray it as a scandal-plagued company brought low by its own legal problems, not Fox's broadcasts. South Florida-based Smartmatic was founded more than two decades ago by a group of Venezuelans who found early success working for the government of the late Hugo Chavez , a devotee of electronic voting. The company later expanded globally, providing voting machines and other technology to help carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia. It was awarded its contract to help with Los Angeles County elections in 2018. The contract, which Smartmatic continues to service, gave the company an important foothold in what was then a fast-expanding U.S. voting-technology market. But Smartmatic has said its business tanked after Fox News gave President Donald Trump's lawyers a platform to paint the company as part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Fox itself eventually aired a piece refuting the allegations after Smartmatic's lawyers complained , but it has aggressively defended itself against the defamation lawsuit in New York. 'Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News's coverage of the 2020 election,' the network's lawyers said in a court filing. Smartmatic has disputed Fox's characterization in court filings as 'lies' and 'another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation.' As part of its effort to investigate Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles, Fox has sued to force LA County Clerk Dean Logan to hand over public records about his dealings with Smartmatic's U.S. affiliate. Fox's lawyers also questioned Logan in a deposition about a dinner a Smartmatic executive bought for him at the members-only Magic Castle club and restaurant in Los Angeles and a Smartmatic-paid trip that Logan made to Taiwan in 2019 to oversee the manufacturing of equipment by a Smartmatic vendor. U.S. prosecutors claim that vendor was deeply involved in the alleged kickback scheme in the Philippines. The five-day trip included business class airfare, hotel and numerous meals as well as time for sightseeing, Fox said. 'The trip's itinerary demonstrates that the trip was not a financial inspection or audit. It was a boondoggle,' Fox said in court filings. Logan, who did not report the gifts in his financial disclosures, said in his 2023 deposition that the meal at the Magic Castle was a 'social occasion' unrelated to business and that he was not required to report the trip to Taiwan because his visit was covered by the contract. Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for Logan's office, said in a statement that the bribery allegations are unrelated to the company's work for L.A. County and that the county had no knowledge of how the proceeds from its contract would be used. All of Smartmatic's work has been evaluated for compliance with the contract's terms, Sanchez added, and as soon as Pinate was indicted he and the other defendants were banned from conducting business with the county. As for the trip to Taiwan, Sanchez said another county official joined Logan for the trip and the two conducted several on-site visits and conducted detailed reviews of electoral technology products that were required prior the start of their manufacturing. Logan's spouse accompanied him on the trip, but at the couple's own expense, the spokesman added. 'Unfortunately, this is an attempt to use the County as a pawn in two serious legal actions to which the County is not a party,' Sanchez said. Smartmatic has settled two other defamation lawsuits it brought against conservative news outlets Newsmax and One America News Network over their 2020 U.S. election coverage. Settlement terms weren't disclosed. U.S. prosecutors in Miami have also accused Pinate of secretly bribing Venezuela's longtime election chief by giving her a luxury home with a pool in Caracas. Prosecutors say the home was transferred to the election chief in an attempt to repair relations following Smartmatic's abrupt exit from Venezuela in 2017 when it accused President Nicolas Maduro 's government of manipulating tallied results in elections for a rubber-stamping constituent assembly. Smartmatic has denied the bribery allegations, saying it ceased all operations in Venezuela in 2017 after blowing the whistle on the government and has never sought to secure business there again. 'There are no slush funds, no gifted house,' the company said. Instead, it accused Fox of engaging in 'victim-blaming' and attempts to use 'frivolous' court filings 'to smear us further, twisting unproven Justice Department allegations.' ___ Peltz reported from New York.
