Former LAPD officer pleads guilty to murder in DUI crash that killed family of three
A former Los Angeles police officer has pleaded guilty to three counts of murder for a 2017 drunk driving crash that killed a mother, father, and their 19-year-old son on the 605 Freeway, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced Friday.
Edgar Verduzco, 34, admitted to three counts of murder, one count of driving under the influence causing injury, and one count of driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 percent causing injury.
Verduzco was off-duty and speeding at 150 mph when he crashed into two vehicles on Sept. 26, 2017. One vehicle hit the center divider and caught fire, killing Maribel Davila, Mario Davila, and their son, Oscar Davila, a 19-year-old UC Riverside student. The second vehicle's driver, a mother with a baby in a car seat, suffered minor injuries.
Shortly before the crash, a video apparently filmed at a bar was posted on Verduzco's Instagram account with the hashtag #dontdrinkanddrive.
'I cannot tell you how angry and disappointed I am that a Los Angeles police officer would disregard the law and cause an accident with such awful, awful consequences,' then-LAPD Chief Charlie Beck said at the time of his arrest.
Verduzco was initially released from jail due to 'insufficient grounds to file charges,' but he was arrested and formally charged months later.
Hochman offered his condolences to the surviving members of the Davila family, and saying Verduzco's actions were not fitting for someone entrusted to enforce the law.
'As a police officer, Mr. Verduzco was aware that recklessly driving under the influence of alcohol at 150 miles per hour was extremely dangerous to human life and could result in the death of innocent victims, as it tragically did in this case,' Hochman said. '[The three family members] were senselessly taken in an instant.'
Verduzco is scheduled to be sentenced July 11 and faces three concurrent terms of 15 years to life in state prison for the murder charges, as well as a concurrent three-year term for the DUI-related offenses.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eater
2 hours ago
- Eater
Dine and Dash Is Back — But It's Way Worse Than You Think
When Bobby Kwak wakes up, the first thing he does is reach for his phone. He's not reading headlines or catching up on texts: The owner of Michelin-starred Nōksu is checking to see how much money he has lost overnight. The first week of June, it was $600; a few days earlier it was $2,500. In the past year, he has lost tens of thousands of dollars. Kwak is one of a clutch of Michelin-starred restaurant owners reeling from astounding chargebacks on prepaid reservations made with stolen credit cards. 'There comes a point where enough is enough,' says Kwak. 'We are a counter restaurant with only 15 seats. Last week four seats were under a stolen credit card. That's 25 percent of my daily sales, gone.' The chargeback scheme goes something like this: X buys a prepaid reservation using a stolen credit card number, then sells it to Y at a discount — usually by posting it on Instagram or on the social media platform Red. The restaurant is none the wiser and serves Y dinner, but a few weeks later gets a notice that the reservation was made with a stolen card number and the entire amount is being refunded to the person whose credit card was stolen. Operators contest the chargebacks, but the banks side with the cardholder, leaving the restaurant holding massive losses. Let's be clear: Credit card fraud is nothing new. In 2024, consumers lost $12.5 billion to online fraud, a 25 percent increase from the figure reported in 2023, according to a report by the Federal Trade Commission. Chargebacks are mushrooming as well; merchants are expected to incur $28.1 billion in annual losses due to chargeback fraud by 2026; that's a 40 percent increase from 2023. Operators interviewed for this story say the frequency of chargebacks for prepaid restaurant reservations has skyrocketed over the past six months, particularly at high-end Japanese restaurants with very few seats that need every single one to make ends meet. 'It's just turned into a virus,' says Kwak. 'It has spread so quickly.' 'There used to be a few reservations challenged here and there, but this most recent wave over the past six months has been serious in frequency and amount, more than we have ever seen in the past,' says Howard Chang, owner of Sushi Ichimura, which serves a 20-course tasting menu priced at $475 per person. Chang has lost $10,000 in the past month because of chargebacks. Bank affidavits show a single stolen credit card was used to make reservations at Chef's Table at Brooklyn Fare, Odo, Noz, Ichimura, and Nōksu, according to Chang. 'It's clear somebody is stealing credit cards from overseas and using them to make and flip reservations,' he says. 'These reservations were all made on the same day.' Emiko Murakami, the manager of Icca, the Michelin-starred sushi restaurant with a $495 omakase menu, also says chargebacks are on the rise: In 2022, she saw three cases and in 2025 there have already been 10. Jō, which serves a $300 per person kaiseki menu, opened three months ago but the restaurant has already had two chargebacks. 'Because it is fairly recent we are still awaiting the credit card company's judgment,' says Jō's chef Hiroki Abe, who estimates $3,000 in losses if the bank doesn't side with him. Operators are not just losing income from refunded reservation fees: Many have to replace the lost gratuity, hundreds of dollars per check, despite the fraud. They are also saddled with paying sales tax on a sale that never really happened. Don't forget the $15 per transaction fee imposed by companies like Stripe, the credit card processor used by many reservation platforms. Operators must also pay Stripe its sales percentage of 2.9 percent per transaction, despite the fact that the sale was actually refunded. Stripe did not respond to multiple queries from Eater for comment on these practices. It's not just the money; it's all the time it takes to dispute the chargeback, gathering evidence that can include reviewing video footage, itemizing bills, sharing screenshots, and more to prove diners were served. 'I send it all, but I lose every time,' says Kwak. 'That is so frustrating because these people have figured out a way to beat the system.' Chang has also spent hours trying to get 'reservation for sale' posts taken down, but it's time he doesn't have. 'They are taken down and then they can register new accounts and continue to do this over and over again,' he says. 'It's like playing Whac-A-Mole.' Many operators are left trying to suss out which diners might be in on the scam or unknowingly using stolen reservations. Fraudulent reservations are made with a stolen credit card that will not match the name of the reservation, but questioning diners can lead to awkward interactions. Both Kwak and Chang try to graciously verify ID and match the reservation name to credit card but both say it's very off-putting. 'Maybe it's fraud, but it can also be a guest whose partner made the reservation,' says Chang. 'We really don't know. And to require the same name on the credit card as the reservation will hurt the business. People will just dine somewhere else.' Abe of Jō is trying to get ahead of any potentially awkward interactions by giving diners a heads-up on its Instagram and website: 'We ask to present a valid ID matching the credit card that the reservation is made with upon arrival at the restaurant. It has been brought to our attention that people are offering discounts for Jō on certain social media sites. Please beware that those are people trying to scam you, we are not offering any discounts through social media. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.' Chang has taken to playing something of a Cordelia Cupp, observing diners' behavior, looking for signs that something is sketchy. A few weeks ago, he suspected a table of four — all arrived at different times, and none of the diners seemed to know each other or interact. Chang approached the table and informed the diners that the prepaid reservation was refunded and that the restaurant would require credit card payment on site. The group in question resisted, but Chang insisted. 'In the end they paid, but I'm pretty sure it would have been disputed. But it's not pleasant for anyone to ask that.' What is sometimes also useful is to scour reservation profiles for evidence that the person is not a scammer. 'If we see a profile with preferences, allergy information, birthdays, and anniversaries, that shows they are a real person,' offers Chang. Another way of avoiding this sort of fraud is to stop taking prepaid reservations, but high-ticket restaurants like Nōksu, Sushi Noz, and Ichimura say they have no choice; teams cannot afford no-shows with a $500 per person tasting menu hanging in the balance. It's not like walk-ins fill the gap. 'We take payment to ensure people will come,' says Chang. 'The setup also helps with cash flow because of the extreme cost of ingredients, many of which are flown in from Japan.' Operators dealing with such rampant fraud are frustrated that reservation platforms can't do more to weed out scammers. 'Reservation platforms are aware, but they haven't been really dealing with it,' says Chang. 'I don't know where the difficulty is.' Resy and OpenTable say they are doing everything they can to thwart scams, from investigating patterns of fraudulent reservations to blocking bad users to leveraging added security features. Rather than reservation platforms, banks and credit card processors are in a far better position with tech available to build a dam against the flow of fraud. Stripe, American Express, Mastercard, and Visa did not return requests for comment. Both Resy and OpenTable require one-time passwords to log in to accounts and make a reservation, but that doesn't stop the fraud. Scammers just create accounts that seem legit. Neither app allows diners to make more than one reservation at the same time, but fraudsters can just use multiple accounts to book the tables. There are other tools in place, says OpenTable's Chris Kennedy, a vice president of technology operations and its chief information security officer. 'We have a team dedicated solely to fraud prevention and are continually evaluating and making changes to maximize protection for our restaurant partners.' Resy and Tock data shows that the volume of chargeback disputes has decreased from 2024 to 2025, according to a spokesperson, an indication that the many protections they have in place against fraud are working as intended. 'Resy and Tock employ some of the most advanced platform security tools on the market, like real-time risk analysis, payment verification checks, and behavioral monitoring to identify and block bad charges,' said a representative in a statement to Eater NY. 'When we are alerted to or detect suspicious behavior, we immediately investigate it and take action, including blocking emails and deactivating accounts associated with fraudulent activity.' Neither OpenTable nor Resy offers the protections of Tock (acquired by Resy) which provides $25,000 in chargeback protection per year — insurance that has kept Icca afloat. 'Thankfully, we haven't exceeded that cap in the past three years,' says Murakami. So far Icca has successfully claimed $10,000 in chargebacks for reimbursement. For now, Kwok continues to check his phone every morning — today it was $579 — bracing for more losses. 'Fine dining margins are razor-thin to begin with and we are losing tens of thousands of dollars,' he says. 'The impact is devastating.' See More:
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Former Boston U soccer players unite for strong statement on coach after Alex Cooper's sexual harassment claims
Boston University's soccer players are backing the team's former longtime soccer coach, Nancy Feldman, after Alex Cooper made damning allegations against her. Cooper, host of the popular 'Call Her Daddy' podcast, claimed in a Hulu documentary that Feldman sexually harassed her and alleged that school officials ignored her when she brought it to their attention. Ninety-nine former Terriers stars came forward as a 'united group' to share their own experiences with Feldman, who retired after in April 2022. Advertisement They said as a group that they 'categorically never felt unsafe,' according to a letter obtained by TMZ. 4 Alex Cooper told her story in a bombshell Hulu Documentary. Getty Images 'We were never at risk of or witness to inappropriate behavior or anything that could be characterized as sexual harassment,' the letter read. 'As a leader, she approached every day with professionalism, making decisions in service of the success of the team. [Feldman] has remained an important part of our lives, and we shall stand by her.' Advertisement Cooper claimed that Feldman asked inappropriate questions about her love life in the mid-2010s, and she alleged that she was benched for not disclosing certain intimate information. Her family then approached school officials over the matter, but nothing came of it. 'I felt a lot of anger — anger at my coach, anger at my school, and anger at the system that allowed this to happen,' Cooper said in the doc. Advertisement 4 Alex Cooper shows off a soccer jersey with her name on it prior to a match between Bay FC and Angel City FC. NWSL via Getty Images Cooper claims that she considered filing a lawsuit over the alleged harassment but ultimately chose not to. Boston University released a statement last week denying any wrongdoing. 4 Alex Cooper (l) during her Boston University days. @alexandracooper/Instagram Advertisement 'Boston University has a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment,' the statement read. 'We have a robust system of resources, support and staff dedicated to student wellbeing and a thorough reporting process through our Equal Opportunity Office. 'We encourage members of our community to report any concerns, and we remain committed to fostering a safe and secure campus environment for all.' 4 Former Boston women's soccer coach Nancy Feldman. @terrierwsoc/Instagram Cooper was a midfielder for Boston University from 2013-15 and has since become one of the most popular podcasters in the country. Her Unwell Network and 'Call Her Daddy' podcast vaulted her into stardom since her departure from Barstool Sports in 2021.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
New details in Emilie Kiser's son's death: Husband told police how boy fell into pool
Brady Kiser, the husband of social media influencer Emilie Kiser, told police he was watching their newborn when their 3-year-old son Trigg fell into the backyard pool and accidentally drowned, according to search warrant applications obtained by The Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network. Trigg Kiser died on May 18 after being pulled from the family's pool in Chandler, Arizona, six days earlier, according to police and court documents. In the weeks since Trigg's death, the Kiser family has pushed to conceal records that would ordinarily be public; Emilie Kiser filed a lawsuit to prevent the release of such records on May 27. The search warrant applications, which were granted by Maricopa County Superior Court judges in May and include sworn police affidavits detailing an interview with Brady Kiser, offer new details about the moments leading up to Trigg falling into the pool. Brady Kiser told Chandler police he was home alone with the two boys at the time. Emilie Kiser was out with friends, her husband told police. New details in Trigg Kiser's drowning death Brady Kiser told police he lost sight of Trigg for three to five minutes before finding the boy floating in the pool, according to the applications. Trigg went to the backyard to play after he finished eating, Brady Kiser told police. The father said he saw Trigg playing near the pool, which the police records said was "not uncommon." Brady Kiser told police the pool usually had a protective cover on it, according to the records. Brady Kiser was "soon distracted" by his newborn son, the police records said. Once he saw that Trigg was in the pool, he jumped in to get the boy and called 911, according to the records. Investigators filed the search warrant applications on May 13 to obtain video surveillance from two outdoor cameras in the backyard so they could corroborate Brady Kiser's statement, the records said. Has Emilie Kiser spoken out about Trigg's death? Emilie Kiser, who has 4 million followers on TikTok, hasn't publicly spoken out since her son's death. Her last social media post was on May 12. Since Trigg's death, Emilie Kiser has turned off commenting on most of her Instagram and TikTok profiles, and Brady Kiser has made his Instagram account private. The family's only statement has come in the form of the May 27 lawsuit pushing to keep public records about the 3-year-old's tragic death private. In the filing, Kiser's attorneys said that she and her family "desperately want to grieve in private, but sadly, the public will not let them," adding that her son's death "has become a media frenzy." "Emilie is trying her best to be there for her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore," the lawsuit says. "But every day is a battle." Emilie Kiser lawsuit: Why public records could be released despite request for privacy Emilie Kiser lawsuit: What has happened so far? Kiser is suing several public agencies to prohibit officials from releasing public documents related to Trigg's death, including the police report, 911 call and scene photos. According to the initial complaint, Kiser and her counsel have not seen the documents, but they presume they are "exceptionally raw and graphic." The release of such records would "intrude upon personal dignity or cause unnecessary harm" to Kiser and her family, the lawsuit says. Gallagher & Kennedy, the firm representing Kiser, has not responded to USA TODAY's requests for comment. The first hearing in Kiser's case was held on June 3. According to The Republic, Kiser's attorney Kevin O'Malley said during the hearing that some redacted documents are likely "appropriate" for public release. As a result of the hearing, the parties in the case agreed to an interim order prohibiting the dissemination of the public records in question, according to court filings obtained by USA TODAY. Kiser's attorneys also filed a notice to dismiss some agencies from the lawsuit, and the court sealed a declaration Kiser wrote about this case. Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at
