logo
FIFA accuses players' union FIFPro of ‘blackmail' and lack of financial transparency

FIFA accuses players' union FIFPro of ‘blackmail' and lack of financial transparency

New York Times25-07-2025
FIFA has accused FIFPro, the global players' union, of 'blackmail' and a lack of financial transparency as tensions between the two bodies escalated.
On Thursday, Sergio Marchi, the new FIFPro president, told The Athletic in an exclusive interview that 'the autocracy of FIFA's president (Gianni Infantino)' was the 'biggest obstacle' to his union.
Advertisement
Following a meeting with 58 player unions in the Netherlands on Friday, FIFPro doubled down on those criticisms, releasing a statement accusing FIFA of 'seriously undermining' players' rights with its 'autocratic system of governance'.
Football's world governing body responded with its own statement on Friday evening, arguing the players' union had 'chosen to pursue a path of public confrontation driven by artificial PR battles' which, rather than protecting player welfare, 'aim to preserve their own personal positions and interests'.
The accusations mark a dramatic deterioration in relations between FIFA and FIFPro, who have clashed over issues such as player welfare and the football calendar. Earlier this month, FIFPro was not invited to the meeting where FIFA said a consensus over the need for defined rest periods for players was reached.
'As FIFPRO is interested in addressing matters such as good governance, maybe they would want to consider publishing their own statutes and releasing transparent annual accounts, to ensure that what is being preached is also being practiced,' a FIFA statement read. 'Let us be clear: you cannot preach transparency while operating in opacity.
'FIFA invites FIFPRO to return to the negotiating table, once they have stopped their blackmail and withdrawn their complaints, and once they have published their statutes, ⁠their full financial reports (including all their sources of income, the detailed intellectual property rights of the players they claim to own, and the funding one of their regional divisions receives from some football organisations), and ⁠the full list of individual members they claim to represent.'
FIFPro's accounts are published on KVK, the Dutch public registrar for companies.
FIFA pointed to the rest period measures brought in after its meeting in New York on the eve of the Club World Cup final as proof that it was acting on concerns over player workload.
It has stated that there must be at least 72 hours of rest between matches, and that players should have a rest period of at least 21 days at the end of each season. FIFPro, which has pressured FIFA to address the issue for many years, has been calling for 28 days of rest.
Advertisement
FIFA claims that the New York meeting took place following a 'protracted period of unsuccessful efforts to bring FIFPRO to the table in an environment of non-hostility and respectful, progressive dialogue'.
The Athletic reported sources with knowledge of the matter indicated that FIFPro was not invited to the meeting and those who were do not represent FIFPro in any capacity. While some in attendance were previously part of FIFPro they have since lost their positions, others, The Athletic has been told, are not recognised by FIFPro.
'The overloaded match calendar, the lack of adequate physical and mental recovery periods, extreme playing conditions, the absence of meaningful dialogue, and the ongoing disregard for players' social rights have regrettably become pillars of FIFA's business model,' a FIFPro statement read. 'This is a model that puts the health of players at risk and sidelines those at the heart of the game.'
The union argued the recent Club World Cup, an expanded 32-team tournament in the United States, where a number of games faced delays due to heat and thunder storms, was 'held under conditions that were extreme and inappropriate for any human being'.
FIFA called FIFPro's response to the recommendations — which included the union's president Sergio Marchi referring to his FIFA counterpart Infantino as 'the man who thinks he is God' — 'a series of personal and disrespectful attacks'.
'Instead of contributing meaningfully, they have opted for theatrical denunciations, prioritising media headlines over measurable progress for the players they claim to represent,' FIFA's statement continued.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

USMNT defender Sergino Dest scores winner for PSV in Dutch Super Cup victory
USMNT defender Sergino Dest scores winner for PSV in Dutch Super Cup victory

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

USMNT defender Sergino Dest scores winner for PSV in Dutch Super Cup victory

USMNT defender Sergino Dest scored the winning goal in PSV's Dutch Super Cup victory over Go Ahead Eagles on Sunday. PSV headed into half-time at the Philips Stadiion 1-0 down thanks to a goal from Mathis Suray. However, late into the second half of the game, an own goal from Gerrit Nauber gave the Eredivisie champions a way back into the game. Advertisement Dest scored the winner in the 84th minute when he found space in the penalty area and angled a shot with his weaker left foot into the far corner. The 24-year-old's goal helped the PSV win their 15th Dutch Super Cup (Johan Cruijff Shield). Matchwinner 🇺🇸#PSVGAE #JCS2025 — PSV (@PSV) August 3, 2025 The defender's 2024/25 campaign was disrupted by an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury suffered in April 2024. That injury kept him out of action for 11 months, and he made his first appearance after the layoff in March. Dest made just seven appearances in all competitions last season as PSV won their second consecutive Eredivisie title. The defender last represented the USMNT in the CONCACAF Nations League final victory over Mexico in March 2024. PSV begin their 2025/26 Eredivisie campaign against Sparta Rotterdam on August 9.

Did McLaren favor Lando Norris over Oscar Piastri in Hungary? Why the team says no
Did McLaren favor Lando Norris over Oscar Piastri in Hungary? Why the team says no

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

Did McLaren favor Lando Norris over Oscar Piastri in Hungary? Why the team says no

The odds seemed to be stacked against Lando Norris on Sunday as Oscar Piastri hunted him down at the 2025 Hungarian Grand Prix, trying to overcome different McLaren strategies and a 12-second gap after his Australian teammate made a second pit stop. Norris opted for a Hail Mary one-stop strategy when race engineer Will Joseph floated the idea mid-race. As the final laps unfolded, he had older tires and was racing in dirty air as they caught up to traffic with no DRS assistance. Piastri was quickly closing the gap, getting it within eight-tenths of a second with five laps to go. Advertisement It was a close battle, and the McLaren teammates came close to contact when Piastri locked up as he made a dive at Turn 1 on the penultimate lap. He was right on Norris's tail and was told by his race engineer to 'remember how we go racing' just beforehand. But, in the end, the Briton brought home McLaren's 200th grand prix victory as he finished 0.698 seconds ahead. McLaren navigated the race wisely to secure a maximum result, extending its already giant constructors' championship lead. But from the drivers' championship perspective, the last race before Formula One's summer shutdown feels like a defining moment in their close battle. The gap between them sits at nine points, Piastri having the edge. Norris didn't look like he had a shot at winning by the end of the first lap of 70. He had a solid start, but so did pole sitter Charles Leclerc. As the grid barreled toward Turn 1, Piastri moved left, and Norris hoped he would go the other way instead. Norris caught a slipstream from his teammate before pulling to the right, while Piastri stayed in Leclerc's slipstream, gaining more speed, with the leading pair then moving right, squeezing off Norris's line. He then slid backwards, sitting fifth by the end of Lap 1. When asked about the start, Norris revealed he'd been sarcastic alone in the cockpit, uttering 'brilliant' to himself, crossing the line. 'I'd watched quite a few videos of lap one to Turn 1,' he continued. 'Clearly, it didn't work.' Norris had the pace, though, as he began another recovery drive. Joseph suggested line changes to help with specific corner time losses – most notably at Turn 2 – to gain more speed. It's these types of small details that build first a lap, then a stint. But being stuck in George Russell's turbulent air while chasing third, particularly on this short and twisty track, proved to be a challenge. Advertisement By Lap 22, Norris was in the lead. He'd not pitted while the other leaders were diving in for their first stops. With no chance to undercut Russell, he opted for more tire delta and extended his stint, eventually making the medium tires last for 31 laps. Later came the conversation about the one-stop Hail Mary. Joseph asked over the radio, 'Keen for it?' Norris replied, 'Yeah, why not?' Norris explained after the race that 'it wasn't a terrible thought that I can make the hards last until the end. I just knew I'd have to push flat out for basically every single lap. That's when it gets a little bit tricky. The tires get hot. It's easy to make mistakes. 'I knew I could make the tires get to the end quite easily, but it was (harder) to stay ahead of the others.' When the one-stopper was proposed, Norris led Leclerc by five seconds and Piastri by seven, as they lapped quicker on their fresher tires. Even if a two-stop strategy went perfectly from there, Norris knew his chances were slim to fight for a win without either a safety car or a strategy gamble. But that wasn't necessary. Norris emerged from his Lap 31 stop to take hard tires, facing a 19-second gap to the lead. When Leclerc pitted again nine laps later, he'd cut this to 14. With 25 laps to go, Norris moved back into the lead while Piastri took his second and final pit stop – Russell also having pitted out of his way. Then it was a case of managing his tires and navigating traffic until the end, even as Piastri roared back. 'My confidence wasn't the highest, but it was my best chance of trying to do something,' Norris said of the one-stopper. 'It turned out to be a little bit trickier, but it actually allowed me to fight until the very end for the win. 'Not sure it still felt like the best strategy, but I think with how difficult overtaking was, it turned out to be pretty good.' Advertisement Every team discusses the various strategy options pre-race, and going into the Budapest contest, the two-stop option was the optimal choice. McLaren discussed the one-stop option, Piastri said, so he knew 'it wasn't completely off the table.' But it didn't think a one-stop strategy would be possible. 'We convinced ourselves that the one-stop was starting to get in the game as we progressed with the first stint,' McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said. 'It wasn't like entering the race with a one or a two stop (both possible), and we would have picked the equivalent. We thought that the two-stop would be the dominant strategy.' What muddies the waters is that Norris was ahead of Piastri. The Australian driver emphasized that it's 'very difficult to know from the cockpit what is going to be the best thing to do.' The McLaren duo started on the back foot after Leclerc bested them surprisingly to snare pole. It's notoriously difficult to overtake at the Hungaroring, and pit stops are often required to execute a pass. McLaren tried to pit Piastri early on Lap 18 to get ahead of Leclerc at the first stint's end. 'It wasn't obvious that we just had enough pace to blow past him and go and win that way,' Piastri said of his strategy. 'For Lando, there was virtually nothing to lose by trying a one-stop race. For myself, potentially there was.' Piastri was asked to consider a one-stopper early in his second stint, but he committed to a two-stop race, his eyes set on catching his championship rival and teammate. His radio message when told the gap to Leclerc, before being called into the pits for a second stop, showed where Piastri's mindset was: the championship. In the end, Ferrari thwarted McLaren's second attempt at an undercut when Leclerc stopped again on Lap 40. Piastri then used tires that were five laps younger to blast past him with a bold move around Turn 1's outside. He set off in his Norris pursuit, but came up short. Advertisement 'I knew that I was catching him a lot when I had clean air, but as soon as I got close, it was incredibly tough to stay close enough,' Piastri explained. 'Even if I had more laps, I'm not sure the result would have been any different. But I certainly tried.' F1 has seen relationships turn sour when teammates battle – whether it's for a win or the championship. Tensions flare and boil over, and rash decisions are made. But McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown isn't worried about any fallout between Piastri and Norris 'because of the communication, trust and respect we all have and they have for each other.' 'We're very fortunate to have the two personalities that we have,' Brown said before Sunday's race. 'We love the challenge. We like it. We talk about it. It's not the elephant in the room. We meet every Sunday morning after we've seen how qualifying is going. They know each other's strategy. We're totally transparent.' Brown has spoken with both drivers individually about whether they've ticked each other off at times, when there are 'windows of opportunity.' The answer has been no from both. The competition is heating up, but it's not hostile. Brown said, 'We're not feeling any tension. As the championship builds, I'm sure that tension will grow,' and the team does expect them to clash again like they did in Montreal. 'I'm positive they're never going to run each other off the track, and that's where you get into bad blood. So they're free to race. There are rules around our racing, which is 'respect your teammate.' They know that,' Brown said, later adding, 'If something bubbles up, we'll deal with it.' Piastri's one attempt at passing Norris on Sunday is an example of what Stella described as 'firm' and 'fair' racing between them. Stella added, 'At the same time, it was definitely within our principles. We had a bit of a lock-up with Oscar. But at the same time, Lando left some space because he knew that Oscar would have been at the limit of braking.' But the move may have come too early for Piastri. He said after the race that he likely 'needed to be at least a couple of tenths closer (for the pass to come off), which was going to take a mistake from Lando to achieve that.' Norris ⚔️ Piastri: How did they not collide?! 😱#F1 #HungarianGP — Formula 1 (@F1) August 3, 2025 McLaren is on a dominant streak, with Norris and Piastri securing four consecutive 1-2 finishes to close out the first portion of the season. It has won 11 out of the 14 grands prix, with Norris taking five wins to Piastri's six. McLaren's gap to the rest of the grid is well over 200 points, and while the drivers are just nine points apart, third-place Max Verstappen is nearly 100 points behind Norris in the drivers' standings. Advertisement Questions of fairness will keep arising in a one-team title fight. And Norris and Piastri have diverged on race strategies in the two most recent races. There's always a risk that things could go wrong in such scenarios. 'We want to give our two drivers the possibility to utilize, express their talent, pursue their aspirations, their personal success, and business to happen within the boundaries of the team interest and the fairness, the sportsmanship, and the respect for one another,' Stella said. 'For me, this is what I see. When we have a deviating strategy, when we have different options, I think this is part of racing. 'We want to make sure that neither driver is surprised, and I think neither driver was surprised. So far, I can only be very grateful to the way Lando and Oscar have interpreted the way we go racing as a team, as a group, which includes the drivers, and I'm sure this is going to be the same until the end of the season.' Additional reporting by Luke Smith (Top photo of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri: Bradley Collyer/PA Images/Alamy Images/Sipa USA)

Chelsea completes the signing of Netherlands defender Jorrel Hato from Ajax
Chelsea completes the signing of Netherlands defender Jorrel Hato from Ajax

Washington Post

timea minute ago

  • Washington Post

Chelsea completes the signing of Netherlands defender Jorrel Hato from Ajax

LONDON — Club World Cup champion Chelsea has completed the signing of Netherlands defender Jorrel Hato from Ajax in a deal worth a reported 37 million pounds ($49 million). The 19-year-old Hato, who has been capped six times by his country, has signed a seven-year contract at Stamford Bridge. He becomes the Blues' eighth signing of the summer transfer window. 'I'm very excited,' Hato, who can operate in central defense or at left back, told the Premier League club's website . 'I thought a lot about my future and wanted to take the next step in my career. Chelsea is the best place for me to do that so I'm very happy.' Hato joined Ajax's academy from hometown club Sparta Rotterdam in 2018 and signed his first professional contract aged 16 four years later. He scored four goals in 111 appearances for the Eredivisie team, with his international debut coming as a substitute in a 6-0 win against Gibraltar in November 2023. Chelsea starts its Premier League season on Aug. 17 at home to Crystal Palace. ___ AP soccer:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store