Aldi set to be first UK supermarket to pay assistants at least £13 an hour
BETTER EVERY PAY Aldi set to be first UK supermarket to pay assistants at least £13 an hour
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
ALDI will be the first UK supermarket to pay assistants at least £13 an hour.
That will be the chain's basic pay rate from September 1.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
Aldi, which uses the slogan 'Better Everyday', last increased its minimum hourly pay to £12.75 nationally and £14.05 in London earlier this year
Credit: Aldi
And staff within the M25 will earn at least £14.33, far exceeding the Real Living Wage of £12.60 and National Living Wage of £12.21.
Long-serving staff will see their pay rise to £13.93 nationally and £14.64 in London.
Already the UK's highest-paying supermarket Aldi, which uses the slogan 'Better Everyday', last increased its minimum hourly pay to £12.75 nationally and £14.05 in London earlier this year.
Aldi also remains the only supermarket offering paid breaks, worth an extra £1,385 per year for the average employee.
Boss Giles Hurley said: 'Our people are the driving force behind our success.
"This latest investment in pay is a reflection of their hard work and the incredible contribution they make.
'We're proud to remain the UK's highest-paying supermarket and will continue to support our colleagues.'
The chain is investing £650million to expand from 1,050 to 1,500 stores nationwide.
It is opening ten new outlets this summer including in Caterham, Sheffield, and Fulham Broadway, and employs 45,000 staff.
Rival Lidl hiked hourly pay for 28,000 workers on April 1.
All upcoming 'Aldi Finds' in the middle aisle next week – including portable chargers, power toothbrushes & dryer balls
Entry level wages rose to £12.75 an hour nationally, with London rates increasing to £14 an hour, as part of a £15million investment into pay.
4
Aldi will be the first UK supermarket to pay assistants at least £13 an hour
Credit: Getty
HEINEKEN REFRESHES LESS
4
Heineken sales fell in Europe and the US as pricing rows and weak demand hit volumes — though UK sales edged up thanks to Cruzcampo and Murphy's
Credit: Reuters
HEINEKEN has faced a tough start to 2025, selling less beer amid fraught pricing talks with European retailers.
Its beer volumes fell 1.2 per cent globally in the first half, with European sales dropping 4.7 per cent as retailers in France, the Netherlands, Germany and Spain pulled the brand over price hikes.
US sales also slumped due to weak consumer sentiment, while proposed tariffs threaten profits.
Despite this, the brewer saw modest UK growth boosted by its Cruzcampo lager and Murphy's stout.
MOVIE MAGIC
EVERYMAN CINEMAS saw a 21 per cent sales surge in the first half of the year.
Admissions climbed by 15 per cent in that time, with blockbusters like Thunderbolts and the new Mission Impossible helping to attract 2.2million visitors.
And average ticket prices rose by six per cent, up to £12.46.
Everyman has 48 venues in the UK, and plans to open more soon. Its shares rose 6.6 per cent in early trading yesterday.
RENT SQUEEZE
4
Rents hit record highs as tenants now pay £400 more a month than five years ago - with London averages soaring to £2,712
Credit: Getty
THE rental market is at record highs, with tenants paying £400 more per month than they did five years ago, Rightmove says.
Average asking rents outside London sit at £1,365 per month, while those in the capital have soared to £2,712.
The news comes despite rent growth slowing, with demand down 10 per cent and supply up 15 per cent.
But tenants still spend 37 per cent of their income on housing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wall Street stocks outperform Europe on megacap earnings boost
NEW YORK/ LONDON, July 31 (Reuters) - Wall Street outperformed European equities on Thursday, boosted by megacap earnings reports, even as data showed signs of rising inflation and investors watched for last-minute trade deals ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline. U.S. Treasury yields briefly pared declines in choppy trading after data showed that U.S. inflation in June as tariffs on imports started raising the cost of some goods, supporting economists' expectations that price pressures would pick up in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve kept rates steady on Wednesday, and chair Jerome Powell said that the central bank needed to wait for more data before deciding whether to adjust rates in September, drawing further criticism from Trump on Thursday. "Anybody hoping for the Fed to move more aggressively in the near term continues to be disappointed that it comes back to both the inflation and the job story. The PCE data this morning reinforced the inflation worries the Fed still has and helps explain why it's in no hurry to move at this point," said Jim Baird, Chief Investment Officer with Plante Moran Financial Advisors. But while Powell's comments had sent equities lower on Wednesday, U.S. indexes rebounded on Thursday after better-than-expected results from Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab. "A couple of solid earnings reports last night suggest that one of the key themes that's been driving the stock market this year is still seemingly intact. You've seen a nice rebound in tech today, or nice surge in tech today. "The AI theme, the enthusiasm around the technology sector still appears to be intact. So that's a positive catalyst for the market," said Baird. On Wall Street, indexes lost some steam as the session progressed. At 11:14 a.m., the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab fell 123.28 points, or 0.28%, to 44,338.00. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab rose 13.57 points, or 0.21%, to 6,376.47 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab rose 119.18 points, or 0.56%, to 21,248.86, both around session lows. In Europe, however, the broad Stoxx 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab benchmark was weighed down by miners after U.S. September Comex copper futures fell 22%, the biggest decline on record, after Trump said the U.S. would impose a 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring. The pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index was down 0.73% while MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab fell 1.07 points, or 0.11%, to 933.26. Earlier, Chinese stocks also retreated after official PMI gauges showed weaker than expected economic activity in July. China's blue chip CSI 300 had ended 1.8% lower, its biggest single day drop since April 7, and Hong Kong's (.HSI), opens new tab index closed 1.6% lower. In currencies, the U.S. dollar had a mixed performance on the day. The dollar index , which measures it against a basket of currencies, including the yen and the euro, rose 0.05% to 99.83. The euro was up 0.34% at $1.1443. But against the Japanese yen , the dollar strengthened 0.59% to 150.39. The Bank of Japan held interest rates steady and increased its inflation forecast. The Korean won weakened 0.2% against the dollar to 1,395.78 per dollar after rising earlier following Trump's announcement that the U.S. would charge a 15% tariff on imports from South Korea, which would in return invest $350 billion in U.S. projects and purchase $100 billion in U.S. energy products. In Treasuries, the yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes fell 4.6 basis points to 4.332%, from 4.378% late on Wednesday while the 30-year bond yield fell 5.1 basis points to 4.8624%. The two-year note yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations for the Federal Reserve, fell 1.9 basis points to 3.918%, from 3.937% late on Wednesday. In oil markets, prices fell after rising for the prior three sessions as investors weighed the supply risks from Trump's push for a to the war in Ukraine through more tariffs and a surprise build in U.S. crude stocks put pressure on prices. U.S. crude fell 1.71% to $68.79 a barrel and Brent fell to $72.47 per barrel, down 1.04% on the day. Gold prices rose as traders turned to the safe haven asset amid ongoing tariff uncertainty, ahead of the August 1 tariff deadline. Spot gold rose 0.63% to $3,295.33 an ounce.
Leader Live
44 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation
The Sweden international, who is reported to have asked Newcastle executives to explore a move away from St James' Park, has been heavily linked with Liverpool. His former club Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at the club's Zubieta facility. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The player did not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia amid speculation over his future, with the club saying at the time he was absent due to a minor thigh injury. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's tariffs: both a political and an economic threat
Donald Trump's 1 August tariffs deadline did what it was always intended to do. It kept the markets and the nations guessing amid last-minute uncertainty. It attempted to reassert the global heft of the United States economy to take on and master all comers. And it placed President Trump at the centre of the media story, where he always insists on being. In the event, there were some last-minute agreements struck this week, few of them fair or rational in trade terms, most of them motivated by the desire to generate some commercial order. Some conflicts are still in the balance. There were 11th-hour court challenges too, disputing the president's very right to play the trade war game in this way. Even now, no one, probably including Mr Trump himself, knows whether this is his administration's last word on US tariffs. Almost certainly not. That's because Mr Trump's love of tariffs is always more about the assertion of political clout rather than economic power. Mr Trump's antipathy towards the European Union drives one example. The pact agreed by Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend underlines that the EU's aspirations as a global economic superpower exceed its actual clout. The EU could not prevent Mr Trump making European goods 15% more expensive if they sell on US markets. Nor could it stop Mr Trump getting EU tariffs on US goods withdrawn. Equally eloquent about the global balance of economic power is that Mr Trump has not been able to force China to bend the knee in the manner of the EU. China has responded aggressively to Trump's tariff threats, retaliating with tariffs of its own and blocking the sale of commodities, including rare-earth minerals, that the US most covets. Unsurprisingly, this standoff has not produced one of Mr Trump's so-called deals. Friday's deadline has been reset for later in the month. It would be no surprise if it was eventually pushed back further. Mr Trump is not imposing tariffs on the rest of the world in order to promote global trade or even to boost the US economy. He is doing it, in part, because Congress has delegated this power to him, allowing the president to impose or waive tariffs at will. He uses this power for many purposes. These include raising government income without congressional oversight and also, because tariffs are regressive, shifting the tax burden away from the very rich, like Mr Trump himself, on to the middle and working class. But economics also comes way down the field in the list of reasons why Mr Trump is wielding the tariff weapon internationally. US talks with Brazil – with which the US runs a trade surplus, not a deficit – have been hijacked by Mr Trump's grievance over the prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro for trying to overturn his 2022 election defeat. Talks with India are deadlocked because Mr Trump wants to penalise Delhi for buying energy and weapons from Russia. Those with Canada have been hit by Mr Trump's objections to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestine. The ultimate test of the policy, however, will indeed be economic. For now, financial markets appear to have decided that Mr Trump's tariffs are manageable. If tariffs now raise the cost of goods on US high streets, slowing growth and feeding inflation, as they may, the wider market response could change quickly. In that event, the mood among American voters might even shift too.
