
UK preparations for flooding and extreme weather ‘inadequate'
Simply sign up to the Climate change myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.
The UK government's preparations for the flooding and higher temperatures triggered by climate change are 'inadequate' and in some cases have got worse, its official adviser has warned.
'Progress is either too slow, has stalled, or is heading in the wrong direction,' the Climate Change Committee (CCC) said on Wednesday in a report responding to the threat climate change poses to the UK's food systems, infrastructure, health, homes and economy.
Warmer, wetter winters have combined with rising sea levels and drier, hotter summers to raise the risk of both flooding and droughts in the UK, creating a need for much clearer goals on improving the country's climate resilience, it said.
The committee's first report on adaptation under chief executive Emma Pinchbeck, a former UK energy lobbyist, scrutinised delivery of an adaptation plan published by the previous government in 2023.
The Labour government has not significantly shifted the dial on already poor adaptation planning, the CCC's report said, despite its manifesto commitment to 'improve resilience and preparation across central government, local authorities, local communities and emergency services'.
Cross-bencher Baroness Brown, chair of the CCC's adaptation committee, said the UK should prepare for a disaster similar to the floods that hit Valencia, Spain, last year, when a year's worth of rain fell in just three hours and 20 minutes, killing more than 200 people. 'We need government to recognise this is the disaster that could be happening tomorrow.'
More than 6.3mn properties, half of the UK's top quality agricultural land and over a third of railways and roads are already at risk of flooding, the report said.
The government should set long-term targets to cut flooding risk in the UK, and ask the National Energy System Operator to consider how flooding and heat and water scarcity could affect the UK's power and grid operations, it said.
The upcoming government spending review should ringfence adaptation spending, Brown added. 'The government is under a lot of pressure to make cuts, but this isn't the one to cut.'
Recommended
The report also highlighted the threats posed by extreme heat to the UK's public health and critical infrastructure, as it can cause rail lines to buckle and power lines to sag. It highlighted research suggesting there could be 10,000 heat related deaths a year by the middle of the century, and a 7 per cent hit to GDP.
No single area of adaptation spanning the economy, health, built environment, infrastructure and land management was good enough, the report said. Water supply management has worsened since the CCC's previous progress report in 2023, with a slow rate of leakage reduction, as had elements of marine habitat monitoring. Some policies on flood resilience had worsened.
Friederike Otto, senior lecturer in climate science at Imperial College London, said the government was doing an 'OK job' on cutting CO₂ emissions. 'However, they simply can't afford to maintain the status quo on adaptation, which is leaving the UK dangerously exposed.' Read More BofA Forecasts Stronger 2025 for Nordic Economies
A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said it was investing 'a record £2.65bn to repair and build flood defences, protecting tens of thousands of homes and businesses and helping local communities become more resilient to the effects of climate change'.
'We will now carefully consider the findings of the Climate Change Committee's report, and we will respond in due course.'
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT's coverage here.
Are you curious about the FT's environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump Bruins a good time at UCLA
BILLION-DOLLAR BATTLE: The Trump administration's battle to dominate higher education has come to California — and this time, it involves one of the country's largest university systems and the taxpayers who help fund it. The University of California, Los Angeles is in court today over more than half a billion dollars the federal government has frozen over antisemitism allegations stemming from last year's Israel-Gaza campus demonstrations. During virtual arguments this afternoon, Judge Rita F. Lin sounded skeptical of some of the administration's arguments, questioning how the Trump administration's explanation that the cuts were an 'indefinite suspension' rather than a 'termination' would comply with a prior ruling. The hearing came days after Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted Donald Trump's demand for $1 billion from UCLA in return for millions of dollars in frozen federal research grants, describing the president's move as an attempt to 'silence academic freedom.' Newsom also floated the idea of another lawsuit. 'He has threatened us through extortion with a billion-dollar fine unless we do his bidding,' the governor told reporters on Friday. Asked about a potential lawsuit, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt today said the governor could 'bring it on,' repeating a refrain Newsom frequently uses against Trump. Here's what we're watching after a week of rapid-fire developments. UCLA is the first public institution the Trump administration has targeted. The president has successfully gone after a handful of prestigious private schools, settling with Brown and Columbia in exchange for keeping their funding. Harvard is also reportedly close to a settlement, and George Washington University appears to be next on Trump's hit list. UCLA's status as a taxpayer-funded school means any major financial moves could have a trickle-down effect on the University of California system and the state, as a whole. It also gives state leaders more say over its actions, although they haven't always agreed with university leaders' decisions — lest we forget the demise of the Pac-12 over Newsom's objections. It's about the money, but it's not just about the money. Trump is using federal funding as leverage to force policy changes at UCLA, as he's done at the other schools that have settled. His administration wants the university to stop giving scholarships based on race or ethnicity, end DEI incentives for hiring, stop using proxies for race in its admissions process and share information on test scores, grade point averages and applicant race. Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel told Playbook it's 'hard to take this seriously,' and it seems more related to 'political gamesmanship.' 'They're asking for a billion-dollar settlement in exchange for not removing roughly $500 million in funding,' he said. 'It just doesn't make any sense. So there's a couple pieces of this that just don't add up.' Trump says the settlement is about antisemitism. California Jewish leaders disagree. The president's administration is using the protest movement and related claims of discrimination to exercise authority over UCLA. But the Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California today released a statement saying it 'strongly opposes' Trump's push for a settlement, saying the move would 'drive a wedge between the Jewish community and other vulnerable groups that are harmed.' 'As a public institution, such a settlement would ironically divert public funds from other initiatives, including those that combat antisemitism and hate,' the group said. UCLA already paid $6.5 million to settle a separate case brought by Jewish students and a professor related to pro-Palestinian encampments protesters constructed on campus last year. Gabriel and his Legislative Jewish Caucus co-chair Scott Wiener, a Democratic state senator from San Francisco, both said rising antisemitism is real, but they've been encouraged to see changes enacted by UCLA's new chancellor, Julio Frenk. They said Trump's settlement demand isn't really about protecting Jewish students. 'He does not care about Jews or antisemitism,' Wiener told Playbook. 'He is using Jews as human shields to accomplish his actual political goals, which are to consolidate control over universities and to destroy scientific research.' University of California leaders are still figuring out their next move. The UC Board of Regents held an emergency meeting about the settlement yesterday and 'discussed a path forward' without taking any action. Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis' team said she was present for the meeting. Newsom's office confirmed he was not in attendance. IT'S TUESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY GOING DIRECT: OpenAI has appealed directly to Newsom in a letter obtained exclusively by California Decoded, suggesting California should consider AI companies that sign onto national and international AI agreements as compliant with state AI rules. The letter, dated Monday from OpenAI's Chief Global Affairs Officer Chris Lehane, comes as Sacramento continues to debate key AI legislation, including Wiener's SB 53, which would require AI companies divulge their safety testing protocols and would establish whistleblower protections for their workers. Lehane recommended 'that California take the lead in harmonizing state-based AI regulation with emerging global standards' when it comes to the technology, dubbing it the 'California Approach.' OpenAI and other developers have already signed onto, or plan to sign onto, the EU's AI code of practice and committed to conducting national security-related assessments of their programs, both voluntary commitments, Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said: 'We have received the letter. We don't typically comment on pending legislation.' The letter offers Newsom something of an off-ramp this year, after he vetoed Wiener's broader SB 1047 AI safety bill last year that would have required programs to complete pre-release safety testing. — Chase DiFeliciantonio If you like this excerpt from POLITICO Pro Technology: California Decoded, you can request a demo here. IN OTHER NEWS MUSICAL CHAIRS: Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones today threw cold water on rumors he might take advantage of Democratic redistricting efforts to mount a congressional campaign — although he doesn't seem to fully rule it out, either. 'Despite unfounded rumors and political gossip, I am not considering a run for Congress because of redistricting,' Jones said in a statement to Playbook. 'I strongly oppose Gavin Newsom's redistricting scheme,' he added. 'Senate Republicans will fight this unfair political power grab that silences Californians and undermines our Constitution.' The San Diego-area Republican, whose final term ends next year, lives in an area with two deep-blue congressional districts that could become more purple as Democrats try to pick up five new seats. As we've reported, San Diego Reps. Scott Peters and Sara Jacobs are preparing to add Republicans as Democrats draw a new map in response to Texas GOP redistricting. TOUTING TELEWORK: A long-awaited state audit of Newsom's return-to-office mandate for state employees was critical of the governor's push to require in-person work. Newsom ordered state workers back to the office for two days per week in 2024 and four days earlier this year, although he postponed the more stringent directive before it took effect. The audit says reducing state office space in response to telework could save the state $225 million. It also said the governor's office 'did not gather some important information about departments' office space needs or the associated costs before directing state employees to work an increasing number of days per week in the office.' GOP Assemblymember Josh Hoover, who's been an advocate of telework, released a statement promoting the report. 'The findings of the audit make clear that providing telework options for state employees in the jobs where it makes sense has substantial benefits for workers, taxpayers, state agencies, commuters, and the environment,' he said. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — Black leaders say Trump's criticisms of Los Angeles, Washington, D.C. and other cities smack of racism. (POLITICO) — Democratic members of Congress are accusing the Trump administration of cleaning up a basement ICE detention center in downtown Los Angeles ahead of their visit. (Los Angeles Times) AROUND THE STATE — The California High Speed Rail Authority wants lawmakers to help the agency resolve land-use conflicts that are slowing the expensive project. (Fresno Bee) — Advocates are urging officials to preserve video evidence of San Diego County jail deaths after surveillance footage from one incident was erased. (San Diego Union-Tribune)


NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Democrats score another big Senate recruiting win: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we dive into the implications of Sherrod Brown's decision to try for a Senate comeback in Ohio. Plus, Steve Kornacki makes sense of new polling data that shows Democrats ahead on the generic congressional ballot, but deeply unpopular with voters. — Adam Wollner Democrats score another big Senate recruiting win Former Sen. Sherrod Brown plans to launch a comeback bid for Senate in Ohio, a major recruiting win for Democrats who need to catch every break they can in their uphill fight for the majority in the chamber. Brown is viewed by Democrats as one of the few, if not the only, members of their party who could put the seat in the red-trending state in play next year. After serving three terms in the Senate, he lost re-election by 3.5 points last year as Donald Trump carried Ohio by 11 points. And the party in power typically faces headwinds in a midterm election. If Brown wins the nomination, he would face GOP Sen. Jon Husted, who was appointed to serve the remainder of Vice President JD Vance's term earlier this year. Battleground recruits: The news comes just weeks after Democrats successfully convinced popular former Gov. Roy Cooper to enter the North Carolina Senate race. Democrats feel even better about the chances Cooper — who has won several statewide contests — has in a state Trump carried more narrowly (3 points) in 2024, particularly with incumbent Republican Thom Tillis declining to seek another term. The biggest remaining question on the Senate map for Democrats is Maine. Alongside North Carolina, Maine, which Trump lost by 7 points, represents Democrats' best pickup opportunity. But longtime GOP Sen. Susan Collins has proven difficult to unseat, winning her last race by 9 points. Democrats are holding out hope that Gov. Janet Mills would take her on, but she's yet to make a final decision. A tough map: Even if Democrats manage to flip North Carolina and Maine, while holding battlegrounds like Georgia and Michigan, they'd still need to win two other Republican-held seats to take control of the Senate. That's where GOP-leaning states like Ohio, Iowa and Texas come into play. There's a growing Democratic field in the Hawkeye State: Josh Turek, a state lawmaker and former Paralympian with two gold medals, is the latest entrant in the race for GOP Sen. Joni Ernst's seat, as Bridget Bowman reports. And the redistricting fight has provided Democratic Senate contenders in Texas with an elevated platform, as Ben Kamisar and Andrew Arenge note. State Rep. James Talarico and former Rep. Beto O'Rourke, who are both considering bids for Republican Sen. John Cornyn's seat, have flooded the zone with digital ads and media appearances in recent weeks. Former Rep. Colin Allred, who is already running, has put redistricting at the center of his message on the trail. The Republican DNA of these trio of states may ultimately be too much for Democrats to overcome. But if they continue to field strong recruits, they can at least make the races competitive and force Republicans to direct resources there they'd rather put to use elsewhere. Trump endorsed Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones in the race for governor over state Attorney General Chris Carr. GOP Rep. Barry Moore is running to replace Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville, who is running next year for governor. How Democrats are leading the generic ballot despite their weak image Analysis by Steve Kornacki The Democratic Party is profoundly unpopular right now. The share of Americans who view it negatively has reached its highest level in decades and its overall image is notably worse than that of the Republican Party. Our own NBC News poll spotted this trend early this year and recent surveys show it persisting, including one from CNBC last week that found that just 22% of Americans have a positive perception of the Democratic Party, compared to 55% negative. For the GOP, it was 36% positive and 46% negative. And yet, the same CNBC poll also put Democrats ahead by five points on the generic congressional ballot, a key indicator as the 2026 midterm playing field takes shape. It raises the question: How could a party with such a dismal image not be getting blown out? The answer has to do with how Democrats think about their own party. Unlike Republicans, who as a group hold an overwhelmingly positive view of the GOP, only a plurality of Democrats actually have a favorable view of their own party. A majority of Democrats are either neutral or hostile to their own party. But, crucially, almost none of them are disillusioned in a way that would lead them to vote against the party next year. In fact, the CNBC poll finds that Democratic voters are slightly more united behind their own party when it comes to the generic ballot than Republicans are. This indicates that hostility to President Donald Trump and the GOP remains the central motivating force for Democratic voters, more than enough to override any qualms they have about their own side. To break down the CNBC poll further, only 44% of those who prefer a Democratic-controlled Congress view the party favorably. By contrast, 79% of those who favor Republican control see the GOP positively. This suggests that the frustrations of Democrats with the Democratic Party are mainly tactical and strategic in nature. As Trump's second terms began, our NBC News poll found that 65% of Democrats wanted their party to dig in and oppose Trump instead of seeking compromise — a reversal from the start of Trump's first term. Many Democratic voters seem to feel their party is simply not fighting Trump with sufficient energy or the right leaders.


Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Sherrod Brown, Ohio's highest-profile Democrat, reportedly expected to seek a return to the US Senate in 2026
Democrats view Brown, a three-term former senator and champion of the working class, as among their most formidable candidates despite his 2024 reelection defeat to Republican Bernie Moreno. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up His entry into the race would mark another major recruiting win for the party. While Democrats face a daunting Senate map in next year's midterm elections, they have been buoyed by the decisions of well known candidates to run in high-profile races. That includes in North Carolina, where former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper announced that he will be running for an open Senate seat, giving Democrats a proven statewide winner in a race that is expected to be one of the most competitive 2026 contests. Advertisement Republicans, meanwhile, have struggled to line up candidates in key battleground states like Georgia, where term-limited Brian Kemp passed on challenging Democratic incumbent Sen. Jon Ossoff, whom Republican leaders have made their biggest target in next year's midterm elections. Advertisement In Ohio, numerous fellow Democrats had been deferring to Brown before announcing their own plans for 2026, when every statewide executive office in Ohio is up for grabs due to term limits. Besides Senate, Brown was also weighing a run for governor. He immediately becomes the front-runner for the Democratic Senate nomination. Husted was appointed to succeed then-Sen. JD Vance after Vance won the 2024 election alongside Trump. Husted's appointment to the seat expires next year. The winner of a fall 2026 special election will serve the remainder of Vance's unexpired six-year term, which runs through 2028, and then would need to run again for a full term. It's unclear how Brown's usual electoral advantage in name recognition might play against Husted, who spent more than 20 years as a statewide officeholder and state lawmaker. But Democratic strategists said Tuesday that a Husted-Brown race would be more centered on Ohio themes, an advantage for Brown over last year's nationally focused contest against Moreno. Trump's endorsement has been a winning formula in Senate bids by both Moreno and Vance before him, who both scored wins as political newcomers even amid fields that included more experienced rivals. Husted's campaign spokesman Tyson Shepherd said in a statement, 'Should Brown enter the race as (Senate Democratic Leader Chuck) Schumer's handpicked candidate he will be starting in the biggest hole of his political career. He has never faced a candidate like Jon Husted.' Ahead of his decision, Schumer visited Ohio to meet with Brown at least twice, as first reported by Axios. Schumer's deep-pocketed Senate Majority PAC helped make Brown's race against Moreno the most expensive in U.S. history. Advertisement Brown launched a pro-worker organization called the Dignity of Work Institute in March, as he weighed his own — and his party's — future in the wake of 2024's losses. Associated Press writers Jill Colvin and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.