
Europeans largely support hikes in national defence budget, poll finds
Support for increasing national defence spending appears widespread in Europe although most seem to think that becoming independent from the US when it comes to security and defence before the end of the decade is impossible, a major new survey has found.
Most of the more than 16,400 respondents polled across 12 European countries by the European Council of Foreign Relations (ECFR) stated that they are in favour of their countries upping their national defence spending with clear majorities in Poland, Denmark, the UK, Estonia, and Portugal.
Pluralities in Romania (50%), Spain (46%), France (45%), Hungary (45%), Germany (47%), and Switzerland (40%) also expressed support for increased defence spending with Italy the only country polled where the majority (57%) was either "somewhat" or "strongly" opposed the idea.
Yet the poll also finds that scepticism over the EU's ability to become independent from the US in terms of its defence and security over the coming five years runs high.
Only in Denmark and Portugal did a majority of respondents feel optimistic about achieving independence from the US before the turn of the decade. Most respondents in France and Romania also seemed to believe it is possible (44% and 45% respectively).
But most people in Poland, Estonia, and Spain thought the reverse. In Italy and Hungary, a majority of respondents (54% and 51% respectively) see EU autonomy on security and defence as "very difficult" or "practically impossible" to achieve in the next five years.
Germans were meanwhile more or less evenly split on the question, with 44% thinking it possible to achieve, and 45% seeing it as difficult or rather impossible.
However, support to Ukraine is not contingent on continued aid from Washington, the survey finds.
Majorities or pluralities in 11 of the 12 countries polled are against the idea of Europe withdrawing its military support for Ukraine, pushing Ukraine to give up on territory occupied by Russia, or lifting economic sanctions on Russia even if the US shifts its policy across these points.
The Donald Trump effect
The results are driven in part by Donald Trump's return to the White House and the anti-European rhetoric he and some in his administration have used over trade and defence which has given rise to anti-American sentiment in some European countries.
Still, although a majority of people in 10 countries thought Trump is damaging the relationship between the EU and the US, most are of the opinion that the relationship will be repaired once he leaves office.
The survey comes a day before leaders of the 32 NATO member states gather in The Hague for their annual summit.
Trump has demanded that the alliance's defence spending target be raised from its current 2% of GDP level to 5%, and cast doubt on Washington's long-term support for European security.
The proposal currently on the table plans for an increase to 3.5% on core military spending, with an additional 1.5% on defence-related investments that would include infrastructure, cybersecurity and money to boost a whole-of-society approach to security.
Yet Spain has poured cold water over the new target, which has to be unanimously approved by all allies, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez writing in a letter to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte last week that Madrid "cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP".
"For Spain, committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive, as it would move Spain away from optimal spending and it would hinder the EU's ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defence ecosystem," Sánchez wrote in the letter that was seen by The Associated Press.
The ECFR survey however notes that respondents in Spain were slightly more worried about their country not spending enough on defence, at the expense of their security than they were about spending too much on defence at the expense of other areas of public spending. The vast majority though did not pronounce themselves on the issue.
In fact on this question, the 12 countries were evenly split, with Denmark, the UK, Poland, Romania, and Germany joining their Spanish counterparts and the other six countries favouring the other stance.
The EU has sought to allay some of its fear with its programme to boost defence production and deployment that it hopes will prompt member states to invest €800 billion into the sector over the next four years.
The plan's main financial firepower comes from allowing member states to deviate from the bloc's stringent fiscal rules provided the additional spending is poured exclusively into defence. The other pillar, called SAFE, would see the Commission provide loans to member states at preferential rates than most would if they raised the money themselves on the market. The EU executive is also allowing untapped EU funds previously earmarked for other programmes to be repurposed for defence spending.
Defence should also be one of the key topics on the agenda of a summit of EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
21 minutes ago
- France 24
Did US strikes 'finish the job' of destroying Fordow plant?
08:58 23/06/2025 Turkey braces for refugees as Iranian flock to borders 23/06/2025 EU urges 'all sides to step back' after US strikes Iran, but can bloc find unified response? 23/06/2025 US warns against Iran retaliation as Trump raises 'regime change' 23/06/2025 Will US strikes be enough to derail Iran's nuclear programme? 23/06/2025 Residents shelter in Tel Aviv as Israel, Iran trade strikes 23/06/2025 How successful were US strikes on Iran? 23/06/2025 'I never expected he would be freed', wife of Belarus opposition leader tells FRANCE 24 23/06/2025 US reveals details of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' 22/06/2025 Iran: How is the war with Israel affecting civil society? Middle East

LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Does Iran still have the means to retaliate against the US and Israel?
With Iran pushed into a corner on the military front, a shroud of uncertainty surrounds the Islamic Republic's intentions and capacity to respond to American airstrikes on Monday, June 23. Also unclear was the future of its nuclear program, which is likely intended for military purposes, after key sites suffered heavy blows overnight from Saturday to Sunday. "Monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term," United States President Donald Trump declared on social media on Sunday, referring to the previous day's American airstrikes on the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites. "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" Trump added. Showing more caution, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, said the sites had suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction." Experts, however, said it was impossible at this point to determine the precise extent of the damage the bombings inflicted underground. Nor was it yet possible to know what had become of the stockpile of enriched uranium that Tehran has accumulated: 408 kilograms enriched to 60% in isotope 235, which if further enriched to 90% would be sufficient to produce several nuclear weapons. Iran claims to have placed its stockpile in a secure location.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Israeli strike on Tehran jail 'irresponsible': French prisoner's sister
Iran's judiciary said Israeli strikes left sections of the facility damaged and Israel's defence minister confirmed the army was targeting it. Cecile Kohler has been held along with her partner Jacques Paris in Evin since May 2022 on espionage charges their families reject. Overall, Iran is believed to hold around 20 European nationals in what some Western governments describe as a strategy of hostage-taking aimed at extracting concessions from the West. Most are held in Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex notorious among activists for rights abuses. It is located in a northern district of the Iranian capital. "This strike is completely irresponsible. Cecile, Jacques and all the prisoners are in mortal danger," Noemie Kohler told AFP. "This is really the worst thing that could have happened," she added. "We have no news, we don't know if they are still alive, we're panicking," Noemie Kohler said. She urged the French authorities to "condemn these extremely dangerous strikes" and secure the release of the French prisoners. She also expressed concern about the risk of "chaos" and "riots". Noemie Kohler has tirelessly campaigned to secure the release of her sister and her sister's partner Jacques Paris. Chirinne Ardakani, a lawyer for the Kohler family, denounced the strikes as "illegal". "The risk of riots, general confusion and reprisals by the security forces against the insurgent prisoners raises fears of bloodshed," she told AFP. "Both sides are playing with people's lives."