House GOP unveils state budget plan with fewer tax breaks than Braun's plan. How it differs
Indiana House Republicans unveiled their state budget proposal Friday, one that's mostly in alignment with the proposal floated by new Gov. Mike Braun. Still, it nixes some tax cuts Braun proposed, such as an end to a tax on tips, and dedicates less money for state-funded pre-K.
Under the House proposal, Hoosiers would see some tax cuts, the restrictions removed on private school vouchers, and more investments for work-based learning, all as in Braun's proposal.
House budget writer Jeff Thompson, a Republican representative from Lizton, says he considers this proposal "really close in alignment" with Braun's.
"He's done a wonderful job in setting the framework for opportunity for Hoosiers and keeping a balanced budget, and so we'll continue discussions with him and the Senate," he told reporters Friday. "I think we've done a lot of things that's in his proposed budget. We've made some tweaks, of course, consulting with him, and look forward to working with him in the future."
Recap: Gov. Mike Braun proposes universal school choice, tax relief in first state budget
There remain some large unanswered questions, mostly having to do with Medicaid and the waitlists the cost crisis created ― questions that can't be resolved until lawmakers negotiate the final terms of a Senate Bill 2, the priority bill that could end up reducing Medicaid expenses.
The House budget increases K-12 tuition funding by about 2% each year, for an increase of $560 million over the biennium ― roughly the same as Braun's.
The two proposals contain the same $160 million-per-year allotment for school textbooks, but the House's proposal is to roll that money into the into the foundation of the tuition funding formula itself.
Both proposals also would make school choice universal, meaning any family of any income could use vouchers. Families of four with an annual income of $220,000 currently qualify. The Legislative Services Agency estimates this change would cost the state about $90 million a year, but those estimates are assuming the new users of the vouchers were already attending private school. In other words, the estimates are high-end.
One main difference between the House and Braun's proposals: Braun wanted to spend $362 million to eliminate the waitlist for child care vouchers ― a waitlist the Family and Social Services Administration re-implemented in December for those who qualify for money from the Child Care Development Fund and On My Way Pre-K program. The House proposes only allocating $155 million to keep families already receiving the benefit on the program, but does not eliminate the waitlist.
Braun proposed providing roughly $700 million in tax relief for Hoosiers through a long list of tax credits and tax holidays.
House Republicans are only keeping two of them: a tax credit for capital investments in rural areas, and a tax credit for employers who provide "upskilling" training for their workforce.
Braun's pitches that didn't make the cut include ending the tax on tips, phasing out retirement income taxes and implementing sales tax holidays for back-to-school and outdoor recreation items.
Thompson reiterated negotiations are ongoing on both the tax breaks included in the state budget, as well as property tax relief, which is more likely to impact local governments' bottom lines.
"We're looking at those in terms of how we do new taxes in general," he said. "Property taxes is a big discussion, and it's an ongoing discussion with the Senate, of course. Where we're going to land that, we're not sure at this point."
House Republicans added their own twist to relief for seniors, though: doubling the income tax deduction for low-income seniors from $500 to $1,000.
Already the individual income tax rate will decrease from 2.95% in 2026 to 2.9% in 2027, as was scheduled by lawmakers in a previous session.
One of Braun's main goals was to find 5% in cuts across all state agencies.
The House budget ends up appropriating nearly $900 million more over the biennium than Braun's proposal ― about 2% more ― and most of that is for two big agencies: the Department of Child Services and the Department of Corrections.
For these two agencies, Braun's proposal was based on some out-of-date spending figures, Thompson said.
"We're working with them to find those places," he said, referring to agencies that might not be able to cut 5%. "Other spots, we may well end up cutting more than 5%."
The House Committee on Ways and Means will debate this budget amendment Monday. Senate Republicans will still need to unveil their version of the budget before the end of the legislative session, so this latest proposal is far from a done deal.
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on Twitter @kayla_dwyer17.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana House Republicans' budget aligns with Gov. Mike Braun, almost
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

33 minutes ago
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. Brehm's attorney, Bradley Girard with Democracy Forward, expressed disappointment with the judge's decision. 'But in our parallel case, Rural Development Innovations v. Marocco, a grantee and two USADF employees have also challenged Marocco's unlawful appointment," Girard wrote in an email. "We are hopeful that the Court will reject the defendants' attempt to ignore the constitutional and statutory requirements for appointing board members to federal agencies.' That lawsuit is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump backs Idaho Gov. Little for reelection — before he's said he'll run
Idaho Gov. Brad Little received President Donald Trump's endorsement Tuesday for another term, nearly a year ahead of the Republican primary — and before the two-term incumbent governor has even announced a bid for reelection. 'Brad Little is the strong and highly popular Governor of Idaho,' Trump posted on Truth Social, the president's social media platform. 'Brad Little has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election — HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!' It is unclear whether Little, 71, an Emmett sheep and cattle rancher, will seek a third term, or which candidates may consider challenging him in the May 2026 primary. Idaho's 33rd governor thanked Trump on the social media platform X, without stating whether he will run for reelection. 'It is an honor to have the support of President @realDonaldTrump,' the post read. 'Idaho will continue leading the fight to Make America Great Again!' Little's campaign did not immediately respond to a request from the Idaho Statesman on Tuesday evening. This year, Little has taken several trips to Washington, D.C., including to visit with Trump. In January, before Trump was sworn in as president, Idaho's governor also traveled to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's private resort in South Florida. Trump, the 45th and 47th U.S. president, remains popular in Idaho, a deep red state. In 2024, he earned nearly 70% of the votes in the presidential election — up from about 64% in 2020 and about 59% in 2016. Nationally, Trump's favorability rating has declined with Americans since he took office, according to recent polling. Little first won election to become Idaho's lead executive in 2018. The sitting lieutenant governor ran in a crowded GOP field and defeated his closest challenger — Raúl Labrador, now Idaho's attorney general — by about 5% points. He sailed to victory over his Democratic rival in the general election that fall. When Little sought a second term in 2022, Trump — out of office after losing the 2020 election to Democratic President Joe Biden — endorsed the governor's main challenger in the Republican primary, Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin. 'I am giving Janice McGeachin my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Governor of Idaho,' Trump said at the time, a near carbon copy of the endorsement he issued Tuesday for Little, right down to the arbitrary capitalization. 'She will make a fantastic Governor, and will never let you down!' Little easily overcame Trump's backing of his rival and beat McGeachin in the primary by nearly 60,000 votes. Six months later in the general election, Little easily earned a second term with nearly 61% of the vote, with his nearest contender winning about 20% of votes. A former four-term state senator, Little was appointed lieutenant governor in 2009 by then-Gov. Butch Otter, a fellow Republican. Little then won two terms as the second-in-command executive role before running to replace his predecessor. In Idaho's 2026 gubernatorial race, only Democrat Terri Pickens, of Boise, has announced her intention to run. She previously ran unsuccessfully for lieutenant governor in 2022. 'We need Idaho Gov. Brad Little to tell the Trump Regime to stay out of Idaho and stay away from the Idaho National Guard,' Pickens said in a statement released earlier Tuesday. 'Gov. Little, we need you to find your courage and stand up for our freedom.'

an hour ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'