logo
Police ready for Glasgow protests when Donald Trump visits

Police ready for Glasgow protests when Donald Trump visits

Glasgow Times22-07-2025
The US President is not expected to be in the city during his four-day stay but the possibility of a large demonstration in the city means officers will be ready to police a protest in Glasgow.
Police said as yet they do not have any intelligence of large-scale protests being organised but officers from throughout the UK will be deployed across several locations.
READ NEXT:Irish republican march to go ahead in Glasgow next month
Assistant Chief Constable, Emma Bond is the Gold Commander for the policing operation.
(Image: Colin Mearns)
At this stage the police will be reacting to spontaneous protests.
She said: 'To some extent we are still waiting to see how the protests will manifest itself.
"We are aware, obviously, of events planned not related directly to the President's visit in Glasgow for example, on Saturday.
'But whenever we look back to 2018, we are very much aware there were people who came out to exercise their right to protest.
'Thousands of people came out across a range of different places.
"We saw that predominantly across Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Ayrshire, so we are working on the basis, as the start of our planning, that we would expect to see protest in those areas.'
READ NEXT:All the latest changes to Glasgow city centre streets explained
Police Scotland said it would police protests proportionately and is centred on being positive and engaged with individuals and groups
She added, however: 'Let me be very clear that abusive, threatening behaviour, any activity that in any way seeks to disrupt an event or any activity that puts the safety of the public at risk is not lawful protest and there may well be consequences from a criminal justice perspective.
'It is a qualified right under Human Rights and not an absolute one and therefore there may need to be decisions taken but we will deal with every aspect of protest in the way that we do on any other day and make sure that is proportionate and seeks to balance the right to peaceful protest.'
Police said they always look to engage with any groups looking to protest ahead of events to ensure a 'no surprises' policing operation.
But so far, there hasn't been specific contact, either to or from any groups.
ACC Bond added there is nothing at this stage to give concern.
She added: "When large numbers of people gather together, there may be issues that arise. People come out and exercise their right to peaceful protest.
ACC Bond said Police Scotland will be 'upfront, honest and clear' about how it polices protest.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Authoritarian states operating without impunity to silence dissidents in UK, report finds
Authoritarian states operating without impunity to silence dissidents in UK, report finds

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Authoritarian states operating without impunity to silence dissidents in UK, report finds

Authoritarian states are operating without impunity in attempts to silence dissidents on UK soil - and the government needs to take urgent action, parliamentarians have warned. Transnational repression has increased in recent years, with foreign states using online harassment, lawsuits, surveillance and physical violence to intimidate people in the UK, a report published on Wednesday by the Joint Committee on Human Rights said. There has been a 48% increase in MI5 investigations into threats from other states in the UK since 2022, the report said. Chairman Lord David Alton warned the rise in threats was "going unchecked" in the UK and said the government "lacks a clear strategy" to address transnational repression (TNR). He said: "This risks undermining the UK's ability to protect the human rights of its citizens and those who have sought safety within its borders. "We have seen prominent cases of Hong Kongers with bounties placed on their heads, Iran intimidating journalists - but evidence submitted to the inquiry suggests this may be the tip of the iceberg." Amnesty International called the report "damning" and said it shows the UK has become a "hunting ground" for authoritarian regimes. The committee called on the government to adopt a formal definition of TNR, a dedicated reporting mechanism for victims, data collection, specialised police training and to work with "like-minded states" to coordinate international action against authoritarian regimes using TNR. The cross-party committee said the government is not doing enough to help victims and should develop a "proactive outreach strategy" aimed at individuals and communities at risk of TNR within 12 months. It said strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) - aimed at exhausting a defendant financially and psychologically - are increasingly being used to "intimidate and silence" people, especially journalists, who expose or criticise authoritarian regimes. The MPs and Lords called on the government to expand protections for defendants in SLAPP cases where it is used as a TNR tool, as there is currently only protection if it is an economic crime. 1:55 Dozen countries carrying out TNR They said China, Iran and Russia were the "most flagrant" perpetrators of TNR, but they also heard evidence from people being targeted by Bahrain, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. The committee also received "substantial" evidence of TNR carried out by the Eritrean government, including being forced to pay a 2% "diaspora tax" and those who refuse "are considered government opponents and face harassment, intimidation and ultimately social isolation", the UN Special Rapporteur on Eritrea told the committee. Interpol red notices The committee criticised Interpol "red notices" - international requests for arrest - saying they were being used to harass dissidents and said Interpol has refused to acknowledge there is a problem. Nearly half of the 6,550 current public red notices have been issued at Russia's request "to intimidate and silence journalists, activists, and other critics", the report said. Lord Alton, who is sanctioned by China, said the UK government needs to press Interpol for action on abuse of red notices and introduce a mechanism to alert people they are subject to a red notice, if there is a strong basis to believe it is politically motivated. China and Hong Kong While Iran and Russia are more obvious with their tactics, the committee said China uses a "broad range", including surveillance, online harassment, and threats to family members abroad. It highlighted the Hong Kong government placing bounties on several democracy protesters who have fled to the UK, naming 20-year-old Chloe Cheung. She gave evidence, telling them it has affected her "mentally, emotionally and physically in profound ways that I never expected" and she now carries lots of self-protection devices and her first thought about people who suddenly want to make friends or approach her is they must work for the Chinese government. Ms Cheung, now an advocacy manager for the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation, said it is "important the UK government doesn't just acknowledge this report, but actually acts on it" to help protect dissidents like her. Concern was also raised about unofficial Chinese "police stations" in the UK, used to monitor and pressure the Chinese diaspora, and the proposed Chinese "super embassy", with fears it could serve as a spy base. The committee repeated calls made by MPs last month for China to be placed in the highest tier of the foreign influence registration (FIRS) scheme, saying its omission risked "undermining the credibility and coherence" of the scheme. Russia The report said Russia has engaged in the "most serious forms" of TNR, including direct threat to life - and highlighted the Salisbury nerve agent attack as creating a "chilling effect" among Kremlin critics. Iran Iran represents "one of the highest kidnap and assassination state threats to the UK", with tactics including physical attacks, smear campaigns, hacking, assassination plots, and "cultural centres" as surveillance fronts, the report said. Kerry Moscogiuri, campaign director at Amnesty International, said the government needs to "now act on these recommendations, not just in principle, but in practice". An Interpol spokesperson said: "Every year, thousands of the world's most serious criminals are arrested thanks to Interpol's systems. "Children are saved from sexual exploitation and terrorists, cyber criminals and traffickers are brought to justice. "Interpol knows red notices are powerful tools for law enforcement co-operation, which is why we have robust processes for ensuring that all Interpol notices and diffusions comply with our rules. "Our constitution forbids Interpol from undertaking activities of a political, military, religious or racial character and all our databases and activities must also comply with the universal declaration for human rights." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We take the threat of transnational repression extremely seriously. "Any attempts by a foreign state to coerce, intimidate, harass, or harm individuals on UK soil are considered a threat to our national security and sovereignty, and will not be tolerated. "The committee's review echoes many of the same findings and recommendations from the Defending Democracy Taskforce report on TNR, published in May, and we are already taking action arising from those recommendations to further strengthen our response."

Palestine Action co-founder wins permission to challenge ban
Palestine Action co-founder wins permission to challenge ban

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Palestine Action co-founder wins permission to challenge ban

The co-founder of Palestine Action can bring an unprecedented legal challenge to the home secretary's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws, a high court judge has ruled. Mr Justice Chamberlain said the proscription order against the direct action group risked 'considerable harm to the public interest' because of a potential 'chilling effect' on legitimate political speech. The judge cited the case of Laura Murton, who the Guardian revealed had been threatened with arrest by armed officers for holding a sign saying 'Free Gaza' and a Palestinian flag. Chamberlain's decision is the first time that an organisation banned under anti-terrorism law has been granted a court trial to challenge proscription. The judge said: 'If, as the claimant says, the proscription order is likely to have a significant chilling effect on the legitimate political speech of many thousands of people, that would do considerable harm to the public interest. 'Reports of the kind of police conduct referred to … are liable to have a chilling effect on those wishing to express legitimate political views. This effect can properly be regarded as an indirect consequence of the proscription order.' He continued: 'I consider it reasonably arguable that the proscription order amounts to a disproportionate interference with the article 10 and article 11 (European convention of human rights) rights (freedom of expression and assembly, respectively) of the claimant and others.' The group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, called it a 'landmark decision … especially at a time when protesters – mostly elderly citizens – are being dragged off in police vans, held in detention for more than 24 hours, having their homes raided and face criminal prosecution, simply for holding signs that they oppose genocide and expressing their support for Palestine Action'. More than 200 people are believed to have been arrested since the 5 July ban on Palestine Action, the first on a direct action group, placing it alongside the likes of Islamic State and Boko Haram. The three-day hearing in November will increase scrutiny on the decision-making of the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, and casts uncertainty over the fate of those recently arrested under the Terrorism Act in relation to Palestine Action – or who might be arrested in future. The Home Office had argued that the proper forum for Palestine Action to challenge the ban was the POAC (Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission), which parliament had designated precisely for that purpose, rather than judicial review. But Chamberlain said POAC would be unlikely to be able to hear the case before the middle of next year whereas a judicial review could be heard this autumn and there was a strong public interest for it to be determined authoritatively as soon as possible. Otherwise, people charged with criminal offences under the Terrorism Act might seek to challenge the legality of the proscription order in courts that might reach different decisions, creating 'a recipe for chaos', he said. The second ground on which Chamberlain granted permission for judicial review, in addition to concerns about freedom of speech and protest, was that Cooper had not consulted Palestine Action before proscribing it, finding it reasonably arguable that there was a duty to consult. The judge refused Ammori permission to challenge the government on six other grounds, including a claim that the home secretary had failed to gather sufficient information on Palestine Action's activities or the impact of the proscription on people associated with the group. Chamberlain referred in his judgment to the 'deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza'. He quoted from a joint statement last week by the foreign secretary, David Lammy, and the foreign ministers of 27 other countries in which they said 'the suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Documents in the case showed that Cooper held private discussions with aides for three months before she took the decision to ban Palestine Action. On one occasion, she decided to ban the group but reversed course two days later. She finally decided to ban the group on 20 June, hours after Palestine Action said its members had broken into the RAF's Brize Norton airbase and defaced two military aircraft with spray paint. On 7 March, the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC), a government body based within MI5, produced a secret report. It concluded that the majority of Palestine Action's activities would not be classified as terrorism on the grounds that the group 'primarily uses direct action tactics', which typically resulted in minor damage to property. 'Common tactics include graffiti, petty vandalism, occupation and lock-ons,' it added. Nonetheless JTAC concluded that Palestine Action should be banned, arguing that its protests had been escalating, citing three protests it said constituted acts of terrorism. Whitehall officials supported a ban too, but conceded that proscribing the group would be 'relatively novel' as 'there was no known precedent of an organisation being proscribed on the basis that it was concerned in terrorism mainly due to its use or threat of action involving series damage to property'. From late March officials recommended on a series of occasions that the group be banned, but Cooper made no firm decision, often requesting more information. On 14 May she backed the ban but two days later delayed implementing it as she wanted more details on Palestine Action's recent activities. A Whitehall minute recorded that by 2.15pm on 20 June, Cooper had decided that Palestine Action was to be banned 'at pace'. An application by Ammori's lawyers to suspend the effect of the proscription order until the trial has taken place in November was rejected by Chamberlain. The judge also refused a request by the Home Office to bring an appeal over his decision about POAC. At last week's hearing, lawyers for Ammori also highlighted the arrest of a man in Leeds for carrying a placard reproducing a graphic from Private Eye magazine, which said: 'Unacceptable Palestine Action: spraying military planes. Acceptable Palestine Action: shooting Palestinians queueing for food.'

UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund

Leader Live

time4 hours ago

  • Leader Live

UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund

The Government confirmed it had decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) in 2024-25, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position'. The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986. It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls. Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn. 'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said. 'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland. 'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported. 'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship. 'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.' Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing. 'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25. 'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store