This musician was getting millions of streams. Then fake tracks appeared under his name
Paul Bender (at right) with his band Hiatus Kaiyote: (from left) Perrin Moss, Simon Mavin and Naomi Saalfield aka Nai Palm.
The problem, he says, is wilful inaction from distributors and streamers. Even basic password protection 'would solve 99 per cent of these cases overnight. Two-factor authentication would solve more. These tech companies are full of developers who could fix this in an afternoon.
So far 'it's just them passing the buck — 'it's the distributor's fault, no, it's the platform's fault'. It's a copout. It just proves how demoralising this system is for artists.'
Spotify, which commands more than 30 per cent of the global streaming market, acknowledged the fakes issue in 2023 when it removed tens of thousands of tracks uploaded by AI music startup Boomy. That followed pressure from Universal Music Group, its biggest licensor.
The Sweet Enoughs' boutique label, Wondercore Island, has had less success. 'It took Spotify six weeks to lift a finger,' says label head Si Jay Gould. 'They're calling it a 'mapping issue' — as if four artists just happened to release terrible AI music under our name.
'There's no incentive to protect us. We're being impersonated, we're losing income, our brand is being damaged, and the response is: 'We've done what we can.' It shows how little they value artists.'
Even now, though Spotify has uncoupled the four fakes from the Sweet Enoughs' profile, the tracks remain live under that name, ready to deceive fans looking for real music.
Spotify declined to comment for this story. When asked about authentication systems, an Australian spokesperson referred us to the company's extensive Spotify for Artists educational manuals.
The scale of hijacking 'can't be human', Gould says. 'The money's too marginal.' Like those old computer scams creaming fractions of cents from millions of bank accounts, 'it has to be automated. I assume they're targeting artists who do well in the algorithm — names the system likes.'
Loading
Industry indicators confirm a growing problem. Deezer reported that 18 per cent of its daily uploads in early 2025 were fully AI-generated. Music generator Mubert claims over 100 million AI tracks were created on its platform in the first half of 2023.
The global Music Fights Fraud Alliance estimates 10 per cent of global streams are fraudulent, often driven by bots, fake profiles or click farms. Some distributors report fraud rates of up to 50 per cent, potentially diverting up to $US3 billion annually from artists.
Now musicians are fighting back. Michael League, best known as leader of American jazz collective Snarky Puppy, says he has collected 'several dozen testimonials from artists of various genres and levels of visibility recounting their experiences with AI-generated music being uploaded to their account without their consent'.
League has briefed the Recording Academy's New York chapter on the hijacking of his own solo artist profile. He says senior executive director Nick Cucci has indicated he will escalate the complaint within the Grammy organisation this week.
'I've been both shocked and horrified by the volume of messages I've received,' League says. 'It's like a silent epidemic in our industry.'
Behind the languid chill of The Sweet Enoughs, Paul Bender is fuming. 'It's not resolved, it's multiplying,' he says. 'I'm f---ing ropeable … You're building towards a new album, and suddenly this steaming pile of crap lands in the middle of your Spotify profile. It's vile and disrespectful.
'There are people in this industry who seem to actively loathe musicians. It's almost sadistic. Real human music and AI slop are the same to them. It's all just a commodity. It's all just content.'
Get the day's breaking news, entertainment ideas and a long read to enjoy. Sign up to receive our Evening Edition newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
21 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Billy Joel reveals he is sick of the ‘woke' movement in interview with Bill Maher
American Culture Project Senior Fellow Corey DeAngelis discusses Billy Joel's disregard for what the woke culture thinks of him. 'Nature is healing, I mean this is how it should be,' Mr DeAngelis told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'Artists should focus on art, politicians should focus on the politics, and look, the American people should listen to what the politicians are saying. 'Hollywood has been a total mess in the United States over the past couple of decades.'
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I lived my dream on US talk shows – the axing of Colbert's Late Show is about one thing
When I first got to Hollywood in 2011, I had a movie-like experience. I was picked up from the airport by my friend in a red '70s convertible and driven straight to a stand-up comedy night where I performed a set that landed me a job writing for The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Having just come from the Melbourne open-mic comedy scene, it seemed surreal that I could all of a sudden land a job on the longest-running late-night talk show in the history of television. If I had stayed in Australia, the best I could hope for would be a gig on brekkie radio – no offence to Kyle and Jackie O. Such is the allure of showbiz in the US. You can turn up and become a star, or you can be caught cheating on your wife at a Coldplay concert. Anything can happen. But over 15 years of working in American television, I've discovered how those showbiz dreams are underpinned by an old boys' club – men (mostly) in suits who all went to the same college, competing for status and bonuses big enough to buy yachts. These business execs aren't patrons of the arts. They're not champions of political causes. They're businesspeople who could just as well be in construction or tech or, if they're really daring, health insurance. This underbelly has now come to the surface with Stephen Colbert's announcement that The Late Show has been cancelled by CBS. The decision came days after Colbert criticised the network for settling a $US16 million lawsuit with President Donald Trump, calling it a 'big fat bribe'. It's speculated that such dissent from Colbert had to be stifled by CBS, to help them secure federal approval of their planned $US8 billion merger with Skydance Media. The network denies this, stating the cancellation of The Late Show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night' – an explanation that would be far more plausible if Colbert wasn't winning the ratings in his time slot and hosting the only late-night talk show in recent years to grow viewers. For the writers, the performers and the audiences of late night, these shows are a sacred emblem of the first amendment. This is where Johnny Carson cracked wise about Nixon during the Watergate scandal; where Leno ripped into Bill Clinton for his affair; where David Letterman had a regular segment mocking George W. Bush for being downright dumb. All of these presidents copped it on the chin because any indication they wanted the mockery stifled would be an affront to the Constitution. That doesn't seem to be the case with the current administration, which has a glass jaw when it comes to criticism. Colbert himself put it best: 'Donald Trump has the thinnest skin in politics. If you just whisper 'Obama' near him, he bruises like a peach in a wind tunnel.' Loading I can only speculate with the rest of the internet about why this cancellation of a popular, prominent Trump critic happened at this time. But I do have experience rubbing shoulders with the decision-makers at these networks. I've sat in the guest lounge at The Tonight Show (where I would pray my jokes would get big laughs) while network execs stood around talking about golf instead of even watching the show they commissioned. They always seemed to be in their own world, competing over their hobbies, their private jets, their business deals, or the calibre of celebrities they secured for projects. Unlike the writers of these shows, they never spoke about politics. They didn't seem to care if jokes were left- or right-leaning. They just wanted good ratings to further their own careers.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
I lived my dream on US talk shows – the axing of Colbert's Late Show is about one thing
When I first got to Hollywood in 2011, I had a movie-like experience. I was picked up from the airport by my friend in a red '70s convertible and driven straight to a stand-up comedy night where I performed a set that landed me a job writing for The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Having just come from the Melbourne open-mic comedy scene, it seemed surreal that I could all of a sudden land a job on the longest-running late-night talk show in the history of television. If I had stayed in Australia, the best I could hope for would be a gig on brekkie radio – no offence to Kyle and Jackie O. Such is the allure of showbiz in the US. You can turn up and become a star, or you can be caught cheating on your wife at a Coldplay concert. Anything can happen. But over 15 years of working in American television, I've discovered how those showbiz dreams are underpinned by an old boys' club – men (mostly) in suits who all went to the same college, competing for status and bonuses big enough to buy yachts. These business execs aren't patrons of the arts. They're not champions of political causes. They're businesspeople who could just as well be in construction or tech or, if they're really daring, health insurance. This underbelly has now come to the surface with Stephen Colbert's announcement that The Late Show has been cancelled by CBS. The decision came days after Colbert criticised the network for settling a $US16 million lawsuit with President Donald Trump, calling it a 'big fat bribe'. It's speculated that such dissent from Colbert had to be stifled by CBS, to help them secure federal approval of their planned $US8 billion merger with Skydance Media. The network denies this, stating the cancellation of The Late Show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night' – an explanation that would be far more plausible if Colbert wasn't winning the ratings in his time slot and hosting the only late-night talk show in recent years to grow viewers. For the writers, the performers and the audiences of late night, these shows are a sacred emblem of the first amendment. This is where Johnny Carson cracked wise about Nixon during the Watergate scandal; where Leno ripped into Bill Clinton for his affair; where David Letterman had a regular segment mocking George W. Bush for being downright dumb. All of these presidents copped it on the chin because any indication they wanted the mockery stifled would be an affront to the Constitution. That doesn't seem to be the case with the current administration, which has a glass jaw when it comes to criticism. Colbert himself put it best: 'Donald Trump has the thinnest skin in politics. If you just whisper 'Obama' near him, he bruises like a peach in a wind tunnel.' Loading I can only speculate with the rest of the internet about why this cancellation of a popular, prominent Trump critic happened at this time. But I do have experience rubbing shoulders with the decision-makers at these networks. I've sat in the guest lounge at The Tonight Show (where I would pray my jokes would get big laughs) while network execs stood around talking about golf instead of even watching the show they commissioned. They always seemed to be in their own world, competing over their hobbies, their private jets, their business deals, or the calibre of celebrities they secured for projects. Unlike the writers of these shows, they never spoke about politics. They didn't seem to care if jokes were left- or right-leaning. They just wanted good ratings to further their own careers.
